Jigless knotless internal brace technique for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a case series study

Outcomes of multiligament knee injury treated with versus without internal brace suture augmentation

PURPOSE

To compare the postoperative outcomes between Internal Brace (IB) and non-IB patients who underwent surgical management of multiple-ligament knee injuries (MLKI).

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical management of MLKI at two institutions between 2010 and 2020 were identified and offered participation in the study via the collection of postoperative functional outcomes for MLKI; Lysholm Knee score, Multiligament Quality of Life (ML-QOL), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive testing (CAT), Pain Interference (PI), Physical Function (PF), and Mobility instruments (MI). The postoperative outcomes and reoperation rates were compared between the IB group and non-IB group.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-six patients were analyzed; 89 were included in the IB group (31.5% female; age 35.6 ± 1.4 years), and 37 were included in the non-IB group (25.7% female; age 38.8 ± 2.4 years). Mean follow-up time of the entire cohort was 37.9 ± 4.7 months [IB: 21.8 + 1.63; non-IB: 76.4 ± 6.2, p < 0.001). The IB group achieved similar PROMIS CAT [PROMIS Pain (51.8 + 1.1 vs. 52.1 + 1.6, p = 0.8736), Physical Function (46.6 + 1.2 vs. 46.4 + 1.8, p = 0.9168), Mobility (46.0 + 1.0 vs. 43.7 + 1.6, p = 0.2185)], ML-QOL [ML-QOL Physical Impairment (36.6 + 2.5 vs. 43.5 ± 4.2, p = 0.1485), Emotional Impairment (42.5 + 2.9 vs. 48.6 ± 4.6, p = 0.2695), Activity Limitation (34.5 + 2.8 vs. 36.2 ± 4.3, p = 0.7384), Societal Involvement (39.1 + 3.0 vs. 41.7 + 4.2, p = 0.6434)] and Lysholm knee score (64.9 + 2.5 vs. 60.4 + 4.0, p = 0.3397) postoperatively compared the non-IB group, but the differences were not significant.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients with MLKI treated with versus without IB, outcomes and reoperation rates trended toward favoring IB, but the study was not sufficiently powered to reach statistical significance. Internal bracing could be useful in the management of MLKI. In the future, matched patient cohorts with more patients are warranted to further evaluate the clinical impact of the internal brace in MLKI.

Suture Augmentation in Orthopaedic Surgery Offers Improved Time-Zero Biomechanics and Promising Short-Term Clinical Outcomes

Ligament and tendon ruptures have historically been addressed with varying techniques involving either repair or reconstruction. More recently, the potential biomechanical benefits of suture augmentation (SA), also known as internal brace, have attracted substantial attention and helped renew interest in ligament repair surgery. We evaluated the biomechanical and clinical outcomes of SA-based techniques in the following sports medicine procedures: medial ulnar collateral ligament repair of the elbow, thumb collateral ligament repair, anterior cruciate ligament repair, Achilles' tendon repair, and deltoid ligament repair. Published data on the use of SA to augment repairs of the ulnar collateral ligament, thumb collateral ligament, anterior cruciate ligament, Achilles' tendon, and deltoid ligament repair demonstrates improved time-zero biomechanical and promising short to mid-term clinical outcomes. However, surgeons must be wary of potential complications, including joint over-constraint, nerve paresthesia, and infection.

Jigless Knotless Internal Brace Versus Other Minimal Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair Techniques in Biomechanical Testing Simulating the Progressive Rehabilitation Protocol

The jigless knotless internal brace surgery (JKIB), an alternative method for minimal invasive surgery (MIS) repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture, has advantages of preventing sural-nerve injury in MIS and superficial wound infection in open surgery, as previous clinical research demonstrates. However, no comparative study on the biomechanical performance between JKIB and other MIS techniques has been reported until now. In this study, 50 fresh porcine Achilles tendons were used to compare the JKIB with open surgery (two-stranded Krachow suture) with other MIS techniques, including Percutaneus Achilles Repair System (PARS), Speedbridge (SB), and Achillon Achilles Tendon Suture System (ACH), using a biomechanical testing with cyclic loading at 1 Hz. This test was used to simulate a progressive rehabilitation protocol where 20 to 100 N was applied in the first 250 cycles, followed by 20 to 190 N in the second 250 cycles, and then 20 to 369 N in the third 250 cycles. The cyclic displacement after 10, 100 and 250 cycles were recorded. The survived cycles were defined as a sudden drop in measured load. In survived cycles, the JKIB group (552.3 ± 72.8) had significantly higher cycles than the open, PARS, and ACH groups (204.3 ± 33.3, 395.9 ± 96.0, and 397.1 ± 80.9, respectively, p < .01) as analyzed by post hoc analysis, but no significant difference as compared with the SB group (641.6 ± 48.7). In cyclic displacement after 250 cyclic loadings, the JKIB group (11.29 ± 1.29) showed no significant difference as compared with PARS, SB, and ACH groups (12.21 ± 1.18, 9.80 ± 0.80, and 11.57 ± 1.10 mm, respectively) and significant less displacement than the open group (14.50 ± 1.85, p < .01). These findings suggest that JKIB could be an option for acute Achilles tendon repair in the MIS fashion due to no larger cyclic elongation compared with other MIS techniques.

Repair of Bilateral Quadriceps Tendon Rupture Using a Modified Knotless Suture Anchor and Internal Brace Technique: Surgical Technique and Case Report

BACKGROUND

Quadriceps tendon rupture (QTR) is a rare clinical condition often caused by indirect injury in healthy people. In addition, spontaneous and bilateral ruptures can occur in patients with predisposing factors, such as endocrine or rheumatic disease. Currently, several QTR repair techniques have been proposed; however, no consensus exists about the best repair technique.

CASE PRESENTATIONS

A 55-year-old man with renal failure secondary to glomerulonephritis suffered from spontaneous bilateral quadriceps tendon ruptures. Based on a knotless suture anchor and internal brace, a novel double-row suture-bridge configuration surgical approach was used to treat the patient. At 11-month follow-up, the patient maintained excellent function, with a Lysholm score of 91 for both knees.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique may be an effective method for repairing ruptured quadriceps tendons.

Jigless knotless internal brace versus other open Achilles tendon repairs using a progressive rehabilitation protocol: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

The jigless knotless internal brace surgery (JKIB), a modified minimal invasive surgery (MIS) for acute Achilles tendon injury, has advantages of preventing sural-nerve injury in MIS and superficial wound infection in open surgery, as demonstrated in previous clinical research. However, to date, biomechanical testing has not yet been validated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty fresh porcine Achilles tendons were used to compare the JKIB with other open surgery techniques, the four-stranded Krackow suture (4sK) and the triple-bundle suture (TBS) in biomechanical testing with cyclic loading set at 1 Hz. This approach simulated a progressive rehabilitation protocol where 20-100 N was applied in the first 1000 cycles, followed by 20-190 N in the second 1000 cycles, and then 20-369 N in the third 1000 cycles. The cycles leading to repair gaps of 2 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm were recorded. The survival cycles were defined as repair gap of 10 mm.

RESULTS

With respect to survival cycles, a significant difference was found among the three groups, in which the TBS was the most robust, followed by the JKIB and the 4sK, where the mean survived cycles were 2639.3 +/- 263.55, 2073.6 +/- 319.92, and 1425.25 +/- 268.96, respectively. Significant differences were verified via a post hoc analysis with the Mann-Whitney U test after the Bonferroni correction (p < 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

The TBS was the strongest suture structure in acute Achilles tendon repair. However, the JKIB could be an option in acute Achilles tendon repair with the MIS technique due to it being more robust than the 4sK, which has been typically favored for use in open repair.

Mini-Open Achilles Repair With a Flat Braided Suture in a Low-Profile Configuration

Achilles repair has evolved over the past 30 years, from large open procedures with high complication rates to shorter, less-invasive procedures with better outcomes. Percutaneous repair has comparable failure rates with open repairs, fewer complications, and faster recovery. However, percutaneous Achilles repairs risk sural nerve injury. A mini-open repair fuses the gap between percutaneous and open procedures, and this approach has the potential to mitigate nerve injury while maintaining the increased efficiency in procedure time and patient recovery. The purpose of this Technical Note and accompanying video is to outline the repair of the Achilles tendon using a mini open repair using a low-profile flat braided suture.