J-bone graft with double locking plate: a symphony of mechanics and biology for atrophic distal femoral non-union with bone defect

Biomechanical analysis of titanium-alloy and biodegradable implants in dual plate osteosynthesis for AO/ASIF type 33-C2 fractures

Background and objective

Treating geriatric osteoporotic distal femur fractures has always presented challenges, but developing biodegradable materials has brought new opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Despite this progress, there currently needs to be more evidence-based biomechanical guidelines for using dual plate fixation and biodegradable materials in treating osteoporotic comminuted distal femoral fractures.In this study, finite element analysis was conducted to evaluate the mechanical effectiveness of different implant materials (titanium alloys, biodegradable materials, and combinations of both) in the fixation of physiological and osteoporotic distal femoral fractures.

Methods

We constructed finite element models of 33-C2 fractures and three types of plates: the Lateral Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) plate, the titanium-alloy medial plate (TAP), and the biodegradable plate (BP). To evaluate the biomechanical advantages in both physiological femur (PF) and osteoporotic femur (OF) conditions, three scenarios were developed: LISS + TAP, LISS + BP, and double biodegradable plates (DBPs). Five loading conditions were applied to measure structural stiffness, fracture micromotion, and implant stress: medio-lateral four-point bending, antero-posterior four-point bending, axial loading, torsional loading, and sideways falling. Several parameters were examined, including peak Von Mises Stress (VMS) of the femur and lateral plate, maximum displacement, bending angle, torsional angle of fracture, and risk of fracture.

Results

In four-point bending tests, the lateral plate of the DBPs group exhibited a slightly lower peak VMS compared to the LISS + TAP and LISS + BP groups. When subjected to axial loading, the stiffness values of the LISS + TAP (OF) were 1.42 times and 1.86 times higher than LISS + BP (OF) and DBPs (OF) groups, and the peak VMS of lateral plate of DBPs (OF) construct was approximately 2% and 16% lower than that of the LISS + TAP (OF) and LISS + BP (OF) constructs. Under torsional loading, DBPs (OF) demonstrated rotational stiffness that was respectively 2% and 52% greater than that of LISS + TAP (OF) and LISS + BP (OF). Regarding the peak VMS of femur, the values of DBPs (OF) were almost 8% and 15% lower than those of LISS + TAP (OF) and LISS + BP (OF).

Conclusions

The use of DBPs at 11.33 GPa facilitated early mobilization of load-bearing joints but exhibited limited ability to support full weight-bearing activities. Though LISS + TAP met practical strength requirements, one should consider the potential biological irritation and stress shielding. Thus, employing a combination of biodegradable and metal internal fixation is a valid approach to effectively treat weight-bearing joint fractures in clinical practice.

Nonvascularized fibular graft with locking screw fixation for metaphyseal bone loss of distal femur: biomechanical assessment validated by a clinical case series

BACKGROUND

The optimal modality to surgically treat significant bone loss of distal femur remains inconclusive. The objectives of the present study were to assess the mechanical performance of nonvascularized fibular graft (NVFG) with locking screw fixation in distal femur fixation construct by finite element analysis and to retrospectively describe the outcomes of the present technique in clinical cases.

METHODS

Four constructs which the fractured femur was stabilized by LCP-DF alone, dual plating, LCP-DF combined with NVFG, and LCP-DF combined with NVFG (LCP-DF-NVFG-S) with locking screw were assessed the biomechanical performance under physiological loads. For the clinical case series, 12 patients with open intercondylar fracture with metaphyseal bone loss of distal femur were operated by LCP-DF-NVFG-S. The collected data included fracture consolidation, length of NVFG, perioperative complications and objective clinical results.

RESULTS

LCP-DF-NVFG-S demonstrated lower implant equivalent von Mises stress (EQV) stress and better fracture stability than other constructs. A locking screw presented its essence in maintaining the NVFG in the required position and subsequently enhancing the fracture stability. In regard to the clinical series, all fractures were consolidated with an average duration of 27.8 weeks (range 20-32). An average NVFG length was 7.8 cm (range 6-12). No perioperative complication was demonstrated. By the Knee Society score, 1 was considered to be excellent, 9 to be good and 2 to be poor.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of mechanical assessment and case series, LCP-DF-NVFG-S can be an effective technique in the management of metaphyseal bone loss of distal femur.

Medial augmentation plating of aseptic distal femoral nonunions

BACKGROUND

Distal femur nonunions are well-recognized contributors to persistent functional disability, with limited data regarding their treatment options. In the current study, we asked whether additional medial augmentation plating is a feasible treatment option for patients with aseptic distal femoral nonunion and intact lateral implants.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective study including 20 patients treated for aseptic distal femoral nonunion between 2002 and 2017. The treatment procedure included a medial approach to the distal femur, debridement of the nonunion site, bone grafting and medial augmentation plating utilizing a large-fragment titanium plate. Outcome measures were bone-related and functional results, measured by the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Rating Scale (HSS) and the German Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D).

RESULTS

Eighteen of 20 nonunions showed osseous healing at 8.16 ± 5.23 (range: 3-21) months after augmentation plating. Regarding functional results, the mean HSS score was 74.17 ± 11.12 (range: 57-87). The mean SMFA-D functional index was 47.38 ± 16.78 (range 25.74-71.32) at the last follow-up. Index procedure-associated complications included two cases of persistent nonunion and one case of infection.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the assessed outcome measures, augmentation plating is a feasible treatment option, with a high proportion of patients achieving bony union and good functional outcomes and a few patients experiencing complications.

Failure analysis of a locking compression plate with asymmetric holes and polyaxial screws

Locking compression plates (LCP) with asymmetrical holes and polyaxial screws are effective for treating mid-femoral fractures, but are prone to failure in cases of bone nonunion. To understand the failure mechanism of the LCP, this study assessed the material composition, microhardness, metallography, fractography and biomechanical performance of a retrieved LCP used for treating a bone fracture of AO type 32-A1. For the biomechanical assessment, a finite element surgical model implanted with the intact fixation-plate system was constructed to understand the stresses and structural stiffness on the construct. Also, to avoid positioning screws around the bone fracture, different working lengths of the plate (the distance between the two innermost screws) and screw inclinations (±5°, ±10° and ±15°) were investigated. The fracture site of the retrieved LCP was divided into a narrow side and broad side due to the asymmetrical distribution of holes on the plate. The results indicated that the chemical composition and microhardness of the LCP complied with ASTM standards. The fatigue failure was found to originate on the narrow side of the hole, while the broad side showed overloading characteristics of crack growth. When the screws were inserted away from the region of the bone fracture by increasing the working length, the stress of the fixation-plate system decreased. Regardless of the screw insertion angle, the maximum stress on the LCP always appeared on the narrow side, and there was little change in the structural stiffness. However, angling the screws at -10° resulted in the most even stress distribution on the fixation-plate system. In conclusion, the LCP assessed in this study failed by fatigue fracture due to bone nonunion and stress concentration. The narrow side of the LCP was vulnerable to failure and needs to be strengthened. When treating an AO type 32-A1 fracture using an LCP with asymmetrical holes and polyaxial screws, inserting the screws at -10° may reduce the risk of implant failure and positing screws around the fractured area of the bone should be avoided.

Dual plating for fixation failure of the distal femur: Finite element analysis and a clinical series

BACKGROUND

The optimal technique for managing distal femur fixation failure remains inconclusive. The author studied the efficacy of a combined proximal humerus locking compression plate (LCP-PH) and 3.5 mm reconstruction plate (LCP-RP) by finite element (FE) analysis and retrospectively described the clinical outcomes of the present technique in such difficult circumstances.

METHODS

Biomechanical study setting included FE models of the distal femur with remaining holes from previous distal femur LCP (LCP-DF) fixation stabilized with three different constructs i.e., LCP-DF alone, LCP-DF-and-LCP-RP, as well as LCP-PH-and-LCP-RP. All settings were analyzed by using FE under physiological loads. Regarding the clinical series, the outcomes of 8 LCP-DF fixation failures operated on by the present technique were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

High Implant stress of 911.2 MPa and elastic strain at fracture site of 200.8 µɛ were found when stabilized with LCP-DF. The constructs of LCP-DF-and-LCP-RP, and LCP-PH-and-LCP-RP presented lower implant stress compared to LCP-DF, 511.5, and 617.5 MPa, respectively. The elastic strain of both dual plating constructs was also 4-5 times lower than LCP-DF and differed from each other by approximately 10 µɛ. Regarding the clinical series, bony consolidation was achieved in all cases with a mean duration of 28.5 weeks (range 24-36). An average ROM of the affected knee was 115° (range 105-140). Regarding the KSS, 1 was determined to be excellent and 7 to be good.

CONCLUSION

By the biomechanical analysis and the clinical results, the construct of LCP-PH-and-LCP-RP could be an effective technique for revision surgery of LCP-DF fixation failure.

Operative treatment of nonunions in the elderly: Clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients at minimum 75 years of age

BACKGROUND

Limited information exists on nonunion treatment in the elderly. This retrospective study evaluates whether results of operative treatment of nonunion of the humerus or femur in patients aged ≥ 75 years are comparable to those in younger patients.

METHODS

We identified patients age ≥ 75 years with a nonunion of humerus or femur treated with open reduction and internal fixation. The Non-Union Scoring System was calculated. Complications, clinical outcome, and radiographic findings were assessed. Primary endpoint was nonunion healing. A literature review compared time to healing of humeral and femoral nonunion in younger populations.

RESULTS

We identified 45 patients treated for a nonunion of humerus or femur with > 12 months follow-up. Median age was 79 years (range 75-96). Median time to presentation was 12 months (range 4-127) after injury, median number of prior surgeries was 1 (range 0-4). Union rate was 100%, with median time to union 6 months (range 2-42). Six patients underwent revision for persistent nonunion and healed without further complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a protocol of debridement, alignment, compression, stable fixation, bone grafting and early motion, patients aged 75 years or older can reliably achieve healing when faced with a nonunion of the humerus or femur.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Finite element analysis of different medial fixation strategies in double-plate osteosynthesis for AO type 33-C2 fractures

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we evaluated the biomechanical characteristics of different locations of medial fixation strategies in double-plate osteosynthesis for fixing AO/ASIF type 33-C2 fractures by means of finite element analysis.

METHODS

We used 3-matic software and UG-NX software to construct AO/ASIF type 33-C2 fractures and lateral less invasive stabilization system (LISS) plates, medial plates (MPs), and medial support pads (MSPs), respectively. Then, the LISS, MP and MSP were assembled into the fracture model separately to form three fixation models: MSP+LISS, anteromedial plate (AMP+LISS), and MP+LISS. In the next procedure, we performed finite element analysis using ANSYS software after meshing the elements of the models in HyperMesh 11.0 software. Loading conditions including lateral-medial four-point bending, anterior-posterior four-point bending, axial loading, and torsional loading were applied to evaluate the biomechanical advantages among the three fixation types. We observed the peak Von Mises Stress (VMS) value, maximum displacement, bending angle in the coronal plane of the fracture, and torsional angle of the fracture to assess the degree of plate deformation and fixation stability.

RESULTS

Our results showed that in both lateral-medial four-point bending and anterior-posterior four-point bending, the calculations of MP+LISS were marginally better than those of AMP+LISS. However, with the action of axial loading and torsional loading, the deformation of MP+LISS was distinctly smaller than that of AMP+LISS, and the fixation stability of MP+LISS was also prominently better. Under lateral-medial four-point bending, the VMS on the lateral plate of MSP+LISS (59.977 MPa) was approximately half of the two double-plate models. Under anterior and posterior four-point bending, the 38.209 MPa peak VMS of MSP+LISS was still superior to the other two double-plate models. Under torsional loading, the peak VMS (347.75 MPa), the maximum torsional angle of the femoral head (7.852 °), and the torsional angle of fracture (0.036 °) of MSP+LISS preceded those of the other two models. However, under axial loading, the peak VMS (76.376 MPa) and the maximum displacement (3.1798 mm) of MSP+LISS were slightly higher than those of MP+LISS.

CONCLUSION

The MSP+LISS model showed better biomechanical performance than the double-plate models, which might be an effective solution for the treatment of comminuted distal femur fractures.

Union rates and functional outcome of double plating of the femur: systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment strategy for the surgical management of femur fractures and non-unions remains unknown. The aim of this study is to assess union rates, complications and outcome after femoral double plating. Treatment of shaft, distal, periprosthetic fractures and pathological proximal femur fractures as well as femoral non-unions with double plating were evaluated.

METHODS

A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was conducted. Published literature reporting on the treatment and clinical outcome of femoral fractures and non-unions with double plating was identified. In total, 24 studies with 436 cases of double plating, 64 cases of single plating, 84 cases of intramedullary nailing (IM), and 1 interfragmentary screw treatment met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. The evaluated literature was published between 1991 and 2020.

RESULTS

Double plating of femoral fractures achieved high healing rates and few complications were reported. It displayed significantly less intraoperative haemorrhage, shorter surgery time reduced risk of malunion in polytraumatised patients when compared to IM. Fracture healing rate of double-plating distal femoral fractures was 88.0%. However, there were no significant differences regarding fracture healing, complication or functional outcome when compared to single plating. Treatment of periprosthetic fractures with double plating displayed high healing rates (88.5%). Double plating of non-unions achieved excellent osseous union rates (98.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The literature provides evidence for superior outcomes when using double plating in distal femoral fractures, periprosthetic fractures and femoral non-unions. Some evidence suggests that the use of double plating of femoral fractures in polytraumatised patients may be beneficial over other types of fracture fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Infected Non-Union of the Distal Femur

The reported levels of non-union in the lateral locking plate differ widely, with some early studies showing rates of less than 6% and up to 17%-21% in more recent studies. We report a case where better results were shown by a non-union treated with distal femoral nailing with allogenic grafting.