Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures

Haematoma block is the most efficient technique for closed forearm fracture reduction: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Forearm fractures are a common ED presentation. This study aimed to compare the resource utilisation of three anaesthetic techniques used for closed forearm fracture reduction in the ED: haematoma block (HB), Bier's block (BB) and procedural sedation (PS).

METHODS

A retrospective multicentre cohort study was conducted of adult patients presenting to either Port Macquarie Base Hospital ED or Kempsey District Hospital ED in New South Wales, Australia, from January 2018 to June 2021. Patients requiring a closed reduction in the ED were included. ED length of stay (LOS) was compared using a likelihood ratio test. Successful reduction on the first attempt and the number of ED specialists present for each method were both modelled with a linear regression. Staff utilisation by the level of training, cost of consumables and complications for each group were presented as descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 226 forearm fractures were included. 84 used HB, 35 BB and 107 PS. The mean ED LOS was lowest for HB (187.7 min) compared with BB (227.2 min) and PS (239.3 min) (p=0.023). The number of ED specialists required for PS was higher when compared with HB and BB (p=0.001). The cost of consumables and a total number of staff were considerably lower for HB compared with PS and BB methods. PS had the highest proportion of successful reductions on the first attempt (94.4%) compared with BB (88.6%) and HB (76.2%) (p=0.006). More patients experienced complications from PS (17.8%) compared with BB (14.3%) and HB (13.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the HB method was the most efficient as it was associated with a shorter ED LOS, lower cost and staff resource utilisation. Although PS had a significantly greater proportion of successful reductions on the first attempt, HB had fewer complications than BB and PS. EDs with limited resources should consider using HB or BB as the initial technique for fracture reduction with PS used for failed HB or when regional blocks are contraindicated.

Going Solo: Techniques for Emergency Fracture Management Without Assistance

Orthopaedic injuries represent some of the most frequent conditions treated in emergency centers worldwide. Proper reduction techniques and evaluation of radiographic parameters are paramount in treating patients effectively. Orthopaedic providers at large tertiary centers may have several assistants available but are also burdened by notable patient loads and volumes. Frequently, fracture care may necessitate procedures performed by providers without the availability of skilled assistance, both in large tertiary academic centers and small independent emergency rooms with limited resources. As providers at a busy level 1 tertiary trauma center with only one primary orthopaedic resident responsible for the performance of most fracture reductions, we present both novel techniques and refined published approaches that allow the safe, efficient, and reliable reduction and stabilization of several different types of fracture dislocations with limited or no assistance, and only commonly found supplies.

Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Pain in Austere Environments: 2024 Update

The Wilderness Medical Society (WMS) convened an expert panel to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of pain in austere environments. Recommendations are graded based on the quality of supporting evidence as defined by criteria put forth by the American College of Chest Physicians. This is an update of the 2014 version of the "WMS Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Pain in Remote Environments" published in Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 2014; 25:41-49.

Analgesic Techniques for Managing Orthopedic Injuries: A Review for the Emergency Clinician

BACKGROUND

Orthopedic injuries are commonly managed in the emergency department (ED) setting. Fractures and dislocations may require reduction for proper management. There are a variety of analgesic and sedative strategies to provide patient comfort during reduction.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review evaluates hematoma block, intra-articular injection, intravenous regional analgesia (IVRA) (also known as the Bier block), and periosteal block for orthopedic analgesia in the ED setting.

DISCUSSION

Analgesia is an essential component of management of orthopedic injuries, particularly when reduction is necessary. Options in the ED setting include hematoma blocks, intra-articular injections, IVRA, and periosteal blocks, which provide adequate analgesia without procedural sedation or opioid administration. When used in isolation, these analgesic techniques decrease complications from sedation and the need for other medications, such as opioids, while decreasing ED length of stay. Emergency clinicians can also use these techniques as analgesic adjuncts. However, training in these techniques is recommended prior to routine use, particularly with IVRA.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of analgesic techniques for orthopedic procedures can assist clinicians in optimizing patient care.

[Conservative treatment of distal radial fractures]

OBJECTIVE

Distal fracture of the radius is common in all age groups. Under careful consideration of individual indications and contraindications, conservative treatment with reduction and immobilization can have significant advantages over the frequently applied surgical approach, particularly in older patients.

THERAPEUTIC GOAL

Immobilization after closed reduction enables satisfactory wrist function to be achieved according to individual patient expectations.

INDICATIONS

A. Patients with a. significant comorbidities, b. high surgical risk from an anesthesiology perspective (ASA > 3), c. low functional requirements, d. low cosmetic expectations regarding residual visible deformity. B. Young patients with an extension fracture and additional a. < 10° dorsal tilt in the case of extraarticular fractures after closed reduction, b. < 5 mm radial shortening after closed reduction, c. < 2 mm intraarticular displacement after closed reduction.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

A. Patient age < 65 years with an extension fracture and additional a. > 10° dorsal tilt in the case of extraarticular fractures after closed reduction, b. > 5 mm radial shortening after closed reduction, c. > 2 mm intraarticular displacement after closed reduction. B. Flexion fracture for which ligamentotaxis for closed reduction is not possible. C. Open distal radial fracture. D. Fracture dislocations. E. Impairments of peripheral circulation, motor or sensory function of the hand after reduction.

TECHNIQUE

After puncturing the fracture hematoma and infiltrating the fracture gap with local anesthetic, the forearm is suspended using Chinese finger traps on the thumb and middle finger. Constant traction in the longitudinal axis of the forearm is ensured by a weight applied via a wide cushioned cuff to the distal upper arm. Reduction then is enabled with the additional reductive effect of ligamentotaxis. After minimal cushioning of the forearm with cotton wool and crepe bandage, a dorsal gypsum longuette is applied. After the plaster bandage has hardened, peripheral circulation, motor function, and sensitivity are checked. The reduction is controlled by X‑ray and documented.

POSTPROCEDURAL MANAGEMENT

A. General procedures to reduce swelling; sufficient analgesics should be prescribed. B. The circular plaster cast is applied once swelling has subsided sufficiently, generally after 2-3 days. C. The duration of cast wearing should be planned at 5 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients (55 women and 18 men) aged 65-88 years were followed up for 12 months to investigate functional outcomes after surgical and conservative therapy. While surgical patients had better functional scores up to 12 weeks after treatment begin, there was no longer a significant difference in the 6‑ and 12-month follow-up results. The measured grip strength was consistently better in the surgically treated group. Clinically visible deformities were present in 78% of the conservatively treated patients; however, the patients were satisfied with the functional or cosmetic results. No deformities were seen in the surgically treated patients. All fractures were completely healed after 6 months. The rate of complications was significantly higher in the surgery group, with 13 complications compared to 5 in the conservative treatment group.

The hematoma block is not enough as method of anesthesia in reduction of displaced distal radius fractures

BACKGROUND

Two out of three wrist fractures seen in the emergency are displaced but most can be treated conservatively after closed reduction. Patient-reported pain during closed reduction of distal radius fractures varies widely and the best method to decrease the perceived pain has not been well established. The purpose of this study was to assess the pain during closed reduction of distal radius fractures after using the hematoma block as method of anaesthesia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional clinical study including all patients who presented an acute fracture of the distal radius requiring closed reduction and immobilization during a six-month period in two University Hospitals. Demographic data, fracture classification, perceived pain using a visual analog scale at different times of reduction and complications were registered.

RESULTS

Ninety-four consecutive patients were included. Mean age was 61 years. Mean pain score at initial assessment was 6 points. After the hematoma block, the perceived pain during the reduction manoeuvre improved to 5.1 points at the wrist, but increased to 7.3 points at the fingers. Pain decreased to 4.9 points during cast placement and reached 1.4 point after sling placement. The reported pain was higher in women at all times. There were no significant differences according to the according to the type of fracture. No neurological or skin complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The hematoma block is only a mild effective method to reduce the wrist pain during closed reduction of distal radius fractures. This technique decreases slightly the perceived pain in the wrist and does not reduce the pain in the fingers. Other reduction methods or other analgesic techniques may be more effective options.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study. Cross-sectional study - Level IV.

[Translated article] The haematoma block is not enough as method of anaesthesia in reduction of displaced distal radius fractures

BACKGROUND

Two out of three wrist fractures seen in an emergency department are displaced but most can be treated conservatively after closed reduction. Patient-reported pain during closed reduction of distal radius fractures varies widely and the best method to decrease the perceived pain has not been well established. The purpose of this study was to assess pain during closed reduction of distal radius fractures after using haematoma block as method of anaesthesia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional clinical study including all patients who presented an acute fracture of the distal radius requiring closed reduction and immobilisation during a six-month period in two University Hospitals. Demographic data, fracture classification, perceived pain using a visual analogue scale at different times of reduction and complications were registered.

RESULTS

Ninety-four consecutive patients were included. Mean age was 61 years. Mean pain score at initial assessment was 6 points. After the haematoma block, the perceived pain during the reduction manoeuvre improved to 5.1 points at the wrist, but increased to 7.3 points at the fingers. Pain decreased to 4.9 points during cast placement and reached 1.4 point after sling placement. The reported pain was higher in women at all times. There were no significant differences according to the according to the type of fracture. No neurological or skin complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Haematoma block is only a mildly effective method to reduce wrist pain during closed reduction of distal radius fractures. This technique slightly decreases the perceived pain in the wrist and does not reduce the pain in the fingers. Other reduction methods or other analgesic techniques may be more effective options.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study. Cross-sectional study - Level IV.

Radial Nerve Supracondylar Block Versus Fracture Hematoma Block. Comparison of Their Efficacy in Cases of Fractures of the Distal Third of the Radius

Objective  The present study compares the analgesic efficacy of two techniques to perform non-surgical reduction: fracture hematoma block and radial nerve supracondylar block. Methods  Forty patients with fractures of the distal third of the radius, who required reduction, were selected in a quasi-randomized clinical trial to receive one of the anesthetic techniques. All patients signed the informed consent form, except for those who did not wish to participate in the study, had neurological injury, had contraindication to the procedure in the emergency room, or with contraindication to the use of lidocaine. To measure analgesia, the numerical pain rate scale was used at four different moments: preblock, postblock, during reduction, and after reduction; then three differences were calculated: the first between before and after blocking; the second between during reduction and after blockade; and the third between before blocking and after reduction. Results  The fracture hematoma and supracondylar block groups showed the following mean values, respectively: 3.90 (1-10) and 3.50 (-6-10) in difference 1; 4.35 (-5-10) and 5.00 (-3-10) in difference 2; and 4.65 (1-10) and 3.80 (-3-10) in difference 3. Conclusion  Both techniques proved to be efficient for analgesia, with mild superiority of hematoma block, but without statistical significance.

Regional Anesthesia in Upper-Limb Surgery

BACKGROUND

Local and regional anesthesia is associated with numerous clinical and institutional advantages relative to general anesthesia. As anesthesiologists and surgeons increasingly integrate local and regional anesthesia into their clinical practice, an understanding of the principles, evolution, and trends underpinning modern anesthetic techniques continues to be relevant.

METHODS

A review of the literature in databases Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE identified recent developments, ongoing trends, and historical milestones in upper-limb regional anesthesia.

RESULTS

Advances in regional anesthetic techniques in the last century have led to reduced postoperative pain, improved safety, and improved outcomes in upper-limb surgery. The development of ultrasound-guided techniques, as well as pharmacological advances in local anesthetic drugs and adjuncts, has further advanced the role of regional anesthesia. Wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet has allowed certain procedures to be performed on select patients in outpatient and low-resource settings.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides an overview of local and regional anesthesia in the upper-limb from its historical origins to its contemporary applications in upper-limb surgery, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Applying the WALANT technique to surgical treatment of distal radius fractures

The Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) method is a recent anesthesia option for surgery of the upper limbs based on the injection of an anesthetic solution containing adrenaline at the surgical site, hence circumventing tourniquet use. In a prospective study, we compared the functional outcomes using this anesthesia technique with those of the regional anesthesia (RA) technique for the surgical care of distal radius fractures (DRF). From November 2019 to June 2020, a non-randomized, single-center study was conducted with a cohort of 41 patients suffering from a DRF and who received volar plate fixation at a university hospital center. Twenty-one patients had WALANT surgery and 20 had RA with installation of a tourniquet. Over a period of 7 months, the clinical and radiological outcomes as well as the QuickDASH functional score were evaluated. Recovery of wrist function return to work, and analgesic withdrawal for the WALANT group occurred earlier than for the RA group. No noticeable differences were found regarding surgery duration or radiographic results. Using WALANT, functional wrist recovery occurs earlier than with RA. In our study, earlier analgesic stoppage, a quicker return to work and resumption of activity were observed with WALANT. As such, it should become part of the therapeutic arsenal for surgical treatment of DRF.