The use of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of bone marrow oedema - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Conservative treatments of bone marrow lesions

Purpose

Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) of the knee are a common magnetic resonance imaging finding and are present in a wide range of pathologies, including traumatic contusions and fractures, following cartilage surgery alterations, osteoarthritis, transient BMLs syndromes, subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee and spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. Regardless of their aetiology, clinical management may prove challenging. This review focuses on the conservative treatment approaches to manage patients affected by knee BML, thanks to the contribution of field experts.

Methods

Experts from around the globe were involved in performing a review on the most used conservative treatment strategies to address BMLs, trying to summarize the available evidence from the most popular first-line treatments while documenting their applications and results for the different BML aetiologies.

Results

Positive results were documented for unloading knee braces, external shockwave therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, pulsed electromagnetic fields therapy and bisphosphonates. Nonetheless, the analysis of the scientific literature documented a scarce number of publications specifically addressing the knee joint, with even less evidence when it comes to the results for the different aetiologies of BMLs.

Conclusion

The management of BMLs is challenging, and many factors influence clinical and radiological outcomes. This paper summarized the evidence on conservative treatments for knee BMLs. Although showing promising results, conservative options still need to be fully investigated. Open questions to be addressed concern treatment duration, BML stage and overlapping with concomitant therapies. Further studies are needed to identify the best first-line conservative approach or treatment combination based on each BML aetiology.

Level of Evidence

Level V: expert opinion.

[The value of physical therapy modalities for osteonecrosis and bone marrow edema : Current study situation and practical applicability in everyday clinical practice]

Physical therapy modalities play an essential role in the treatment of osteonecrosis and bone marrow edema. In addition to an accurate diagnosis, it is essential to understand the pathogenesis of the disease in order to define relevant physiological, cellular and biochemical targets. After careful consideration of efficacy and side effects, these therapies can be used both as adjunctive measures and as stand-alone treatments to prevent disease progression. In particular, shock wave and magnetic field therapies show promising results both clinically and in ongoing trials. In addition, in the acute phase, a targeted unloading phase may be helpful to reduce mechanical pressure on bone tissue. Interdisciplinary treatment planning and patient compliance are of similar importance.

Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave on IGF-1, TNF-α, and IL-1in Joint Fluid of Patients with Temporomandibular Joint Disorder Syndrome

As a new therapeutic method, extracorporeal shock wave (ESW) has shown remarkable efficacy in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorder syndrome. Numerous studies have shown that it has the advantages of noninvasiveness, short treatment time, etc. It can effectively relieve pain and improve symptoms such as joint mobility and opening degree. In clinical practice, through accurate diagnosis and positioning of different patients, appropriate treatment parameters such as therapeutic transducer, frequency and pressure can be selected to significantly improve the efficacy. At the same time, follow-up evaluation after treatment, including temporomandibular joint disorder index and visual analogue score, is also helpful to fully understand the rehabilitation of patients. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) brings new hope to patients with temporomandibular joint disorder syndrome and has a broad application prospect.

Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedic Surgery: Expanding Our Toolbox

Regenerative medicine leverages the body's inherent regenerative capabilities to repair damaged tissues and address organ dysfunction. In orthopedics, this approach includes a variety of treatments collectively known as orthoregeneration, encompassing modalities such as prolotherapy, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, therapeutic ultrasound, and photobiomodulation therapy, and orthobiologics like platelet-rich plasma and cell-based therapies. These minimally invasive techniques are becoming prominent due to their potential for fewer complications in orthopedic surgery. As regenerative medicine continues to advance, surgeons must stay informed about these developments. This paper highlights the current state of regenerative medicine in orthopedics and advocates for further clinical research to validate and expand these treatments to enhance patient outcomes.

Staying in the Game: Interventions for Managing Achilles Tendinopathy in the In-Season Athlete

ABSTRACT

Achilles tendinopathy is a common overuse injury that is traditionally managed with activity modification and a progressive eccentric strengthening program. This narrative review describes the available evidence for adjunctive procedural interventions in the management of midportion and insertional AT, specifically in the athletic population. Safety and efficacy data from available literature on extracorporeal shockwave therapy, platelet-rich plasma, high-volume injectate with or without tendon scraping, and percutaneous needle tenotomy are used to propose an algorithm for treatment of Achilles tendinopathy for the in-season athlete.

Bone marrow edema of the knee: a narrative review

Bone marrow edema (BME) is a frequent MRI finding in patients with knee pain. According to the etiology, BME of the knee can be classified into three main categories: ischemic, mechanic, and reactive. The diagnosis may be difficult, because of the specificity of symptoms and the poor radiographic findings. MRI is the gold standard, showing an area of altered signal of the bone with an high signal intensity on fat-suppressed, T2 weighted images, usually in combination with an intermediate or low signal intensity on T1 weighted images. Bone marrow edema tends to be self-limiting and, in most cases, resolves without any consequences in a varying amount of time. However, since it may evolve to complete joint destruction, early diagnosis and correct treatment are crucial to prevent the articular degeneration. Conservative therapy is the first step, with no weight-bearing for 3 to 6 weeks on the affected side, in combination with the administration of anti-inflammatory drugs or painkillers to manage symptoms. In non-responding forms and more advanced stages, minimally invasive preservative surgery can provide significant results, with subchondroplasty and core decompression being the two main procedures available. Knee arthroplasty, both total (TKA) or unicompartmental (UKA), is the only effective option when the degradation of cartilage is diffuse and in patients with subchondral bone collapse.

No dose response effect in shockwave therapy applied to bone conditions: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

Background

Shock waves have been widely used to treat bone conditions, but despite the articles and meta-analyses, there are still doubts about its effectiveness, with a meta-analysis pointing to uncertain evidence of positive effects for pain and delayed or non-union, while others point to a positive effect on the same outcomes. One hypothesis for this conflict in the results is the lack of research on the relationship between the applied dose and clinical outcomes.

Purpose

Identify the effect of the dose applied in shockwave therapy on clinical results in bone conditions by meta-regression of controlled trials.

Methods

Our search was conducted on PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science and Scopus in November 2022. The results of 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, post treatment of shockwave therapy of long bone fractures, osteonecrosis of femoral head and bone marrow edema were analyzed for pain, functional scores, size of lesion and non-union with meta-analysis and meta-regressions were conducted with the clinical results and the parameters of the quantity of pulses and energy flux density (EFD).

Results

3641 studies were retrieved and after the selection process eight of them were included for analyses. Shockwave therapy applied at the moment of surgery led to significant lower raw mean difference (RMD) pain scores at six months (RMD: -1.53[-2.58; -0.48], p=0.004) and at 3 and 12 months. Better functional standard mean difference (SMD) scores were found at six months (SMD: 0.83[0.32; 1.33], p<0.001) and at 3 and 24 months. A reduction in the size of lesion for the osteonecrosis of the femoral head was found at 12 months (RMD: -19.01[-35.63; -2.39], p=0.02). The meta-regression analyses showed no association between EFD (R2=0.00; p=0.42), or the number of pulses (R2=0.00; p=0.36) with pain scores; or EFD (R2=0.00; p=0.75), and the number of pulses (R2=0.00; p=0.65) with functional values.

Discussion

The results point that shockwave therapy had positive effects in pain and functional scores at different time points after bone fractures or osteonecrosis of the femoral head, however, neither the quantity of pulses or the energy flux density showed any relationship with these positive outcomes.

Bone marrow edema of the hip: a narrative review

Bone marrow edema (BME) of the hip is a radiological-clinical condition with symptoms ranging from asymptomatic to severe, and it is characterized by increased interstitial fluid within the bone marrow, usually at the femur. Depending on the etiology it can be classified as primary or secondary. The primary cause of BME is unknown, while the secondary forms include traumatic, degenerative, inflammatory, vascular, infectious, metabolic, iatrogenic, and neoplastic etiologies. BME could be classified as reversible or progressive. Reversible forms include transient BME syndrome and regional migratory BME syndrome. Progressive forms include avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVNH), subchondral insufficiency fracture, and hip degenerative arthritis. The diagnosis can be difficult, because at the beginning, the outbreak of hip pain, typically acute and disabling without any prior trauma or exceptional physical activity, is poorly supported by radiographic findings. MRI is the gold standard, and it shows an area of intermediate signal on T1-weighted MRI scans and a high signal on T2-weighted scans, usually lacking sharps margins. In the reversible form, BME is typically self-limiting, and it can be managed conservatively by means of pharmacological and physical therapy. Surgery is generally required for progressive forms in patients who failed non-operative treatment, and it ranges from femoral head and neck core decompression to total hip arthroplasty.

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Pain: A Narrative Review

Extracorporeal shock waves are high-intensity mechanical waves (500-1000 bar) of a microsecond duration with a morphology characterized by a rapid positive phase followed by a negative phase.

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal shock waves have been used for pain treatment for various sub-acute and chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) problems since 2000. The aim of this article is to update information on the role of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of various pathologies that cause MSK pain.

METHODS

Given that in the last two years, articles of interest (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses) have been published on less known indications, such as low back pain, nerve entrapments, osteoarthritis and bone vascular diseases, a literature search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Database, EMBASE, CINAHL and PEDro, with the aim of developing a narrative review of the current literature on this topic. The purposes of the review were to review possible new mechanisms of action, update the level of evidence for known indications and assess possible new indications that have emerged in recent years.

RESULTS

Although extracorporeal shock waves have mechanical effects, their main mechanism of action is biological, through a phenomenon called mechanotransduction. There is solid evidence that supports their use to improve pain in many MSK pathologies, such as different tendinopathies (epicondylar, trochanteric, patellar, Achilles or calcific shoulder), plantar fasciitis, axial pain (myofascial, lumbar or coccygodynia), osteoarthritis and bone lesions (delayed union, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, Kienbock's disease, bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip, pubis osteitis or carpal tunnel syndrome). Of the clinical indications mentioned in this review, five have a level of evidence of 1+, eight have a level of evidence of 1-, one indication has a level of evidence of 2- and two indications have a level of evidence of 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature shows that ESWT is a safe treatment, with hardly any adverse effects reported. Furthermore, it can be used alone or in conjunction with other physical therapies such as eccentric strengthening exercises or static stretching, which can enhance its therapeutic effect.

Shock Waves and Therapeutic Exercise in Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Cross-Over

This study aimed to verify the comparative effectiveness of shock wave therapy versus therapeutic exercise, including the possibility of combining both therapies, in patients who did not respond to the first treatment. A prospective randomized clinical trial was carried out, predicting the possibility of a cross-over between the two treatment options, with patients who did not respond to either treatment. Treatments were, respectively, eccentric therapeutic exercise consisting of 30 min sessions of stretching and strengthening exercises, 5 days a week for 4 weeks (Groups A and D) and Extracorporeal Shock Waves Therapy (ESWT) according to a protocol of three sessions, one per week, each of 2000 pulses at a 4 Hz frequency and administering an energy flux density (EFD) varying between 0.03 mJ/mm² and 0.17 mJ/mm² (Groups B and C). Patients were evaluated at baseline (T0), 2 (T1), 4 (T2) and 6 months (T3) after the last session, using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Low Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and Roles and Maudsley Scale (RMS). The whole study population demonstrated a progressive clinical reduction in pain according to NRS, a recovery from disability according to LEFS and a perception of recovery according to RMS within 6 months, with no significant differences between the four protocols (exercise; ESWT; exercise + ESWT; and ESWT + exercise). Both therapies are therefore valid options in patients with trochanteritis; the combination of the two therapies could be evaluated for those patients who do not respond to the single treatment.

The Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hospital das Clínicas University of São Paulo School of Medicine comprehensive rehabilitation program for elderly people with knee osteoarthritis

Background

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability in the elderly population. Chronic disabling pain is associated with maladaptive neuroplastic changes in brain networks, commonly associated with central sensitization. The main clinical features of nociplastic pain conditions include combined peripheral and central sensitization, and it is crucial to recognize this type of pain, as it responds to different therapies than nociceptive and neuropathic pain.

Objective

To report the effect of the Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (IMREA) comprehensive rehabilitation program to reduce pain and to improve functioning in elderly people with knee OA, under the DEFINE cohort.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational cohort of 96 patients with knee OA, recruited from October 2018 to December 2019. All patients were evaluated by a trained multidisciplinary team using the Kellgren Lawrence classification, bilateral knee ultrasonography, the visual analog scale (VAS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, rigidity and difficulty scores, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), 10-m and 6-min walking test (10 and 6 MWT), Berg Balance Scale, isokinetic dynamometry for knee extension and flexion strength, and pain pressure thresholds. The rehabilitation program included paraspinous lidocaine blocks, focal extracorporeal shockwaves combined with radial pressure waves and functional electrical stimulation according to individual needs. The baseline was compred with the treatment results with a paired t-test.

Results

The study sample is composed of 96 participants, mostly females (n = 81, 84.38%), with bilateral osteoarthritis (n = 91, 94.79%), and a mean age of 68.89 (SD 9.73) years. Functional improvement was observed in TUG (p = 0.019), 6-mwt (p = 0.033), right knee flexion strength (p &lt; 0.0001), WOMAC rigidity and difficulty domains (p &lt; 0.0001). Pain was reduced from baseline as measured by WOMAC pain domain (p &lt; 0.0001), VAS for both knees (p &lt; 0.0001), and SF-36 pain domain (p &lt; 0.0001). Pressure pain threshold was modified above the patella (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002 for right and left knees, respectively), at the patellar tendons (p = 0.015 and p = 0.010 for right and left patellar tendons, respectively), left S2 dermatome (p = 0.017), and L1-L2 (p = 0.008).

Conclusions

The IMREA comprehensive rehabilitation program improved functioning and reduced disabling pain in elderly people with knee OA. We highlight the relevance and discuss the implementation of our intervention protocol. Although this is an open cohort study, it is important to note the significant improvement with this clinical protocol.

Multimodal conservative treatment of migrating bone marrow edema associated with early osteonecrosis of the hip

Bone marrow edema syndrome is a severely disabling painful condition without a defined treatment and related to pathogenetic mechanisms not yet clearly recognized. We report the case of a 59-year-old post-menopausal woman, affected by bone marrow edema associated with early osteonecrosis of the femoral head with secondary appearance of a rare migrant bone edema of the hip acetabulum. Clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging were used to monitor the outcome of the patient. Pre-treatment clinical evaluation revealed pain upon stepping with the left limb, reduced range of motion of spine and hip, and hip pain during passive rotation. Magnetic resonance imaging showed diffuse signal alteration of the head and neck of the left femur in relation to bone edema, associated with an unclear small cephalic area of the femoral head suggestive of initial osteonecrosis. A further computed tomography scan was performed that did not reveal any alterations in bone profile, interruption of the cortex, or trabecular bone collapse. We immediately started a multimodal conservative treatment administering neridronate (100 mg, intravenously) combined with calcium and vitamin D supplementation and biophysical therapies (magnetotherapy and extracorporeal shockwave therapy). We also instructed the patient not to bear the load on the affected lower limb during standing and walking, using crutches. After 2 months, a notable regression of pain with improvement in mobility was observed. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed complete regression of edema at the head and neck of the femur; however, the new appearance of acetabular bone edema of the ipsilateral acetabular roof was detected. After 4 months, a third magnetic resonance imaging showed the disappearance of the femoral head and acetabular roof defects as well as the complete clinical recovery of the patient. An early diagnosis and intervention are essential to conservatively treat cases of bone marrow edema syndrome.