Sequential damage assessment of the posterolateral complex of the knee joint: a finite element study

Do Age and Timing Influence the Outcomes of Single-stage Reconstruction of Multiple Ligament Knee Injuries? 5-10 Years Follow Up

OBJECTIVES

Multiple ligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are disruptive injuries, however, there are controversies in the results of acute and delayed reconstruction. Also, clinical outcomes between patients older or younger than 40 have not been compared in MLKIs. This study was designed to investigate the influence of age and timing of reconstruction on the outcomes of single-stage reconstruction of MLKIs.

METHODS

The patients who underwent reconstruction of multiple injured ligaments because of MLKIs between May 2013 and July 2019 were added to the cohort. The postoperative complications, knee range of motion (ROM), Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 score, Tegner activity level, patient satisfaction, and SF-36 score were compared between young (≤ 40 years old, n = 41) and old patients (n = 61); acute (≤ 3 weeks after injury, n = 75) and delayed reconstruction (n = 27), using Mann-Whitney U test or χ2 test.

RESULTS

A total of 102 MLKI patients managed by single-stage multi-ligament reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were followed up after surgery for a mean of 7.3 years (5.2-10.7 years). At the last follow-up, no significant difference was found in knee ROM, functional scores, and patient-reported outcomes between patients older or younger than 40; acute and delayed reconstruction (p > 0.05). The rate of complications in the delayed reconstruction group was higher than that of the acute reconstruction group (22.2% vs 5.3%, p < 0.05). The IKDC objective scores reached grade A in 63.7%-80.4% of patients, and grade B in 11.8%-23.5% patients.

CONCLUSION

The single-stage reconstruction of MLKIs can obtain comparative long-term functional and objective outcomes regardless of patients older or younger than 40; acute and delayed reconstruction, however, delayed reconstruction is related to a high rate of postoperative complications.

Role of the proximal tibiofibular joint on the biomechanics of the knee joint: A three-dimensional finite element analysis

PURPOSE

The proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) is easily ignored, although many diseases of the knee are caused by PTFJ injuries. Therefore, studying PTFJ biomechanics is very important. The effects of PTFJ injury on ankle function have been reported. However, few studies have assessed the effects of PTFJ injury on the knee joint. This study was performed to describe the biomechanical effects of PTFJ on the knee joint according to a three-dimensional finite element model.

METHODS

The knee joint of a healthy volunteer was scanned by CT and MRI. CT and MRI scanning data in DICOM format were imported into Mimics software. Subsequently, 3D models of the normal and PTFJ injured knee, including the bone, cartilage, meniscus and ligament structures were established, and their validity was verified on the basis of available studies in literature. The biomechanical changes in the two knee models under different conditions were compared.

RESULTS

The validity of the intact model was verified. No significant difference was observed in tibial mobility in the two models under the conditions of 134 N forward, 10 N·m internal rotation and 10 N·m valgus load. After application of 134 N backward, 10 N·m varus and external rotation load with respect to the tibia, the posterior movement of the tibia and the varus and external rotation angles of the tibia were 3.583±0.892 mm, 4.799±0.092° and 18.963±0.027° in the normal knee model, and 5.127±1.224 mm, 5.277±0.104° and 21.399±0.031° in the PTFJ injury model, respectively, and a significant statistical difference was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

PTFJ played an important role in maintaining the posterolateral stability of the knee joint and thus deserves more attention in clinical operations.