Anatomical study for the treatment of proximal humeral fracture through the medial approach

Dual-Plate Fixation for Proximal Humerus Fractures With Unstable Medial Column in Patients With Osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES

To compare radiological and clinical outcomes between lateral locking plate (LLP) and dual-plate fixation (LLP and additional medial buttress plate) for proximal humerus fractures with medial column comminution and varus deformity in patients with osteoporosis.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Overall, 52 patients were enrolled. Of these, 26 patients underwent dual-plate fixation. The control group (LLP) was matched to the dual-plate group for age, sex, injured side, and fracture type.

INTERVENTION

Patients in the dual-plate group were treated with LLP and medial buttress plate, whereas patients in the LLP group were treated with only an LLP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Demographic factors, operative time, and level of hemoglobin of the 2 groups obtained from medical records. Changes in the neck-shaft angle and the development of postoperative complications were recorded. Clinical outcomes were measured based on the visual analog scale; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; and Constant-Murley scores.

RESULTS

The operation time and hemoglobin loss did not differ significantly between the groups. Radiographic evaluation showed a significantly lower change in neck-shaft angle in the dual-=plate group than in the LLP group. The dual-plate group also showed better Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; and Constant-Murley scores than the LLP group.

CONCLUSION

Fixation using additional medial buttress plate with LLP may be considered for treating proximal humerus fractures in patients with an unstable medial column, varus deformity, and osteoporosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Physiological Offset Parameters of the Adult Shoulder Joint-A MRI Study of 800 Patients

Background: Humeral offset (HO) and glenoidal offset (GO) are important morphological parameters in diagnostics and therapy for shoulder pathologies. However, physiological reference values have not yet been sufficiently determined. The aim of the present study was to establish physiological reference values for shoulder offset parameters (SOPs). Methods: MRI images of the shoulder joints of 800 patients (mean age: 50.13 years [±16.01]) were analysed retrospectively. HO, GO, lateral glenoidal humeral offset (LGHO), humeral shaft axis offset (HAO) and cortical offset (CO) were measured. SOPs were examined for associations with age, gender, side and osteoarthritis. Results: The mean HO was 26.19 (±2.70), the mean GO was 61.79 (±5.67), the mean LGHO was 54.49 (±4.69), the mean HAO was 28.17 (±2.82) and the mean CO was 16.70 (±3.08). For all SOPs, significantly higher values were measured in male shoulders. There was a significantly (p < 0.001) higher mean value for HO, GO and LGHO in right shoulders. There was a significant correlation between age and LGHO, and HAO and CO, but not between age and HO or GO. Shoulders with osteoarthritis and non-osteoarthritis did not differ in the mean value of HO, GO, LGHO and HAO, except for CO (p = 0.049). Conclusion: Reference values for SOPs in the adult shoulder joint were determined for the first time. Significant gender-specific differences were found for all measured SOPs. In addition, it was seen that for some SOPs, the joint side and the patient’s age has to be taken into account in shoulder diagnostics and surgery.