Patella resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty is cost-effective and has lower re-operation rates compared to non-resurfacing

Patellar resurfacing in contemporary total knee arthroplasty: Frequency of complications in a matched cohort

Introduction

Optimum patient selection and outcomes following patellar resurfacing are ongoing debates amongst the arthroplasty community. This study compared the outcomes of patients who had a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patellar resurfacing to those left with their native patella.

Methods

A retrospective review of 1941 TKAs performed between 2016 and 2020 was conducted. 41 TKAs without patellar resurfacing and with 2-years of minimum follow-up were identified. Of these, 38 TKAs were matched on age (exact), sex (exact), and body mass index (±10) to 38 TKAs that had patellar resurfacing. The indications for patella resurfacing were subjective based upon the surgeon preference and assessment of cartilage quality. Paired t-tests and chi-square tests were used for analysis.

Results

There was 1 major patellofemoral complication in both the resurfaced group (patellar fracture) and the non-resurfaced group (patellar tendon tear), requiring nonoperative management and revision surgery, respectively. However, in the non-resurfaced group there were 4 cases of subjective patellofemoral pain compared to none in the resurfaced group (p = 0.37). Additionally, 3 non-resurfaced patients required manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) compared to none in the resurfaced group (p = 0.44).

Discussion

There was no difference in the frequency of major patella-specific complications between the groups. However, there was a non-statistically significant trend towards increased patellofemoral pain and MUA in the non-resurfaced group. Based on this study both methods of treatment remain viable options, but the trend towards increased pain and stiffness should continue to be closely evaluated.

The Statistical Fragility of Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have conflicting findings, with some reporting its efficacy and others demonstrating no clinical significance. The fragility index (FI), reverse fragility index (rFI), and fragility quotient (FQ) evaluated statistical fragility of outcomes in RCTs evaluating patellar resurfacing in TKA.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were systematically searched for RCTs (January 1, 2000, to August 1, 2023) assessing patellar resurfacing in TKA. Of 226 RCTs screened, 19 studies were included for analysis. We calculated FI and rFI, which represent the number of outcome event reversals required to alter statistical significance for significant and non-significant outcomes, respectively. The outcome categories of interest included anterior knee pain, complications/ adverse events, crepitus, reoperation, patient satisfaction, and clinical improvement. The FQ was determined by dividing the FI by the study sample size.

RESULTS

Across 46 outcomes, the median FI was 5 (Interquartile Range (IQR) 3 to 8) with a median FQ of 0.041 (IQR 0.025 to 0.063). There were nine outcomes that were statistically significant, with a median FI of 3 (IQR 2 to 8) and a FQ of 0.011 (IQR 0.0044 to 0.039). There were 37 outcomes that were non-significant, with a median rFI of 5 (IQR 4 to 7) and FQ of 0.043 (IQR 0.031 to 0.062). Notably, in 47.8% of all outcomes, the number of patients lost-to-follow-up was greater than the outcome's respective FI or rFI. Outcomes regarding patient satisfaction (FI 4.5) and anterior knee pain (FI 5) were most fragile.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of interest regarding patellar resurfacing from RCTs are statistically fragile, particularly significant outcomes and patient satisfaction outcomes. Data surrounding patellar resurfacing remains inconclusive, and combining P-values with FI/FQ metrics may aid in interpreting patellar resurfacing findings. Future studies may mitigate fragility by obtaining higher follow-up rates and sample sizes.

Global Trends in Patellar Resurfacing From 2004 to 2022

BACKGROUND

International rates of patellar resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are highly variable. This study sought to determine how trends in patellar resurfacing rates have changed between 2004 and 2022. In addition, we investigated how modern rates of revision have varied between resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae in primary TKA among national joint registries.

METHODS

Data between 2004 and 2022 was obtained either from the publicly available joint registry annual reports, a literature review, or via direct correspondence with registry personnel in Sweden, New Zealand, Australia, the United States, Norway, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Canada, and India. Only English language national joint registries or data via direct correspondence with registry administrators were utilized. Additionally, the 10-year cumulative risk of revision TKA with and without patellar resurfacing was pulled from those registries that had this data available.

RESULTS

There were persistent differences in the rates of patellar resurfacing among countries. Australia documented a 40% increase in patellar resurfacing rates, while other countries demonstrated modest or little change in resurfacing rates. This may indicate that surgeons are making the decision to resurface based on national TKA revision rates. The average rates of patellar resurfacing in primary TKA ranged from 4% in Sweden to 94% in the United States. Canada, the United States, Australia, and Switzerland documented a lower risk of revision when the patella was resurfaced, while Sweden, conversely, showed a higher risk of revision with resurfacing.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of patellar resurfacing in primary TKA were highly variable among countries, as were rates of change over time. It appears that the optimal patellar resurfacing strategy may depend mostly on unique patient factors and surgeon expertise. Future studies should attempt to elucidate the individual patient characteristics that contribute to increased risks of revision or anterior knee pain to determine who will most benefit from patellar resurfacing in primary TKA.

Patella is rarely resurfaced during primary total knee arthroplasty in clinical trials conducted in Greece: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to report the approach of Greek surgeons regarding patellar management and provide the outcomes and the rate of the need for secondary patella resurfacing.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were accessed in January 2024. Clinical studies evaluating the outcomes of patients undergoing primary TKA were considered eligible for this systematic review if the following predefined criteria were fulfilled: (1) published in English, (2) were conducted in Greece, and had a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The methodological quality and publication bias were assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) and ROBIS tool, respectively. Data was presented in tables using absolute values from individual studies. Pooled data were presented as means, ranges, and percentages.

RESULTS

Six clinical studies with a total of 1084 TKAs were included. Four studies were retrospectives, and two studies were prospective. Patella was only resurfaced in 0.6% of total TKAs. TKA without patellar resurfaced, which resulted in an improvement in functional outcome. Among studies, the overall need for revision incidence was 7.6% (68 out of 892 TKAs). Additionally, Aseptic loosening (2.4%) was the most common reason for revision due to patellofemoral joint complications, followed by secondary patellar resurfacing (2.1%) and deep infection (1.3%). The mean mCMS demonstrated a fair methodological quality level, and the ROBIS toll a low risk of bias in all four domains.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence supports that Greek surgeons mainly do not resurface the patella. However, patellar non-resurfacing yields good functional outcomes and presents relatively low revision rates for secondary patellar resurfacing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Secondary Patellar Resurfacing Following Primary Unresurfaced Total Knee Arthroplasty: Beware of the Incidence of Late Patellar Erosion

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) indications and rates in a single-surgeon series utilizing a modern TKA design and additionally, to review the functional outcomes of patients after undergoing SPR.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected institutional database was performed. All patients undergoing primary TKA by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2021 were included. During this time, the senior surgeon resurfaced the patella selectively. Patients were divided into the primary resurfaced (PR) and the primary unresurfaced (UR). All patients undergoing SPR in the UR group were identified, their radiographs reviewed, and their clinical outcomes assessed. During the study period, 1,511 TKAs were performed, with 73.1% (1,105 TKAs) being unresurfaced.

RESULTS

The all-cause revision rate was 1.2% in the PR group and 3.6% in the UR group. The rate of SPR in the UR group was 2.0% (22 of 1,105 TKAs). No patient in the PR group underwent revision surgery for a patellar complication. The mean age at primary TKA for those undergoing SPR was 65 years (range, 50 to 78). The average time for SPR from primary TKA was 3.4 years (range, 1.1 to 8.8). Postoperative radiographic progression of patellar erosion, in combination with new onset anterior knee pain, was the indication for SPR in 14 of the 22 (63.7%) SPR cases. After SPR, the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index score (P < .001) and Knee Society Score (P < .001) improved from pre-SPR.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) was the most common (55%) reason for revision surgery after primary UR TKA in this series. An SPR improved clinical outcomes in symptomatic patients. Surgeons should consider patellar resurfacing for all patients undergoing primary TKA to reduce the burden of revision surgery post-TKA. Additionally, the paradigm that late SPR does not improve clinical outcomes needs to be revisited.

Decreased Patellar Fractures and Subluxation With Patellar Component Replacement at Stage-One Spacer

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection is a devastating complication of total knee arthroplasty and is often treated with 2-stage revision. We retrospectively assessed whether replacing the patellar component with articulating stage-one spacers was associated with improved outcomes compared to spacers without patellar component replacement.

METHODS

A total of 139 patients from a single academic institution were identified who underwent an articulating stage-one revision total knee arthroplasty and had at least 1-year follow-up. Of the 139 patients, 91 underwent patellar component removal without replacement, while 48 had a patellar component replaced at stage-one revision. Patellar fracture and reinfection at any point after stage-one were recorded. Knee range of motion (ROM), patellar thickness, lateral tilt, and lateral displacement were measured at 6-weeks post stage-one. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t-tests were utilized for comparisons. There were no significant demographic differences between groups.

RESULTS

Patellar component replacement at stage-one revision was associated with fewer patellar fractures (2.1 versus 12.1%, P = .046), less lateral patellar displacement (1.7 versus 16.0 mm, P < .01), and improved pre to postoperative knee ROM 6 weeks after stage-one (+5.9 versus -11.4°, P = .03). There was no difference in reinfections after stage-2 revision for the replaced or unreplaced patellar groups (15.4 versus 15%, P = 1.000). While the mean time between stage-one and stage-2 was not different (5.2 versus 4.5 months, P = .50), at one-year follow-up, significantly more patients in the patellar component replacement group were satisfied and refused stage-2 revision (45.8 versus 3.3%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Replacing the patellar component at stage-one revision is associated with a decreased rate of patellar fracture and lateral patellar subluxation, improved ROM, and possible increased patient satisfaction, as reflected by nearly half of these patients electing to keep their spacer. There was no difference in reinfection rates between the cohorts.

Minimum 15-Year Survival of a Biconvex Inlay Patellar Component in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 2,530 Total Knee Arthroplasties From a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

Routine patellar resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. To our knowledge, there are no studies reporting the long-term performance of a cemented biconvex all-polyethylene inlay component implanted at the time of primary TKA. The purpose of this study was to examine the 15-year survivorship and long-term clinical outcomes of this biconvex inlay patella used at our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected institutional database and identified 2,530 patients who underwent cemented TKA with a single prosthetic design (from 1996 to 2007) where the patella was resurfaced using this cemented biconvex inlay patella. The mean age at surgery was 68 years (range, 29 to 93). The mean body mass index was 33.0 (range, 16.4 to 76.3), with 61.9% women. At the time of analysis, the mean time from surgery was 20.4 years (range, 15 to 26). We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to calculate survivorship at 15 years. We analyzed clinical outcomes using 3 patient-reported outcome measures collected prospectively.

RESULTS

The 15-year survivorship with revision surgery for all causes as the end point was 97.1% (95% confidence interval 96.1 to 98.1%). The 15-year survivorship with revision surgery for a patella-related complication as the end point was 99.7% (95% confidence interval 99.4 to 1.0). At the final follow-up, patients showed significant improvement in scores for the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (P < .001), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (P < .001), and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey physical component (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine patellar resurfacing using a biconvex inlay patellar component has excellent survivorship and a low rate of complications at 15 years post-TKA.

What are the Outcomes of Secondary Patella Resurfacing for Dissatisfaction Following Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 604 Knees

BACKGROUND

Secondary patella resurfacing is often performed for dissatisfaction following primary knee arthroplasty where the native patella was retained. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate outcomes of secondary patella resurfacing.

METHODS

The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting on patients who underwent secondary patella resurfacing after previous primary knee arthroplasty with retention of the native patella were considered eligible. The risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized studies tool. A random-effects model and the inverse-variance weighting method was used for meta-analysis. There were sixteen retrospective studies including 604 knees (594 patients) with a mean follow up of 42 months (range, 2 to 197).

RESULTS

An overall improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) was achieved in 53% of cases from pooled data available for 293 knees [95% Confidence Interval (CI) (0.44, 0.62), I2=68% - moderate heterogeneity]. The pooled proportion of patients satisfied with the procedure was 59% [95% CI (48, 68), I2 = 70% - moderate heterogeneity] in a sample size of 415. There was a minimal rate (2%) of complication incidence when performing secondary patella resurfacing and a pooled rate of revision surgery of 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

An improvement in pain, satisfaction, and PROMs was achieved in slightly more than half of the patients following secondary patella resurfacing. However, studies lacked standardized objective selection criteria for the procedure and the available data was predominantly retrospective, with high heterogeneity and variation in outcome reporting.

Different modalities of patellar management in primary total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The primary management modalities for the patella in TKA include patellar resurfacing, patellar non-resurfacing, patellar resurfacing with denervation, and patellar non-resurfacing with denervation. Traditionally, meta-analyses have predominantly focused on examining comparisons between two management modalities. However, this study performed a network meta-analysis to compare all four patellar management interventions to identify the most optimal approach for patellar management in TKA.

METHODS

A computer-based search of PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), The Cochrane Library, Web of science, Embase, and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials focusing on the four management interventions for the patella in TKA. Comparisons included two-by-two comparisons as well as those involving more than two concurrent comparisons. The search timeframe spanned from inception to June 30, 2023. Two independent authors extracted the data and evaluated the quality of the literature. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias (ROB) tool was used to evaluate the overall quality of the literature. Subsequently, a network meta-analysis was conducted using the "gemtc" package of the R-4.2.3 software. Outcome measures such as anterior knee pain (AKP), reoperation rate, and patient satisfaction rate were evaluated using odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Additionally, the knee society score (KSS), function score (FS), and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated using mean differences (MD) with associated 95% CI. The different treatment measures were ranked using the surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA).

RESULTS

A total of 50 randomized controlled trials involving 9,283 patients were included in the analysis. The findings from this network meta-analysis revealed that patellar resurfacing exhibited significantly lower postoperative reoperation rate (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.63) and AKP (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.32-1) compared to non-resurfacing. Additionally, patellar resurfacing exhibited higher postoperative KSS clinical scores in comparison with non-resurfacing (MD: 1.13, 95% CI 0.18-2.11). However, for postoperative FS, ROM, and patient satisfaction, no significant differences were observed among the four management interventions.

CONCLUSION

Patellar resurfacing emerges as the optimal management modality in primary TKA. However, future studies should aim to reduce sources of heterogeneity and minimize the influence of confounding factors on outcomes.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023434418 identifier: CRD42023434418.

Patella Fracture After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review

The management and underlying causes of patellar periprosthetic fractures (PPF) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) constitute an issue of growing importance given the rising frequency of these procedures. Patella periprosthetic fractures, though relatively rare, pose significant challenges and are a frequent indication for revision surgeries. Despite a decrease in overall incidence, PPFs remain the second most common type of periprosthetic fractures after TKA. Several factors have been identified and associated with patient-specific factors, surgical technique errors, and implant-related causes. Currently extensor apparatus integrity, bone stock, and component loosening are the major concerns and indications for the selective treatment approach. In this study, a thorough review of the existing literature was performed summarizing the epidemiology, clinical manifestation, treatment approach, and functional outcome of PPF. This review aims to underline the significance of such predisposing factors, point out the severity of PPF, and offer insights into the optimal intra- and post-operative management of the patella.

When to Do Selective Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Decision-Making Algorithm Based on Pre-operative and Intra-operative Findings

Background

Persistent anterior knee pain post total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a significant cause of patient dissatisfaction. Selective patellar resurfacing is commonly practiced for primary total knee replacement (TKR) but there is a paucity in literature regarding its decision making.

Study Objective

This study aims to develop a decision-making algorithm for selective patellar resurfacing using Hospital for Special Surgery Patello-femoral Assessment score (HSS PFA score), weight-bearing patellofemoral X-ray, and intraoperative cartilage wear assessment based on the Outerbridge classification.

Materials and Methods

This prospective study enrolled 65 patients, assessing preoperative factors including HSS PFA score and Baldini view radiography. Intraoperative cartilage wear was categorized using the Outerbridge classification. Preoperative findings were correlated with intraoperative outcomes through statistical analysis, leading to the development of a predictive algorithm. The efficiency of algorithm was assessed at 3-year follow-up using HSS PFA score.

Results

A significant negative correlation (r = - 0.272, p = 0.029) was observed between HSS PFA score and cartilage wear. However, no significant relationships were established between HSS PFA score and Baldini view observations, including radiological tilt (p = 0.517) and displacement (p = 0.277). Intraoperative cartilage wear versus patellar tilt (p = 0.65) and displacement (p = 0.837) also yielded non-significant results. Three-year follow-up examinations revealed no complications and significant HSS PFA score improvements in all patients.

Conclusion

The requirement for patellar resurfacing can be predicted using a combination of preoperative parameter such as HSS PFA score and the intra-operative cartilage wear. We put forward an algorithm based on above findings to aid in the decision making.

A Crossed Screw Patellar Reconstruction Technique for the Treatment of the Severely Deficient Scaphoid Shaped Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty

One of the contraindications to patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty is a thin and severely eroded 'deficient' patella. However, such patients often present with severe patellofemoral joint arthritis, patellar lateral subluxation, and patella maltracking, which can only be treated effectively with resurfacing. While various treatments have been proposed, options remain limited. Here we introduce a method of patella reconstruction using four 2.7-mm titanium cortical screws crossing each other into the inner shell of the patella. This provides a scaffold onto which bone cement and any standard polyethylene patellar component can be fixed. Postoperatively, the patient had no anterior knee pain, no patella maltracking, and no component loosening. Advantages of this technique include minimization of extensor disruption, low costs, easy accessibility, reproducibility, and improved mechanical strength.

Periprosthetic patella fractures in total knee replacement and revision surgeries: how to diagnose and treat this rare but potentially devastating complication-a review of the current literature

PURPOSE

Periprosthetic patella fractures (PPPFs) are infrequent but potentially devastating complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and revision TKA (rTKA). These fractures may occur both in resurfaced and un-resurfaced patella. This review summarizes the current literature on PPPFs to help orthopedic surgeons diagnose and treat this uncommon but extremely challenging TKA complication.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in three databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, and EMBASE. All relevant information was retrieved and summarized in this narrative review.

RESULTS

In the studies analyzed, there is a general trend in favor of nonsurgical treatment, except for implant loosening or extensor lag with extensor apparatus disruption, because surgery is often associated with poor clinical outcomes and high complication rates.

CONCLUSION

PPPF is a rare but catastrophic event in TKA and rTKA, occurring mainly in a reconstructed patella. Patient-, implant-, and surgical technique-related factors contribute to its multifactorial etiopathogenesis. Prevention plays a crucial role in reducing the PPPFs rate. Conservative management is the treatment of choice due to high surgery complication rates unless implant loosening, or extensor apparatus disruption occurs.

Outcomes and Survivorships of Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Resurfaced and Unresurfaced Patellae

BACKGROUND

The decision to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. While there is some consensus that leaving the patella unresurfaced increases risk of reoperation, there is conflicting evidence about patient reported outcomes or indications for resurfacing. This study sought to determine recent rates of patellar resurfacing, examine factors affecting rates of resurfacing, and analyze the associations between patellar resurfacing and both revision rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

The American Joint Replacement Registry was used to identify primary TKAs performed for osteoarthritis between 2012 and 2021. Cases were classified as resurfaced patella and unresurfaced patella (URP). Outcomes analyzed included trends in patellar resurfacing, factors influencing rate of resurfacing, revision rates, operative time, and 2 PROMs.

RESULTS

Rates of patellar resurfacing decreased and rates of URP increased significantly faster in ambulatory surgery centers and among high volume surgeons. Operative time was significantly lower in URP versus resurfaced patella (88.15 versus 89.90 minutes). The URP were significantly more likely to require revision surgery (odds ratio = 1.206 (1.078, 1.35), P = .0011). There was no significant difference in the likelihood of achieving the minimal clinically important difference in PROMs between resurfaced and nonresurfaced TKAs at 1 year (odds ratio = 1.060 (0.710, 1.581), P = .7755).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in minimal clinically important difference between resurfaced and URPs and no clinically relevant difference in operative time. However, URPs were more likely to require revision surgery. Therefore, the decision not to resurface should be made carefully considering the known risk of revision and the uncertain benefit.

Patellar resurfacing and kneeling ability after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Difficulty kneeling following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains highly prevalent, and has cultural, social, and occupational implications. With no clear evidence of superiority, whether or not to resurface the patella remains debatable. This systematic review examined whether resurfacing the patella (PR) or not (NPR) influences kneeling ability following TKA.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted by following PRISMA guidelines. Three electronic databases were searched utilizing a search strategy developed with the aid of a department librarian. Study quality was assessed using MINROS criteria. Article screening, methodological quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent authors, and a third senior author was consulted if consensus was not reached.

RESULTS

A total of 459 records were identified, with eight studies included in the final analysis, and all deemed to be level III evidence. The average MINORS score was 16.5 for comparative studies and 10.5 for non-comparative studies. The total number of patients was 24,342, with a mean age of 67.6 years. Kneeling ability was predominantly measured as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), with two studies also including an objective assessment. Two studies demonstrated a statistically significant link between PR and kneeling, with one demonstrating improved kneeling ability with PR and the other reporting the opposite. Other potential factors associated with kneeling included gender, postoperative flexion, and body mass index (BMI). Re-operation rates were significantly higher in the NPR cohort whereas PR cohorts had higher Feller scores, patient-reported limp and patellar apprehension.

CONCLUSION

Despite its importance to patients, kneeling remains not only under-reported but also ill-defined in the literature, with no clear consensus regarding the optimum outcome assessment tool. Conflicting evidence remains as to whether PR influences kneeling ability, and to clarify the situation, large prospective randomized studies are required.

Patellar resurfacing versus retention in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

Aims

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the influence of patellar resurfacing following cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the incidence of anterior knee pain, knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures, complication rates, and reoperation rates.

Methods

A systematic review of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) according to search criteria. Search terms used included: arthroplasty, replacement, knee (Mesh), TKA, prosthesis, patella, patellar resurfacing, and patellar retaining. RCTs that compared patellar resurfacing versus unresurfaced in primary TKA were included for further analysis. Studies were evaluated using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network assessment tool for quality and minimization of bias. Data were synthesized and meta-analysis performed.

Results

There were 4,135 TKAs (2,068 resurfaced and 2,027 unresurfaced) identified in 35 separate cohorts from 33 peer-reviewed studies. Anterior knee pain rates were significantly higher in unresurfaced knees overall (odds ratio (OR) 1.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 2.83; p = 0.006) but more specifically associated with CR implants (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.0 to 3.52; p = 0.030). There was a significantly better Knee Society function score (mean difference (MD) -1.98; 95% CI -1.1 to -2.84; p < 0.001) and Oxford Knee Score (MD -2.24; 95% CI -0.07 to -4.41; p = 0.040) for PS implants when patellar resurfacing was performed, but these differences did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference for these scores. There were no significant differences in complication rates or infection rates according to implant design. There was an overall significantly higher reoperation rate for unresurfaced TKA (OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.06); p = 0.030) but there was no difference between PS or CR TKA.

Conclusion

Patellar resurfacing, when performed with CR implants, resulted in lower rates of anterior knee pain and, when used with a PS implant, yielded better knee-specific functional outcomes. Patellar resurfacing was associated with a lower risk of reoperation overall, but implant type did not influence this.

Patella component diameters of 38 mm and up might be associated with higher revision rates after patella resurfacing

PURPOSE

Patellar resurfacing is considered the standard of care for total knee arthroplasty in the USA. Complications of patella resurfacing include aseptic loosening or patella fractures and can threaten the integrity of the extensor mechanism. The goal of this study was to report on patella button revision rates in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 01/2010 and 08/2016 patella buttons were implanted in 1056 patients (267 men and 550 women) as part of a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Of 1056 cases, 35 cases (14 women, 15 men, 5 bilateral, 3.3%) showed early loosening at a mean 52.5 months postoperatively. Patella components of 38 mm or larger diameters showed a significantly higher loosening rate than the 29, 32, 35 mm buttons (p < 0.01). Mean BMI of patients identified with aseptic loosening was 31.7 kg/m², mean age at time of revision surgery was 63.3 years. All of the patients with loosening of the patella button required revision surgery; in 33 cases an exchange of the button was performed, in two cases a removal of the button and patellar bone grafting was indicated. No complications occurred after revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

The current study reports a 3.3% patella loosening rate during this mid-term follow-up. Size 38 mm and larger patella components showed a significantly higher revision rate than smaller buttons and the authors advise caution when using large diameter patella components.

Patella non-resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty provides good functional results-a retrospective review of nine thousand three hundred forty six knees

PURPOSE

Patellar resurfacing has long been a contentious subject in TKA with no consensus and the literature yielding disparate results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term functional outcomes and complications of patients undergoing primary TKA without patellar resurfacing (non-resurfacing).

METHODS

This study retrospectively analysed 9346 patients who underwent primary manual jig-based TKA without patellar resurfacing at a single high-volume arthroplasty centre between 2010 and 2018. Patients with a minimum three year follow-up irrespective of disease etiology and implant manufacturer were included in the study. Primary outcome was measured using Oxford knee score and patellofemoral Feller score. Secondary outcomes included determining the incidence of patellofemoral complications and re-operation rates following TKA.

RESULTS

A total of 8695 knees were eligible for final evaluation having a mean follow-up of 6.6 years. Mean age of the patients was 62.6 (SD-7.5) years with female predominance of (N-6619, 70.8%). The majority of the patients had primary OA (N-8792, 94.1%) with varus deformity (N-8642, 92.46%). Depuy was the most used manufacturer (n = 2592, 26.4%) with the posterior stabilised (N-4127, 44.2%) design being the most predominant. The mean Feller score of the study population was 24.5 (SD = 3) with a majority of patients having good to excellent outcomes (86.95%, N-8424) and mean Oxford knee score was 36.9 (SD-6.9) with a majority of the patients having an OKS greater than 30 (87.1%, N-8133) with anterior knee pain (AKP) reported in only 4.8% patients (N-418). Most common complications included patellar clunk (N-56, 0.7%), traumatic patellar fractures (N-62, 0.8%), quadriceps tendon tear (N-54, 0.7%) and patellar dislocation (N-4, 0.05%) CONCLUSION: Patellar non-resurfacing has no detrimental impact on functional outcomes and incidence of AKP. We conclude that it is a safe, cost-effective and satisfactory approach in primary TKA with no significant complications.

Patellar resurfacing was not associated with a clinically significant advantage when a modern patellar friendly total knee arthroplasty is employed: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) femoral components are designed to provide a more optimal articular surface for the patella whether or not it has been resurfaced. Previous systematic reviews comparing outcomes of patellar resurfacing and no resurfacing combine both historic and modern designs.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of patellar resurfacing in modern "patellar friendly" implants on (1) incidence of anterior knee pain, (2) patient reported outcomes (3) complication rates, and (4) reoperation rates compared with unresurfaced patellae in primary TKA.

METHODS

MEDline, PubMed and google scholar studies were evaluated using SIGN assessment tool and data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.2 on only randomised controlled trials. The search terms were: arthroplasty, replacement, knee (Mesh), TKA, prosthesis, patella, patellar resurfacing, patellar retaining.

RESULTS

Thirty-two randomised controlled studies were identified that reported the type of TKA implant used: 11 used modern "patellar friendly" implants; and 21 older "patellar non-friendly" implants. Among "patellar friendly" TKAs there were no significant differences in anterior knee pain rates between resurfaced and unresurfaced groups. Patellar resurfacing with "patellar friendly" implants had significantly higher clinical (mean difference (MD) -0.77, p = 0.007) and functional (MD -1.87, p < 0.0001) knee society scores (KSS) than unresurfaced counterparts but these did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Resurfacing with "patellar friendly" implants was not associated with a significant (p = 0.59) difference in the Oxford knee score (OKS), in contrast when a "patellar non-friendly" implant was used there was a significant difference (MD 3.3, p = 0.005) in favour of resurfacing. There was an increased risk of reoperation for unresurfaced TKAs with "non-patellar friendly" implants (Odds ratio (OR) 1.68, 95% CI 1.03-2.74, p = 0.04), but not for unresurfaced patellae with "patellar friendly" implants (OR 1.17, CI 0.59-2.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Patellar resurfacing in combination with a modern patellar friendly implant was not associated with a lower rate of anterior knee pain, complications, or reoperations compared to not resurfacing, nor did it give a clinically significant improvement in knee specific function. In contrast patellar resurfacing in combination with a "non-friendly" TKA implant was associated with a significantly better OKS and lower reoperation rate. Implant design should be acknowledged when patellar resurfacing is being considered.

Patella resurfacing is not associated with a difference in the Oxford knee score after total knee arthroplasty but stair descent is enhanced

BACKGROUND

The primary aim was to assess the Oxford knee scores (OKS) on patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patellar resurfacing compared to those who did not. Secondary aims were to identify: (1) factors associated with resurfacing, (2) the effect of resurfacing on specific components of the OKS related to patellofemoral function, (3) the influence on patient satisfaction, and (4) whether a subgroup of patients had an improved outcome when resurfacing was undertaken.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken using outcome data from the arthroplasty database held at the study centre. Patient demographics and OKS were collected preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was assessed at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Three thousand one hundred and twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria of which 46.5% (n = 1453) underwent resurfacing. There were no differences in the OKS change at 1 or 2 years between those undergoing and not undergoing resurfacing (difference 0.2, p ≥ 0.469). Patients undergoing resurfacing were more likely to be female (odds ratio (OR) 1.53, 95% CI 1.30-1.79, p < 0.001), undergo a posterior stabilised knee (OR 6.87, 95% CI 5.71-8.27, p < 0.001) or had a worse response to question 5-standing from a chair, (p = 0.011) or 12-stair descent, (p = 0.017) of the OKS preoperatively. There was no difference in postoperative patient satisfaction (p ≥ 0.180). There was a significantly greater improvement in question 12 of the OKS at 1 year (p = 0.019) in the resurfaced group. There were no patient-related factors or symptoms that were associated with a clinically significant (≥ 5 points) greater postoperative OKS.

CONCLUSION

Patella resurfacing was not associated with a clinically important improvement in OKS. No specific indications for patella resurfacing were identified that offered an improved outcome, but when it was undertaken there was a greater improvement in the ability to descend stairs. Level of evidence Retrospective diagnostic study, Level III.

The Fate and Relevance of the Patella in Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether reimplantation of a patellar component during a two-stage revision for periprosthetic total knee arthroplasty infection (PJI) affects patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) or implant survivorship. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether patellar resurfacing during reimplantation confers a functional benefit or increases implant survivorship after two-stage treatment for PJI.

METHODS

Two-stage revisions for knee PJI performed by three surgeons at a single tertiary care center were reviewed retrospectively. All original patellar components and cement were removed during resection and the patella was resurfaced whenever feasible during reimplantation. PROMs, implant survivorship, and radiographic measurements (patellar tilt and displacement) were compared between knees reimplanted with a patellar component versus those without a patellar component.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients met the inclusion criteria. Forty-three patients (41.7%) underwent reimplantation with, and 60 patients (58.3%) without a patellar component. At a mean follow-up of 33.5 months, there were no significant differences in patient demographics or PROMs between groups (P ≥ .156). No significant differences were found in the estimated Kaplan-Meier all-cause, aseptic, or septic survivorship between groups (P ≥ .342) at a maximum of 75 months follow-up. There was no significant difference in the change (pre-resection to post-reimplant) of patellar tilt (P = .504) or displacement (P = .097) between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Patellar resurfacing during knee reimplantation does not appear to meaningfully impact postoperative PROMs or survivorship. Given the risk of potential extensor mechanism complications with patellar resurfacing, surgeons may choose to leave the patella without an implant during total knee reimplantation and expect similar clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Impact of patient and prosthesis characteristics on common reasons for total knee replacement revision: a registry study of 36,626 revision cases from Australia, Sweden, and USA

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Total knee replacement (TKR) studies usually analyze all-cause revision when considering relationships with patient and prosthesis factors. We studied how these factors impact different revision diagnoses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used data from 2003 to 2019 of TKR for osteoarthritis from the arthroplasty registries of Sweden, Australia, and Kaiser Permanente, USA to study patient and prosthesis characteristics for specific revision diagnoses. There were 1,072,924 primary TKR included and 36,626 were revised. Factors studied included age, sex, prosthesis constraint, fixation method, bearing mobility, polyethylene type, and patellar component use. Revision diagnoses were arthrofibrosis, fracture, infection, instability, loosening, pain, patellar reasons, and wear. Odds ratios (ORs) for revision were estimated and summary effects were calculated using a meta-analytic approach.

RESULTS

We found between-registry consistency in 15 factor/reason analyses. Risk factors for revision for arthrofibrosis were age < 65 years (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.4-2.7) and mobile bearing designs (MB) (OR 1.7; CI 1.1-2.5), for fracture were female sex (OR 3.2; CI 2.2-4.8), age ≥ 65 years (OR 2.8; CI 1.9-4) and posterior stabilized prostheses (PS) (OR 2.1; CI 1.3-3.5), for infection were male sex (OR 1.9; CI 1.7-2.0) and PS (OR 1.5; CI 1.2-1.8), for instability were age < 65 years (OR 1.5; CI 1.3-1.8) and MB (OR 1.5; CI 1.1-2.2), for loosening were PS (OR 1.5; CI 1.4-1.6), MB (OR 2.2; CI 1.6-3.0) and use of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (OR 2.3; CI 1.8-2.9), for patellar reasons were not resurfacing the patella (OR 13.6; CI 2.1-87.2) and MB (OR 2.0; CI 1.2-3.3) and for wear was cementless fixation (OR 4.9; CI 4.3-5.5).

INTERPRETATION

Patients could be counselled regarding specific age and sex risks. Use of minimally stabilized, fixed bearing, cemented prostheses, and patellar components is encouraged to minimize revision risk.

[Digital study on the relationship between position of patellar high point and shape of osteotomy surface in Chinese]

OBJECTIVE

To measure the position of patellar high point and the shape of the osteotomy surface, and to analyze their relationship, distribution, and gender differences.

METHODS

A total of 127 patients who needed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or meniscus repair due to trauma between September 2020 and September 2021 were selected as the research subjects. There were 71 males and 56 females, with an average age of 30.5 years (range, 19-43 years). There were significant differences in height and body weight between male and female patients ( P<0.05), but no significant difference in age and body mass index ( P>0.05). The three-dimensional model of the patella was reconstructed in Mimics software based on the CT images of the knee joint, and then imported into Geomagic Studio software for virtual osteotomy of the patella. The horizontal axis and vertical axis of the osteotomy surface represented the total width (W) and total height (H) of the osteotomy surface, respectively. Then the osteotomy surface was divided into four quadrants with the two axes: inner proximal, inner distal, outer proximal, and outer distal, and the inner width (W1), proximal height (H1), outer width (W2), and distal height (H2) were measured. The midpoint of the patellar ridge was selected as the patellar high point, and the point projected onto the osteotomy surface was defined as the optimal point for patellar prosthesis positioning (OPPP). The distances of OPPP on the horizontal axis (L1) and vertical axis (L2) relative to the center of the osteotomy surface were measured and L1/W1 and L2/H1 were also calculated; the quadrant distribution of OPPP was recorded. The patients were grouped according to gender, and the morphological parameters of the osteotomy surface (W, W1, W2, H, H1, H2) and the parameters related to the position of the OPPP (L1, L2, L1/W1, L2/H1) were analyzed between groups.

RESULTS

The width and height of each osteotomy surface of the patella in males were significantly larger than those in females ( P<0.05). As for the relationship between OPPP and osteotomy surface, the L1 of both male and female patients was 1-7 mm, and there was no significant difference in the distribution between the two groups ( χ ²=8.068, P=0.149); L1/W1 in both male and female patients was mainly 1/10-3/10. The L2 of male patients was 0-5 mm, and that of female patients was -1-4 mm; the difference in distribution between the two groups was significant ( χ ²=15.500, P=0.006); L2/H1 in both male and female patients was mainly 0-1/5. The OPPP of male patients was mainly distributed in the inner proximal (98.59%) and outer proximal (1.41%) quadrants, while the female patients were distributed in the inner proximal (91.07%), inner distal (7.14%), and outer proximal (1.79%) quadrants. There was significant difference in the OPPP quadrant distribution between the two groups ( χ ²=5.186, P=0.036).

CONCLUSION

The OPPP points are widely distributed but mainly concentrated on around 1/5 of the medial patella surface and around 1/10 of the superior patella surface. A small portion of females' OPPP were inferior while all males' OPPP were superior to the center of the patella.

Patella Strength Characteristics in Cemented vs Press-fit Implants: A Biomechanical Analysis of Initial Stability

Background

Patellar resurfacing is routinely performed during total knee arthroplasty to reduce pain associated with patellofemoral osteoarthritis. With 3-dimensional ingrowth materials readily available, the present study aimed to evaluate if cemented polyethylene (CP) patellar buttons conferred higher ultimate load to failure than press-fit metal-backed (PF) buttons in axial compression.

Material and methods

Ten matched cadaveric and 20 composite patellae were resurfaced and implanted with either a PF or CP button. Biomechanical testing using an MTS machine was performed to measure the force required to generate a periprosthetic patella fracture. Mean load to failure and load to failure per 1-mm patellar thickness were compared with a paired and independent samples Students’ t-test for the cadaveric and composite patellae, respectively.

Results

The average load to failure for the matched cadaveric patellae with PF implants was significantly lower than that for patellae with CP buttons (4082.05 N vs 5898.37 N, P = .045). The average load to failure for composite patella with PF implants was significantly higher than that for composite patellae with CP implants (6004.09 N vs 4551.40 N, P = .001). The mean load to failure per 1-mm patellar thickness was also significantly higher for composite patellae with PF implants (263.80 N/mm vs 200.37 N/mm, P = .001).

Conclusion

Cadaveric patellae with cemented implants had a significantly higher ultimate load to failure in axial compression than press-fit patella. However, this result was reversed in the composite model. Exploration of biological and composite model properties could provide further insight into patellar implant selection during total knee arthroplasty.

Association between type of anesthesia and length of hospital stay in primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty patients: a single-center retrospective study

Objective

This study explored the risk factors influencing the length of hospital stay (LOS) and establish whether the type of anesthesia is independently associated with the LOS in patients after primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, 2309 patients undergoing unilateral TKA were recruited between January 2013 and June 2014 in a tertiary academic medical center in Singapore. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were used to identify the independent risk factors associated with LOS. Besides, subgroup and interaction analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between the type of anesthesia and LOS.

Result

In total, 2309 patients were identified. Out of these, 791 patients underwent general anesthesia, whereas 1518 patients underwent regional anesthesia. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that prolonged LOS was significantly associated with age ≥ 65 years (β = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.09–0.87; P = 0.015), diabetes mellitus (DM) (β = 0.8; 95% CI, 0.33–1.27; P = 0.001), congestive cardiac failure (CCF) (β = 4.1; 95% CI, 2.02–6.17; P < 0.001), perioperative blood transfusion (β = 5.71; 95% CI, 4.86–6.56; P < 0.001), creatinine > 2 mg/dL (β = 4.54; 95% CI, 2.46–6.62; P < 0.001), ASA status (III) (β = 1.72; 95% CI, 0.72–2.71; P = 0.001), general anesthesia (β = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.41–1.66; P < 0.001). The LOS further decreased among participants receiving regional anesthesia at advanced age (age ≥ 65 years) (β = − 1.12; 95% CI, − 1.66 to − 0.58; P < 0.001), patients with BMI ≤ 25 kg/m² (β = − 1.92; 95% CI, − 2.73 to − 1.11; P < 0.001) or ≥ 30 kg/m² (β = − 0.58; 95% CI, − 1.1 to − 0.06; P = 0.029).

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrated that age ≥ 65 years, DM, CCF, perioperative blood transfusion, creatinine > 2 mg/dL, ASA status (III), general anesthesia are associated with a prolonged LOS after primary TKA. Elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) and patients with BMI ≤ 25 kg/m² or ≥ 30 kg/m² receiving regional anesthesia have a further reduced LOS. Therefore, when TKA is performed, priority for regional anesthesia is given to the elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years old) and those with BMI ≤ 25 kg/m² or ≥ 30 kg/m².

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02817-4.