Intramedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures of proximal femur: a consecutive series of 323 patients treated with two devices

Effect of oral trehalose supplementation on inflammation and wound healing in patients with peri-trochanteric fractures: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Peri-trochanteric fractures, common among the elderly with osteoporosis, pose significant morbidity and mortality risks. These fractures are increasing due to the ageing population, with Nordic countries seeing a high incidence. They present challenges for orthopaedic surgeons and can lead to functional decline and high medical costs. Hip fractures have severe consequences, including pain, immobility and increased mortality. Managing wound care is complex, involving various healing phases. Trehalose, a disaccharide with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, has shown promise in wound healing and other health conditions. Studies suggest its potential benefits in reducing inflammation and aiding wound healing in peri-trochanteric fracture patients, but more research is needed to confirm its clinical effectiveness in humans.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial aiming to evaluate the effect of trehalose consumption on patients with peri-trochanteric fractures. The study will include 64 patients meeting specific inclusion criteria and will assess inflammatory markers and wound healing at different time points. Patients will be divided into two groups, one receiving trehalose and the other receiving a placebo for 12 weeks. Various measurements and assessments will be conducted, including biochemical assays, wound assessments, anthropometric measurements and dietary intake evaluations. Data analysis will be performed using SPSS software, and statistical tests will be used to compare outcomes between the intervention and control groups.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1403.191).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials. IRCT20180404039188N5. URL of trial registry record: https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/77572. Registration date: 7 July 2024.

There is no correlation between differences in adverse events and differences in patient-reported outcome measures in orthopaedic trauma randomized controlled trials: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

A recovery without adverse events is a top priority of orthopaedic trauma patients, however many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are only powered to detect a difference in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). While it may be assumed that differences in major adverse event rates between treatment groups will result in differences in PROMs, this has not been established. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of RCTs to evaluate if differences in these outcomes were correlated.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted of online databases to identify RCTs in orthopaedic trauma fracture management that reported both major adverse events and PROMs. Adverse events included secondary surgeries or complications that could negatively affect long-term outcomes (nonunion, chronic regional pain syndrome, etc.). The correlation between a difference (p < 0.05) in adverse events and a difference in PROMs was assessed.

RESULTS

The systematic review yielded 30 RCTs involving 6,769 patients. The primary outcome was a continuous PROM in 70.0 % (21/30). A difference in major adverse events was reported in 23.3 % (7/30) and a difference in PROMs was reported in 6.7 % (2/30). Studies reporting a difference in adverse events, compared to those that did not, were not more likely to report a difference in PROMs (14.3 % (1/7) vs. 4.3 % (1/23); p = 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no correlation between differences in adverse event rates and differences in PROMs in orthopaedic trauma RCTs. Investigators should consider powering studies to detect differences in the major adverse events that both patients and surgeons wish to avoid.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

[Rotationally stable screw anchor (RoSA) vs. Gamma3 Nail (G3N) in pertrochanteric femoral fractures : A functional outcome analysis]

BACKGROUND

The pertrochanteric femoral fracture (PFF) represents one of the most common fracture types throughout Germany. To enable early mobilization of patients, the primary surgical goal is load-stable osteosynthesis. Implant failure still represents the largest group of implant-related complications (>80%).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to document and analyze the influence of the implant on the functional outcome and an evaluation of the rotationally stable screw anchor (RoSA) vs. Gamma3 nail.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a retrospective study 43 patients with PFF (AO 31A1-A3) were included in the study. The influence of the implant on the functional outcome was assessed by 2 standardized questionnaires (SF-36, NMS (New Mobility Score)) and analyzed in a retrospective evaluation.

RESULTS

In the study no significant differences in functional outcome scores ≥ 1 year after osteosynthesis of the PFF could be shown depending on the implant used. There is an overall tendency for a better outcome in the G3N group.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

In the literature the superiority of intramedullary nailing over extramedullary implants is continually discussed. Implant failure is still the most frequent complication. In intramedullary implants, such as the G3N, the primary cause is failure of the head-neck component. For conventional extramedullary implants the biomechanical properties on the femoral shaft also pose a challenge in the case of unstable PFF. The further development of the RoSA to an intramedullary implant could combine the advantages of intramedullary load carriers with the advantages of the blade-screw combination in the head-neck fragment and lead to a reduction in implant-associated complications.

One year "ADAPT system" use for proximal femoral fracture osteosynthesis with intramedullary nail . A case control study

Introduction

Proximal femoral fractures (PFF) are a significant health concern among the elderly, often leading to complications and high mortality rates. Intramedullary nailing is widely considered the most effective treatment for lateral proximal femoral fractures (LPFF), with the Tip Apex Distance (TAD) being a crucial predictor of surgical success. This study aimed to compare outcomes between patients treated with and without the ADAPT (ADAptive Positioning Technology) system, which aids in the precise placement of the cephalic screw.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 97 patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated in 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: those treated with the ADAPT system (group I, n=34) and those treated without it (group II, n=63). Fractures were classified according to AO/OTA classification. The primary outcomes measured were operative time, cephalic screw angle, TAD, and incidence of lag screw cut-out. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and t-tests, with significance set at P < 0.05.

Results

The ADAPT system did not significantly reduce TAD (18.21 mm in the ADAPT group vs. 19.94 mm in the control group, p=0.149). Operative times were similar between the groups. The incidence of lag screw cut-out was low in both groups, with no significant differences. The study confirmed a strong correlation between higher TAD and increased risk of screw cut-out, underscoring the importance of precise screw placement.

Discussion

Computer-assisted surgery, such as the ADAPT system, aims to enhance the accuracy of cephalic screw placement. In this study, the ADAPT system didn't demonstrate a statistically significant advantage in reducing TAD or preventing screw cut-out. Nevertheless, the critical role of TAD in preventing fixation failure was reaffirmed, emphasising the need for precise surgical techniques.

Conclusion

While the ADAPT system did not show a significant advantage in reducing TAD or preventing screw cut-out in this study, the importance of achieving optimal TAD in cephalomedullary nailing was reinforced. Future research should continue to explore the role of computer-assisted systems in enhancing surgical accuracy and improving outcomes for patients with LPFF.

Biomechanical evaluation of a new intramedullary nail compared with proximal femoral nail antirotation and InterTAN for the management of femoral intertrochanteric fractures

Purpose: Surgical treatment is the main treatment method for femoral intertrochanteric fractures (FIFs), however, there are lots of implant-related complications after surgery. Our team designed a new intramedullary nail (NIN) to manage such fractures. The purpose of this study was to introduce this new implant and compare it with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and InterTAN for treating FIFs. Methods: An AO/OTA 31-A1.3 FIF model was built and three fixation models were created via finite element method, comprising PFNA, InterTAN, and the NIN. Vertical, anteroposterior (A-P) bending, and torsional loads were simulated and applied to the three fixation models. Displacement and stress distribution were monitored. In order to compare PFNA and the NIN deeply, finite element testing was repeated for five times in vertical load case. Results: The finite element analysis (FEA) data indicated that the NIN possessed the most outstanding mechanical properties among the three fixation models. The NIN model had lower maximal stress at implants compared to PFNA and InterTAN models under three load conditions. The trend of maximal stress at bones was similar to that of maximal stress at implants. Besides, the NIN model showed smaller maximal displacement compared with PFNA and InterTAN models under vertical, A-P bending, and torsional load cases. The trend for maximal displacement of fracture surface (MDFS) was almost identical with that of maximal displacement. In addition, there was significant difference between the PFNA and NIN groups in vertical load case (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with PFNA and InterTAN, the NIN displayed the best mechanical properties for managing FIFs, including the lowest von Mises stress at implants and bones, and the smallest maximal displacement and MDFS under vertical, A-P bending, and torsional load cases. Therefore, this study might provide a new choice for patients with FIFs.

Holistic Symmetry Assessment Using Pedobarography after Treatment of Pertrochanteric Fractures in Elderly Patients

Pertrochanteric fractures (PFs) are life threatening due to the prolonged immobilization of the elderly patient that affects, indirectly, the function of most organs. PFs may have an impact on the symmetry of the human body and contribute to poor global alignment. The aim of the study is to evaluate the functional, pedobarographic and radiological outcomes in a group of subjects with PFs treated with either a dynamic hip screw (DHS) or an intramedullary gamma nail fixation. A study group of 40 patients, admitted to hospital for pertrochanteric fractures between 2015 and 2019, at a mean age of 74.87 (range 65–99), were enrolled. A control group included 20 subjects free from significant disorders of the musculoskeletal system and any other disorders that might induce a compensatory abnormal gait pattern. Functional results were assessed by the Harris Hip Score, and the plantar pressure distribution and arch index were measured with a pedobarographic examination. Radiographic parameters were assessed based on the preoperative and postoperative standing AP pelvic radiographs and axial projection of the hip. The obtained results were evaluated at 9-month follow-up. The obtained results showed no significant difference between both study groups within the scope of the variables under study. To sum up, surgical treatment, either with DHS or intramedullary gamma nail fixation, and rehabilitation treatment support the symmetry of the musculoskeletal system. However, the full return of symmetry was not achieved at 9-month follow-up compared to the control group.

Methods of Quantifying Intraoperative Blood Loss in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To collect and present the recently published methods of quantifying blood loss (BL) in orthopaedic trauma.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of English-language literature in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines on articles describing the methods of determining BL in orthopaedic trauma published since 2010.

STUDY SELECTION

English, full-text, peer-reviewed articles documenting intraoperative BL in an adult patient population undergoing orthopaedic trauma surgery were eligible for inclusion.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently extracted data from the included studies. Articles were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias and ROBINS-I.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The included studies proved to be heterogeneous in nature with insufficient data to make data pooling and analysis feasible.

CONCLUSIONS

Eleven methods were identified: 6 unique formulas with multiple variations, changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, measured suction volume and weighed surgical gauze, transfusion quantification, cell salvage volumes, and hematoma evacuation frequency. Formulas included those of Gross, Mercuriali, Lisander, Sehat, Foss, and Stahl, with Gross being the most common (25%). All formulas used blood volume estimation, determined by equations from Nadler (94%) or Moore (6%), and measure change in preoperative and postoperative blood counts. This systematic review highlights the variability in BL estimation methods published in current orthopaedic trauma literature. Methods of quantifying BL should be taken into consideration when designing and evaluating research.

Functional Symmetry after Surgical Treatment of Pertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly

Pertrochanteric fractures (PFs) in the elderly and their consequences are among the leading causes of disability; they significantly reduce the quality of life and lead to loss of independence. This article aims to determine the functional and radiological outcomes in a group of patients with PFs treated with either the Dynamic hip screw (DHS) or intramedullary Gamma nail fixation. A total of 618 patients, admitted to hospital for pertrochanteric fractures between 2015 and 2019, at a mean age of 82.40 (range 29–104) were screened. Finally, 78 patients were enrolled. Parameters related to hospital stay and surgery (length of hospital stay, surgery duration) were compared in both groups. Functional outcomes were assessed by the Harris hip score, subjective pain was measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS), and quality of life was evaluated using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The obtained results were evaluated at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Radiographic parameters were measured based on the preoperative and postoperative standing anterior–posterior pelvic radiographs and axial projection of the hip at 6-month follow-up. The results showed no significant difference between groups treated either with DHS or intramedullary Gamma nail fixation within the scope of the variables under study. In conclusion, both analysed methods support the functional symmetry of the musculoskeletal system.

Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are a major healthcare problem, presenting a challenge and burden to individuals and healthcare systems. The number of hip fractures globally is rising. The majority of extracapsular hip fractures are treated surgically.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relative effects (benefits and harms) of all surgical treatments used in the management of extracapsular hip fractures in older adults, using a network meta-analysis of randomised trials, and to generate a hierarchy of interventions according to their outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and five other databases in July 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing different treatments for fragility extracapsular hip fractures in older adults. We included internal and external fixation, arthroplasties and non-operative treatment. We excluded studies of hip fractures with specific pathologies other than osteoporosis or resulting from high-energy trauma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. One review author completed data extraction which was checked by a second review author. We collected data for three outcomes at different time points: mortality and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) - both reported within 4 months, at 12 months and after 24 months of surgery, and unplanned return to theatre (at end of study follow-up). We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) with Stata software, using frequentist methods, and calculated the differences between treatments using risk ratios (RRs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also performed direct comparisons using the same codes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 184 studies (160 RCTs and 24 quasi-RCTs) with 26,073 participants with 26,086 extracapsular hip fractures in the review. The mean age in most studies ranged from 60 to 93 years, and 69% were women. After discussion with clinical experts, we selected nine nodes that represented the best balance between clinical plausibility and efficiency of the networks: fixed angle plate (dynamic and static), cephalomedullary nail (short and long), condylocephalic nail, external fixation, hemiarthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty (THA) and non-operative treatment. Seventy-three studies (with 11,126 participants) with data for at least two of these treatments contributed to the NMA. We selected the dynamic fixed angle plate as a reference treatment against which other treatments were compared. This was a common treatment in the networks, providing a clinically appropriate comparison.  We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for serious and very serious risks of bias, and because some of the estimates included the possibility of transitivity owing to the proportion of stable and unstable fractures between treatment comparisons. We also downgraded if we noted evidence of inconsistency in direct or indirect estimates from which the network estimate was derived. Most estimates included the possibility of benefits and harms, and we downgraded the evidence for these treatments for imprecision.  Overall, 20.2% of participants who received the reference treatment had died by 12 months after surgery. We noted no evidence of any differences in mortality at this time point between the treatments compared. Effect estimates of all treatments included plausible benefits as well as harms. Short cephalomedullary nails had the narrowest confidence interval (CI), with 7 fewer deaths (26 fewer to 15 more) per 1000 participants, compared to the reference treatment (risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.07). THA had the widest CI, with 62 fewer deaths (177 fewer to 610 more) per 1000 participants, compared to the reference treatment (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.12 to 4.03). The certainty of the evidence for all treatments was low to very low. Although we ranked the treatments, this ranking should be interpreted cautiously because of the imprecision in all the network estimates for these treatments. Overall, 4.3% of participants who received the reference treatment had unplanned return to theatre. Compared to this treatment, we found very low-certainty evidence that 58 more participants (14 to 137 more) per 1000 participants returned to theatre if they were treated with a static fixed angle plate (RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.36 to 4.50), and 91 more participants (37 to 182 more) per 1000 participants returned to theatre if treated with a condylocephalic nail (RR 3.33, 95% CI 1.95 to 5.68). We also found that these treatments were ranked as having the highest probability of unplanned return to theatre. In the remaining treatments, we noted no evidence of any differences in unplanned return to theatre, with effect estimates including benefits as well as harms. The certainty of the evidence for these other treatments ranged from low to very low. We did not use GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for early mortality, but our findings were similar to those for 12-month mortality, with no evidence of any differences in treatments when compared to dynamic fixed angle plate. Very few studies reported HRQoL and we were unable to build networks from these studies and perform network meta-analysis.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Across the networks, we found that there was considerable variability in the ranking of each treatment such that there was no one outstanding, or subset of outstanding, superior treatments. However, static implants such as condylocephalic nails and static fixed angle plates did yield a higher risk of unplanned return to theatre. We had insufficient evidence to determine the effects of any treatments on HRQoL, and this review includes data for only two outcomes. More detailed pairwise comparisons of some of the included treatments are reported in other Cochrane Reviews in this series. Short cephalomedullary nails versus dynamic fixed angle plates contributed the most evidence to each network, and our findings indicate that there may be no difference between these treatments. These data included people with both stable and unstable extracapsular fractures. At this time, there are too few studies to draw any conclusions regarding the benefits or harms of arthroplasty or external fixation for extracapsular fracture in older adults. Future research could focus on the benefits and harms of arthroplasty interventions compared with internal fixation using a dynamic implant.

The factors that affect blood loss in intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail in the elderly

PURPOSE

Intertrochanteric femur fractures (IFF) is one of the biggest health problems in elderly population and mostly treated by proximal femoral nails. Although it is done in less invasive technique this method can cause higher blood loss than expected and subsequent allogenic blood transfusions. In this study, we aimed to investigate the factors that were related to the blood loss in proximal femoral nail fixation of IFF including patients' ongoing anticoagulant treatments.

METHODS

231 consecutive patients with IFF who treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation between January 2017 and December 2019 were included the study. The factors that can affect the blood loss determined as patients demographics, time from injury to operation, duration of operation, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, preoperative anticoagulant medications. Hematocrit and hemoglobin were obtained on admission day, postoperative day one and postoperative day 3. Total blood loss and allogenic blood transfusions assessed.

RESULTS

Higher BMI is found related to higher blood loss. The patients who were operated in the first two days after admission had lower blood loss levels independent from anticoagulant use (p = 0.027). Preoperative Hct was higher in patients who did not need RBCs in the perioperative period (p = 0.039). According to the AO classification, A2.1 fractures had lower blood loss levels.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that ongoing anticoagulant treatments of intertrochanteric fracture patients did not increase the perioperative blood loss. The factors affecting blood loss in the proximal femoral nail fixation were BMI, the time to surgery, and fracture type in the elderly.