Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using two blind transverse semi-patella tunnels and an implant-free technique for patellar fixation: a technical note

Radiographic Landmark Measurements for the Femoral Footprint of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex May Be Affected by Visible Femoral Shaft Length on Lateral Knee Radiographs

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of visible femoral shaft length on the accuracy of radiographic landmarks of the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC).

METHODS

In 9 cadaveric knees, the MPFC footprint was exposed on the medial femur, and its proximal and distal boundaries were marked. Lateral fluoroscopic images of the knee were assessed in 1-cm length increments, beginning 1 cm proximal to the medial condyle and continuing proximally to 8 cm. The MPFC midpoint was described on each image relative to the posterior cortical line of the femur and a line perpendicular to this line through the proximal margin of the medial condyle. In addition, the MPFC midpoint was assessed relative to a line from the proximal posterior cortex to the midpoint of Blumensaat line.

RESULTS

Using the posterior cortical line as a reference, the MPFC radiographic landmark moved anteriorly with decreasing visible femoral shaft on radiographs, particularly at 4 cm and less. However, no proximal-distal change was noted. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a relationship between visible femoral shaft and MPFC position on radiographs (R = 0.461, R2 = 0.212, B = -0.636, P < .001). For every centimeter decrease in the visible femoral shaft, the radiographic MPFC footprint moved anteriorly by 0.636 mm. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a minimum of 4 cm of femoral shaft on lateral radiographs is required for accurate MPFC footprint localization (area under the curve = 0.80; sensitivity = 76.7%; specificity = 69.0%; P < .001). In contrast, no anterior-posterior change was seen when referencing a line from the proximal posterior cortex to the midpoint of Blumensaat line.

CONCLUSIONS

When using the posterior cortical line to identify the midpoint of the MPFC, at least 4 cm of femoral shaft should be visible for accurate assessment. If less than 4 cm of shaft is visible, a line through the midpoint of Blumensaat line and the proximal posterior cortex can be used as an alternative method to estimate the position of the femoral footprint.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As fluoroscopy is frequently used intraoperatively for MPFC reconstruction, our findings may serve as a guide when assessing femoral tunnel placement on fluoroscopy.

The 100 Top-Cited Articles on Medial Patellofemoral Ligament: A Bibliometric Analysis and Review

Background

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has been investigated widely in the past 30 years, resulting in many research achievements in this field.

Purpose

To perform a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to evaluate the 100 top-cited articles on the MPFL.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

We searched the Scopus database in December 2022 using the terms "medial patellofemoral ligament" OR "MPFL." The search was confined to English-language articles, including technical notes, systematic reviews on clinical outcomes and/or complications, clinical studies, studies regarding complications, and basic science articles (either cadaveric or biomechanical); we excluded letters, case reports, personal opinions, guidelines, editorials, and narrative or other types of reviews. Analysis of the 100 top-cited articles was performed according to total number of citations, average citations per year (ACY), study type, country of origin, journal of publication, affiliated institution, and most published authors.

Results

The total number of citations was 16,358 (range of citations per article, 72-692). The majority of articles were published as clinical studies (54%), with cadaveric studies being the second most common (21%). Most studies originated in the United States (32%), with Japan (15%) and Germany (13%) following. The American Journal of Sports Medicine published the majority of the 100 top-cited articles (37/100; 6304 citations) as well as the 10 top-cited articles according to ACY (7/10; mean, 285.14 citations). The most prolific authors were Nomura (8 articles); Burks (6 articles); and Inoue, Sillanpää, and Dreyhaupt (5 articles each).

Conclusion

By analyzing the characteristics of the 100 top-cited articles, this study demonstrated that the MPFL is a growing and popular area of research, with the focus varying through timeline trends. Questions regarding MPFL anatomy, isometry, and biomechanics might have been answered adequately, but research regarding optimal fixation technique under various circumstances is still ongoing.

Soft-tissue fixation is not inferior to suture-anchor fixation in reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using a nonresorbable suture tape

PURPOSE

Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL-R) with nonresorbable suture tape (FiberTape^®, FT) is becoming popular. Patella-side fixation of the FT can be performed with suture anchors or via soft-tissue fixation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether patella-side soft-tissue fixation can achieve equivalent primary stability compared to suture-anchor fixation.

METHODS

In ten human, fresh-frozen knee joint specimens (m/f 6/4; age 74 ± 9 a), the MPFL was identified and dissected near the femoral insertion site. In five knee joints, the MPFL-R using FT was performed with soft-tissue fixation at the patella (study group; SG), and in five knee joints, the FT was fixed via suture anchors (control group, CG). All reconstructions were evaluated until load to failure of the patella-side fixation with a displacement rate of 200 mm/min.

RESULTS

The mean maximum load to failure in the SG was 395.3 ± 57.9 N. All reconstructions failed by complete tearing off the medial patellar retinaculum from its medial patellar margin, but fixation of the FT remained stable. In the CG, the mean maximum load to failure was 239.4 ± 54.5 N and was significantly different compared to the SG (p = 0.04). All reconstructions failed via pullout of the suture anchors. Stiffness and elongation did not differ between the groups, and no failure of the FT was observed in any of the specimens.

CONCLUSION

Primary stability of soft-tissue MPFL-R using FT was superior to suture-anchor fixation. Both fixation techniques provided sufficient primary stability, superior to previously reported native MPFL tensile strengths. MPFL-R with FT could be a possible alternative procedure for MPFL-R, eliminating potential complications due to autologous tendon graft harvesting.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using a digital tensiometer to determine graft tension: Surgical technique and mid-term follow-up

PURPOSE

The optimal method for achieving proper graft tension during patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is a topic of debate. In the past, a digital tensiometer was used to simulate the knee structure, and a tension of approximately 2N was identified as suitable for restoring the patellofemoral track. However, it is unclear whether this tension level is sufficient during the actual surgery. The objective of this study was to verify the efficacy of graft tension using a digital tensiometer for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and to conduct a mid-term follow-up.

METHODS

The study enrolled 39 patients who had experienced recurrent patellar dislocation. Preoperative computed tomography scans and X-rays confirmed patellar instability, patellar tilt angle patellar congruence angle and the history of dislocation and patellar apprehension test. Knee function was evaluated using preoperative and postoperative Lysholm and Kujala scores.

RESULTS

The study included 39 knees, comprising 22 females and 17 males, with an average age of 21.10 ± 7.26. The patients were followed up for at least 24 months through telephone or face-to-face questionnaires. All patients had a preoperative history of ≥2 patellar dislocations, none of which were surgically treated. During surgery, all patients underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction and lateral retinacula release. The mean Kujala and Lysholm scores were 91.28 ± 4.90 and 90.67 ± 5.15, respectively. The mean PTA and PCA were 11.5 ± 2.63 and 2.38 ± 3.58, respectively. The study found that a tension of approximately 27.39 ± 5.57N (14.3-33.5N) was required to restore the patellofemoral track in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation. No patients required reoperation during the follow-up period. Overall, 36 out of 39 patients (92.31%) reported no pain when completing daily activities at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, a tension level of approximately 27.39 ± 5.57N is necessary to restore normal patellofemoral relationships during clinical practice, which indicates that using a tension of 2N is too low. The use of a tensiometer during patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is a more accurate and reliable surgical procedure for treating recurrent patellar dislocation.

Hardware-free MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability is safe and effective

PURPOSE

This systematic review evaluated the clinical outcomes of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction techniques in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, focusing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), redislocation rate, and complications. The hypothesis was that hardware-free MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability is safe and effective.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Virtual Health Library databases were accessed in October 2021. All the clinical studies investigating the efficacy and feasibility of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction were screened for inclusion. Only studies with a minimum 24-month follow-up were considered eligible. Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale improvement and redislocation rate after surgical treatment were evaluated as primary outcomes. The rate of postoperative complications was evaluated as a secondary outcome. The quality of the methodological assessment was assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the present systematic review. The quality of the methodological assessment was moderate. Short- to long-term improvement of Kujala score was observed in all included studies. Mean score improvement ranged from + 13.2/100 to + 54/100, with mean postoperative scores ranging from 82/100 to 94/100. Patellar redislocation was observed in 8.33% (8 of 96) patients.

CONCLUSION

Hardware-free MPFL reconstruction with or without associated soft-tissue or bony realignment procedures provided reliable clinical improvements and was associated with a low rate of redislocation in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability. Advantages such as safety, femoral physis preservation, and comparable complication profiles with implant-based techniques endorse its implementation. Orthopedic surgeons in cost-sensitive environments may also benefit their patients with lower costs, no need for implants, lack of implant-related complications, or surgery for implant removal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

A computed tomography cadaveric study of the radiological anatomy of the patella: the size of the patella correlates with bone bridge between tunnels and R angles are introduced for safe tunnel drilling during MPFL reconstruction

PURPOSE

To measure the safe range of angles during tunnel drilling and map ideal patella tunnel placement with the use of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan and compare results after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using a hardware-free patellar fixation technique with two semi-patellar tunnels between a) a free-hand technique, and b) its modification with the use of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibia aiming device.

METHODS

CT scan was performed on 30 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees a) prior to any intervention and b) after MPFL reconstruction. For MPFL reconstruction, specimens were randomly allocated to 1) Group A, which consisted of knees operated with free-hand, hardware-free patellar fixation technique with two semi-patellar tunnels and 2) Group B, which consisted of knees operated on with a technique modification with the ACL tibia device.

PATELLAR MEASUREMENTS

L1 was the maximal patellar length. L2 was the minimum possible distance of placement for the upper tunnel from the proximal pole of the patella. The maximum bone bridge between tunnels was calculated as half of L1 minus the L2 distance (L1/2-L2). We also measured R1 and R2 angles at the proximal and distal tunnel that represent safe angles at the entry point during tunnel drilling (without breaching the anterior cortex or articular cartilage).

RESULTS

Preoperatively, mean L1 was 3.45 cm (range 3.05-4.52). Mean L2 was 0.62 cm (range 0.49-0.89). The mean maximum possible bone bridge between tunnels (L1/2-L2) was 1.1 cm (range 0.77-1.58). R1 was 6.05⁰ (range 4.78-7.44), R2 was 6.64⁰ (range 4.57-9.03), and their difference reached statistical significance (p = 0.03). Postoperatively, in group A, in 4 out of 15 patellas, multiple attempts were made during tunnel drilling in order to avoid anterior cortex or cartilage breaching. In group B, all tunnels were correctly drilled with the first attempt. Bone bridge between tunnels was significantly shorter postoperatively (0.93 cm, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Small-size patellae correlate with short maximum bone bridge between tunnels, which makes anatomic, double-bundle, hardware-free patella fixation, with two semi-patellar tunnels MPFL reconstruction challenging. Furthermore, R angles create a narrow window to avoid intraoperative breaching, rendering the use of the ACL tibia device an extremely useful instrument.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.