Comparison of efficacy between endoscope-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and open ACDF in the treatment of single-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic and full-endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of the full-endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (FE-PCF) and the unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (UBE-PCF) in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR).

METHODS

Patients who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical method, the patients were divided into two groups: FE-PCF group and UBE-PCF group. Perioperative data included operation time, Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay were collected. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS)-arm, VAS-neck, and Neck Diability Index (NDI) was used to evaluate the clinical outcomes at preoperative, postoperative 1 week and Last follow-up. Serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were recorded to evaluate surgical invasiveness.

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients were included, including 89 cases of FE-PCF and 71 cases of UBE-PCF. The demographic and preoperative data showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). The mean operating time was significantly shorter in the UBE-PCF group compared to FE-PCF group (P < 0.05). Serum CRP and CPK levels of the two groups both exhibited a pattern of rising and then falling, peaking one day following surgery and decreasing to near normal values three days after the operation. Compared with preoperative, both groups showed significant improvement in postoperative VAS and NDI scores, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). However, the differences in results between the groups were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Both UBE-PCF and FE-PCF are secure and efficient methods for treating CSR by continuous visualization. UBE-PCF offers predictable and adequate decompression within a reduced surgical duration, facilitated by its separate observation and operation channels.

Motor Pathways Reorganization following Surgical Decompression for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Combined Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Clinical Outcome Study

(1) Background: Degenerative cervical myelopathy is one of the main causes of disability in the elderly. The treatment of choice in patients with clear symptomatology and radiological correlation is surgical decompression. The application of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) techniques has the potential to provide additional insights into the cortical and corticospinal behavior of the myelopathic cord and to better characterize the possible extent of clinical recovery. The objective of our study was to use nTMS to evaluate the effect of surgical decompression on neurophysiological properties at the cortical and corticospinal level and to better characterize the extent of possible clinical recovery. (2) Methods: We conducted a longitudinal study in which we assessed and compared nTMS neurophysiological indexes and clinical parameters (modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score and nine-hole pegboard test) before surgery, at 6 months, and at 12 months' follow-up in a population of 15 patients. (3) Results: We found a significant reduction in resting motor threshold (RMT; average 7%), cortical silent period (CSP; average 15%), and motor area (average 25%) at both 6 months and 12 months. A statistically significant linear correlation emerged between recruitment curve (RC) values obtained at follow-up appointments and at baseline (r = 0.95 at 6 months, r = 0.98 at 12 months). A concomitant improvement in the mJOA score and in the nine-hole pegboard task was observed after surgery. (4) Conclusions: Our results suggest that surgical decompression of the myelopathic spinal cord improves the neurophysiological balance at the cortical and corticospinal level, resulting in clinically significant recovery. Such findings contribute to the existing evidence characterizing the brain and the spinal cord as a dynamic system capable of functional and reversible plasticity and provide useful clinical insights to be used for patient counseling.