The use of incisional vacuum-assisted closure system following one-stage incision suture combined with continuous irrigation to treat early deep surgical site infection after posterior lumbar fusion with instrumentation

Negative pressure wound therapy in the management of postoperative spinal wound infections: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative wound infection after spinal surgery might be a challenge to manage. A wide range of procedures have been described for managing infected spinal wounds. An increasingly common procedure in the management of surgical site infections (SSI) is negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), also known as vacuum-assisted closure. As there is a paucity of clear clinical advice the present investigation aims to update current evidence on the use of NPWT to manage postoperative SSI occurring after instrumented spine surgery.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the preferred reporting Items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the 2020 PRISMA statement. In January 2024, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. No time constraint was set for the search. All the clinical studies investigating the unique use of NPWT in treating postoperative spinal wound infections were accessed.

RESULTS

A total of 381 patients were included in the present study. Of them 52.5% (200 of 381 patients) were women. The mean age was 52.2 ± 15.2 years. The average length of the NPWT was 21.2 days (range 7-90 days).

CONCLUSION

NPWT could be a valuable adjuvant therapy for the management of SSI after spine surgery. Additional high-quality investigations are required to assess the efficacy and safety of NPWT in SSI after spine surgery, especially if combined with contraindications or risk factors, such as the presence of intraoperative CSF leak.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Systematic review.

Vacuum assisted closure and local drug delivery systems in spinal infections: A review of current evidence

Background

Spinal infections are still showing increased incidence throughout the years as our surgical capabilities increase, coupled with an overall aging population with greater number of chronic comorbidities. The management of spinal infection is of utmost importance, due to high rates of morbidity and mortality, on top of the general difficulty in eradicating spinal infection due to the ease of hematogenous spread in the spine. We aim to summarize the utility of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) and local drug delivery systems (LDDS) in the management of spinal infections.

Methods

A narrative review was conducted. All studies that were related to the use of VAC and LDDS in Spinal Infections were included in the study.

Results

A total of 62 studies were included in this review. We discussed the utility of VAC as a tool for the management of wounds requiring secondary closure, as well as how it is increasingly being used after primary closure as prophylaxis for surgical site infections in high-risk wounds of patients undergoing spinal surgery. The role of LDDS in spinal infections was also discussed, with preliminary studies showing good outcomes when patients were treated with various novel LDDS.

Conclusions

We have summarized and given our recommendations for the use of VAC and LDDS for spinal infections. A treatment algorithm has also been established, to act as a guide for spine surgeons to follow when tackling various spinal infections in day-to-day clinical practice.

Cost Savings Associated with Vacuum-Assisted Closure in Trauma Patients Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the implications of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) versus standard wound dressings on postoperative posterior spinal fusion (PSF) wounds with respect to potential cost savings associated with reduced incidence of surgical site infections.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of trauma patients who underwent open PSF under the care of a single surgeon at a Level I trauma center. Patients were postoperatively monitored for 90 days. Statistical analysis was performed with χ2 testing with the calculation of number needed to treat values.

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria were met by 208 patients who underwent open PSF. The χ2 test revealed a significant increase in incidence of surgical site infections (20% vs. 8%; P = 0.021) in the non-VAC group (n = 112) compared with the VAC group (n = 96). Cost-benefit analysis revealed that use of VAC in patients undergoing open PSF could enable a mean cost savings of $163,492 per 100 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of VAC in patients undergoing open PSF was associated with a 2-fold decrease in incidence of surgical site infections and an infection-related cost savings of $163,492 per 100 patients. Further investigation is needed to ascertain additional benefits of VAC usage in patients undergoing open PSF.

Incisional Wound Vacuum-Evaluation of Wound Outcomes in Comparison With Standard Dressings for Posterior Spinal Fusions in Traumatic Patients

BACKGROUND

Postoperative incisional negative pressure wound vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) dressings are being used as a primary dressing to optimize wound healing and help avoid complications of infection and dehiscence. Few studies have investigated whether application of VAC dressings on postoperative posterior spinal wounds can reduce the incidence of surgical site infections.

OBJECTIVE

To describe our single-surgeon experience of using primary VAC after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in a large sample of trauma patients.

METHODS

This was an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective comparative study and included all trauma patients presenting to our level 1 safety-net trauma center who required PSF and were operated on by the senior surgeon between 2016 and 2021. Primary outcomes were complications (surgical site infection, readmission for infection, and wound-related return to operating room [OR]) within 90 days after surgery. χ2 testing and Student t testing were used to assess differences between treatment groups while bivariate and multivariate regression was performed for outcome assessment.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-four patients met criteria and were included. One hundred fifty-seven (59%) were treated with standard dressing and 107 (41%) with VAC. Patients treated with VAC were more likely to be older (P = .015), have diabetes (P = .041), have an elevated body mass index (P = .020), and had more levels of fusion (P = .002). Despite this, presence of VAC was independently associated with decreased 90-day infection (hazard ratio = 0.397, P = .023) and decreased 90-day return to OR for wound-related reasons (hazard ratio = 0.099, P = .031).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the use of standard dressing, VAC was found to decrease surgical site infection and return to OR risk in trauma patients undergoing PSF.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Spinal Surgery

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has demonstrated promise in the management of surgical site infections as well as assisting in surgical wound healing. In this manuscript, we describe the mechanisms and applications of NPWT for surgical wounds and existing evidence for NPWT in cardiac, plastic, and general surgery, followed by a discussion of the emerging evidence base for NPWT in spinal surgery. We also discuss the different applications of NPWT for open wounds and closed incisions, and the promise of newer closed-incision NPWT (ciNPWT) devices. There is nominal but promising prospective evidence on NPWT's efficacy in select at-risk populations for post-operative wound complications after spinal surgery. As there is currently a paucity of robust clinical evidence on its efficacy, rigorous randomized prospective clinical trials are needed.

Sweat contamination induced surgical site infections after spine surgery: Three case reports and literature review

Introduction and importance

Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most intractable complications following spine surgery during the early postoperative stage. Elderly (age > 70 years), body mass index > 30, smoking, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, low serum albumin, operation time > 3 h, and perioperative blood loss > 500 mL are the common risk factors of SSI after spine surgery. However, there are few published reports about sweat contamination induced surgical site infections with Staphylococcus epidermidis up to date. Staphylococcus epidermidis is a permanent member of the normal human microbiota and has emerged as an important opportunistic pathogen in SSI. We aim to detect the influence of sweat infiltration on SSI with Staphylococcus epidermidis and effective management.

Case presentation

A 73-year-old male, a 54-year-old male and a 73-year-old female were admitted to our hospital. All of them underwent posterior compression and fusion surgery with internal fixation and got surgical site infection after primary surgery. Two of them suffered moderate surgical site infection while the third patient with comorbidities suffered severe surgical site infection. Antibiotic therapy and debridement with internal fixation retained were utilized during which microbiological culture were taken. The moderate infection patients got fully recovered after debridement and primary suture while the serious one had recurrence after the first debridement, and then the second operation was performed. SSI, however, relapsed after three days. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system was placed in the third debridement. The severe patient got well recovered and discharged after displacement of VAC system.

Clinical discussion

This report serves to explore a normal but overlooked factor for SSI. SSI is one of the most intractable complications after spine surgery and the report introduce some uncomplicated but effective methods to moderate and severe SSI.

Conclusion

Sweat-contaminated is an inducement of SSI with Staphylococcus epidermidis that should attract surgeons' attention. For mild infection, changing dressing and infrared treatment can achieve good results. For moderate infection, one debridement and primary suture are enough. For severe infection, early application of VAC system can reduce the number of debridement and achieve good clinical outcome.

•

The article introduces a factor that can cause early postoperative stage infection which is intractable complications.

•

Three patients with fixation retained were shown to discuss whether instrumentation should be removed in deep infection.

•

The report generalized effective therapeutics for mild, moderate and severe infection in early stage.