Can pelvic tilt be restored by spinal osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis? A minimum follow-up of 2 years

Multilevel Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Correction of Thoracolumbar Kyphosis in Ankylosing Spondylitis: Clinical Effect and Biomechanical Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes and biomechanical characteristics of 1-, 2-, and 3-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), and establish selection criteria based on preoperative radiographic parameters.

METHODS

Patients undergone PSO to treat ankylosing spondylitis from February 2009 to May 2019 in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were enrolled. According to the quantity of osteotomy performed, the participants were divided into group A (1-level PSO, n = 24), group B (2-level PSO, n = 19), and group C (3-level PSO, n = 11). Clinical outcomes were assessed before surgery and at the final follow-up. Comparisons of the radiographic parameters and quality-of-life indicators were performed among and within these groups, and the selection criteria were established by regression. Finite element analysis was conducted to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the spine treated with different quantity of osteotomies under different working conditions.

RESULTS

Three-level PSO improved the sagittal parameters more significantly, but resulted in longer operative time and greater blood loss (p < 0.05). Greater stress was found in the proximal screws and proximal junction area of the vertebra in the model simulating 1-level PSO. Larger stress of screws and vertebra was observed at the distal end in the model simulating 3-level PSO.

CONCLUSION

Multilevel PSO works better for larger deformity correction than single-level PSO by allowing greater sagittal parameter correction and obtaining a better distribution of stress in the hardware construct, although with longer operation time and greater blood loss. Three-level osteotomy is recommended for the patients with preoperative of global kyphosis > 85.95°, T1 pelvic angle > 62.3°, sagittal vertical alignment > 299.55 mm, and pelvic tilt+ chin-brow vertical angle > 109.6°.

Does the Change of Acetabular Anteversion Result From Lumbar Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Ankylosing Spondylitis-Related Kyphosis After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the change in acetabular anteversion (AA) after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis who have already undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

AS patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis following lumbar PSO from January 2005 to January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Only the patients performed with THA prior to the PSO were included. AA was measured on the full-length standing posterior-anterior radiographs using the ellipse method.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (34 hips) with a mean age of 36.8 years (range, 22 to 63 years) were included. After lumbar PSO, AA was reduced from 18.59° to 5.85° (P < 0.001). Postoperative change in AA was correlated with the spinal deformity correction. Additionally, the change in AA postoperatively was correlated with pelvic incidence (PI) (R = 0.346, P = 0.045). Although the postoperative change in sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was larger in the patients after L2 or L3 PSO (153.97 mm vs 70.03 mm, P = 0.006), no difference was found in the postoperative change in AA (12.83° vs 10.96°, P = 0.540) compared with the patients following L1 PSO.

CONCLUSIONS

AA was significantly decreased following lumbar PSO and the postoperative change in AA was correlated with the magnitude of spinal deformity correction. Notably, the effect of osteotomy level on the postoperative change in AA was limited in the AS patients underwent 1-level PSO.

Preoperative prediction of sagittal imbalance in kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis after one-level three-column osteotomy

Background

This study aimed to determine preoperative predictors for sagittal imbalance in kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis (AS) after one-level three-column osteotomy.

Methods

A total of 55 patients with AS who underwent one-level three-column osteotomy were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups according to sagittal vertical axis (SVA) value at the final follow-up (group A: SVA > 5 cm; group B: SVA ≤ 5 cm). The radiographic measures included global kyphosis, lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope, T1 pelvic angle (TPA), SVA, osteotomized vertebral angle and PI and LL mismatch (PI − LL). Postoperative clinical outcomes were evaluated using Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire (SRS-22) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

Results

Fifty-five AS patients had an average follow-up of 30.6 ± 10.2 months (range 24–84 months). Group A had larger preoperative and postoperative LL, PT, PI − LL, TPA and SVA values compared with group B (P < 0.05), and no significant differences were found in ODI and SRS-22 scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). Preoperative LL, PT, PI − LL, TPA, and SVA values were positively correlated with the follow-up SVA value (P < 0.05). Among them, TPA > 40.9°, PI − LL > 32.5° and SVA > 13.7 cm were the top three predictors with the best accuracy to predict sagittal imbalance. Immediate postoperative SVA value of ≤ 7.4 cm was a key factor in reducing the risk of sagittal imbalance during follow-up.

Conclusions

Preoperative TPA > 40.9°, PI − LL > 32.5° and SVA > 13.7 cm could predict sagittal imbalance in AS kyphosis after one-level three-column osteotomy, and additional osteotomies were recommended for this condition. Immediate postoperative SVA ≤ 7.4 cm was an optimal indicator for preventing sagittal imbalance.

Level of evidence

IV.

The Hip-Spine Challenge

➤

The proper diagnosis and treatment of patients with concurrent hip and spine pathological processes can be challenging because of the substantial overlap in symptomatology.

➤

There is no consensus on which pathological condition should be addressed first.

➤

Factors such as advanced spinal degeneration, deformity, and prior fusion alter the biomechanics of the spinopelvic unit. Attention should be paid to recognizing these issues during the work-up for a total hip arthroplasty as they can result in an increased risk of dislocation.

➤

In patients with concurrent spine and hip degeneration, the surgeon must pay close attention to appropriate implant positioning and have consideration for implants with enhanced stability to minimize the risk of dislocation.

➤

A proper understanding of sagittal balance and restoration of this balance is integral to improving patient outcomes following spinal surgery.

➤

The advent of new imaging modalities, increased awareness of spinopelvic mobility, as well as a better understanding of sagittal alignment will hopefully improve our treatment of patients with hip-spine syndrome.