The active knee extension after extensor mechanism reconstruction using allograft is not influenced by "early mobilization": a systematic review and meta-analysis

Limited Durability of Extensor Mechanism Reconstruction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: Mesh and Allograft Show Equivalent Outcomes at Five-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Extensor mechanism disruption is a challenging complication following total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between patients who received mesh versus allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction.

METHODS

All patients who underwent extensor mechanism reconstruction at a single institution were screened. Demographic and surgical variables were recorded, including technique (ie, synthetic mesh versus allograft reconstruction). Patients were assessed for preoperative and postoperative extensor lag, revision, and duration of follow-up. Analyses, including Kaplan-Meier survivorships, were performed to compare mesh to allograft reconstruction. In total, 50 extensor mechanism reconstructions (30 mesh and 20 allograft) were conducted between January 1st, 2001, and December 31st, 2022.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the cohorts with respect to revision (26.7 [8 of 30] versus 35.0% [7 of 20], P = .680) or failure defined as above knee amputation or fusion (6.7 [2 of 30] versus 5.0% [1 of 20], P = .808). There were also no differences in time to reoperation (average 27 months [range, 6.7 to 58.8] versus 29 months [range, 1.2 to 84.9], P = .910) or in postoperative extensor lag among patients who did not undergo a reoperation (13 [0 to 50] versus 11° [0 to 30], P = .921). The estimated 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival with extensor mechanism revision as the endpoint was similar between the 2 groups (52.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 25.4 to 73.3 versus 55.0%, 95% CI = 23.0 to 78.4%, P = .990).

CONCLUSIONS

The purpose of this study was to present the findings of a large cohort of patients who required extensor mechanism reconstruction. Regardless of the reconstruction type, the 5-year outcomes of patients requiring extensor mechanism reconstruction are suboptimal.

Extensor mechanism reconstruction with allograft following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of achilles tendon versus extensor mechanism allografts for isolated chronic patellar tendon ruptures

BACKGROUND

Extensor mechanism rupture is a severe complication with an incidence of 0.1-2.5% after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Achilles tendon allograft (ATA) and extensor mechanism allograft (EMA) in TKA surgery have yielded mixed clinical results. Our systematic review aims to identify the proportion of failure in extensor mechanism reconstruction after TKA using allograft and evaluate clinical and functional outcomes and the most common complications. Furthermore, we performed a meta-analysis among studies dealing with isolated patellar tendon ruptures to assess the failure rate, surgical complications, and clinical findings (extensor lag and knee range of motion) of extensor mechanism reconstruction using either ATA or EMA grafts.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed following the PRISMA guidelines, including the studies dealing with the use of EMA and ATA for extensor mechanism rupture following TKA. Coleman Methodology Score and the MINORS score were used to assess the quality of the studies. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the failure rate, complications, and clinical findings (extensor lag and knee range of motion) of the ATA and EMA treatments in isolated patellar tendon ruptures.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients (245 knees), with a mean age ranging from 54 to 74 years, who underwent extensor mechanism reconstruction with an allograft were identified in the 18 included studies. We analysed 166 patellar tendon ruptures, 29 quadriceps tendon ruptures, and 29 patellar fractures in the analysis. A chronic injury was described in the majority of included cases. ATA and whole EMA were used in 89 patients (92 knees) and 149 patients (153 knees), respectively. The overall failure percentage was 23%, while EMA and ATA were 23 and 24%. The most common complication was extensor lag (≥ 20°). The overall incidence of postoperative infection was 7%. Eleven of 14 included papers reported more than 100° of the mean postoperative knee flexion. The percentage of patients requiring walking aids is 55 and 34.5% in ATA and EMA, respectively. The failure outcome after extensor mechanism reconstruction in isolated patellar tendon ruptures was 27%, with no statistical difference between EMA and ATA in terms of failure rate and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensor mechanism reconstruction with allograft represents a valid treatment option in patients with acute or chronic rupture following total knee arthroplasty. Persistent extensor lag represents the most common complication. EMA is associated with a lower frequency of patients requiring walking aids at last follow-up, although it has similar clinical and functional outcomes to ATA. In patellar tendon ruptures, ATA has a comparable success rate with EMA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019141574.

Early patellar tendon rupture after total knee arthroplasty: A direct repair method

BACKGROUND

Patellar tendon rupture after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a catastrophic complication. Although the occurrence of this injury is rare, it can lead to significant dysfunction for the patient and is very tricky to deal with. There has been no standard treatment for early patella tendon rupture after TKA, and long-term follow-up data are lacking.

AIM

To introduce a direct repair method for early patella tendon rupture following TKA and determine the clinical outcomes and complications of this method.

METHODS

During the period of 2008 to 2021, 3265 consecutive TKAs were retrospectively reviewed. Twelve patients developed early patellar tendon rupture postoperatively and were treated by a direct repair method. Mean follow-up was 5.7 years. Demographic, operative, and clinical data were collected. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, knee range of motion, extensor lag, and surgical complications. Descriptive statistics and paired t test were employed to analyze the data.

RESULTS

For all 12 patients who underwent direct repair for early patellar tendon rupture, 3 patients failed: One (8.3%) for infection and two (17.6%) for re-fracture. The two patients with re-fracture both underwent reoperation to reconstruct the extensor mechanism and the patient with infection underwent revision surgery. The range of motion was 109.2° ± 10.6° preoperatively to 87.9° ± 11° postoperatively, mean extensor lag was 21° at follow-up, and mean WOMAC and HSS scores were 65.8 ± 30.9 and 60.3 ± 21.7 points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This direct repair method of early patellar tendon rupture is not an ideal therapy. It is actually ineffective for the recovery of knee joint function in patients, and is still associated with severe knee extension lag and high complication rates. Compared with the outcomes of other repair methods mentioned in the literature, this direct repair method shows poor clinical outcomes.