Effect of the presence of the articular cartilage on the femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty in female and varus osteoarthritis knees

Femoral cartilage thickness measured on MRI varies among individuals: Time to deepen one of the principles of kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A systematic review

Purpose

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA), as a pure resurfacing procedure, is based on matching implant thickness with bone cut and kerf thickness, plus cartilage wear. However, the assumption of a consistent 2 mm femoral cartilage thickness remains unproven. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature concerning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of femoral cartilage thickness in non‐arthritic patients. Our hypothesis was that cartilage thickness values would vary significantly among individuals, thereby challenging the established KA paradigm of ‘one‐cartilage‐fits‐all’.

Methods

Systematic literature searches (Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane Library) followed PRISMA guidelines. English‐language studies assessing distal and posterior femoral cartilage thickness using MRI in non‐arthritic adults were included. Studies lacking numerical cartilage thickness data, involving post‐operative MRI, considering total femoro‐tibial cartilage thickness, or failing to specify the compartment of the knee being studied were excluded.

Results

Overall, 27 studies comprising 8170 MRIs were analysed. Weighted mean femoral cartilage thicknesses were: 2.05 ± 0.62 mm (mean range 1.06–2.6) for the distal medial condyle, 1.95 ± 0.4 mm (mean range 1.15–2.5) for the distal lateral condyle, 2.44 ± 0.5 mm (mean range 1.37–2.6) for the posterior medial condyle and 2.27 ± 0.38 mm (mean range 1.48–2.5) for the posterior lateral condyle.

Discussion

Femoral cartilage thickness varies significantly across patients. In KA TKA, relying on a fixed thickness of 2 mm may jeopardize the accurate restoration of individual anatomy, leading to errors in implant coronal and rotational alignment. An intraoperative assessment of cartilage thickness may be advisable to express the KA philosophy at its full potential.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Evaluation of the External Rotation of the Femur Component in Functionally Aligned Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background The conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for grade 4 knee arthritis lacks individualized strategies for determining femur component rotation, contributing to suboptimal clinical outcomes and heightened patient dissatisfaction. Methods One hundred consecutive active robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) patients were retrospectively evaluated. The control group is the patients undergoing conventional TKA for grade 4 arthritis of the knee joint, where the femoral component is placed in a fixed 3-degree external rotation. The study aimed to explore the relationships between the posterior femoral axis of the functionally aligned TKA (FAA), the trans-epicondylar axis (TEA), and the posterior condylar axis (PCA). Specifically, it investigated whether there is a statistically significant difference in femoral component rotation between the functionally aligned TKA (FTKA) and the conventional 3-degrees of external rotation of the femoral component used in traditional TKA (C-TKA). Internal rotation is indicated by a negative value for the femur component. A student's t-test was employed to compare mean rotation values between FTKA and C-TKA, with a p-value below 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results A total of 100 patients (male: female, 11:89) were studied. The FAA was externally rotated in relation to the TEA (mean 1.451°, SD 1.023°, p-value <0.0001). As regards the PCA, the FAA was externally rotated (mean 2.36°, SD 2.221°, p-value 0.0002). These findings demonstrate a statistically significant difference in femoral component rotation between FTKA and C-TKA. Clinically, no patellofemoral complications or premature loosening were observed at one-year follow-up. Conclusion Functional alignment TKA technique resulted in external rotation of the femur component with respect to TEA and PCA. This negates the null hypothesis, indicating a statistically significant difference amongst the femur component rotation implanted according to the FTKA concept with robotic assisted technology and C-TKA.

Lateral distal femoral condyle has more uniform cartilage wear in varus knee osteoarthritis

Bone resection is highly valued in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but how to determine the amount of distal femur resection is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to explore how to use lateral condyle as a reference for distal femoral osteotomy in TKA. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Radiographic images from 118 nonarthritic subjects and 123 osteoarthritis (OA) subjects were used to assess the cartilage wear pattern of the distal femur in varus knees. Measurements were performed on three-dimensional reconstruction after virtual bone cutting. The difference between the resection amount of distal (0°) and posterior (90°) was calculated when the medial condyle was used as a reference in OA patients. The osteotomy amount on lateral was calculated in nonarthritic subjects when the medial condylar osteotomy was consistent with the thickness of the implants. In 43% of OA patients, there was > 1 mm difference between the 0° and 90° in medial condyle cartilage, and no difference was observed in lateral. When using medial condyle as a reference for osteotomy, there was a difference of 1.3 ± 0.56 mm between the resection amount of 0° and 90°, and the difference was 0.24 ± 0.27 mm when using lateral condyle. Statistical analysis showed that there was a linear correlation between the resection amount of lateral condyle and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) in nonarthritic subjects (r = 0.845, p < 0.001). Lateral distal femoral condyle has more uniform cartilage wear in varus knee osteoarthritis. Using the lateral condyle as the reference for distal femoral osteotomy is more suitable for the cartilage wear pattern of the varus knee. The position of cutting guide can be adjusted by preoperative measurements of mLDFA.

Is the Surface Anatomy of the Popliteal Crease Related to Lower Extremity Alignment or Knee Osseous Morphology? A Radiographic Study

Background and objectives: The popliteal crease varies among individuals, and there has been no prior study on this aspect. We assumed that it may be associated with lower extremity alignment and osseous morphology. To demonstrate this, we conducted a radiographic analysis. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 121 knees of 63 patients, whose popliteal creases were well distinguished on clinical photographs. PCOA was defined as the angle between the longitudinal axis of the lower leg and the popliteal crease. Through the radiologic examinations performed, the HKA, MPTA, mLDFA, JLCA, MFCA/TEA, and PCA/TEA were measured. Pearson correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were performed on the PCOA and the six radiologic measurements to analyze the relationship. Results: Pearson correlation analysis found HKA had the highest coefficient at 0.568. In multiple linear regression, only HKA was associated, excluding all other measurements. Conclusions: Popliteal crease obliquity is significantly associated with coronal plane lower extremity alignment and exhibits a stronger correlation than with underlying knee osseous morphology. If future research is conducted based on this, popliteal crease could serve as a valuable clue for predicting lower extremity alignment and the risk of osteoarthritis development.

Postoperative femoral component rotation using posterior condylar referencing is difficult to predict preoperatively in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Many modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems use posterior condylar axis (PCA) to derive the surgical trans-epicondylar axis (sTEA), which is widely regarded as the gold standard for femoral component rotation. However, the previous imaging studies showed that cartilage remnants can alter component rotation. We therefore conducted this study to determine how the postoperative femoral component rotation deviated from the preoperative plan using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) which does not consider cartilage thickness.

METHODS

A total of 123 knees of 97 consecutive osteoarthritis patients who underwent the same primary TKA system using PCA reference guide were included. External rotation was set at 3°or 5° according to the preoperative 3D CT plan. The number of varus knees (hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle >5° varus) and valgus knees (HKA >5° valgus) were 100 and 5, respectively. The deviation from the preoperative plan was measured using overlapping pre- and postoperative 3D CT images.

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation, range) deviation from the preoperative plan in varus group, external rotation setting of 3°, 5° in varus group and valgus group were 1.3° (1.9°, -2.6° - 7.3°), 1.0° (1.6°, -2.5° - 4.8°), 3.3° (2.3°, -1.2° - 7.3°), and -0.8° (0.8°, -2.0°-0.0°), respectively. No correlation was found between the deviation from the plan and the preoperative HKA angle in varus group (R = 0.15, P = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of asymmetric cartilage wear for rotation in the present study was supposed to be approximately 1° as mean value, but it can vary widely from patient to patient.

Semiactive robotic-arm system versus patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty: Efficacy and accuracy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the difference in efficacy and accuracy during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) among robotic-arm system, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional TKA (COTKA).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 90 advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients in our hospital between June 2019 and December 2020 was conducted. Patients were divided into robotic arm-assisted (RA)TKA (group A), PSITKA (group B) and COTKA (group C), 30 cases in each group. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and length of hospital stay were counted. Imaging data of hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), posterior condylar angle (PCA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and sagittal tibial component angle (sTCA) were statistically analyzed. The postoperative recovery of the patients was evaluated by Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Western Ontario Mac Master University Index Score (WOMAC).

RESULTS

Group A had the least intraoperative bleeding. For operation time, group A was the longest compared with group B and group C (P < 0.05), while group B was longer than group C (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in HKA, LDFA, and MPTA among the three groups, and the lower limb alignments were all restored to the neutral position. PCA of group A and B were both smaller than that of group C and closer to 0° (P < 0.05), but the difference between group A and B was not statistically significant. The sTCA in group A was significantly better than group B, and group B was significantly better than group C (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in function scores among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the PSI and CO, RA is more minimally invasive and more accurate in radiographic results.

The Presence of Cartilage Affects Femoral Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Objective

To assess the difference between the posterior condylar angle (PCA) and the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) in the osseous and cartilaginous contours in a non-arthritic Chinese population.

Methods

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were obtained from 83 patients with knee injuries before arthroscopy, and femur and distal femoral cartilage three-dimensional (3D) models were constructed. The 3D cartilage model was arranged to share physical space with the 3D femoral model, and then PCA and mLDFA were measured on the osseous and cartilaginous contours, respectively. The differences between the measurements with and without cartilage were evaluated.

Results

The average PCA with cartilage was 2.88 ± 1.35° and without was 2.73 ± 1.34°. The difference was significant in all patients and females but not in males. The average mLDFA with cartilage was 84.73 ± 2.15° and without cartilage was 84.83 ± 2.26°, but the difference was statistically insignificant in all groups.

Conclusion

PCA on the osseous and cartilaginous contours significantly differed with and without cartilage in the female group, suggesting that cartilage thickness should be considered during preoperative femoral rotational resection planning.