Peri-prosthetic bone remodeling of hydroxyapatite-coated compaction short stem was not affected by stem alignment

No Impact of Contact Between the Medial Collar of a Hydroxyapatite-Coated Triple-Tapered Stem and the Femoral Neck on Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density

BACKGROUND

Hydroxyapatite-coated, triple-tapered, shorter-length stems with a medial collar have been reported with good results for a few years. We investigated whether contact between the medial collar and femoral neck affects clinical outcomes and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients who have this type of stem in their total hip arthroplasty construct.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center study involving 62 patients scheduled for unilateral total hip arthroplasty using a hydroxyapatite-coated, triple-tapered, shorter-length stem who were followed for at least 1 year postoperatively. All patients had a Dorr type B femoral canal shape. Contact between the medial collar and the femoral neck was evaluated by computed tomography at the third postoperative month, and patients were classified into 2 groups. Postoperative clinical outcomes were investigated by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores; radiological evaluation included stem fixation, spot welds and cortical hypertrophy, postoperative 3-dimensional stem alignment, and periprosthetic BMD changes.

RESULTS

There were 51 patients in the Contact + group (collar and neck contact) and 11 in the Contact-group (no contact). There were no differences between the 2 groups in the improvement of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, stem fixation, occurrence of cortical hypertrophy, or 3-dimensional stem alignment. Radiolucent lines were present in zones 3, 4, and 5 in 6 patients (12%) in the Contact + group only, who had no statistical difference between the 2 groups. Bone mineral density (BMD) decreased most in zone 7 in both groups, with no difference between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence or absence of contact between the medial collar and femoral neck did not affect postoperative BMD changes or radiological or clinical results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Bone mineral density in osseointegration implant surgery: A review of current studies (Review)

Osseointegration implant (OI) surgery is the latest rehabilitation technology for amputees, where a bone-anchored implant obviates the limitations of traditional socket prostheses. The bone mineral density (BMD) in the periprosthetic and other anatomical regions can be used to assess bone remodelling following OI surgery. Currently, limited studies have used BMD measurements in reporting post-operative OI outcomes and the association between the maintenance of BMD and implant efficacy has remained elusive. This review captured and analysed all studies that have reported the BMD as an objective outcome measure in patients with trans-femoral or trans-tibial OI. The PubMed, Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched using the terms 'amputation', 'osseointegration' and 'bone mineral density'. A total of 6 studies involving human participants were included for analysis. All studies used dual X-ray absorptiometry and/or X-rays for measuring BMD. Rehabilitation of trans-femoral or trans-tibial amputation using OI may help restore healthy BMD by enabling physiological bone loading. However, there is a low correlation between the BMD around the OI and the success of OI surgery or the risk of periprosthetic fractures. This review summarises the current evidence on BMD assessment in OI for lower limb amputee rehabilitation. Despite the great variability in the results, the available evidence suggests that OI may help restore BMD following surgery. The limited evidence calls for further investigation, as well as the development of a standard BMD measurement protocol.

The assessment of canal flare index and proximal femoral bone density can improve stem selection for peri-prosthetic bone maintenance after total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Bone maintenance after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is important for implant success. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between patient characteristics and periprosthetic bone maintenance after THA for better implant selection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 112 consecutive patients who underwent THA using full hydroxyapatite (HA) compaction with short (n = 55) or short-tapered wedge (n = 61) stems. Periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) was compared between the two groups after propensity score matching, and the relationship between periprosthetic BMD changes and patient background was analyzed.

RESULTS

Both groups showed similar periprosthetic BMD changes after adjusting for patient background using propensity score matching. Canal flare index > 3.7 in patients that underwent THA using tapered-wedge stem (odds ratio (OR), 3.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-7.9, p = 0.013) and baseline zone 1 BMD > 0.65 in patients that received with short HA compaction stems (OR, 430.0; 95% CI 1.3-1420, p = 0.040) were associated with proximal periprosthetic bone maintenance after THA.

CONCLUSION

Considering their predictive value, canal flare index and zone 1 BMD assessment might be useful strategies for implant selection during THA.

Effect of short stem alignment on initial fixation, stress transfer, and failure risk

BACKGROUND

Short stems are advantageous for revision as they preserve autogenous bone. At present, the method of short-stem installation is determined based on the surgeon's experience.

OBJECTIVE

To provide the guideline for installing a short stem, we aimed to investigate the alignment effect on the initial fixation of the stem, stress transfer, and the risk of failure numerically.

METHODS

Models in which the caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle and flexion angle were hypothetically changed based on the two clinical cases of hip osteoarthritis were analyzed using the non-linear finite element method.

RESULTS

The medial settlement of the stem increased in the varus model and decreased in the valgus model. With varus alignment, the stresses acting on the femur were high in the distal to the femoral neck. In contrast, the stresses in the proximal to the femoral neck tend to be higher with valgus alignment, although the difference in the femur stress between varus and valgus alignment was slight.

CONCLUSION

Both initial fixation and stress transmission are lower when the device was placed in the valgus model than in the actual surgical case. In order to obtain initial fixation and suppress stress shielding, it is essential to extend the contact area between the medial portion of the stem and the femur along the bone axis, and to ensure adequate contact between the lateral portion of the stem tip and the femur.

Accuracy comparison of cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty using Hip Align and AR-Hip in the supine position

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of acetabular cup positioning between the accelerometer-based navigation system and the augmented reality-based navigation system during THA in the supine position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 66 patients (70 hips) who underwent THA using two types of portable navigation system, Hip Align or AR-Hip, in the spine position. The absolute difference between the intraoperative navigation record and postoperative measurement using computed tomography data was evaluated. Preoperative clinical factors that decreased the accuracy of cup positioning by ≥ 3° were analyzed via multiple logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The average absolute error of inclination was 2.8 ± 2.6° in Hip Align and 2.7 ± 1.8° in AR-Hip, and absolute anteversion error was 2.5 ± 2.0° in Hip Align and 2.6 ± 2.2° in AR-Hip, and there was no significantly different between the two navigation systems. There was a significant association between the absolute measurement error (≥ 3°) of cup inclination and patients' BMI in the Hip Align group [odds ratio (OR) 1.350; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.035-1.760; p = 0.027], but not in the AR-Hip group.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of the acetabular cup positioning between the Hip Align and AR-Hip showed no difference during THA in the spine position. The high BMI could have negative influence on the accuracy of cup positioning in THA using Hip Align, thus AR-Hip could be designable for obesity patients.

Comparison study of periprosthetic bone remodeling between simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty and unilateral total hip arthroplasty: a matched cohort study

PURPOSE

The load-bearing pattern of periprosthetic bone may differ between patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral and unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). We investigated the differences in periprosthetic bone remodeling after simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty and unilateral total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 154 consecutive patients undergoing THA using full hydroxyapatite (HA) compaction short stems. Patient characteristics including age, body mass index, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, and bone shape of the proximal femur were adjusted by propensity score matching. Subsequently, periprosthetic bone mineral density changes were compared between simultaneous bilateral and unilateral THA.

RESULTS

We found that bone mineral density loss in the simultaneous bilateral THA group was significantly higher in zones 6 and 7 at 24 months after THA (zone 6, p = 0.019; zone 7, p = 0.041). Periprosthetic bone mineral density loss was not associated with clinical factors, including age, body mass index, and daily activity. Additionally, we demonstrated that periprosthetic bone mineral density loss was higher in zones 1, 4, 6, and 7 of patients with a normal hip on the contralateral side after unilateral THA (zone 1, p = 0.041; zone 4, p = 0.041; zone 6, p = 0.037; zone7, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative periprosthetic bone remodeling was lower in patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral THA than in those who underwent unilateral THA, even though patient characteristics were adjusted by propensity matching. Further observation of periprosthetic bone mineral density loss is needed to clarify the differences between the groups.