The efficacy of gait rehabilitations for the treatment of incomplete spinal cord injury: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

The Orthotic Effects of Different Functional Electrical Stimulation Protocols on Walking Performance in Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series

Background

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of paralyzed muscles can facilitate walking after spinal cord injury (SCI).

Objectives

To test the orthotic effects of different FES walking protocols on lower joint kinematics and walking speed.

Methods

Three adults with incomplete SCI participated in this study. Their lower extremity motor scores and 10-meter walk test results were as follows: subject A: 50, 1.05 m/s, subject B: 44, 0.29 m/s, and subject C: 32, 0.27 m/s. Participants completed four conditions of over-ground walking including no FES and three bilateral FES-walking protocols as follows: multi-muscle stimulation (stimulation of quadriceps and gastrocnemius in the stance phase, and hamstring and tibialis anterior in the swing phase), drop foot (tibialis anterior stimulation), and flexor withdrawal (common peroneal nerve stimulation). The FES system obtained gait phase information from foot switches located under the individuals' heels. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis was undertaken to measure minimum toe clearance (MTC); ankle, knee, and hip range of motion (ROM); stride length; and stride speed.

Results

Compared to no-FES walking, MTC increased during drop foot (all subjects), flexor withdrawal (subjects A and B), and multi-muscle stimulation (subjects B and C) protocols. A significant decrease in ankle ROM was seen with drop foot (all subjects), flexor withdrawal (subjects A), and multi-muscle stimulation (subjects A and C) protocols. Hip ROM increased with drop foot (subjects B and C), flexor withdrawal (subject B), and multi-muscle stimulation (subject C) protocols.

Conclusion

Three FES walking protocols induced positive kinematic changes as indicated by increased MTC, decreased ankle ROM, and increased hip ROM during walking in subjects with incomplete SCI.

Management of Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without Major Bone Injury in Adults

The incidence of cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major bone injury is increasing, possibly because older people typically have pre-existing cervical spinal canal stenosis. The demographics, neurological injury, treatment, and prognosis of this type of CSCI differ from those of CSCI with bone or central cord injury. Spine surgeons worldwide are debating on the optimal management of CSCI without major bone injury. Therefore, this narrative review aimed to address unresolved clinical questions related to CSCI without major bone injury and discuss treatment strategies based on current findings. The greatest divide among spine surgeons worldwide hinges on whether surgery is necessary for patients with CSCI without major bone injury. Certain studies have recommended early surgery within 24 h after injury; however, evidence regarding its superiority over conservative treatment remains limited. Delayed MRI may be beneficial; nevertheless, reliable factors and imaging findings that predict functional prognosis during the acute phase and ascertain the necessity of surgery should be identified to determine whether surgery/early surgery is better than conservative therapy/delayed surgery. Quality-of-life assessments, including neuropathic pain, spasticity, manual dexterity, and motor function, should be performed to examine the superiority of surgery/early surgery to conservative therapy/delayed surgery.