Impact of severe left ventricular dysfunction on in-hospital and mid-term outcomes of Chinese patients undergoing first isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Prognostic factors of surgical management for heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

Objectives

There are many available pharmaceutical and surgical management for Coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. However, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the preferred treatment modality for CAD patients with low ejection fraction (EF) in view of the more favorable outcomes. This study aimed to determine the associated factors of poor outcomes post-CABG for heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction who underwent on-pump and off-pump CABG.

Methods

A retrospective review of CAD patients who underwent isolated on-pump CABG (ONCAB) or off-pump CABG (OPCAB) in Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated with Capital Medical University from January 2013 to March 2021. Only those with confirmed reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% on preoperative echocardiography were included. By analyzing the clinical and surgical data, postoperative mortality and morbidity, as well as major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events (MACCE) as endpoints, certain risk factors of the postoperative complications were identified.

Results

Out of the 500 patients, 64 developed MACCE, of which 14 (13.6%) occurred in the ONCAB group and 50 (14.0%) in the OPCAB group. Univariate COX regression analysis showed that age ≥65 years, history of diabetes, and preoperative renal insufficiency were independent risk factors for postoperative primary endpoint events in CAD patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Following the multivariate COX regression analysis, in addition to the above three risk factors, a history of previous percutaneous coronary angiography (PCI) intervention was also a risk factor for the occurrence of the primary endpoints post-CABG.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis, significant predictors of post-CABG MACCE in patients with HFrEF included being older than 65 years old, having diabetes, preoperative renal insufficiency, and having previous PCI.

Surgical revascularization in stable coronary artery disease with ventricular dysfunction: a single-center cohort study

PURPOSE

Stress-gated myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is used for prognosis in stable coronary artery disease (CAD). We sought to assess coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) outcomes in stable coronary artery disease patients who had myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction.

METHODS

Stable CAD patients who underwent CABG (2012-2019) and had stress-gated MPS were identified retrospectively. Based on the post-stress LV ejection fraction, a total of 130 patients were divided into a control group (51%) and LV dysfunction group (49%).

RESULTS

Patients with left ventricular dysfunction had significantly more mean summed stress score (22.1 ± 9 Vs. 12.5 ± 8; P ≤ 0.001) and summed resting score (14.6 ± 8 Vs. 3.7 ± 4; P ≤ 0.001) compared to the control group respectively. They also had a greater risk for developing low cardiac output syndrome after surgery (OR: 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-6.6, P=0.033). At 4.7 years, freedom from cardiac death was not statistically significant between the left ventricular dysfunction and control groups, respectively (90.2% vs. 95.6%; P=0.157). Cardiac death was not influenced by either ventricular dysfunction at the time of surgery (HR: 2.6, 95% CI 0.64-10.6, P=0.182) nor by having percent ischemic myocardium > 10% (HR: 0.86, 95% CI 0.23-3.24, P=0.826).

CONCLUSION

Significant myocardial ischemia and ventricular dysfunction before complete surgical revascularization did not influence the risk of cardiac-related deaths on long-term follow-up. This might be related to the improved survival after CABG in patients with myocardial ischemia and left ventricular dysfunction.

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting-a surreal controversy?

As per the findings of the SYNTAX Trial, it has been established that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) affords the best long-term results in patients with multivessel disease. However, it is still a point of contention whether 'off-pump' CABG (OPCAB) (on cardiopulmonary bypass) is better. Many studies appear to establish the superiority of one or the other. But there is still no well-planned multi-centre randomised controlled trial looking into all aspects of the issue that can, once and for all, put the controversy to rest. But as long as one is able to give the patient a good result, does it really matter whether the procedure is done off or on pump? This article looks at the available evidence with regard to various parameters comparing OPCAB and conventional CABG in an attempt to answer the question, if at all, it is a question!