Patients' priorities and expectations on an EU registry for rare bone and mineral conditions

ERN BOND: The key European network leveraging diagnosis, research, and treatment for rare bone conditions

There is no universally accepted definition for rare diseases: in Europe a disease is considered to be rare when affecting fewer than 1 in 2000 people. European Reference Networks (ERNs) have been the concrete response to address the unmet needs of rare disease patients and many pan-European issues in the field, reducing inequities, and significantly increasing accessibility to high-quality healthcare across Europe. ERNs are virtual networks, involving centres and patient representatives with the general scope to facilitate discussion on complex cases requiring highly specialised competences and trained expertise. ERN BOND - the European Reference Network on rare BONe Diseases - is one of these 24 approved networks with the specific ongoing mission to implement measures facilitating multidisciplinary, holistic, continuous, patient-centred, and participative care provision to patients, and supporting them in the full realisation of their fundamental human rights. ERN BOND includes in 2023 a total of 53 centres of expertise from 20 European countries. Its governing structure installed in March 2017 includes decision-making, operative and consultative committees, which comprise experts in the field and patient representatives ensuring patient's voice and perspectives are taken into account. Over the years, ERN BOND has worked hard to achieve its mission and valuably contribute to the advancement of diagnosis, management, treatment, and research in rare diseases. The network activities are mainly related to (i) the provision of care which collectively involves averagely 2800 patients diagnosed per year, (ii) the development of education for and training of the healthcare personnel consisting until now in the realisation of 7 thematic workshops and 19 webinars, (iii) the dissemination and exchange and spread of knowledge via network's website (https://ernbond.eu/), social media channels, and newsletters, (iv) the management of related data through a disease registry currently mapping over 2300 cases and recording over 600 reported cases, and (v) the enhancement of research which now include two clinical trials endorsed by the network. ERN BOND represents therefore an unprecedented move to improve the healthcare management of patients suffering from rare bone diseases through European collaborations. This network, through the support from the European Health Programme, will continue to pursue its efforts to achieve its goals, always maintaining the patients and their families at the centre of healthcare services.

Data collection on rare bone and mineral conditions in Europe: The landscape of registries and databases

BACKGROUND

knowledge on the natural history of rare diseases is necessary to improve outcomes. Disease registries may play a key role in covering these unmet needs in the rare bone and mineral community.

OBJECTIVE

to map existing bone and mineral conditions registries in Europe and their characteristics.

METHODS

online survey about the use of registries/databases and their characteristics. This survey was disseminated among members of the European Reference Network on Rare Bone Diseases (ERN BOND) and non-ERN experts in the field of bone and mineral conditions as well as patient organisations.

RESULTS

sixty-three responses from health care providers (HCPs) and 10 responses from patient groups (PGs) were collected. The response rate for ERN BOND members was 55%. Of 63 HCPs, 37 declared using a registry. Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) was the most registered condition. We mapped 3 international registries, all were disease-specific.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for developing a common high-quality platform for registering rare bone and mineral conditions.

The International X-Linked Hypophosphatemia (XLH) Registry: first interim analysis of baseline demographic, genetic and clinical data

BACKGROUND

X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) is a rare, hereditary, progressive, renal phosphate-wasting disorder characterized by a pathological increase in FGF23 concentration and activity. Due to its rarity, diagnosis may be delayed, which can adversely affect outcomes. As a chronic disease resulting in progressive accumulation of musculoskeletal manifestations, it is important to understand the natural history of XLH over the patient's lifetime and the impact of drug treatments and other interventions. This multicentre, international patient registry (International XLH Registry) was established to address the paucity of these data. Here we present the findings of the first interim analysis of the registry.

RESULTS

The International XLH Registry was initiated in August 2017 and includes participants of all ages diagnosed with XLH, regardless of their treatment and management. At the database lock for this first interim analysis (29 March 2021), 579 participants had entered the registry before 30 November 2020 and are included in the analysis (360 children [62.2%], 217 adults [37.5%] and 2 whose ages were not recorded [0.3%]; 64.2% were female). Family history data were available for 319/345 (92.5%) children and 145/187 (77.5%) adults; 62.1% had biological parents affected by XLH. Genetic testing data were available for 341 (94.7%) children and 203 (93.5%) adults; 370/546 (67.8%) had genetic test results; 331/370 (89.5%) had a confirmed PHEX mutation. A notably longer time to diagnosis was observed in adults ≥ 50 years of age (mean [median] duration 9.4 [2.0] years) versus all adults (3.7 [0.1] years) and children (1.0 [0.2] years). Participants presented with normal weight, shorter length or height and elevated body mass index (approximately - 2 and + 2 Z-scores, respectively) versus the general population. Clinical histories were collected for 349 participants (239 children and 110 adults). General data trends for prevalence of bone, dental, renal and joint conditions in all participants were aligned with expectations for a typical population of people with XLH.

CONCLUSION

The data collected within the International XLH Registry, the largest XLH registry to date, provide substantial information to address the paucity of natural history data, starting with demographic, family history, genetic testing, diagnosis, auxology and baseline data on clinical presentation.

"Osteogenesis Imperfecta Patients Wish Orthopedic Surgeons Had Better Strategies to Help with…"-Results of a Patient and Parent-Oriented Survey

Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) is a rare genetic disorder in Type I collagen characterized by bone fractures, fragility, and deformity. Current treatments are focused on decreasing fracture rates, improving bone strength, and improving overall global function. Recent research has focused primarily on fracture fixation and outcomes of intramedullary rodding of long bones. While surgical techniques continue to evolve, recent trends in OI research are focusing on patient quality of life and patient-reported outcomes. We created a 12-question survey seeking information regarding aspects of orthopedic care that OI patients and families feel are the most pressing to improve. The survey was electronically administered, and 341 individuals participated. A total of 75% of respondents who answered the age question (254/335) were adults. Regarding surgical intervention for long bones, only 16% of respondents recall being told they could not have surgery because they were too young. Of the 16%, 37.8% were told that <5 years was too young, 13.4% <4 years was too young, and 48.8% <3 years of age was too young for surgical intervention for fractures or deformities. Nearly 22% of respondents were told that their bones were too small for intramedullary fixation. The patient and family responses help elucidate the topics requiring focus for the improvement of OI orthopedic care. Patient concerns and insights should drive the research questions we ask to advance the orthopedic care of OI patients.

The patient-related factors in revision procedures on tibia of patients with osteogenesis imperfecta treated with the Peter-Williams nail

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the patient-related factors that affect the revision rate for the tibia in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta treated with the Peter-Williams nail, and to explore the relationship between the risk factors and complications postsurgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the data of 211 patients (93 females (44.08%) and 118 males (55.92%)) with osteogenesis imperfecta treated with Peter-Williams. The factors affecting surgical revision were analysed by performing binary logistic regression. Then, a total of 211 patients with type III, type I or type IV OI were divided into five groups according to the results of regression. Statistical comparison of these groups was performed to further investigate the relationship between patient-related factors and revision procedures. Statistical comparison was also performed to analyse the relationship between the classification and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Among the 211 patients who underwent surgery, 40 had type I OI, 109 had type IV OI, and 62 had type III OI. Binary logistic regression revealed that the classification (OR = 3.32, 95% CI 1.06-10.39, P = 0.039) and initial operation age (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.92, P < 0.001) were significantly correlated with revision procedures. In type III patients, the initial operation age was significantly correlated with revision procedures (P < 0.001), and the revision rate was lower in patients aged 9 to12 years (P = 0.001). In type I and IV patients, the initial operation age was not significantly correlated with revision procedures (P = 0.281). Classification had a significant effect on postoperative deformity (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The study reported that the age of initial surgery and classification were the influencing factors affecting the revision procedures of tibia in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta treated with the Peter-Williams nail. In patients with type III disease, the revision rate was lower individuals aged 9-12 years old, and a higher incidence of postoperative deformity was observed.

High Bone Mass Disorders: New Insights From Connecting the Clinic and the Bench

Monogenic high bone mass (HBM) disorders are characterized by an increased amount of bone in general, or at specific sites in the skeleton. Here, we describe 59 HBM disorders with 50 known disease-causing genes from the literature, and we provide an overview of the signaling pathways and mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of these disorders. Based on this, we classify the known HBM genes into HBM (sub)groups according to uniform Gene Ontology (GO) terminology. This classification system may aid in hypothesis generation, for both wet lab experimental design and clinical genetic screening strategies. We discuss how functional genomics can shape discovery of novel HBM genes and/or mechanisms in the future, through implementation of omics assessments in existing and future model systems. Finally, we address strategies to improve gene identification in unsolved HBM cases and highlight the importance for cross-laboratory collaborations encompassing multidisciplinary efforts to transfer knowledge generated at the bench to the clinic. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).