A modified axillo-femoral perfusion for acute type a aortic dissection accompanied with lower limb malperfusion

Management for lower limb malperfusion in acute type a aortic dissection patients

OBJECTIVE

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) accompanied with lower limb malperfusion (LLM) is considered to be a catastrophic event, and remains a great challenge for cardiac surgeons. Here we introduce our experience in treating ATAAD patients accompanied with LLM.

METHODS

61 patients diagnosed with ATAAD accompanied by LLM enrolled in this study. All patients received aortic repair (Total-arch replacement or Hemi-arch replacement) as soon as possible on admission. Patients who still suffered LLM were performed extra-anatomic bypass using artificial vessels. All the discharged patients underwent the standard follow-up protocol.

RESULTS

38 patients (38/61, 62.3%) got satisfied reperfusion of the lower limbs after aortic repair while the others did not. Five patients had femorofemoral bypass, 16 received aortofemoral bypass, and two underwent aortofemoral bypass plus femorofemoral bypass. The ICU stay time was 5.4 ± 3.6 days. Fifty-five patients were discharged home successfully, while six patients died postoperatively with hospital mortality of 9.8%. Major postoperative complications included acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis in seven patients, delayed wake-up (>3 days) in 5, prolonged ventilation (>4 days) in 8, and lower limb ischaemia in 1. Follow-up was successfully conducted in 50 patients with a mean follow-up time 4.9 ± 2.6 years. Five patients died during the follow-up. The estimated 5-year survival rate was 87.5 ± 6.1%. CTA images showed 100% patency of the extra-anatomic bypass.

CONCLUSION

Aortic repair plus concomitant extra-anatomic bypass grafting in one operative setting could be a simple, safe and effective treatment on ATAAD patients with LLM.

Malperfusion syndromes in acute type A aortic dissection do not affect long-term survival in Chinese population: A 10-year institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Preoperative malperfusion of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains a catastrophic complication that is associated with high postoperative morbidity and mortality. The relationship between malperfusion and long-term survival in the Chinese population is unknown.

METHODS

A total of 771 patients who underwent ATAAD surgery between January 2009 and December 2018 at our center were included. In-hospital mortality, complications, morbidity, and long-term survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Preoperative malperfusion was identified in 292 of 771 patients (37.9%), the in-hospital mortality rate was 20.9% in patients with preoperative malperfusion and 9.2% in those without. Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality included any malperfusion (odds ratio [OR], 5.132; p = .001), pericardial tamponade (OR, 1.808; p = .046), advanced age (OR, 1.028; p = .003), and cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR, 1.008; p = .001). Immediate emergency surgery (OR, 0.492; p = .007) and antegrade cerebral perfusion perioperatively (OR, 0.477; p = .020) were protective against postoperative mortality. The postoperative survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 94.4% ± 1.5%, 91.9% ± 1.8%, and 83.0% ± 3.2% in patients with malperfusion and 94.7% ± 1.1%, 90.2% ± 1.7%, and 84.4% ± 2.7%, respectively, in those without. Preoperative malperfusion did not significantly affect the long-term outcomes of operative survivors (log-rank p = .601).

CONCLUSION

Malperfusion resulted in an unfavorable prognosis in the short term, but showed almost equal long-term survival in patients without malperfusion of ATAAD. Emergency central repair might be considered to further improve the outcomes of ATAAD with malperfusion.