Feasibility of primary sternal plating for morbidly obese patients after cardiac surgery

The Results of Rigid Titanium Plate Reinforcement and Only Conventional Wire Methods in Sternal Fixation in Morbidly Obese Patients

INTRODUCTION

In this study, it was aimed to compare the clinical results and complications of rigid titanium plate reinforcement and only conventional wire methods for sternum fixation in morbidly obese patients who underwent sternotomy for open-heart surgery.

METHODS

The study was planned as a retrospective case-control study. Morbidly obese patients who underwent open-heart surgery with median sternotomy between 2011 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of characteristics of the patients (P≥0.05). Sternal dehiscence, sternum revision, wound drainage, and mediastinitis were significantly less common in the titanium plate group (P≤0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of 30-day mortality (P≥0.05).

CONCLUSION

Rigid titanium plate reinforcement application produced more positive clinical results than only conventional wire application. In addition, it was determined that although the rigid titanium plate application prolonged the operation time, it did not make a significant difference in terms of mortality and morbidity compared to the conventional wire applied group.

What is the impact of a previously failed Robicsek repair in the subsequent treatment of sternal dehiscence with thermoreactive nitinol clips?

BACKGROUND

In this study, we conducted a retrospective review of patients at our institution with noninfectious sternal dehiscence (NISD) after median sternotomy who received thermoreactive nitinol clips (TRNC) treatment during a 10-year period. The purpose of the study was to analyze the impact of previous Robicsek repair on the later treatment of sternal dehiscence with TRCN to establish which method was better in high-risk patients with NISD.

METHODS

Between December 2009 and January 2020, out of 283 patients with NISD who underwent refixation, we studied 34 cases who received TRNC treatment. We divided these 34 cases into two groups: patients who had a previously failed Robicsek procedure before TRNC treatment (group A, n = 11) and patients who had been directly referred to TRCN treatment (group B, n = 23). High-risk patients were defined as those having three or more risk factors.

RESULTS

Postoperative complication rate was significantly higher in group A (p = .026). Hospitalization duration was significantly longer in group A due to the higher complication rate (p = .001). Operative time was significantly shorter and blood loss was significantly lower in group B (p = .001).

CONCLUSION

The Robicsek procedure is considered an effective method in the treatment of NISD but, in case of its failure, subsequent TRNC treatment might become cumbersome in high-risk patients. In our study, a previously failed Robicsek procedure caused significantly higher morbidity, additional operative risk and lower success rate in later TRNC treatment of high-risk cases. Ultimately, we speculate that a direct TRNC treatment for NISD is favorable in high-risk patients.

Orthopedic Principles to Facilitate Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols recognize early postoperative mobilization as a driver of faster postoperative recovery, return to normal activities, and improved long-term patient outcomes. For patients undergoing open cardiac surgery, an opportunity for facilitating earlier mobilization and a return to normal activity lies in the use of improved techniques to stabilize the sternal osteotomy. By following the key orthopedic principles of approximation, compression, and rigid fixation, a more nuanced approach to sternal precaution protocols is possible, which may enable earlier patient mobilization, physical rehabilitation, and recovery.

Does Elective Sternal Plating in Morbidly Obese Patients Reduce Sternal Complication Rates?

BACKGROUND

Although the literature shows rigid plate fixation has superior outcomes over wire cerclage techniques, a patient population clearly benefitting from initial sternal plating over standard closure has not been identified. Data on plating as primary sternal closure in the morbidly obese patient remains sparse.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was performed on 564 consecutive patients undergoing complete median sternotomy from July 2014 to July 2017. Postoperative outcomes of patients with a body mass index of 35 kg/m² or more were compared between sternotomies with standard wire cerclage closure and those with sternal plate reinforcement. The primary endpoint was postoperative sternal complication defined as deep sternal wound infection, acute sternal dehiscence, chronic sternal disunion, or noninfectious sternal wound complication requiring operative intervention.

RESULTS

In all, 32.6% of sternotomies (184 of 564) were performed on patients with a body mass index of 35 kg/m² or greater. Of this group, 31.5% (58 of 184) underwent sternal closure with titanium plate reinforcement and 68.5% (126 of 184) underwent traditional chest closure. The overall sternal complication rate was 4.9% (9 of 184), consisting of 6 of 126 nonplated patients and 3 of 58 plated patients (4.8% vs 5.2%, P = .80).

CONCLUSIONS

Sternal plate reinforcement for sternotomy closure of patients with a body mass index 35 kg/m² or greater produced no difference in postoperative sternal complication rates.