1
|
van Blommestein MYH, Govaert LHM, van der Palen J, Verra WC, Koorevaar RCT, Schröder FF, Veen EJD. Instability Severity Index Score predicts recurrent shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2024; 32:2152-2160. [PMID: 38720406 DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Instability Severity Index (ISI) Score was developed to preoperatively assess the risk of recurrent shoulder instability after an arthroscopic Bankart repair. This study aims to validate the use of ISI Score for predicting the risk of recurrence after an arthroscopic Bankart repair in a heterogeneous population and proposes an appropriate cut-off point for treating patients with an arthroscopic Bankart repair or otherwise. METHODS This study analysed 99 shoulders after a traumatic dislocation that underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with at least 3 years follow-up. Patients were divided into subcategories based on their respective ISI Score. Recurrence includes either a postoperative dislocation or perceived instability. RESULTS The overall recurrence rate was found to be 26.3%. A significant correlation was identified between ISI Score and the recurrence rate (odds ratio [OR]: 1.545, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.231-1.939, p < 0.001). Furthermore, ISI Score 4-6 (OR: 4.498, 95% CI: 1.866-10.842, p < 0.001) and ISI Score > 6 (OR: 7.076, 95% CI: 2.393-20.924, p < 0.001) both had a significantly higher risk of recurrence compared to ISI Score 0-3. In ISI Score subcategories 0-3, 4-6 and >6, the recurrence rate was, respectively, 15.4%, 40.7% and 71.4%. CONCLUSION ISI Score has predictive value in determining the recurrence risk of shoulder instability following an arthroscopic Bankart repair in a heterogeneous population. Based on the findings of this study, we recommend using arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients with ISI Score 0-3. Clinical and shared decision-making are essential in the group with ISI Score 4-6, since the recurrence rate is significantly higher than in patients with ISI Score 0-3. Arthroscopic Bankart repair is not suitable for patients with ISI Score > 6. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lonneke H M Govaert
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Job van der Palen
- Department of Epidemiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Section Cognition, Data and Education, Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Wiebe C Verra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rinco C T Koorevaar
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bergman Clinics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke F Schröder
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Medical 3D Lab, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Egbert Jan D Veen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Castillo de la Peña J, Ma J, Wong I. Arthroscopic capsular shift from inferior to superior has an exceptional safety profile and short-term outcomes. J ISAKOS 2024; 9:314-318. [PMID: 38403194 DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Arthroscopic Bankart for anterior shoulder instability has a good safety profile but with a relatively high recurrence index. Open surgery has been used to decrease recurrence rates but with a higher complication rate. Arthroscopic capsular shift from inferior to superior (ACSIS) was designed to decrease the recurrence rates without the added morbidity of open surgery. METHODS An observational retrospective study was conducted to analyze perioperative complications and patient reported outcomes of patients treated with ACSIS to determine the safety profile of the procedure. The patients with anterior traumatic shoulder instability treated with ACSIS between January 2015 and December 2021 were included for the study. The analysis was conducted using SPSS (Version 27). The pre vs. postoperative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores were compared using a paired sample t-test or Wilcoxon signed ranks test depending on the results of the normality test and Levene's test. The significance level was 0.05 in all analyses. Thirty-six patients were included in this study, the mean age of the population is 30.8 ± 11.4 years, with a male dominance of 86.1% (N = 31), and a mean clinical follow-up of 2.7 ± 1.2 years. RESULTS No intraoperative complications, including bleeding or neurovascular injury, were noted. Additionally, no early postoperative complications, including infection or hospital readmission, were noted. During the follow-up, one patient (3%) had persistent apprehension. The mean Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index decreased from 66.6 ± 13.10% to 27.9 ± 22% postoperatively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS ACSIS procedure is safe and has good short-term outcomes with a low recurrence rate at 1-year minimum follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 (Observational study).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Castillo de la Peña
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2E1, Canada
| | - Jie Ma
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2E1, Canada
| | - Ivan Wong
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2E1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sonke C, Wong I. Editorial Commentary: Anterior Shoulder Stabilization Combining Arthroscopic Bankart and Inferior Capsular Shift Avoids Open Surgery in Athletes Without Critical Glenoid Bone Loss. Arthroscopy 2024; 40:1431-1433. [PMID: 38323954 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations can cause a myriad of injuries, each with their own unique set of challenges with respect to surgical management. The debate of whether open or arthroscopic management is the superior approach is one that predates most currently practicing orthopaedic surgeons yet remains one of the most actively researched areas of orthopaedics. Current trends favor arthroscopic management for anterior instability secondary to a Bankart lesion in patients without other risk factors for instability, such as critical glenoid bone loss. However, excellent results are not guaranteed following arthroscopic Bankart repair, particularly in athletes, due to high rates of recurrence. While the technique of inferior to superior capsular shift is not new, transitioning a historically open technique to the arthroscopic world may represent another tool in the glenohumeral instability management toolbox. While perspectives are evolving, more evidence supporting arthroscopic techniques like the capsular shift are needed to better identify appropriate patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ivan Wong
- Dalhousie University; Nova Scotia Health
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jackson GR, Brusalis CM, Schundler SF, Sachdev D, Obioha OA, McCormick JR, Mameri ES, Kaplan DJ, Knapik DM, Chahla J, Verma NN. Isolated Primary Latarjet Procedures for Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in High Rates of Graft Resorption and Glenohumeral Degenerative Changes With Low Rates of Failure at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy 2024; 40:581-591.e1. [PMID: 37270111 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the incidence of postoperative complications after an isolated primary Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability at a minimum 2-year follow-up. METHODS A systematic review was performed in accordance with 2020 PRISMA guidelines. EMBASE, Scopus, and PubMed databases were queried from database inception through September 2022. The literature search was limited to human clinical studies reporting on postoperative complications and adverse events after a primary Latarjet procedure with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Risk of bias was measured using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Twenty-two studies, consisting of 1,797 patients (n = 1,816 shoulders), with a mean age of 24 years were identified. The overall postoperative complication rate ranged from 0% to 25.7%, with the most common complication being persistent shoulder pain (range: 0%-25.7%). Radiological changes included graft resorption (range: 7.5%-100%) and glenohumeral degenerative changes (range: 0%-52.5%). Recurrent instability following surgery was documented in 0% to 35% of shoulders, while the incidence of bone block fractures ranged from 0% to 6% of cases. Postoperative nonunion, infection, and hematomas had a reported incidence rate ranging from 0% to 16.7%, 0% to 2.6%, and 0% to 4.4%, respectively. Overall, 0% to 7.5% of surgeries were reported failures, and 0% to 11.1% of shoulders required reoperation, with a revision rate ranging from 0% to 7.7%. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of complications following the primary Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability was variable, ranging from 0% to 25.7%. High rates of graft resorption, degenerative changes, and nonunion were present while failure and revision rates remained low at a minimum 2-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, systematic review of Level I-III studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett R Jackson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Christopher M Brusalis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Sabrina F Schundler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Divesh Sachdev
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Obianuju A Obioha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Johnathon R McCormick
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Enzo S Mameri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; Instituto Brasil de Tecnologia da Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Daniel J Kaplan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Derrick M Knapik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University and Barnes-Jewish Orthopedic Center, Chesterfield, Missouri, U.S.A
| | - Jorge Chahla
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Nikhil N Verma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Masud S, Momtaz D, Betsch M, Migliorini F, Ghali A, Popa A, Gouveia K, Leroux T, Degen R, Khan M. A comprehensive comparison and evaluation of surgical techniques for anterior shoulder instability: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:e531-e547. [PMID: 37541334 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anterior shoulder instability is a common clinical problem; however, conflicting evidence exists regarding optimal treatment algorithms. We perform a comparative analysis of stabilization techniques used for recurrent anterior shoulder instability to identify the one associated with the lowest rate of recurrent instability. We additionally explore how glenoid bone loss and osseus lesions affect recurrence rates. METHODS PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for clinical studies comparing surgical techniques for anterior shoulder instability. Two team members independently assessed all potential studies for eligibility and extracted data. Each included study underwent a risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane risk of bias summary tool. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of recurrent instability, which underwent a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Additional analyses were performed relating to the degree of glenoid bone loss and the presence of osseous lesions. RESULTS Of 2699 studies screened, 52 studies with 4209 patients were included. Patients who underwent open Latarjet demonstrated the overall lowest rate of recurrent instability [log odds ratio (LOR) 1.93], whereas patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair demonstrated the highest (LOR 2.87). When glenoid bone loss was 10% to 20%, open Latarjet had significantly lower recurrent instability (P = .0016) compared to arthroscopic Bankart repair. When glenoid bone loss increased from 0%-10% to 10%-20%, arthroscopic Bankart repair had a significantly increased rate of recurrence (P = .021). In the presence of an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion, both open Latarjet (P = .01) and arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage (P = .029) had significantly reduced recurrence rates compared to arthroscopic Bankart repair. Finally, regardless of procedure, the presence of a Hill-Sachs or bony Bankart lesion was associated with an increased risk of recurrent instability (r = 0.44, P = .0003, and r = 0.40, P = .006, respectively). CONCLUSION The open Latarjet has the overall lowest recurrent instability and significantly lower compared to arthroscopic Bankart repair in the setting of increasing glenoid bone loss. Bone loss between 0% and 10% results in similar outcomes across all procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Masud
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Marcel Betsch
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty of the University Heidelberg, Mannheim, BW, Germany
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, NW, Germany
| | - Abdullah Ghali
- Department of Orthopaedics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Kyle Gouveia
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Timothy Leroux
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ryan Degen
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Moin Khan
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bitar IJ, Bustos DG, Marangoni LD, Robles C, Gentile L, Bertiche P. Outcomes of Open Bankart Repair Plus Inferior Capsular Shift Compared with Latarjet Procedure in Contact Athletes with Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability. THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY 2023; 11:39-46. [PMID: 36793665 PMCID: PMC9903310 DOI: 10.22038/abjs.2022.60208.2974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Background Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift (OBICS) and Latarjet procedure (LA) are considered appropriate treatment alternatives for high-performance athletes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes and recurrence rate of each surgery. Our hypothesis: there were no differences between the two treatments. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted with n=90 contact athletes divided into two groups of 45 patients. One group was treated with OBICS, and the other one with LA. The mean follow-up period was 25 (24-32) months for the OBICS group and 26 (24-31) months for the LA group. Primary functional outcomes of each group were assessed at baseline, six months, one year, and two years after surgery. The functional outcomes were also compared between the groups. The evaluation tools used were the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score (WOSI) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale (ASES). In addition, recurrent instability and range of motion (ROM) were also evaluated. Results In each group, significant changes were found in the WOSI score and ASES scale from pre-op to postop. However, there were no significant differences between the functional outcomes of the groups at the final follow-up (P-values 0.73 and 0.19). Three dislocations and one subluxation (8.8%) were reported in the OBICS group, and three subluxations were reported in the LA group (6.6%), revealing no significant differences between the groups (P=0.37). Moreover, there were no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative ROM in each group or in terms of external rotation (ER) and ER in 90º abduction between the groups. Conclusion No differences were found between OBICS and LA surgery. Both procedures can be indicated according to the surgeon's preference to reduce recurrence rates in contact athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability.
Collapse
|
7
|
Falbo R, Moore A, Singleton A, Steffenson A, Levine J, Miller R. Glenoid bone augmentation: a contemporary and comprehensive systematic review of open procedures. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2022; 14:37834. [PMID: 36045697 DOI: 10.52965/001c.37834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction There is a trend towards arthroscopically treating shoulder instability with glenoid deficiency. Despite this, there remains the option for treatment through an open technique. Multiple bone augmentation options are available for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Objective To provide a systematic review of recent studies for recurrent anterior shoulder instability necessitating glenoid bone augmentation specifically through open procedures using coracoid bone or free bone blocks [iliac crest bone autograft/allograft or distal tibia allograft (DTA)]. Methods PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for studies reporting open glenoid bone augmentation procedures with iliac crest, tibia, or coracoid bones within 10 years. Extracted data included study/patient characteristics, techniques, prior surgeries, prior dislocations, radiographic findings, range of motion (ROM), recurrent instability, patient-reported outcomes, and complications. Results 92 met inclusion criteria (5693 total patients). Six were studies of iliac crest bone, four of DTA, and 84 using the coracoid bone. 29 studies measured postoperative arthritis showing no development or mild arthritis. 26 studies reported postoperative graft position. 62 studies reported ROM noting decline in internal/external rotation. 87 studies measured postoperative instability with low rates. Rowe Scores with noted improvement across 31/59 (52.5%) studies were seen. Common post operative complications included infection, hematoma, graft fracture, nerve injury, pain, and screw-related irritation. Conclusion Despite a trend towards arthroscopic management of recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid deficiency, open procedures continue to provide satisfactory outcomes. Additionally, studies have demonstrated safe and efficacious use of free bone block graft options in the primary and revision setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Falbo
- Orthopedic Surgery, Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center
| | - Austin Moore
- Orthopedic Surgery, Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center
| | - Amy Singleton
- Orthopedic Surgery, Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center
| | | | - Jason Levine
- Orthopedic Surgery, Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center
| | - Richard Miller
- Orthopedic Surgery, Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Menon A, Fossati C, Magnani M, Boveri S, Compagnoni R, Randelli PS. Low grade of osteoarthritis development after Latarjet procedure with a minimum 5 years of follow-up: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30:2074-2083. [PMID: 34677621 PMCID: PMC9165270 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06771-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this systematic review and pooled analysis was to evaluate incidence and risk factors for glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) in patients who underwent Latarjet procedure with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. METHODS The PRISMA guidelines were followed to perform this systematic review. PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to February 29, 2020 for English, human in vivo studies that evaluated glenohumeral OA in patients undergoing Latarjet procedure at least 5 years after surgery. A pooled analysis on the included databases sent by authors was performed to evaluate the risk factors influencing the development or progression of dislocation arthropathy after the Latarjet procedure. RESULTS Four studies, including a total of 280 patients (213 males and 67 females), were analysed. In our study population, the median age at surgery was 25.0 years (range 20.8-32.6 years). and 92.1% were athletes. In 90% of the cases, the number of dislocations before surgery were fewer than 5. The recurrence of instability after Latarjet procedure was observed only in seven patients (2.5%). The position of the bone graft resulted flush to the anterior glenoid rim in 238 cases (85.3%), medial in 8 (2.9%) and overhanging in 33 (11.8%). Radiological signs of development or progression of shoulder OA were observed in 25.8% of the patients, of which 88.6% presented a grade 1 of OA according to Samilson and Prieto classification. The overhanging position of the bone graft resulted statistically significant for onset or worsening of OA. The age at surgery, the number of dislocations before surgery and the Hill-Sachs lesion were not significantly associated with joint degeneration. Instead, hyperlaxity showed a prevention role in the development of OA after open Latarjet procedure. CONCLUSION The Latarjet procedure is a valid and safe surgical treatment in recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a low risk of developing moderate or severe OA also at long-term follow-up. The overhanging position of the bone graft represents the principal risk factor of joint degeneration, whereas the hyperlaxity seems to be protective. Finally, age, gender, time between first dislocation and surgery, and number of dislocations do not seem to affect the onset of OA after Latarjet procedure. Therefore, an accurate execution of the Latarjet procedure can be considered a valid treatment even in young and athletes thanks to the low recurrence rates and the low development of major long-term complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Menon
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milan, Italy ,U.O.C. 1a Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Fossati
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milan, Italy ,U.O.C. 1a Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Magnani
- U.O.C. 1a Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| | - Sara Boveri
- Scientific Directorate, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Malan 1, 20097 Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Compagnoni
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milan, Italy ,U.O.C. 1a Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Simone Randelli
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milan, Italy ,U.O.C. 1a Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122 Milan, Italy ,Research Center for Adult and Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases (RECAP-RD), Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Haratian A, Yensen K, Bell JA, Hasan LK, Shelby T, Yoshida B, Bolia IK, Weber AE, Petrigliano FA. Open Stabilization Procedures of the Shoulder in the Athlete: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. Open Access J Sports Med 2021; 12:159-169. [PMID: 34754248 PMCID: PMC8572104 DOI: 10.2147/oajsm.s321883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Shoulder instability is a relatively common injury especially in the young athletic population and its surgical management continues to remain a controversial topic in sports medicine orthopedics. Anterior instability is the most common type encountered and is estimated to have an incidence rate of 0.08 per 1000 person-years in the general population; however, this figure is likely higher in the young athletic population. While in recent practice, arthroscopic surgery has become the new gold standard for management, reported failure rates as high as 26% and high recurrence rates in specific subpopulations such as young men in high collision sports have led to the consideration of alternative open procedures such as open Bankart repair, Latarjet, capsular shift, and glenoid bone grafting. These procedures may be preferred in specific patient subgroups such as young athletes involved in contact sports and those with Hill-Sachs defects and multidirectional instability, with postoperative recurrence rates of instability as low as 10%. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of different open surgical techniques in the management of shoulder instability and summarize patient outcomes including recurrence rates for shoulder instability, return to sport, range of motion (ROM), muscle strength, and complications either individually by procedure or in comparison with other techniques, with special focus on their impact in the athletic population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aryan Haratian
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Katie Yensen
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer A Bell
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laith K Hasan
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tara Shelby
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Brandon Yoshida
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ioanna K Bolia
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alexander E Weber
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Frank A Petrigliano
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nabergoj M, Zumstein M, Denard PJ, Collin P, Ho SWL, Wang S, Lädermann A. Capsulolabral Reconstruction During the Open Latarjet Procedure. Arthrosc Tech 2021; 10:e2397-e2406. [PMID: 34868840 PMCID: PMC8626587 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgical treatment of anterior glenohumeral joint instability can be challenging and carries the inherent risk of recurrent instability, dislocation arthropathy, and postoperative loss of external rotation. In the current manuscript, a technique for combined reconstruction of anterior labrum and capsule, with concomitant reduction of the humeral head during anterior capsule reconstruction in open Latarjet procedure, is presented. Analogous to other techniques, the coracoid graft is fixed on the anteroinferior part of the glenoid between 3 and 5 o'clock. However, for this technique, reattachment of the labrum is performed between the native glenoid and the bone graft. Additionally, during the reconstruction of the anterior capsule on the coracoacromial ligament, while the operated arm is held in external rotation to avoid the postoperative rotational deficit, the humeral head is reduced posteriorly in the center of the glenoid during adduction, slight anterior forward flexion, and a posterior lever push. By doing so, the inherent theoretical risks of persistent instability and dislocation arthropathy are believed to be decreased. Further studies are needed to clarify the long-term consequences of this surgical technique in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marko Nabergoj
- Valdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Ankaran, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Matthias Zumstein
- Shoulder, Elbow and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Orthopädie Sonnenhof, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Patrick J. Denard
- Department of Orthopaedic & Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Philippe Collin
- Centre Hospitalier Privé Saint-Grégoire (Vivalto Santé), Saint-Grégoire, France
| | - Sean Wei Loong Ho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Sidi Wang
- Research Department, La Tour Hospital, 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland
| | - Alexandre Lädermann
- Research Department, La Tour Hospital, 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva
- Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Address correspondence to Alexandre Lädermann, P.D.-M.D., Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Av. J.-D. Maillard 3, CH-1217 Meyrin, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rai S, Tamang N, Sharma LK, Marasini RP, Singh JL, Khanal K, Ghimire KC M, Sherchan B. Comparative study of arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet procedure for recurrent shoulder dislocation. J Int Med Res 2021; 49:3000605211007328. [PMID: 33845604 PMCID: PMC8047861 DOI: 10.1177/03000605211007328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The primary aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet procedure for recurrent dislocation of the shoulder. The secondary aims were to assess and compare the surgical cost, patient satisfaction, and complications, including recurrence and infection. METHODS We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes of all consecutive patients undergoing either arthroscopic Bankart repair or the open Latarjet procedure from May 2015 to May 2018 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Forty-one patients (32 men, 9 women) in the Bankart group and 40 patients (34 men, 6 women) in the Latarjet group were available for the final follow-up. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences in the demographic parameters or clinical outcomes between the two groups. Functional satisfaction was higher with the Latarjet procedure. Bankart repair had a significantly higher operating cost than the Latarjet procedure. Three patients in the Bankart group and no patients in the Latarjet group developed recurrence. CONCLUSION Both procedures provided satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, the Latarjet group had a higher rate of functional satisfaction and lower operating cost, and there was a trend toward higher recurrence in the arthroscopic Bankart group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saroj Rai
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, National Trauma Center, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Nira Tamang
- Department of Nursing, Norvic International Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Laxmi Kanta Sharma
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, National Trauma Center, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Rudra Prasad Marasini
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, National Trauma Center, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Janith Lal Singh
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, National Trauma Center, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Kiran Khanal
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, National Trauma Center, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Milan Ghimire KC
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, National Trauma Center, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Binod Sherchan
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, National Trauma Center, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gilat R, Haunschild ED, Lavoie-Gagne OZ, Tauro TM, Knapik DM, Fu MC, Cole BJ. Outcomes of the Latarjet Procedure Versus Free Bone Block Procedures for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:805-816. [PMID: 32795174 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520925833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Free bone block (FBB) procedures for anterior shoulder instability have been proposed as an alternative to or bail-out for the Latarjet procedure. However, studies comparing the outcomes of these treatment modalities are limited. PURPOSE To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing anterior shoulder stabilization with a Latarjet or FBB procedure. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from inception to 2019 for human-participants studies published in the English language. The search was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement including studies reporting clinical outcomes of patients undergoing Latarjet or FBB procedures for anterior shoulder instability with minimum 2-year follow-up. Case reports and technique articles were excluded. Data were synthesized, and a random effects meta-analysis was performed to determine the proportions of recurrent instability, other complications, progression of osteoarthritis, return to sports, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) improvement. RESULTS A total of 2007 studies were screened; of these, 70 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. These studies reported outcomes on a total of 4540 shoulders, of which 3917 were treated with a Latarjet procedure and 623 were treated with an FBB stabilization procedure. Weighted mean follow-up was 75.8 months (range, 24-420 months) for the Latarjet group and 92.3 months (range, 24-444 months) for the FBB group. No significant differences were found between the Latarjet and the FBB groups in the overall random pooled summary estimate of the rate of recurrent instability (5% vs 3%, respectively; P = .09), other complications (4% vs 5%, respectively; P = .892), progression of osteoarthritis (12% vs 4%, respectively; P = .077), and return to sports (73% vs 88%; respectively, P = .066). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores improved after both Latarjet and FBB, with a significantly greater increase after FBB procedures (10.44 for Latarjet vs 32.86 for FBB; P = .006). Other recorded PRO scores improved in all studies, with no significant difference between groups. CONCLUSION Current evidence supports the safety and efficacy of both the Latarjet and FBB procedures for anterior shoulder stabilization in the presence of glenoid bone loss. We found no significant differences between the procedures in rates of recurrent instability, other complications, osteoarthritis progression, and return to sports. Significant improvement in PROs was demonstrated for both groups. Significant heterogeneity existed between studies on outcomes of the Latarjet and FBB procedures, warranting future high-quality, comparative studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Gilat
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eric D Haunschild
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Tracy M Tauro
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Derrick M Knapik
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael C Fu
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Brian J Cole
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Background A paucity of literature exists on the outcomes after Latarjet for anterior shoulder instability in patients with seizure disorders (SDs). The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability in patients with SDs. Methods A retrospective review of patients undergoing Latarjet from 2013 to 2017 for anterior shoulder instability with minimum 2 years of clinical follow-up was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients diagnosed with SD, and patients without a history of seizure (control). Demographics, indications, SD details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. The incidence of complications, recurrent instability, revision surgery, and repeat seizure(s) were also examined. Results A total of 53 patients were identified, including 10 shoulders in 9 patients with an SD (88.9% male; mean age, 29.2 years [range, 20-37]), and 44 shoulders in 44 non-SD patients (86.4% male; mean age, 30.3 years [range, 18-52]). The mean follow-up time was 3.4 (range, 2.2-4.8) and 3.8 (range, 2.1-5.6) years in the SD and control group, respectively. During the follow-up period, 4 of 9 (44.4%) patients with an SD (50% shoulders) had a recurrent seizure postoperatively. Of those 4 patients, three sustained a recurrent dislocation of the operative shoulder(s) resulting from a postoperative seizure, including one who dislocated bilateral shoulders from a single seizure event after bilateral Latarjet procedures. There was no recurrent instability in patients who did not sustain a seizure in the postoperative period. Having a seizure in the postoperative period significantly increased the risk of recurrent dislocation (OR = 39.9, P = 0.04). Conclusions Latarjet is a successful operation for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in patients without an SD. While it can still be successful in patients with SD, adequate control of seizures postoperatively is paramount to prevent recurrent instability episodes. Patients with an SD can be advised that if their seizures can remain controlled, they have a high likelihood of clinical success equal to that of patients without an SD.
Collapse
|
14
|
Gilat R, Lavoie-Gagne O, Haunschild ED, Knapik DM, Parvaresh KC, Fu MC, Forsythe B, Verma N, Cole BJ. Outcomes of the Latarjet procedure with minimum 5- and 10-year follow-up: A systematic review. Shoulder Elbow 2020; 12:315-329. [PMID: 33123221 PMCID: PMC7545530 DOI: 10.1177/1758573220945318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to evaluate mid- and long-term outcomes following the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability. METHODS PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane libraries were systematically searched, in line with PRISMA guidelines, for studies reporting on outcomes following the Latarjet procedure with minimum five-year follow-up. Outcomes of studies with follow-up between 5 and 10 years were compared to those with minimum follow-up of 10 years. RESULTS Fifteen studies reporting on 1052 Latarjet procedures were included. Recurrent instability occurred in 127 patients, with an overall random summary estimates in studies with a minimum five-year follow-up of 0-18% (I2 = 90%) compared to 5-26% (I2 = 59%) for studies with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Overall rates for return to sports, non-instability related complications, and progression of arthritis estimated at 65-100% (I2 = 87%), 0-20% (I2 = 85%), and 8-42% (I2 = 89%) for the minimum five-year follow-up studies and 62-93% (I2 = 86%), 0-9% (I2 = 28%), and 9-71% (I2 = 91%) for the minimum 10-year follow-up studies, respectively. All studies reported good-to-excellent mean PRO scores at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The Latarjet is a safe and effective procedure for patients with shoulder instability. The majority of patients return to sport, though at long-term follow-up, a trend towards an increased incidence of recurrent instability is appreciated, while a significant number may demonstrate arthritis progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Gilat
- Midwest Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel,Ron Gilat, 1611 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| | | | - Eric D Haunschild
- Midwest Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Derrick M Knapik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kevin C Parvaresh
- Midwest Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael C Fu
- Midwest Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian Forsythe
- Midwest Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nikhil Verma
- Midwest Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian J Cole
- Midwest Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|