The effect of corticosteroid injection in the treatment of greater trochanter pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Comparative effect of triamcinolone/lidocaine ultrasonophoresis and injection on pain, disability, quality of life in patients with acute rotator cuff related shoulder pain: a double blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Alleviating inflammation should be considered as one of the first steps of the treatment plan in patients with acute rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of triamcinolone/lidocaine ultrasonophoresis, injection on pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with acute RCRSP.

METHODS

A total of 28 acute RCRSP patients were randomly allocated into two groups of ultrasonophoresis and injection. Both groups received vitamin C and shoulder care education for 10 days and then were subjected to therapeutic interventions. Ultrasonophoresis group received triamcinolone (16 mg) and lidocaine (2mg) using ultrasonophoresis (frequency: 3 MHz, intensity: 1.50 W/Cm2), while the injection group received a single subacromial injection of triamcinolone (80 mg) and lidocaine (10 mg). The main outcomes measures were pain assessed by two scales (visual analog scale), and shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), disability (SPADI), and quality of life (Western Ontario rotator cuff questionnaire).

RESULTS

Although the main effect of time was statistically significant for all dependent variables (P< 0.01), no significant interaction was found between group and time (P-value (0.12-0.55)). The ultrasonophoresis effect, size for pain, disability, and quality of life were 2.58, 1.43, 1.78, and 1.35, respectively. The injection effect, size for pain, disability, and quality of life were 1.98, 2.02, 1.40, and 1.60, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Triamcinolone/lidocaine ultrasonophoresis demonstrated similar outcomes to injection in reducing pain, improving disability, and enhancing quality of life in patients with acute RCRSP in short time. According to our findings, ultrasonophoresis with triamcinolone/lidocaine cream is as effective as triamcinolone/lidocaine injection and can be proposed as a potential adjunctive treatment for patients with acute RCRSP.

Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on nerve conduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), as a non-invasive physical agent modality, was effective in relieving spasticity, reducing pain, and improving dysfunction. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of ESWT on nerve conduction, and to find out whether the ESWT group is superior to the control or other comparison groups, thus providing support for guiding the rehabilitation of peripheral nerve injury in clinical work.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from inception to August 20, 2024. This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42024500891). It aimed to compare (1) the ESWT group (ESWT) and baseline, and (2) subgroup analyses: ESWT and the control group (Control), ESWT and the local corticosteroid injection group (LCI), ESWT combined with physical therapy (ESWT + PT) and PT alone, and ESWT and PT. Outcome indicators extracted were nerve conduction study results: sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude, SNAP distal latency, sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude, motor nerve distal latency (MNDL), motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV), H/M ratio and H-reflex latency.

Results

A total of 879 papers were identified through the database searches. Twenty-four trials were included in the systematic review, and 22 trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that: (1) compared to the baseline, ESWT reduced SNAP distal latency mid-term (MD, -0.39; 95% CI: -0.52, -0.26; I 2 = 85%), and improved SNCV both short-term (MD, 4.36; 95% CI: 1.23, 7.49; I 2 = 91%) and mid-term (MD, 2.65; 95% CI: 1.79, 3.51; I 2 = 61%). At the same time, it reduced MNDL short-term (MD, -0.61; 95% CI: -0.91, -0.30; I 2 = 92%), but had no significant effect on MNCV. (2) Subgroup analyses showed that ESWT was superior to Control but not significantly better than LCI, especially in SNCV. The excitatory effect of ESWT + PT on the sensory and motor nerves was significantly better than that of PT alone.

Conclusion

ESWT had some excitatory effect on peripheral nerves, especially on sensory nerve studies. Although the efficacy of this treatment was superior to that of the control group, and the combined treatment with PT was more effective than PT alone, its efficacy might not exceed that of LCI.

Systematic review registration

Unique identifier: PROSPERO (CRD42024500891).

Comparison of the effects of ultrasound-guided steroid injection and anatomic landmark-guided injection on pain and disability in greater trochanteric pain syndrome

Objective

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a prevalent condition that can significantly affect patient comfort and function. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound (USG)-guided and anatomic landmark-guided corticosteroid injections in managing GTPS.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with GTPS received either USG or anatomic landmark-guided corticosteroid injections. Pain scores (Visual Analog Scale, VAS) and functional outcomes (modified Harris Hip Score, HHS) were assessed at baseline, 1 month, and 1 year postinjection. Cost-effectiveness was calculated using public and private payor pricing from June 2024.

Results

Both treatment groups exhibited significant improvements in pain and function. The USG group demonstrated greater initial improvements at the 1-month mark, particularly in VAS activity and HHS. However, these differences between the groups converged over time, with similar long-term outcomes observed in these parameters. The USG-guided injections showed more pronounced initial benefits, especially for patients with higher initial pain levels and lower functional scores. USG was found to be more cost-effective in terms of HHS, but not VAS measures.

Conclusion

While both USG and anatomic landmark-guided injections are effective for managing GTPS, USG-guided injections may provide greater initial relief in pain and function, particularly for patients with higher initial pain levels. USG does not demonstrate longterm superiority over anatomic injections. The study underscores the importance of evaluating long-term outcomes to comprehensively assess the sustained effectiveness of different treatment strategies for GTPS.

Level of Evidence

Level III, Therapeutic study.

Commentary: The Effect of Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Greater Trochanter Pain Syndrome

Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome is a broad term employed to characterize lateral hip pain originating from the structures attached to the greater trochanter of the femur. The documented decrease in work participation, elevated levels of pain and dysfunction impeding physical activity, and diminished quality of life align with those observed in individuals with severe hip osteoarthritis. Effectively managing Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome can present considerable challenges. Generally, patients with Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome tend to respond favourably to conservative management. However, regarding the conservative approach of using corticosteroid injections there is still some debate regarding the specific estimation of effect. A recent systematic review by Wang et al. (2022) was undertaken to explore the effect of corticosteroid injection in the treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome. This commentary seeks to critically assess the methodologies employed in the review conducted by Wang et al. (2022) and provide a broader understanding of the findings in the context of the four pillars of advanced practice; clinical practice, leadership, education and research.

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) affects 17.6% of adults aged 50 to 79 years, particularly women. While exercise therapy and corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are common treatments, their limitations include inadequate pain control and potential tendon weakening. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is an emerging alternative for GTPS. This systematic review assessed ESWT's efficacy in GTPS by evaluating pain and functional outcomes at different follow-up intervals.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was conducted comparing ESWT with other GTPS treatments up to March 1, 2024. Two reviewers independently extracted data, assessing study quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. A random-effects pairwise meta-analysis compared ESWT with other treatments.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs involving 754 patients (169 male, 585 female patients) were included. Seven RCTs were deemed high risk of bias, and 1 RCT had some concerns. Five RCTs investigated focused on focused ESWT, and 3 examined radial ESWT. ESWT provided significantly lower pain scores than other treatments at 2 to 4 months (standardized mean difference = -0.431; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.82 to -0.039; I2 = 83%). Functional improvement (Lower Extremity Functional Scale) was significantly higher at 6 months (weighted mean difference = 6.68; 95% CI, 3.11-10.25; I2 = 0%) but did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference. Focused ESWT provided greater pain reduction than radial ESWT.

CONCLUSION

Three weekly ESWT sessions offer short-term pain relief at 2 to 4 months for patients with GTPS, especially with focused ESWT. Functional improvements at 6 months were notable but not clinically significant. These findings suggest ESWT may complement or serve as an alternative to CSIs and exercise. However, caution is needed when interpreting these results due to high risk of bias with the included RCTs and heterogeneity across the studies. Further high-quality trials are needed to confirm ESWT's long-term benefits over other treatments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Current and future advances in practice: tendinopathies of the hip

Tendinopathy describes persistent tendon pain and loss of function related to mechanical loading. Two common hip tendinopathies seen in practice are gluteal tendinopathy and proximal hamstring tendinopathy. Both conditions can be frustrating for patients and clinicians due to the delay in diagnosis, significant disability caused and lack of response to common treatments. Tendinopathy is a clinical diagnosis and can most often be made using findings from the patient interview and pain provocation tests, without the need for imaging. Specific education and progressive exercise offer a low-risk and effective option for gluteal tendinopathy and result in greater rates of treatment success than corticosteroid injection, both in the short term (8 weeks) and at 1 year. Proximal hamstring tendinopathy is a common, but less researched, and under-recognized cause of persistent ischial pain. As research on proximal hamstring tendinopathy is limited, this review summarizes the available evidence on diagnosis and treatment following similar principles to other well-researched tendinopathies.

Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome With Ultrasound-Guided Bipolar Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Trochanteric Branches of the Femoral Nerve: A Case Series of Nine Patients

BACKGROUND

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a prevalent cause of lateral hip pain that often leads to significant functional limitations. Conservative treatment options include physical therapy, pharmacological treatment, and more invasive techniques such as corticosteroid injections. However, despite the high success rates reported with corticosteroid injections, a significant number of patients have their symptoms persist or recur.

OBJECTIVES

In this case series, we present the outcomes of nine patients with GTPS who underwent ultrasound-guided bipolar pulsed radiofrequency targeting the trochanteric branches of the femoral nerve. We aim to discuss the effectiveness and safety of this approach.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eligible patients referred to our centre underwent ultrasound-guided bipolar pulsed radiofrequency aimed at the trochanteric branches of the femoral nerve. The procedure consisted of one cycle at 42°C for six minutes, followed by the injection of ropivacaine (0.2%, 3 mL) and dexamethasone (12 mg). The Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-sf) and Lequesne Algofunctional Index (LAI) were used before the procedure and at the third and sixth months post-procedure. We monitored immediate and late complications, as well as adverse effects.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Our results indicate a favourable outcome for most patients, with an average pain reduction of 76.51% according to their report of the BPI-sf. Additionally, eight out of nine patients experienced at least 50% relief. These findings align with a previous case series, which reported a similar average pain reduction. Before the procedure, most patients were classified as "extremely severe" in the LAI, with an average score of 18.17. Although there was only a slight reduction of 16.84% at the six-month follow-up, this suggests a potential improvement in their functional status. We did not observe any immediate complications or adverse effects after the procedure, nor were any reported at the subsequent follow-ups, which is consistent with existing literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that ultrasound-guided bipolar pulsed radiofrequency treatment is a promising minimally invasive technique for GPTS, especially for patients who do not respond to conservative treatments. Although our case series provides some evidence of effectiveness and safety, further controlled studies on a larger scale are necessary, particularly to compare this intervention with the use of corticosteroid injections alone.

Hip Pain in an Athlete

ABSTRACT

Hip pain is a common complaint in sports, and narrowing the differential diagnosis can be difficult. Many etiologies are secondary to overuse and respond well to nonsurgical treatment. The increased use of point-of-care ultrasound has helped provide timely and accurate diagnoses and some guided treatments. The hip is in close proximity to the abdomen and pelvis, and clinicians should be familiar with nonmusculoskeletal pain generators. This article is a comprehensive review of hip pain etiologies in athletes.

Effectiveness of Exercise Treatments with or without Adjuncts for Common Lower Limb Tendinopathies: A Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Exercise therapy is usually prescribed as first-line treatment for lower limb tendinopathies. The multitude of exercise- and non-exercise-based management options can be overwhelming for the treating sports professional and patient alike. We chose to investigate the comparative effectiveness of exercise therapy with or without adjuncts for managing the commonest lower limb tendinopathies.

METHODS

Through an extensive systematic literature search using multiple databases, we aimed to identify eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on Achilles tendinopathy, patellar tendinopathy or greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) that included at least one exercise intervention in their treatment arms. Our primary outcomes were patient-reported pain and function (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment; VISA). Follow-up was defined as short-term (≤ 12 weeks), mid-term (> 12 weeks to < 12 months) and long-term (≥ 12 months). The risk of bias and strength of evidence were assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration and GRADE-NMA tools, respectively. Analyses were performed separately for each one of the three tendinopathies.

RESULTS

A total of 68 RCTs were included in the systematic review. All pairwise comparisons that demonstrated statistically and clinically significant differences between interventions were based on low or very low strength of evidence. Based on evidence of moderate strength, the addition of extracorporeal shockwave therapy to eccentric exercise in patellar tendinopathy was associated with no short-term benefit in pain or VISA-P. From the network meta-analyses, promising interventions such as slow resistance exercise and therapies administered alongside eccentric exercise, such as topical glyceryl trinitrate for patellar tendinopathy and high-volume injection with corticosteroid for Achilles tendinopathy were based on low/very low strength of evidence.

CONCLUSION

In this network meta-analysis, we found no convincing evidence that any adjuncts administered on their own or alongside exercise are more effective than exercise alone. Therefore, we recommend that exercise monotherapy continues to be offered as first-line treatment for patients with Achilles and patellar tendinopathies and GTPS for at least 3 months before an adjunct is considered. We provide treatment recommendations for each tendinopathy. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021289534.