Radiocarpal joint stiffness following surgical treatment for distal radius fractures: the incidence and associated factors

Effectiveness of the static progressive Joint Active System splint in improving upper extremity joint stiffness

PURPOSE

Injuries to the upper extremity often result in stiffness. The joint capsule may lose its elastic properties, limiting motion. Most modalities for increasing motion are based on capsule stretching, and usually involve physical or occupational therapy. We tested the hypothesis that the Joint Active System static-progressive splint is helpful in increasing range of motion in stiff joints after failure of other treatments.

METHODS

Candidates for the Joint Active System splint were mostly patients with upper extremity trauma that required surgery, if they plateaued after therapy but still had stiffness. A retrospective review was performed of all patients from 2015 to 2019 that met our inclusion criteria. Etiologies of stiffness and patient demographics were documented. Range of motion was recorded before and after treatment and, when available, functional scores were calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were treated with the Joint Active System splint; 5 were excluded, leaving 39 for analysis: 15 elbow, 14 wrist and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints. All patients had received therapy before using the Joint Active System and 11 had tried a dynamic splint in addition to therapy. All joints showed significant improvement in motion after treatment: from 66.5° to 95.7° in the elbow, 63.5° to 81.1° in the wrist and 33.2° to 51.8° in the proximal interphalangeal joint. When functional scores were available before and after treatment, there was significant improvement for both elbow and wrist. Even when the Joint Active System was started many months after injury, it was effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite reaching a plateau with therapy, the Joint Active System static-progressive splint is effective in improving range of motion in elbow, wrist and finger joints with stiffness following injury or surgery.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective case series.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, level IV.

Surgical treatment of distal radius fractures: impact on forearm rotation in non-elderly patients

Forearm rotation restriction (FRR) is common after surgery for distal radius fractures (DRFs). The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of DRFs on forearm rotation. This retrospective study reviewed patients with DRFs who underwent surgical treatment from January 2019 to December 2021. The patients' basic data and radiographic parameters were analyzed. Forearm rotation, including pronation and supination, was assessed using a standard goniometer. The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score was evaluated, and the incidence of FRR at the 6-month follow-up was recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors correlated with FRR. A total of 127 patients with DRFs were included in this study. After surgery, 46 cases were considered to have FRR, with a rate of 36.2%, while the remaining 81 cases (63.8%) did not have FRR. The PRWE scores were 22.8 ± 5.2 and 17.9 ± 4.2 in the FRR group and non-FRR group, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the involvement of the sigmoid notch (OR, 2.88; 95% CI 1.49-5.56), post-operative volar tilt < 0° (OR, 2.16; 95% CI 1.34-3.50), and post-operative ulnar variance > 0 mm (OR, 1.37; 95% CI 1.06-1.78) were independently associated with the incidence of FRR. The FRR is associated with an increased PRWE score and may have had some impact on the patient's daily life. Fractures involving the sigmoid notch, dorsal angulation, and radial shortening deformity were found to be correlated with the incidence of FRR. Preoperative risk notification and intraoperative preventive measures are necessary for these patients.

Complications of operatively treated distal radial fractures

Distal radial fractures represent the most common fractures of the upper extremity. Operative treatment is performed for approximately one-third of distal radial fractures in the adult population. Complications following operative treatment of distal radial fractures vary depending on the treatment modality and can be stratified into preoperative and postoperative complications. Complications can occur in the near, intermediate and long term. The most common complications seen are tendon irritation and rupture, chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS), carpal tunnel syndrome, ulnar or radial neuropathy, compartment syndrome, malunion, inadequate fixation or loss of fixation, symptomatic hardware, post-traumatic arthritis, stiffness and infection. Careful planning, treatment and patient selection can help to mitigate these complications.Level of evidence: V.

An evaluation of wrist and forearm movement during purposeful activities and range of movement exercises after surgical repair of a distal radius fracture: A randomized crossover study

PURPOSE

Following surgical repair of distal radius fractures, range of movement (ROM) exercises are the primary approach for restoring movement during early rehabilitation. Specified purposeful activities can also be used, but the movement produced by activities is not well-understood. The study aimed to evaluate and compare movement during purposeful activity and ROM exercises METHODS: Thirty-five adults with a surgically repaired distal radius facture undertook two 10-minutes interventions: purposeful activity (PA) and active ROM exercises (AE), separated by a 60 minute washout, in random order. Data collection occurred during a single session on the same day. Electrogoniometry was used to measure time-accumulated position (TAP), a global metric of movement range and amount, maximum active end range, movement repetitions, excursions >75% of available ROM, and active time. Data were analyzed using linear mixed and generalized linear mixed regression models.

RESULTS

Purposeful activities selected were predominantly household or food preparation. TAP was significantly higher during AE than PA: -1878 [-2388, -1367], p ≤.001, for wrist extension/flexion. PA produced significantly greater movement repetitions for wrist extension/flexion and deviation, excursions beyond 75% of available ROM, and active time, than AE. During PA the wrist was extending/flexing a mean of 97% [92, 101], of the time, compared with 43% [40, 47], during AE. There were no significant differences in maximum end range for wrist extension between PA, 33.7° [29.8, 37.5] and AE, 34.5° [30.7, 38.4], or for ulnar deviation.

CONCLUSIONS

ROM exercises produced higher volumes of sustained joint position than purposeful activity but activities, selected for importance and challenge, produced significantly higher volumes of continuous, repetitious motion in equivalent ranges of movement as exercise repetitions. The study challenges therapists to consider the rehabilitative potential of movement produced by activity for restoring movement and function in the early postoperative weeks.

The effect of distal radius fractures involving the distal radioulnar articular joint on forearm rotation

Background

The objective of this study was to predict the function of the forearm rotation on the basis of the articular surface of the sigmoid notch from three-dimensional reconstruction images.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent volar plate fixation for intra-articular distal radius fractures (DRFs) in our institution between January 2017 and July 2019. The 3D image of the sigmoid notch on the fractured distal radius was reconstructed and looked up from the ulnar view to determine the existence of gaps or steps. Patients with or without gaps/steps on the sigmoid notch were included in the case group or control group, respectively. The patients’ basic data and postoperative data were collected and compared.

Results

A total of 81 patients were included. There were 33 patients in the case group, and 48 patients in the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups at baseline. The total range of motion (ROM) of rotation in the case group and control group was 130.3 ± 6.2° and 145.3 ± 6.7°, respectively (P < 0.001). The percentage of rotation ROM of contralateral limb in the case group and control group was 72.3 ± 3.1% and 80.7 ± 3.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). VAS during forearm rotation was 2.1 ± 0.7 in the case group, which is significantly higher than that in the control group (1.5 ± 0.5, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study proposed a new method to assess the articular surface of the sigmoid notch which is based on 3D reconstruction images. With the assistance of this method, we found that gaps or steps on the sigmoid notch not only limit forearm pronation rotation and supination rotation, but also cause apparent wrist pain during forearm rotation movement and poor wrist ability.