Experience with periprosthetic infection after limb salvage surgery for patients with osteosarcoma

The effect of preoperative embolization on giant cell tumors of the bone localized in the iliosacral region of the pelvis

INTRODUCTION

Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are aggressive neoplasms, with rare occurrences in the posterior pelvis and sacral area. Surgical challenges in this region include the inability to apply a tourniquet and limited cementation post-curettage due to proximity to neurovascular structures, leading to potential complications. This case-control study explores the impact of preoperative embolization on GCTB located in the iliosacral region.

METHODS

Five surgeries (January-December 2021) for pelvic GCTB (3 sacrum, 2 posterior ilium) were performed on four patients. Diagnosis was confirmed through preoperative CT-guided biopsies. One surgery involved curettage with PMMA cement filling, while four surgeries had curettage without cavity filling. Preoperative embolization of the tumor feeding vessel occurred approximately 16 h before surgery in two cases. Denosumab treatment was not administered.

RESULTS

Tumor volume, assessed by preoperative MRI, was comparable between patients with and without preoperative embolization (p = .14). Surgeries without embolization had a mean intraoperative blood loss of 3250 ml, erythrocyte transfusion volume of 1125 ml, and a mean surgical time of 114.5 min for two surgeries. Surgeries with preoperative embolization showed a mean intraoperative blood loss of 1850 ml, no erythrocyte transfusion requirement, and a mean surgical time of 68 min.

CONCLUSION

Curettage of GCTB in the posterior pelvis and sacrum presents challenges, with significant intraoperative blood loss impacting surgical time and transfusion needs. Preoperative embolization may be beneficial in reducing blood loss during surgery in these cases.

High Rates of Treatment Failure and Amputation in Modular Endoprosthesis Prosthetic Joint Infections Caused by Fungal Infections With Candida

BACKGROUND

Fungal prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are rare yet severe events associated with high rates of recurrent infection. Although bacterial PJIs associated with megaprostheses are known to be associated with higher rates of recurrence and amputation, little is known about fungal PJIs near megaprostheses.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In patients with fungal megaprosthesis PJIs from one institutional registry, we asked: (1) What were the most common microorganisms isolated? (2) What were the reoperation-, revision-, and amputation-free survival rates 1 and 2 years after surgery?

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of megaprostheses in our institutional database. Between 2000 and 2022, 86 patients with a diagnosis of PJI after megaprosthesis implantation were surgically treated at our institution. We considered patients with microbiological cultures that were positive for fungal organisms and who had a minimum follow-up of 2 years from the initial treatment for PJI. Ten patients with fungal megaprosthesis PJIs were included. Although four patients had a follow-up shorter than 2 years, all reached one of the study endpoints at that earlier interval, and therefore were included. All included patients were treated between 2016 and 2022, and the diagnosis of PJI was made in accordance with the 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Patients were treated with either debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), DAIR-plus (debridement, antibiotics, modular implant component exchange, and stem retention), or one-stage or two-stage revision. In general, DAIR was used for acute PJIs, while DAIR-plus was performed in patients with chronic PJIs who were deemed medically unfit to endure the high morbidity associated with removal of the stems. In cases of prior unsuccessful DAIR-plus or patients with fewer comorbidities, one-stage or two-stage revision was the main treatment approach. The median age at diagnosis was 67 years (range 32 to 84 years), 5 of 10 patients were female, and the median BMI was 31 kg/m 2 (range 20 to 43 kg/m 2 ). The median follow-up was 26 months (range 1 to 54 months). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to calculate reoperation-, revision-, and amputation-free survival at 1 and 2 years from the index surgery for PJI.

RESULTS

The two most common organisms were Candida albicans (5 of 10 patients) and C.parapsilosis (3 of 10). Six of 10 patients had coinfection with a bacterial organism. One-year reoperation-free and revision-free survival were 35% (95% CI 9% to 64%) and 42% (95% CI 11% to 71%), respectively. Two-year reoperation-free and revision-free survival were 12% (95% CI 1% to 40%) and 14% (95% CI 1% to 46%), respectively. Amputation-free survival was 74% (95% CI 30% to 93%) at the 1-year interval and 40% at the 2-year interval (95% CI 7% to 73%). At the final follow-up interval, four patients had undergone amputations and four were being administered chronic antifungal suppression.

CONCLUSION

Megaprosthesis fungal PJIs are rare but devastating. Arthroplasty surgeons should consider treatment efficacy, which appears to be low across surgical strategies, and the patient's capacity to withstand it. A lower decision threshold for performing amputation may be considered in patients who require rapid infection control to initiate immunosuppressive treatments. Future studies should aim to compare the surgical and clinical outcomes of fungal PJIs with those of other etiologies while controlling for potential variables. Efforts should be made to establish multi-institutional collaborations to achieve larger study samples.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Complications after limb salvage surgeries for musculoskeletal malignancies: 10-year experience of the main sarcoma center in Bulgaria

INTRODUCTION

Limb salvage surgery is currently the most frequently used treatment option in Bulgaria for individuals with musculoskeletal malignancies. Clinical data about complications from these procedures is limited in the country, with only a few studies currently available.

Using 3D Printing Technology to Manufacture Personalized Bone Cement Placeholder Mold for Bone Defect Repair and Reconstruction with Infection: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage surgery is the preferred treatment for most malignant bone tumors, but postoperative infection treatment is very challenging. Simultaneously controlling infection and solving bone defects are clinical treatment challenges.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here we describe a new technique for treating bone defect infection after bone tumor surgery. An 8-year-old patient suffered an incision infection after osteosarcoma resection and bone defect reconstruction. In response, we designed her a personalized, anatomically matched, antibiotic-loaded, bone cement spacer mold using 3D printing technology. The patient's infection was cured, and limb salvage was successful. In follow-up, the patient had returned to normal postoperative chemotherapy and was able to walk with the help of a cane. There was no obvious pain in the knee joint. At 3 months after operation, the range of motion of the knee joint was 0°-60°.

CONCLUSION

The 3D printing spacer mold is an effective solution for treating the infection with large bone defect.

Collaborative Design of MgO/FeOx Nanosheets on Titanium: Combining Therapy with Regeneration

The repair of bone defects caused by osteosarcoma resection remains a clinical challenge because of the tumor recurrence and bacterial infection. Combining tumor and bacterial therapy with bone regeneration properties in bone implants is a promising strategy for the treatment of osteosarcoma. Here, a layer of MgO/FeO_x nanosheet is constructed on the Ti implant to prevent tumor recurrence and bacterial infection, while simultaneously accelerating bone formation. This MgO/FeO_x double metal oxide demonstrates good peroxidase activity to catalyze H₂ O₂ , which is rich in tumor microenvironment, to form reactive oxygen species (ROS), and shows good photothermal conversion capacity to produce photothermal effect, thus synergistically killing tumor cells and eliminating tumor tissue. In addition, it generates a local alkaline surface microenvironment to inhibit the energy metabolism of bacteria to enhance the photothermal antibacterial effect. Furthermore, benefiting from the generation of a Mg ion-containing alkaline microenvironment, this MgO/FeO_x film can promote the osteogenic differentiation of osteoblast and angiogenesis of vascular endothelial cells in vitro as well as accelerated bone formation in vivo. This study proposes a multifunctional platform for integrating tumor and bacterial therapy and bone regeneration, which has good application prospects for the treatment of osteosarcoma.

Prosthetic Joint Infection in Mega-Arthroplasty Following Shoulder, Hip and Knee Malignancy-A Prospective Follow-Up Study

INTRODUCTION

The risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in mega-prosthesis for malignancy is increased compared with non-tumor cases. While several studies describe PJI in tumor-related arthroplasty, prospective studies comparing infection characteristics among different joints are limited. The present study analyzes mega-arthroplasty for hip, knee, and shoulder malignancy and compares the epidemiology, diagnosis, microbe spectrum, treatments, and outcomes between the different entities.

METHODS

The retrospective inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) mega-arthroplasty (2) in the hip, knee, or shoulder joint and a total femur arthroplasty (3) following a malignant bone tumor or metastasis (4) between 1996 and 2019. All included patients were prospectively followed and invited for a renewed hospital examination, and their PJI characteristics (if identified) were analyzed using both retrospective as well as newly gained prospective data. A PJI was defined according to the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) and re-infection was defined according to the modified Delphi Consensus criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 83 cases of tumor mega-arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 3.9 years could be included (32 knee, 30 hip, and 19 shoulder cases and 2 cases of total femur arthroplasty). In total, 14 PJIs were identified, with chondrosarcoma in 6 and osteosarcoma in 3 being the leading tumor entities. Knee arthroplasty demonstrated a significantly higher rate of PJI (p = 0.027) compared with hips (28.1% vs. 6.7%), while no significant difference could be found between the knee and shoulder (10.5%) (p = 0.134) or among shoulder and hip cases (p = 0.631). The average time of PJI following primary implantation was 141.4 months in knee patients, 64.6 in hip patients, and 8.2 months in shoulder patients. Age at the time of the primary PJI, as well as the time of the first PJI, did not show significant differences among the groups. Thirteen of the fourteen patients with PJI had a primary bone tumor. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference in the disadvantage of primary bone tumors (p = 0.11). While the overall cancer-related mortality in the knee PJI group (10%) was low, it was 50% in the hip and 100% in the shoulder group.

CONCLUSION

The risk of PJI in knee tumor arthroplasty is significantly increased compared with hips, while cancer-related mortality is significantly higher in hip PJI cases. At the same time, mega-prostheses appear to be associated with a higher risk of infection due to a primary bone tumor compared with metastases. The study confirms existing knowledge concerning PJI in tumor arthroplasty, while, being one of the few studies to compare three different joints concerning PJI characteristics.

Can "domino" therapy effectively treat the infection around the prosthesis after the limb salvage surgery of bone tumor? - A study of sequential therapy

BACKGROUND

Tumor resection and prosthetic replacement have become the treatments of choice for malignant bone tumors. Infections are the leading cause of failure of limb salvage surgeries. Therefore, treating infections around prostheses after limb salvage is essential and challenging. Our research team designed a "domino" sequential treatment plan to treat postoperative infections around tumor prostheses and evaluated its efficacy.

PURPOSE

To introduce the new domino sequential treatment plan for postoperative infections of tumor prostheses, and evaluate the technical points of the plan and prognosis in medium- and long-term follow-ups.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and August 2021, 14 patients were treated with prosthesis-preserving domino sequential therapy for peripheral prosthesis infections after bone-tumor limb salvage. The sample included eight cases of distal femur tumor, two of proximal tibia tumor, three of pelvic tumor, and one of middle femur tumor. We evaluated routine blood test results, C-reactive protein level, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and other indicators. X-rays and CT scans of the surgical site were obtained and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was calculated. Treatment involved debridement and lavage of the prosthesis, and systemic and local antibiotics.

RESULTS

The positivity rate of microbial culture was 78.6%. There were three cases of Staphylococcus aureus, one of Staphylococcus epidermidis, two of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, one of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, two of Acinetobacter baumannii, one of Streptococcus lactis (group C), one of Streptococcus mitis, and three with negative cultures. In three cases, sequential treatment failed to control the infection. The operation success rate was 78.6% (11/14). One case eventually required amputation, and another required long-term wound dressings. To control the infection, a third had to be treated using antibiotic bone cement combined with the "intramedullary nail reverse double insertion" technique. The MSTS scores of patients before infection debridement and at the last follow-up showed statistically significant differences (t = 5.312, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The prosthesis-preserving domino sequential method has certain advantages for treating bone-tumor limb salvage infections around the prosthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic.

Megaprosthesis anti-bacterial coatings: A comprehensive translational review

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are catastrophic complications for patients with implanted megaprostheses and pose significant challenges in the management of orthopaedic oncology patients. Despite various preventative strategies, with the increasing rate of implanted orthopaedic prostheses, the number of PJIs may be increasing. PJIs are associated with a high rate of amputation. Therefore, novel strategies to combat bacterial colonization and biofilm formation are required. A promising strategy is the utilization of anti-bacterial coatings on megaprosthetic implants. In this translational review, a brief overview of the mechanism of bacterial colonization of implants and biofilm formation will be provided, followed by a discussion and classification of major anti-bacterial coatings currently in use and development. In addition, current in vitro outcomes, clinical significance, economic importance, evolutionary perspectives, and future directions of anti-bacterial coatings will also be discussed. Megaprosthetic anti-bacterial coating strategies will help reduce infection rates following the implantation of megaprostheses and would positively impact sarcoma care. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This review highlights the clinical challenges and a multitude of potential solutions to combating peri-prosthetic join infections in megaprotheses using anti-bacterial coatings. Reducing infection rates following the implantation of megaprostheses would have a major impact on sarcoma care and major trauma surgeries that require reconstruction of large skeletal defects.

Cutaneous diphtheria complicated oncologic reconstruction surgery in osteosarcoma

Diphtheria is an uncommon bacterial infection of the upper respiratory tract. We described a surgical site infection in a young adolescent female on maintenance chemotherapy. Corynebacterium diphtheriae was recovered from the wound, and she was treated with antibiotics and antitoxin. Cutaneous diphtheria should be considered in immunocompromised patients receiving chemotherapy.