Supramalleolar osteotomy combined with lateral ligament reconstruction and talofibular immobilization for varus ankle osteoarthritis with excessive talar tilt angle

The effects of medial soft tissue release for varus deformity during medial open wedge supramalleolar osteotomy: a cadaveric study

This study was performed to investigate the effects of fibular osteotomy and release of medial soft tissues including posterior tibial tendon (PTT), and deep deltoid ligaments, which act as medial stabilizing structures in medial open wedge SMO. Twelve fresh frozen human legs were obtained and disarticulated below the knee. Experiments were conducted in four steps. First, medial open wedge tibial osteotomy was performed. Second, fibular osteotomy was performed in an inferomedial direction at the same level as the tibial osteotomy. Third, the deep deltoid ligament was released from tibial attachments. Forth, total tenotomy of the PTT was performed behind the medial malleolus. After finishing each step, contact area and peak and mean pressures were measured in the tibiotalar and talofibular joints. Fibular osteotomy after medial open wedge SMO significantly decreased mean pressure in the tibiotalar joint, mean and peak pressures in the talofibular joint. Medial soft tissue release resulted in a remarkable lateral shift and decreased tibiotalar joint loading. However, no remarkable change was observed in the tibiotalar joint during releasing medial soft tissues. The overall peak pressure distribution tended to shift more laterally compared to the value of normal alignment. In conclusion, concomitant fibular osteotomy and release of the deltoid ligament and PTT provide a useful means of minimizing tibiotalar joint stress.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-024-00370-7.

Supramalleolar osteotomy for the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis leads to favourable outcomes and low complication rates at mid-term follow-up: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate both the clinical and radiographic outcomes following supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) in patients with ankle osteoarthritis, and to analyse the level of evidence (LOE) and quality of evidence (QOE) of the included studies.

METHODS

A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting clinical data following SMO for the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis were included and assessed. The level and quality of evidence of the included studies were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies with 1160 patients (1182 ankles) were included. Overall, 78.8% patients presented with post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis. The weighted mean AOFAS score improved from 52.6 ± 9.7 (range 33.8-78.4) preoperatively to 78.1 ± 5.7 postoperatively at weighted mean follow-up of 50.4 ± 18.6 months (range 24.5-99.0).  The most frequently utilised radiographic parameter was the tibial anterior surface angle, which improved from a preoperative weighted mean of 86.3° ± 5.6° (range 76.0°-102.0°) to a postoperative weighted mean of 89.9° ± 3.7° (range 84.9°-99.6°). The complication rate was 5.1% with non-union as the most commonly reported complication (1.6%). Secondary procedures were carried out in 28.2% of patients, the most common of which was implant and hardware removal (17.6%). The failure rate was 6.8%. Two studies were LOE II, 3 studies were LOE III, and 19 studies were LOE IV. The mean Modified Coleman Methodology Score was 59.3 ± 6.6 and the mean MINORS criteria score of all the included studies was 9.5 ± 3.7.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review demonstrates good clinical and radiological outcomes, together with a low failure rate at mid-term follow-up following supramalleolar osteotomy in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. However, a moderate reoperation rate (28.2%) was reported. A low failure rate (6.8%) was reported, which must be interpreted in light of the shortcomings of the design of the included studies and a relatively short follow-up period. In addition, there is a low level and quality of evidence in the current literature with inconsistent reporting of data which underscores the need for further higher quality research to be conducted. Our review highlights that SMO may be an effective and safe procedure in the setting of early-to-intermediate-stage ankle osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Is there an optimal degree of correction for ankle varus deformity after supramalleolar osteotomy? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the angle targeted for in varus ankle deformity after supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT). The aim of this study was to investigate which obtained correction has the best clinical outcome after valgus SMOT.

METHODS

A systematic review according PRISMA guidelines was conducted with studies being eligible for inclusion when published in English, German or Dutch, patients older than 18 years at study entrance, primary or posttraumatic varus ankle osteoarthritis, using any valgus SMOT technique, describing radiological alignment and clinical outcome at baseline and after at least 12 months follow-up. Risk of bias was assessed using the McMaster University Occupational Therapy Evidence-Based Practice Research Group quality assessment tool. The electronical databases PubMed, EMBASE and Cinahl were used as data sources. Included cohorts were categorized according to the mean obtained medial distal tibia angle (MDTA; ranged between 87° and 100°). A linear mixed effect model was used for individual patient data to assess the association between the MDTA and the (difference in) clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Thirty studies including 33 patient cohorts with 922 ankles were identified. At a mean follow-up of 4 years no differences in clinical outcome between correction categories were found. Individual data of 34 ankles showed no relationship between obtained MDTA and clinical outcome either.

CONCLUSION

This review could not demonstrate an optimal degree of correction after valgus SMOT. Results were hampered by biased low quality studies and the widespread use of unreliable 2D alignment measures such as the MDTA.

Efficacy evaluation and systematic review of supramalleolar osteotomy for treatment of varus-type ankle arthritis

BACKGROUND

The current surgical treatment plan for medium-term varus-type ankle arthritis is primarily supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT), but the reliability of this procedure still lacks high-quality evidence-based medical studies, such as randomized controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses of comparative studies.

OBJECTIVE

The current study explored whether significant differences were present in the clinical effect, reoperation rate, complications, and failure rate of this type of surgery.

METHOD

Two researchers searched the relevant literature in seven databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, the China Biomedical Literature Database, the China Academic Journals Full-text Database, the Wanfang database, and the Weipu Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database. The retrieval time spanned the establishment of the specific database up to September 2020, and the literature was screened to determine their final inclusion in the study.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A total of 20 studies were included, including one Chinese and 19 English language studies. The primary indicators included a definitive effect of SMOT on the treatment of medium-term varus-type ankle arthritis. Concerning secondary indicators, although the surgery effect was satisfactory, some patients may require follow-up surgery, which may be unsuccessful with complications. The study results showed that, based on existing literature reports, the effect of SMOT for varus-type ankle arthritis was a satisfactory surgical method with some clinical value for correcting the ankle force line and relieving or even reversing ankle arthritis. However, its risk of complications and failure rate were comparatively high and, accordingly, requires good preoperative planning and close communication with patients. Due to the limited sample size of this study, more data and longer follow-up times involving this type of surgery should be reviewed to confirm this conclusion.

Joint Preservation Strategies for Managing Varus Ankle Deformities

Joint preserving strategies have evolved to a successful treatment option in early and midstage medial ankle OA caused by varus deformity. Though talar tilt can often not be fully corrected, it provides substantial postoperative pain relief, functional improvement, and slowing of the degenerative process. Osseous balancing with osteotomies is the main step for restoration of ankle mechanics and normalization of joint load. Overall, the key for success is to understand the underlying causes that have contributed to the varus OA in each case, and to use all treatment modalities necessary to restore appropriate alignment of the hindfoot complex.

Distal tibial oblique osteotomy for reconstruction of ankle joint congruity and stability

Teramoto distal tibial oblique osteotomy (DTOO) is a joint-preserving surgery for ankle osteoarthritis (AOA). However, there are few articles on the radiological assessment of DTOO. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical outcomes and radiological evaluations of weight-bearing radiographs before and after DTOO. We retrospectively reviewed 52 patients who underwent DTOO between 2007 and 2018. We recorded the Tanaka-Takakura classification, fixation methods, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot Ankle/Hindfoot Scale (JSSF scale), and complications. The tibial articular surface angle (TAS), medial malleolar angle (MMA), tibial lateral surface angle (TLS), talar tilt angle (TTA), and tibiotalar surface angle (TTS) were evaluated using weight-bearing ankle radiographs. The median patient age was 66 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 46 ± 23 months. Two stage 2, 9 stage 3a, 30 stage 3b, and 11 stage 4 according to the Tanaka-Takakura classification were performed using DTOO. The JSSF scale improved significantly from 39.9 ± 13.8 before surgery to 87.2 ± 7.5 after surgery. Seven cases were fixed using a locking plate, and 45 cases were fixed using a circular external fixator. The TAS, MMA, TLS, TTA, and TTS significantly changed before and after DTOO. Radiological evaluation indicated that DTOO influences talar behavior during weight-bearing, and improves the clinical outcomes of AOA.

Simulated operation combined with patient-specific instrumentation technology is superior to conventional technology for supramalleolar osteotomy: a retrospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE

Over the past seven years, our team has designed a simulated operation combined with patient-specific instrumentation (SO-PSI) assisted supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT) method and applied it in the clinic. This study aimed to evaluate the differences between SO-PSI technology and conventional operation (CO) technology for SMOT in preoperative planning, intraoperative application, and postoperative curative effect.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed SMOT data collected from our hospital between October 2014 and December 2018. Patients (n = 28) were enrolled and divided into CO (n = 17) and SO-PSI (n = 11) groups; mean follow-up time was 33.4 (range, 13 to 59) months. We statistically analyzed and compared perioperative data, accuracy of preoperative planning, intraoperative application, difference between pre- and post-operative radiologic ankle angles, changes in American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, range of ankle motion, and Takakura stage after surgery.

RESULTS

All ankle alignments and positions were recovered for both groups. Compared with the CO group, the SO-PSI group had a shorter mean operating time and postoperative hospital stay, a decreased number of fluoroscopy examinations, lower albumin reduction, longer preoperative planning time and preoperative hospital stay, and increased hospitalization expenses. In the SO-PSI group, comparison of ankle angles at preoperative planning and postoperatively revealed good correlation, while this was not the case in the CO group. Mean tibial ankle center discrepancy for the SO-PSI group was 1.86 ± 1.06 mm. On follow-up, all radiologic parameters for the two groups improved significantly; however, the improvement of the tibial anterior surface angle and tibiotalar tilt angle for the SO-PSI group were more obvious than those for the CO group. AOFAS score, VAS score, ankle range of motion, and Takakura stage improved after surgery in both groups; however, the improvements in the SO-PSI group were greater than those in the CO group overall.

CONCLUSIONS

SO-PSI technology can facilitate accurate and rapid preoperative planning for SMOT. In general, compared with conventional technology, SO-PSI has advantages for preoperative planning, intraoperative application, and postoperative curative effect.