Fractures of the distal femur in elderly patients: retrospective analysis of a case series treated with single or double plate

Weightbearing versus non-weight bearing in geriatric distal femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Demographics of patients who sustain geriatric distal femoral fractures (DFF) match those of patients with neck-of-femur fractures but have limited evidence with which to support post-operative weightbearing protocols.

PURPOSE

This systematic review sought to identify any difference in outcomes for elderly patients with DFF who were allowed early versus delayed weightbearing postoperatively.

METHODS

DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Medline, Embase and The Cochrane Library, reference lists of retrieved articles.

STUDY SELECTION

English language papers published between January 2010 and February 2023 with AO-OTA type 33A, B and C femoral fractures as well as Lewis and Rorabeck Type I and II periprosthetic DFF surgically treated with either a lateral locking plate or retrograde intramedullary nail and an average patient age of ≥ 60 years.

DATA EXTRACTION

Studies were assessed for inclusion by two authors and quality was assessed using the MINORS tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Sixteen studies were included, Meta-analysis of non-union, malunion, infection, delayed union and implant complications was performed using Microsoft Excel and the MetaXL extension. The data on return to mobility were presented in narrative form. The analyses demonstrated no difference between the early and delayed weightbearing groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no significant differences in complication rates between early versus delayed weightbearing after surgery for DFF in an elderly population. The study results are limited by high heterogeneity and low-quality studies. High quality, prospective studies are needed to determine the ideal postoperative weightbearing protocol.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Level III studies. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews registration-Prospero CRD42022371460.

Intraoperative Fracture during the Insertion of Advanced Locking Screws (T2 Alpha Femur Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing System): Report of Two Cases and Identifying Causes and Prevention

Background: Recently, the T2 alpha nailing system (Stryker, Inc.), which has advanced locking screws that can attach a screw to a rod, has been used worldwide and is expected to improve fracture fixation. We analyzed two cases of supracondylar femoral fractures in older adult patients, in which intraoperative fractures occurred during the insertion of advanced locking screws of the T2 alpha femur retrograde intramedullary nail. Case presentation: A 93-year-old and an 82-year-old woman each underwent T2 alpha femur retrograde nail fixation for supracondylar femur fractures at separate hospitals, and advanced locking screws were used as the proximal transverse locking screws. In both patients, a fracture line was observed at the proximal screw postoperatively, and the fractures were refixed with distal cable wiring and/or femoral distal plates. The patients were subsequently discharged from the same facility with no remarkable pain. Conclusions: When inserting advanced locking screws, it is necessary to enlarge the screw hole in the near-bone cortex with a counterbore drill, which might add torque to the bone cortex that could result in fractures. If the sleeve is distant from the bone, the counterbore drill will not reach the bone, the screw hole will not expand, and the insertion of advanced locking screws will apply a strong torque to the bone cortex and may result in fracture. Moreover, it is important to confirm that the counterbore drill is securely inserted under fluoroscopy and to carefully enlarge the bony foramen manually to prevent fractures during screw insertion.

Radiographic Union Assessment in Surgically Treated Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Distal femur fractures are known to have challenging nonunion rates. Despite various available treatment methods aimed to improve union, optimal interventions are yet to be determined. Importantly, there remains no standard agreement on what defines radiographic union. Although various proposed criteria of defining radiographic union exist in the literature, there is no clear consensus on which criteria provide the most precise measurement. The use of inconsistent measures of fracture healing between studies can be problematic and limits their generalizability. Therefore, this systematic review aims to identify how fracture union is defined based on radiographic parameters for surgically treated distal femur fractures in current literature.

METHODS

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection databases were searched from inception to October 2022. Studies that addressed surgically treated distal femur fractures with reported radiographic union assessment were included. Outcomes extracted included radiographic definition of union; any testing of validity, reliability, or responsiveness; reported union rate; reported time to fracture union; and any functional outcomes correlated with radiographic union.

RESULTS

Sixty articles with 3,050 operatively treated distal femur fractures were included. Operative interventions included lateral locked plate (42 studies), intramedullary nail (15 studies), dynamic condylar screw or blade plate (7 studies), dual plate or plate and nail construct (5 studies), distal anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior screws (1 study), and external fixation with a circular frame (1 study). The range of mean follow-up time reported was 4.3 to 44 months. The most common definitions of fracture union included "bridging or callus formation across 3 of 4 cortices" in 26 (43%) studies, "bony bridging of cortices" in 21 (35%) studies, and "complete bridging of cortices" in 9 (15%) studies. Two studies included additional assessment of radiographic union using the Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fracture (RUST) or modified Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fracture (mRUST) scores. One study included description of validity, and the other study included reliability testing. The reported mean union rate of distal femur fractures was 89% (range 58%-100%). The mean time to fracture union was documented in 49 studies and found to be 18 weeks (range 12-36 weeks) in 2,441 cases. No studies reported correlations between functional outcomes and radiographic parameters.

CONCLUSION

The current literature evaluating surgically treated distal femur fractures lacks consistent definition of radiographic fracture union, and the appropriate time point to make this judgement is unclear. To advance surgical optimization, it is necessary that future research uses validated, reliable, and continuous measures of radiographic bone healing and correlation with functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Geriatric distal femoral fractures: post-operative complications and nine-year mortality-a retrospective analysis of two tertiary trauma centres

PURPOSE

This study aimed to estimate the mortality at various post-operative intervals and explore influential variables for these outcomes in elderly patients with distal femur fractures (DFF).

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted across two tertiary care institutions, between 2014 and 2020. The primary outcomes were mortality rates at 30-day, six month, and one year post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included 1-year readmission and reintervention rates along with their correlated complications.

RESULTS

A total of 37 DFF in 35 patients was analyzed; average age was 83.6 years (range, 65-98 years). The overall mortality rate at a maximum follow-up of 8.8 years was 74% (26/35 patients). The median survival time was 3.2 years and the survival probability at five years was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13 to 43%). Mortality rates at 30 days, six months, and one year after surgery were 8.6% (3 patients), 23% (8 patients), and 34% (12 patients), respectively. Overall mortality rate was 64% (15/24 patients) for native distal femur fractures, and 92% (13/14 patients) for periprosthetic fractures (p = 0.109). Patients older than 85 years and male gender were identified as risk factors for mortality within the first year post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

Elderly fractures have a high mortality at eight years of follow-up. Mortality at one year was much higher than in other studies of the same nature. We did not find statistically significant differences when comparing native bone fractures with periprosthetic fractures. Factors that impact mortality were being a man, advanced age, elevated index comorbidity, and dementia. There is no relationship between the time to be taken to the surgical procedure and mortality results.