The effects of barbed suture on watertightness after knee arthrotomy closure: a cadaveric study

Capsular and fascial closure with barbed sutures reduces blood loss compared to traditional interrupted sutures in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

STRATAFIX, a recently introduced barbed suture device, incorporates self-anchoring, knotless sutures with higher tensile strength and enhanced tissue-holding capacity compared to traditional braided absorbable sutures. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of barbed sutures and interrupted sutures in capsular and fascial closure during total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty between April 2017 and March 2021. Overall, 547 patients were evaluated, comprising 77 men and 470 women (mean age: 64.5 years). Among them, 330 patients were in the interrupted suture (control) group, while 217 were in the barbed suture (BS) group. Data on surgical time, perioperative hemoglobin, length of hospital stay, complications such as transfusions and delayed wound healing, and dislocation rates were collected during the latest outpatient follow-up and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss between the groups. However, the BS group exhibited significantly longer operative time, as well as significantly lower postoperative blood loss, total blood loss, and postoperative hemoglobin drop compared to the control group. Dislocation was reported in two cases within the control group, whereas no instances were recorded in the BS group.

CONCLUSION

The use of barbed sutures demonstrated effectiveness in reducing perioperative blood loss for capsular and fascial closure during total hip arthroplasty.

Wound Management following Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Updated Review

Optimal wound closure techniques following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have focused on enhancing healing potential, preventing infection, yielding satisfactory cosmesis, and allowing early ambulation and functionality. An appropriate layered closure and management of the TKA typically involves addressing the (1) deep fascial layer; (2) subdermal layer; (3) intradermal layer, including the subcuticular region; and (4) final application of a specific aseptic dressing, each of which are covered here in detail. This focused critical review of the literature discusses traditional techniques used in all layers of wound closure following TKA while introducing several emerging popular techniques. For example, absorbable barbed skin sutures and occlusive dressings have the potential to reduce operative time, limit the need for early postoperative visits, obviate the need for suture or staple removal, and safely promote patient communication via telemedicine. As novel wound closure techniques continue to emerge and traditional approaches are improved upon, future comparative studies will assist in elucidating the key advantages of various options. In an extremely important field that has tremendous variability, these efforts may enable the reaching of a classically elusive standard of care for these techniques.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF KNOTLESS BARBED SUTURES IN CAPSULAR CLOSURE FOLLOWING DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURE FIXATION

Introduction

Good wound closure is an important step in management of distal femur fracture to prevent infection and faster rehabilitation. Knotless barbed sutures can save time and distribute wound tension evenly. However, its role in terms of functional outcome, closure time, and postoperative complications has not been studied in a distal femur fracture.

Material and methods

A total of 47 patients aged more than 18 years of distal femur fracture treated with distal femur locking plate were randomized either into either barbed or traditional suture groups. in the barbed group, capsular wound closure was carried out with 2-0 bidirectional barbed knotless sutures (Quill SRS^® PDO, Angiotech, Vancouver, BC, Canada). In patients assigned to group B, capsular closure was done with 1-0 Vicryl^® (Ethicon inc. Somerville, NJ) and 5-0 Ethibond^® alternatively.

Results

The mean flexion at the knee joint was 105.7±15.6 degrees in the study group while it was 110.4±13.7 in the control group (p= 0.2133). Mean estimated closure time was significantly shorter in the study group as compared to the control group (p<0.05). Cases of needle prick injury were higher in traditional suture group. Patients developed stitch abscess and superficial infection in both groups. However, the difference in incidence between the two was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Barbed suture is an efficient method of wound closure. It reduces wound closure time with similar complication rate as with use of conventional sutures. Evidence Level II; Randomized Clinical Trial.

Goals, challenges and strategies for wound and bleeding management in total knee arthroplasty: A modified Delphi method

BACKGROUND

Surgical techniques related to soft tissue management play critical roles in optimizing surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite the importance of wound closure and bleeding management approaches, no published guidelines/consensus are available.

METHODS

Twelve orthopedic surgeons participated in a modified Delphi panel consisting of 2 parts (each part comprising two rounds) from September-October 2018. Questionnaires were developed based on published evidence and guidelines on surgical techniques/materials. Questionnaires were administered via email (Round 1) or at a face-to-face meeting (subsequent rounds). Panelists ranked their agreement with each statement on a five-point Likert scale. Consensus was achieved if ≥70% of panelists selected 4/5, or 1/2. Statements not reaching consensus in Round 1 were discussed and repeated or modified in Round 2. Statements not reaching consensus in Round 2 were excluded from the final consensus framework.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on 13 goals of wound management. Panelists agreed on 38 challenges and 71 strategies addressing surgical techniques or wound closure materials for each tissue layer, and management strategies for blood loss reduction or deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in TKA. Statements on closure of capsular and skin layers, wound irrigation, dressings and drains required repeat voting or modification to reach consensus.

CONCLUSION

Consensus from Asia-Pacific TKA experts highlights the importance of wound management in optimizing TKA outcomes. The consensus framework provides a basis for future research, guidance to reduce variability in patient outcomes, and can help inform recommendations for wound management in TKA.

Barbed Sutures for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Have Shorter Wound Closure Time and are Cost-Effective in Comparison to Traditional Sutures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

Surgical wound closure is of paramount importance, especially in total joint replacement surgeries wherein correct closure technique not only aids in rapid healing, but with lesser complications, we would be looking at a quicker rehabilitation of the patients. Bidirectional barbed sutures appear to reduce the wound closure time in all the planes and are cost-effective in comparison with traditional sutures. This study is aimed at evaluating the efficacy and superiority of bidirectional barbed sutures in comparison to traditional suturing techniques.

METHODS

Electronic databases like Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Lilacs were searched up to February 2021. 16 high-quality randomized-controlled trials (RCT) were selected in this study. The search method identified 2168 total knee replacements (TKR) and 229 total hip replacements (THR) among 2397 patients. All the studies compared barbed sutures with traditional wound closure techniques. Data of wound closure time, overall cost, length of hospital stay, overall wound complications, suture-related complications, range of motion data, and knee society scores were collected and further analyzed.

RESULTS

The baseline patient characteristics were identical among all the included studies. Compared to traditional sutures a significantly decreased wound closure time in both THR and TKRs (p < 0.00001) and cost (p < 0.00001) was noted, although no statistically significant difference was found in overall complications in THRs (p = 0.95) and TKRs (p = 0.69). ROM (p = 0.54-6 weeks after surgery and p = 0.68-3 months after surgery) and Knee society scores (p = 0.92) in both the groups of patients undergoing TKR. However, the length of hospital stay was prolonged in the barbed suture group (p = 0.01), pinpricks (p = 0.02), and broken sutures (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Novel methods of wound closure such as barbed sutures achieve satisfactory surgical implementation being more efficient in the form of decreasing the overall wound closure time, with comparable wound complication rates and being cost-effective. But the drawbacks like the incidence of broken sutures and pinpricks are more. Overall using barbed sutures in place of traditional sutures may be considered safe and a viable alternative choice for suturing in total joint replacements.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, Systematic review and Meta-analysis of RCT.

Barbed Sutures in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials

Newer methods of wound closure such as barbed sutures hold the potential to reduce closure time and equivalent wound complications in various surgeries. However, few studies have compared barbed suture and conventional wound closure techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this review was to appraise the efficacy and safety of the barbed suture in closure of TKA. We conducted a meta-analysis to identify relevant randomized-controlled trials involving barbed sutures and conventional sutures in TKA in electronic databases, including Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Library, Highwire, CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang database, up to August 2019. Finally, we identified 1,472 TKAs (1,270 patients) assessed in 13 randomized-controlled trials. Compared with conventional wound closure techniques, barbed sutures resulted in shorter total wound closure time (p < 0.001), fewer needle puncture injuries to members of the surgical team (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in terms of blister formation (p = 1.0), superficial infection (p = 0.82), range of motion (p = 0.94), incisional exudate (p = 0.75), suture abscess (p = 0.26), or suture breakage (p = 0.11), wound-related complications (p = 0.10), ecchymosis (p = 0.08) between barbed and conventional wound closure. Based on the available level I evidence, we thus conclude that a knotless barbed suture is a safe and effective approach for wound closure in TKA. Given the relevant possible biases in our meta-analysis, more adequately powered and better-designed randomized-controlled trials studies with long-term follow-up are required to recommend barbed sutures for routine administration in TKA.

Comparing the Water-Tight Closure of Barbed and Conventional Suture Under Static and Dynamic Conditions in an Ex-Vivo Human Knee Arthrotomy Model

Background

Barbed suture has become popular for closure of the arthrotomy and overlying tissues in total knee arthroplasty. STRATAFIX Symmetric PDS Knotless Tissue Control Device, a unique and novel barbed suture, with barbs formed integral to the suture core provides greater suture strength than the more common cut barbed suture designs. It is the only barbed suture commercially available with an indication in high tension areas, such as fascia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of this novel barbed suture in the formation of a water-tight arthrotomy closure, using a continuous suture pattern, compared to conventional Coated VICRYL (polyglactin 910) Suture, using an interrupted suture pattern, in a cadaveric knee arthrotomy.

Methods

Twenty fresh-frozen cadaver knees underwent randomization to provide donor-paired matching of the knee arthrotomy closures using barbed suture in a continuous pattern or conventional suture in an interrupted pattern. Each specimen underwent 5 phases of testing that included 1) predynamic static leak testing; 2) dynamic motion leak testing; 3) postdynamic static leak testing; 4) suture release static leak testing; and 5) postsuture release dynamic motion leak testing, to assess the fluid leak rate.

Results

Under the initial static conditions, watertightness was similar for the 2 types of sutures. However, in all subsequent phases of testing, continuous barbed suture created a better watertight closure than interrupted conventional suture.

Conclusions

In this study, it was observed that closure of a knee arthrotomy using the novel barbed suture provided improved watertightness compared to conventional interrupted closure under dynamic conditions and suture release.

A Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of the Quality of Wound Closure With Barbed Versus Standard Suture After Total Joint Arthroplasty

Complications such as joint infection or delayed wound healing can lead to morbidity and elevated health care costs after total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of running knotless barbed suture vs standard monofilament suture wound closure with respect to wound drainage and healing complications after total joint arthroplasty. For this study, 1000 joint arthroplasty patients were prospectively randomized to have fascial, soft tissue, and skin closure with knotless barbed suture vs standard suture during the period 2016 to 2018. An absorptive dressing was used for 1 week postoperatively. Each dressing was weighed and the saturated surface area of the dressing measured. A total of 939 dressings were available for evaluation. Incisions were evaluated for wound healing at each postoperative visit. Of the 1000 joint arthroplasties performed, suture breakage or needle disengagement occurred similarly with the standard monofilament suture and the running barbed suture (13 times vs 6 times; P=.17). Dressings were weighed, and when standard monofilament sutures were used, an average of 1.2 g more postoperative bandage weight was recorded (P<.002). Postoperative wound complications including stitch abscess or wound irritation occurred more often with standard monofilament sutures than with running barbed sutures (16 times vs 5 times; P<.025). Optimal wound closure after joint replacement is critical to enhance soft tissue healing and minimize infection risk, which can be caused by excessive wound drainage. The positive results shown for the running barbed suture of this prospective study indicate the difference in quality of closure between the standard monofilament suture and the running barbed suture in hip and knee arthroplasty surgical sites. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):216-222.].

A symmetric anchor designed barbed suture versus conventional interrupted sutures in total knee arthroplasty: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

This randomized controlled study was designed to compare the wound closure efficacy and safety of barbed suture in comparison to the conventional interrupted suture for total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

This multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolled 184 patients who underwent elective TKA between June 2017 and April 2018. The subjects were randomized between two groups. Surgical incision closure time was considered as the primary end point.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients participated in this randomized controlled trial; 91 patients had wound closure that involved barbed suture and 93 patients underwent conventional treatment-that is interrupted suturing with nonbarbed sutures. The surgical incision closure time was shorter (p < 0.0001) in the barbed suture group compared with the control group (15.5 ± 4.88 vs. 20.9 ± 6.30 min). However, both groups were found to be equal in terms of the rate of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Usage of the symmetric anchor designed barbed suture is safe, efficacious, and demonstrates a decrease in surgical incision closure time in patients undergoing TKA compared to interrupted closure using conventional sutures. Future studies are warranted to demonstrate clinical and economic benefits of barbed sutures.

Is continuous locking suture with braided suture sufficient for arthrotomy repair in the conventional TKR? A randomized controlled trial study

Introduction

Medial-parapatellar-arthrotomy is the standard approach for total knee replacement(TKR). No studies have clarified the outcomes as quadriceps-strength-recovery (QS) and safety of Continuous-locking-suture-technique(CLS) for the arthrotomy-repair.

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned into a CLS(n = 40) and an interrupted-horizontal-mattress(IHM, n = 40). QS, visual-analog-scale(VAS), modified-timed-up-and-go(TUGT) test, Western-Ontario-and McMasters-Universities-Osteoarthritis-Index[WOMAC] and Knee-Society-Score[KSS] were followed for 6 months’.

Results

A significantly-shorter capsular-closure-time in CLS(233 ± 40 VS 388 ± 47 sec)(p < 0.0001). There were insignificant difference in QS, VAS, TUGT, WOMAC and KSS during the 6-month follow-up period(p > 0.05 all). No wound complications were found.

Conclusion

CLS with braided-suture is safe and effective as demonstrated a recovery of the QS and knee function outcome comparable to IHM.

Trial registration

This study was registered in Thai Clinical Trials Registry on December 2015 (https://www.clinicaltrials.in.th). The registration number was TCTR20151208003.

A novel and efficient surgical knotting technique for high-tension closures

Background

The closure of high-tension incisions without any assistance can be difficult and challenging for surgeons. A common practice is to fix the first knot with a clamp and then tie a reverse locking knot; however, this practice has certain disadvantages. The aim of this study was to introduce a novel and efficient surgical knotting technique with various advantages.

Methods

The two knotting methods used in this study were the absorbable braided suture where the first suture was fixed with a clamp (with assistance) and the SH-9Hospital knotting technique (without assistance) applied on the smooth surface of a cylinder. Mechanical testing was performed using a universal material testing machine. The load-elongation curve and ultimate tensile load (UTL) were recorded.

Results

The mean knotting time was 36.40±1.50 s (range, 32–41 s) and 24.80±1.16 s (range, 21–28 s) in the clamp and SH-9Hosptial groups, respectively. The mean UTL was 120.8±10.14 N (range, 81.11–136.55 N)and 126.5±6.29 N (range, 104.88–139.56 N) in the clamp and SH-9Hospital groups, respectively. The knot strength of the SH-9Hospital technique was not inferior to traditional clinical practice.

Conclusions

The SH-9Hospital knotting technique was a secure, convenient, and efficient method for high-tension closure.

A comparison between barbed suture and conventional suture in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of barbed versus conventional sutures in total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Two investigators independently performed data extraction and assessed study quality using the keywords "barbed suture, wound suture, total knee arthroplasty" in two search trials, individual trials, and trials from Systematic Reviews or Meta-analyses in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases.

RESULT

A total of 11 articles (involving 1546 total knee arthroplasties) were included in this study. Comparison was made between barbed and conventional sutures in terms of various measures. No significant differences were identified in superficial infection and deep infection (p > 0.51; odds ratio 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.50, 1.4] and p > 0.28; odds ratio 0.50 [95% confidence interval, 0.14, 1.75], respectively). There was no significant difference in time for capsular suture (p < 0.05; odds ratio - 4.05 [95% confidence interval, - 4.39, - 3.71]). There existed no significant differences in Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score and Knee Society Score (p > 0.05; odds ratio - 1.20 [95% confidence interval, - 2.98, 0.58] and p > 0.05; odds ratio - 1.62 [95% confidence interval, - 4.06, 0.18], respectively). No significant differences were revealed in suture breakage and needle stick injury (p < 0.05; odds ratio 36.51 [95% confidence interval, 7.06, 188.72] and p < 0.05; odds ratio 0.16 [95% confidence interval, 0.04, 0.72], respectively). No significant difference was exhibited in dehiscence (p = 0.99; odds ratio 0.99 [95% confidence interval, 0.41, 2.38]).

CONCLUSION

In total knee arthroplasty, both barbed and conventional sutures yielded similar results in terms of superficial and deep infection, Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score, Knee Society Score, and wound dehiscence. Barbed suture was associated with higher incidence of suture breakage, shorter suture time, and less needle stick injury.