Characteristics and correlation analysis of spino-pelvic sagittal parameters in elderly patients with lumbar degenerative disease

Sagittal Alignment in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine: Surgical Planning

➤ Sagittal alignment of the spine has gained attention in the field of spinal deformity surgery for decades. However, emerging data support the importance of restoring segmental lumbar lordosis and lumbar spinal shape according to the pelvic morphology when surgically addressing degenerative lumbar pathologies such as degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis.➤ The distribution of caudal lordosis (L4-S1) and cranial lordosis (L1-L4) as a percentage of global lordosis varies by pelvic incidence (PI), with cephalad lordosis increasing its contribution to total lordosis as PI increases.➤ Spinal fusion may lead to iatrogenic deformity if performed without attention to lordosis magnitude and location in the lumbar spine.➤ A solid foundation of knowledge with regard to optimal spinal sagittal alignment is beneficial when performing lumbar spinal surgery, and thoughtful planning and execution of lumbar fusions with a focus on alignment may improve patient outcomes.

Global Sagittal Balance of Spine in Asymptomatic Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the global sagittal balance of spine (GSBS) in asymptomatic controls.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library, and Web of Science searched up to July 2020. Studies were screened for the GSB parameters including T1 pelvic angle (TPA), spinosacral angle (SSA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C7/sacrofemoral distance ratio (Barrey index), odontoid hip axis (OD-HA), and Full Balance Index (FBI) as measured in asymptomatic participants. A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize pooled estimates. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 76 studies were identified including 12,169 participants (54.7% female) with mean age ranges from 12.0 to 72.9 years old. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of studies included in this review. Begg's test did not indicate obvious publication bias. The pooled analysis reveals that the mean (standard deviation) normative values were: 1) age ˃18 years, SSA (°), 127.6 (0.89); SVA absolute value (millimeters), 13.1 (1.13); TPA (°), 9.8 (1.13); T1SPI (°), -4.3 (0.57); and Barrey index absolute value, 0.51 (0.3). The mean value of the OD-HA (°) was reported 2.9 (1.6), and the FBI average value was less than 5°. 2) Age ≤18 years, SSA (°), 132.1 (8.3); SVA absolute value (millimeters), 11.9 (2.0); and Barrey index, -0.7 (8.3). A significant difference was observed between the 2 age groups based on SVA and SSA.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper presents normative data on TPA, SSA, SVA, Barrey index, OD-HA, and FBI as a reference for evaluating/measuring a GSB of spine in asymptomatic controls.

Correlation between thoracolumbar disc degeneration and anatomical spinopelvic parameters in supine position on MRI

Objective

This study aims to investigate the correlation between spinopelvic parameters in supine position (pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL)), disc degeneration and herniation of the thoracolumbar spine, as well as cardiovascular risk factors and back pain in a southern German cohort from the general population.

Methods

This study is a cross-sectional, case–control study drawn from a prospective cohort of the “Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg/Kooperative Gesundheitsforschung in der Region Augsburg” study (KORA). In total, 374 participants (mean age 56.4 ± 9.2 years; 57.8% male) from the whole-body MRI cohort (FF4) were included. All participants underwent a standardized whole-body MRI on which disc degeneration of the thoracic and lumbar spine was evaluated using a sequence adapted Pfirrmann score. PI, PT, SS and LL were measured according to the description in the literature, using sagittal imaging. Furthermore, disc bulging and protrusion were assessed. Correlations were estimated by logistic regression models providing odds ratios.

Results

Mean PI was 54.0° ± 11.1°, PT 13.0° ± 5.8°, SS 40.2° ± 8.8° and LL 36.2° ± 9.6°. SS was greater in men (p<0.05) and lumbar lordosis in women (p<0.001). PT increased by 0.09° per age-year with rising age. Age was not associated with PI, SS and LL. Neither BMI, hypertension, cholesterol, lipid levels, nor physical activity were associated with PI, PT, SS or LL. Diabetes mellitus negatively correlated with SS (β = -4.19; 95%CI -7.31–1.06, p<0.01). Smaller spinopelvic parameters (PI, SS and LL) where significantly (p<0.05) correlated with an increased frequency of disc bulging, as well as a local clustering in the lumbar, but not the thoracic spine.

Conclusion

In conclusion, spinopelvic parameters, measured in supine position, are significantly correlated with disc bulging alone; there is no significant correlation between supine spinopelvic parameters and disc degeneration, back pain or cardiovascular risk factors.

Coronal and sagittal spinal alignment in lumbar disc herniation with scoliosis and trunk shift

Background

To investigate the incidence of scoliosis and trunk shift in patients with LDH (lumbar disc herniation) and analyze the differences in spinopelvic alignment among patients with or without trunk shift and non-symptom controls.

Materials and methods

All included subjects had standard upright antero-posterior and lateral radiographs of the whole spine taken. Evidence of disc herniation was confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The parameters measured included trunk shift and Cobb angle, TK (thoracic kyphosis), TLK (thoraco-lumbar junction kyphosis), LL (lumbar lordosis), PI (pelvic incidence), SS (sacral slope), PT (pelvic tilt) and SVA (sagittal vertical axis).

Results

Sixty-eight patients with LDH and 61 controls were included. There were significantly more male patients with trunk shift than the patients without trunk shift. Forty-two patients had curve magnitudes ranging from 5 to 38°. The trunk shift ranged from 0.5 to 7.3 cm. A total of 54.76% of patients had a disc herniation on the concave side of the main curve. Fifty percent of patients showed a trunk shift towards the opposite side of disc herniation. There were significant differences in spinopelvic parameters among groups. Significant correlations were also observed between several spinopelvic parameters in the three groups. However, the degrees of correlations among the spinopelvic parameters differed among the three groups.

Conclusion

Spinal sagittal morphology in LDH patients with trunk shift exhibits a more anterior shift of the C7 plumb line, less LL, and a more horizontal sacrum. Correlation analysis indicated a disharmonious spinopelvic interaction and a change in the compensatory model in patients with LDH.