Clinical and molecular characterization of craniofrontonasal syndrome: new symptoms and novel pathogenic variants in the EFNB1 gene

Case report: Craniofrontonasal syndrome caused by a novel variant in the EFNB1 gene in a Colombian woman

Craniofrontonasal Syndrome is a very rare dominant X-linked genetic disorder characterized by symptoms such as hypertelorism, craniosynostosis, eye alterations, bifid nose tip, and longitudinal ridging and splitting of nails. Heterozygous females are usually the patients severely affected. To date, clinical or genetic data have not been published for these patients in Colombia. Here we report a female proband with coronal craniosynostosis, hypertelorism, strabismus, rotational nystagmus, high-arched palate, dental crowding, scoliosis, severe pectus excavatum, unilateral breast hypoplasia, and brachydactyly; diagnosed with Craniofrontonasal Syndrome with the novel heterozygous variant c.374A>C (p.Glu125Ala) in the EFNB1 gene. So far, she has been treated with physical therapy and surgical correction of the bifid nose and an umbilical hernia. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with this rare genetic disorder in Colombia, expanding its mutational spectrum and highlighting the importance of genetic evaluation of patients with craniosynostosis and facial dysmorphism.

Results from Genetic Studies in Patients Affected with Craniosynostosis: Clinical and Molecular Aspects

Background: Craniosynostosis (CS) represents a highly heterogeneous genetic condition whose genetic background has not been yet revealed. The abnormality occurs either in isolated form or syndromic, as an element of hundreds of different inborn syndromes. Consequently, CS may often represent a challenging diagnostic issue.

Methods: We investigated a three-tiered approach (karyotyping, Sanger sequencing, followed by custom gene panel/chromosomal microarray analysis, and exome sequencing), coupled with prioritization of variants based on dysmorphological assessment and description in terms of human phenotype ontology. In addition, we have also performed a statistical analysis of the obtained clinical data using the nonparametric test χ².

Results: We achieved a 43% diagnostic success rate and have demonstrated the complexity of mutations’ type harbored by the patients, which were either chromosomal aberrations, copy number variations, or point mutations. The majority of pathogenic variants were found in the well-known CS genes, however, variants found in genes associated with chromatinopathies or RASopathies are of particular interest.

Conclusion: We have critically summarized and then optimised a cost-effective diagnostic algorithm, which may be helpful in a daily diagnostic routine and future clinical research of various CS types. Moreover, we have pinpointed the possible underestimated co-occurrence of CS and intellectual disability, suggesting it may be overlooked when intellectual disability constitutes a primary clinical complaint. On the other hand, in any case of already detected syndromic CS and intellectual disability, the possible occurrence of clinical features suggestive for chromatinopathies or RASopathies should also be considered.