Comparison of lateral approach versus anterolateral approach with Herbert screw fixation for isolated coronal shear fractures of humeral capitellum

Surgical treatment of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus with an intact lateral epicondyle by the lateral combined approach

BACKGROUND

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are not only rare and prone to misdiagnosis, but their surgical treatment can be challenging. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of exposing distal humeral coronal shear fractures with a combined lateral approach that preserves the extensors and lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) and to analyze the clinical efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of these injuries.

METHODS

We included 45 patients who sustained coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus with the lateral epicondyle intact and were treated with open reduction and internal fixation from January 2013 to August 2020. The fractures were exposed by the lateral combined approach in which the tendons involving the common extensor, the extensor carpi ulnaris, and the LUCL were preserved. Two observation windows were formed anterior to and posterior to these tendons and the LUCL was used to achieve fracture reduction. Countersunk screws, with or without a plate placed on the posterior lateral condyle, were used to fix the fragments. The functional outcomes of these patients were reviewed and assessed with physical and radiographic examinations, range of motion measurements, and self-evaluation Mayo Elbow Performance Index and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores.

RESULTS

In total, 40 patients were followed up with for over 1 year and were included in the final analysis. The mean follow-up duration was 42 ± 30 months (range, 12-107 months). The patients' mean age was 42 years (range, 14-74 years). According to the Dubberley Classification, there were 15 type I, 17 type II, and 8 type III fractures. At the final follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arc was 131° (range, 65-150) and mean pronation and supination was 73° (range, 45-80) and 71° (range, 40-80), respectively. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index score was 88 (range, 61-97) points; the results were excellent in 21, good in 13, fair in 4, and poor in 2 patients. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 11 (range, 0-42) points. Neither functional score nor range of movement was associated with age, sex, fracture type, injury type, or surgical timing.

CONCLUSION

Reduction and stable fixation with internal fixation for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus can be achieved by the lateral combined approach. Early functional mobilization allows for satisfactory restoration of elbow function.

Clinical Outcomes and Management Strategies for Capitellum and Trochlea Fractures: A Systematic Review

Purpose

Capitellum and trochlea fractures, also referred to as coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus, are infrequent yet challenging intra-articular fractures of the elbow. There are a variety of surgical approaches and fixation methods with often variable outcomes. This systematic review investigates interventions, outcomes and complications of capitellum and trochlea fractures.

Methods

A systematic review of studies published in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health literature (CINAHL) was conducted to assess the clinical outcomes of capitellum and trochlea fractures managed surgically. Data on patient demographics, surgical approach, implant usage, postoperative outcomes and complications were compiled.

Results

Forty-one studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 700 patients. Surgical interventions primarily utilized either the lateral (79%) or antero-lateral (15%) approaches with headless compression screws as the most common fixation method (68%). Clinical outcomes were measured using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) with a mean score of 89.9 (±2.6) and the DASH score with a mean of 16.9 (±7.3). Elbow range of motion showed a mean flexion of 126.3° (±19.4), extension of 5.71° (±11.8), pronation of 75.23° (±12.2), and supination of 76.6° (±9.8). The mean flexion-extension arc was 113.7° (±16.9), and the mean pronation-supination arc was 165.31° (±9.41). Complications occurred in 19.8% of cases, with re-interventions required in 8.3% of cases, mainly due to symptomatic implants and elbow stiffness requiring surgical release. Other complications included implant removal (10.4%), overall reported stiff elbows (6%), nerve palsies (2%), non-union (1.5%), and infection (1.2%).

Conclusion

The treatment of capitellum and trochlea fractures yields satisfactory outcomes but has a considerable rate of complications and reoperations primarily due to symptomatic implants and elbow stiffness. There is noteworthy variability in the achieved range of motion, suggesting unpredictable outcomes. Deficits in functionality and range of motion are common after surgery, especially with more complex injury patterns.

Rate of Complications After Capitellum Fracture Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to determine the incidence of complications following surgical fixation of an acute capitellum fracture. We secondarily aimed to compare the complication rate between anterior-to-posterior (A-P) versus posterior-to-anterior (P-A) screw insertion.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched to identify studies on surgical fixation of capitellum fractures in skeletally mature patients. The main outcome was the rate of complication after fracture fixation. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the impact of the fixation technique on the outcomes after surgery. An inverse variance method using random or fixed effects models was used to perform a meta-analysis based on the degree of heterogeneity between studies. Study heterogeneity was evaluated using Q statistics to calculate the I2 index.

RESULTS

We included 42 studies in the final analysis. The most reported complications after surgical fixation of capitellum fractures included elbow pain (21%), radiocapitellar arthritis (19%), hardware removal (17%), and heterotopic ossification (13%). When groups were stratified based on the direction of screw insertion, the mean rate of avascular necrosis was higher in the P-A direction (29% vs 11%). In comparison, the rate of revision fixation (2.9% vs 6.7%) and heterotopic ossification (7.3% vs 22%) were higher in the A-P direction. Transient posterior interosseous nerve palsy was reported in four patients in four studies, of whom three patients had A-P screw fixation.

CONCLUSION

Fixation of a displaced capitellum fracture is recommended when possible. However, patients should be counseled about the potential risk of complications and chances of undergoing an unplanned surgery.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Computer-Assisted Surgical Anatomical Mapping of the Antebrachial Cutaneous Nerves: An Anatomical Study with a Proposition for Alternative, Cutaneous Nerve-Sparing Anterior Elbow Incisions

It is common practice to assess the distance from nerves to anatomical structures in centimeters, but patients have various body compositions and anatomical variations are common. The purpose of this study was therefore to assess the relative distance from cutaneous nerves around the elbow to surrounding anatomical landmarks by providing a stacked image that displays the average position of cutaneous nerves around the elbow. The aim was to research possibilities for adjusting common skin incisions in the anterior elbow so that cutaneous nerve injury may be avoided.

Methods

The lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN) and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (MABCN) were identified in the coronal plane around the elbow joint in 10 fresh-frozen human arm specimens. Marked photographs of the specimens were analyzed using computer-assisted surgical anatomical mapping (CASAM). Common anterior surgical approaches to the elbow joint and the distal humerus were then compared with merged images, and nerve-sparing alternatives are proposed.

Results

The arm was divided longitudinally, from medial to lateral in the coronal plane, into 4 quarters. The LABCN crossed the central-lateral quarter of the interepicondylar line (i.e., was somewhat lateral to the midline at the level of the elbow crease) in 9 of 10 specimens. The MABCN ran medial to the basilic vein and crossed the most medial quarter of the interepicondylar line. Thus, 2 of the quarters were either free of cutaneous nerves (the most lateral quarter) or contained a distal cutaneous branch in only 1 of 10 specimens (the central-medial quarter).

Conclusions

The Boyd-Anderson approach, which is often used to access anteromedial structures of the elbow, should be placed slightly further medially than traditionally advised. The distal part of the Henry approach should deviate laterally, so that it runs over the mobile wad. In distal biceps tendon surgery, the risk of cutaneous nerve injury may be reduced if a single distal incision is placed slightly more laterally (in the most lateral quarter), as in the modified Henry approach. If proximal extension is required, LABCN injury may be prevented by using the modified Boyd-Anderson incision, which runs in the central-medial quarter.

Clinical Relevance

Cutaneous nerve injury may be prevented by slightly altering the commonly used skin incisions around the elbow on the basis of the safe zones that were identified by depicting the cumulative course of the MABCN and LABCN using CASAM.

Coronal Plane Articular Shear Fractures of the Distal Humerus

Coronal plane articular shear fractures of the distal humerus are a rare injury, comprising 6% of distal humerus fractures. The fracture can be easily missed on initial radiographs; therefore, a high index of suspicion is warranted. Radiographically obvious fractures are often more complex than initially appreciated, with plain radiographs often underestimating the extent of posterior comminution and trochlear involvement. Associated bony and ligamentous injuries are common. Anatomic reduction and internal fixation of displaced fractures is the standard of care because poor results have been described with nonsurgical treatment. However, the regional anatomy and the often-limited bone stock can make open reduction and internal fixation challenging. The lateral approach, with headless compression screws placed from anterior to posterior, is commonly used for simpler fracture patterns, but exposure and fixation of trochlea extension can be difficult. In the absence of posterior comminution, the anterolateral approach can enhance trochlea exposure and allow for a better trajectory for screw placement. Posterior comminution often requires locking plate fixation. Better results and lower complication rates have been reported for fractures with less fragmentation of the articular surface and those without posterior comminution. Contracture and symptomatic implants are the most common reasons for revision surgery.

Biomechanical stability of complex coronal plane fracture fixation of the capitellum

INTRODUCTION

Coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus are relatively rare and can be challenging to treat due to their complexity and intra-articular nature. There is no gold standard for surgical management of these complex fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability and strength of two different internal fixation techniques for complex coronal plane fractures of the capitellum with posterior comminution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen fresh frozen, age- and gender-matched cadaveric elbows were 3D-navigated osteotomized simulating a Dubberley type IIB fracture. Specimens were randomized into one of two treatment groups and stabilized with an anterior antiglide plate with additional anteroposterior cannulated headless compression screws (group antiGP + HCS) or a posterolateral distal humerus locking plate with lateral extension (group PLP). Cyclic testing was performed with 75 N over 2000 cycles and ultimately until construct failure. Data were analyzed for displacement, construct stiffness, and ultimate load to failure.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in displacement during 2000 cycles (p = 0.291), stiffness (310 vs. 347 N/mm; p = 0.612) or ultimate load to failure (649 ± 351 vs. 887 ± 187 N; p = 0.140) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterolateral distal humerus locking plate achieves equal biomechanical fixation strength as an anterior antiglide plate with additional anteroposterior cannulated headless compression screws for fracture fixation of complex coronal plane fractures of the capitellum. These results support the use of a posterolateral distal humerus locking plate considering the clinical advantages of less invasive surgery and extraarticular metalware.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Biomechanical study.

Surgical outcomes of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the elderly with coronal shear fractures (CSFs) of the distal humerus who had undergone open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

Between April 2002 and March 2019, eight elderly patients (76.3 ± 5.1 years)with CSFs of the distal humerus were investigated retrospectively. Postoperative complications, the range of motion (ROM) of the elbow joint, and functional elbow scoring (Mayo elbow performance score; MEPS) were assessed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 23.6 ± 13.9 months. CSFs were treated by a buried implantable headless screw or Kirshner wires or bioresorbable screw with/without lateral locking plates. There were no superficial or deep infections, or elbow joint instability. Seven patients obtained fracture healing, but one patient showed non-union. Osteochondritis dissecans was present in one patient. Three patients showed step-off deformity (> 2 mm) of the articular surface. Two patients displayed a collapse of the fractured articular surface. A patient with severe comminution of both the capitellum and the trochlear showed the collapse of the whole articular surface with osteonecrosis of the capitellum and trochlea. Mean the range of motion of the elbow were flexion, 116.3±12.7° and extension, -28.8±14.1°. The mean MEPS was 78.8±10.2 points, representing patients who scored an excellent (n=1), good (n=3), and fair (n=4).

CONCLUSION

ORIF yielded satisfactory outcomes for theelderly with noncomminuted CSF of the distal humerus. However, the cases with comminuted articular fragment or complex posterior fractures were still challenging.

Biomechanical stability of simple coronal shear fracture fixation of the capitellum

BACKGROUND

Coronal shear fractures of the capitellum are rare, and their surgical management is challenging, without a defined gold standard. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of 3 different internal fixation techniques for simple coronal shear fractures of the capitellum without posterior comminution.

METHODS

Dubberley type IA fractures of the capitellum were created in 18 cadaveric elbows, which were age and sex matched to the following 3 internal fixation groups: (1) two anteroposterior cannulated headless compression screws (HCSs), (2) two anteroposterior HCSs with an additional anterior antiglide plate (antiGP), and (3) a posterolateral distal humeral locking plate (LP). All fixation techniques were cyclically loaded with 75 N over 2000 cycles and ultimately until construct failure. Data were analyzed for displacement, construct stiffness, and ultimate load to failure.

RESULTS

Fragment displacement under cyclic loading with 2000 cycles did not show a significant difference (P = .886) between the 3 groups. The HCS group showed the highest stiffness compared with the HCS-antiGP and LP groups (602 N/mm vs. 540 N/mm vs. 462 N/mm, P = .417), without reaching a statistically significant difference. Ultimate load to failure was also not significantly different on comparison of all 3 groups (P = .297).

CONCLUSIONS

Simple coronal shear fractures of the capitellum are biomechanically equally stabilized by HCSs compared with HCSs with an additional antiGP or a posterolateral distal humeral LP. In view of the advantages of less (invasive) metalware, the clinical use of 2 isolated anteroposterior HCSs appears reasonable.

Complications of articular distal humeral fracture fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Distal humeral fractures are relatively rare injuries in adults. Fractures that involve the articular surface can be particularly challenging to treat. Open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) remains the preferred treatment for most intra-articular distal humeral fractures, depending on the degree of comminution and functional demands of the patient. Many surgical approaches, fixation techniques, and potential complications have been described in the literature; however, the relative incidence and associated characteristics of these complications have not been studied. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of complications and reoperations after ORIF for intra-articular distal humeral fractures. We sought to provide practical guidance to surgeons and offer insights on the avoidance and prognosis of complications through a systematic review of the published literature over the past 20 years.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting complications and reoperation rates after ORIF for intra-articular distal humeral fractures. Subgroup analysis was conducted for complication rates between type 13B and 13C fractures, olecranon osteotomy and non-osteotomy approaches, and parallel and perpendicular plating.

RESULTS

Eighty-three studies met the inclusion criteria (2362 elbows; 5 level II, 2 level III, and 76 level IV studies). The mean clinical follow-up period was 2.6 years. The majority of fractures were type C (83%), the remainder were type B (17%). Of the fractures, 71% were closed whereas 9% were open; this was not reported for 20%. The mean postoperative flexion arc was 110°. The overall complication rate was 53%, and the overall reoperation rate was 21%. Although a parallel plating approach resulted in a lower rate of fixation failure requiring revision (1% vs. 6%, P < .001), a perpendicular plating approach showed a significantly lower rate of overall complications (45% vs. 54%, P = .006). This was primarily driven by lower rates of wound dehiscence (0.1% vs. 5%, P < .001), neuropathy (9% vs. 13%, P = .03), and implant prominence (3% vs. 7%, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review is the largest report of complications and reoperations of intra-articular distal humeral fractures after ORIF in the current literature. These results suggest that complications may be more frequent than previously understood. In contrast to prior small comparative studies, our study observed a significantly higher overall complication rate with parallel plating than with perpendicular plating. Perpendicular plating for intra-articular distal humeral fractures may be considered if adequate fixation and biomechanical stability can be achieved.

Therapeutic analysis of Herbert screw fixation for capitellar fractures via the anterior approach in adolescent patients

Objective

The aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy of open reduction and Herbert screw fixation for coronal fractures of the capitellum via the anterior approach in adolescents.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging data of 15 adolescents with capitellar fractures who were admitted to our hospital from May 2014 to May 2019. The fracture was reduced through the cubital crease incision via the anterior approach and was internally fixated with Herbert screws. A follow-up was conducted after the operation to examine fracture healing and elbow function. The postoperative functional recovery of patients was evaluated with the Mayo Elbow Performance index (MEPI) and the Broberg-Morrey rating system.

Results

Patients underwent surgery 3.7 days after injury on average. Intraoperative fracture reduction was satisfactory. No vascular injury or nerve injury occurred. Bony union occurred in an average of 6 weeks after the operation. All adolescents completed a 12- to 36-month follow-up. At the last follow-up, the Mayo Elbow Performance index was considered excellent in 12 patients and good in three patients. The Broberg-Morrey score was considered excellent in 12 patients, good in two patients, and fair in one patient.

Conclusion

Open reduction with Herbert screw fixation via the anterior approach is a feasible surgical method for the treatment of coronal fractures of the capitellum in adolescents.

Levels of evidence

Therapeutic, retrospective study-Level IV

Clinical Efficacy of Vertical or Parallel Technique of a Micro-Locking Plate for Treatment of Dubberley B-Type Capitellar Fractures

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of micro‐locking plate through vertical or parallel technique for treatment of Dubberley B‐type capitellar fractures.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed in 24 patients (17 males and seven females, with an average age of 44.9 years, range from 19 to 75 years) with capitellar fractures that were treated with micro‐locking plate using vertical or parallel technique between January 2016 to January 2019. The inclusion criteria include closed capitellar fracture, normal anterior elbow joint movement before injury, and recent capitellar fracture with injury within past 3 weeks. Fractures classified according to Dubberley included four cases of type IB, eight cases of type IIB, and 12 cases of type IIIB. Radiographic evaluation was performed. Surgery time, blood loss, range of motion of the elbow, forearm rotation, and complications were recorded. Elbow joint function was evaluated by Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).

Results

The mean follow‐up period was 19.6 months (range, 12–36 months). The average clinical healing time for fractures was 11.2 ± 3.2 weeks (range, 8–20 weeks). Fracture united in all patients. Two patients showed slight delayed union, but union was achieved eventually. The mean time from injury to surgery was 6.3 ± 3.1 days (range, 2–15 days). The average surgical time was 68.1 ± 11.5 min (range, 50–90 min), and the mean blood loss was 75.2 ± 26.5 mL (range, 40–120 mL). The mean range of flexion was 122.5° ± 10.5°(range, 95°–140°). The mean range of extension was 8.5° ± 5.8°(range, 0°–20°). The mean range of pronation was 79.7° ± 8.0°(range, 65°–90°). The mean range of supination was 80.5° ± 7.1°(range, 60°–90°). The mean MEPS at final follow‐up was 89.8 ± 9.0 (range, 60–100). Based on the MEPS, 18 (75%) patients had excellent, five (20.8%) patients had good, and one (4.2%) patient had fair. None of the 24 patients suffered vascular or nerve injury. One patient showed superficial infection, which was treated with surgical dressing.

Conclusions

The vertical or parallel technique of the micro‐locking plate is an excellent method for treating Dubberley B‐type capitellar fractures.

Neglected Comminuted Fracture of the Capitellum

Fracture of the capitellum is a rare injury, accounting for about 1% of the fractures around the elbow. We report the case of a young adult with elbow pain and swelling presenting to us three weeks after the injury. Radiographs suggested a comminuted fracture of the capitellum extending medially to the trochlea. Using the anterolateral approach to the elbow, an open reduction and internal fixation of the fracture with screws was done. The procedure had an excellent functional outcome. Through this case report, we aim to highlight the importance of radiographic assessment and decision-making regarding the surgical approach and choice of the implant in the treatment of comminuted capitellar fractures.

Functional Outcome of a Coronal Shear Fracture of the Capitellum Managed by Herbert Screw Fixation Using the Anterolateral Surgical Approach

Fractures of the capitellum, particularly coronal shear fractures, are difficult to manage. The challenges are adequate surgical exposure, proper anatomic reduction, and stable fixation of these fractures. Our study included 10 patients with a coronal shear fracture of the capitellum without any involvement of the posterior condyle. All patients underwent open reduction and Herbert screw fixation using the anterolateral approach, with good functional outcome. In our opinion, this is a good option for the treatment of coronal shear fractures of the capitellum.