Physician- and patient-reported perspectives on myasthenia gravis in Europe: a real-world survey

New treatment strategies in Myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune neuromuscular disorder characterized by muscle weakness and fatigue. The disease is primarily caused by antibodies targeting acetylcholine receptors (AChR) and muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) proteins at the neuromuscular junction. Traditional treatments for MG, such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressants, have shown efficacy but are often associated with significant long-term side effects and variable patient response rates. Notably, approximately 15% of patients exhibit inadequate responses to these standard therapies. Recent advancements in molecular therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, B cell-depleting agents, complement inhibitors, Fc receptor antagonists, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell-based therapies, have introduced promising alternatives for MG treatment. These novel therapeutic approaches offer potential improvements in targeting specific immune pathways involved in MG pathogenesis. This review highlights the progress and challenges in developing and implementing these molecular therapies. It discusses their mechanisms, efficacy, and the potential for personalized medicine in managing MG. The integration of new molecular therapies into clinical practice could significantly transform the treatment landscape of MG, offering more effective and tailored therapeutic options for patients who do not respond adequately to traditional treatments. These innovations underscore the importance of ongoing research and clinical trials to optimize therapeutic strategies and improve the quality of life for individuals with MG.

Treatment of myasthenia gravis in france: A retrospective claims database study (STAMINA)

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to describe treatment patterns in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) in France.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the French National Health Data System (SNDS) database between 2008 and 2019. MG patients were identified using ICD-10 codes during hospitalization and/or long-term disease. We defined two adult subpopulations: a prevalent MG population of patients alive on 31/12/2019 and an incident population of newly identified patients with MG in 2012 and 2013.

RESULTS

Among the 22,079 prevalent patients, 53.1% (n = 11,498) received at least one chronic MG treatment in 2019. Among these treated patients, 52.5% received Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) only, 10.2% were treated with corticosteroids (CS) ± AChEIs, 7.3% with non-steroidal immunosuppressive treatments (NSIST) and CS, 24.2% with NSIST w/o CS, and 5.8% received immunoglobulin and/or plasma exchange. Among the 2,661 incident patients, 84.6% received at least one chronic MG treatment over the 6-year follow-up period, and among them, 79.0% had at least one treatment category change. During the first semester of follow-up, 28.1% of patients were treated with an immunomodulator (CS, NSIST). Among patients starting treatment with immunomodulator, the proportion of those treated with CS decreased from 35.3% at initiation to 10.9% at 6 years.

CONCLUSION

This study illustrates the complexity of MG management. Significant CS sparing was observed over time. The frequent treatment changes especially in patients with an immunomodulator treatment reflect the high variability of the disease severity. The need for personalised treatment approaches in the management of MG to reduce the burden of disease remains.

Astragaloside IV protects against autoimmune myasthenia gravis in rats via regulation of mitophagy and apoptosis

Astragaloside IV (AS‑IV) has various pharmacological effects, including antioxidant and immunoregulatory properties, which can improve myasthenia gravis (MG) symptoms. However, the potential mechanism underlying the effects of AS‑IV on MG remains to be elucidated. The present study aimed to investigate whether AS‑IV has a therapeutic effect on MG and its potential mechanism of action. By subcutaneously immunizing rats with R97‑116 peptide, an experimental autoimmune (EA) MG rat model was established. AS‑IV (40 or 80 mg/kg/day) treatment was then applied for 28 days after modeling. The results demonstrated that AS‑IV significantly ameliorated the weight loss, Lennon score and pathological changes in the gastrocnemius muscle of EAMG rats compared with the model group. Additionally, the levels of acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR‑Ab) were significantly decreased, whereas mitochondrial function [ATPase and cytochrome c (Cyt‑C) oxidase activities] and ultrastructure were improved in the AS‑IV treated rats. Moreover, the mRNA and protein expression levels of phosphatase and tensin homolog‑induced putative kinase 1, Parkin, LC3II and Bcl‑2, key signaling molecules for mitophagy and apoptosis, were upregulated, whereas the mRNA and protein expression levels of p62, Cyt‑C, Bax, caspase 3 and caspase 9 were downregulated following AS‑IV intervention. In conclusion, AS‑IV may protect against EAMG in a rat model by modulating mitophagy and apoptosis. These findings indicated the potential mechanism underlying the effects of AS‑IV on MG and provided novel insights into treatment strategies for MG.

Constructing and Validating a Nomogram Model for Short-Term Prognosis of Patients with AChR-Ab+ GMG

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to establish and validate a nomogram prognostic model for predicting short-term efficacy of acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (GMG).

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted at the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, enrolling patients diagnosed with AChR-Ab+ GMG from May 2020 to September 2022. The primary outcome was the change in the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) post-intervention status after 6 months of standard treatment. Predictive factors were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, with significant factors incorporated into the nomogram. The bootstrap test was used for internal validation of the nomogram model. Model performance was assessed using calibration curves, receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients were enrolled, of whom 30 achieved unchanged or worse status after 6 months of standard therapy. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that quantitative myasthenia gravis score, gender, body mass index, course of disease, hemoglobin levels, and white blood cell counts were six potential predictors. These factors were used for multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram was constructed. The calibration curve showed that the predicted value was in good agreement with the actual value (p = 0.707), and the area under the curve value (0.792, 95% CI 0.686-0.899) indicated good discrimination ability. DCA suggests that this model has potential clinical application value.

CONCLUSION

The constructed nomogram, based on key patient indicators, shows promise as a clinically useful tool for predicting the short-term efficacy of treatment of AChR-Ab+ GMG. Validation in larger, multicenter cohorts is needed to further substantiate its applicability.

Advancements and prospects of novel biologicals for myasthenia gravis: toward personalized treatment based on autoantibody specificities

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an antibody-mediated autoimmune disease with a prevalence of 150-250 cases per million individuals. Autoantibodies include long-lived antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), mainly of the IgG1 subclass, and IgG4, produced almost exclusively by short-lived plasmablasts, which are prevalent in muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) myasthenia gravis. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that MG patients receiving conventional medication today still do not possess satisfactory symptom control, indicating a substantial disease burden. Subsequently, based on the type of the autoantibody and the pathogenesis, we synthesized the published material to date and reached a conclusion regarding the literature related to personalized targeted therapy for MG. Novel agents for AChR MG have shown their efficacy in clinical research, such as complement inhibitors, FcRn receptor antagonists, and B-cell activating factor (BAFF) inhibitors. Rituximab, a representative drug of anti-CD20 therapy, has demonstrated benefits in treatment of MuSK MG patients. Due to the existence of low-affinity antibodies or unidentified antibodies that are inaccessible by existing methods, the treatment for seronegative MG remains complicated; thus, special testing and therapy considerations are necessary. It may be advantageous to initiate the application of novel biologicals at an early stage of the disease. Currently, therapies can also be combined and individualized according to different types of antibodies. With such a wide range of drugs, how to tailor treatment strategies to patients with various conditions and find the most suitable solution for each MG profile are our necessary and urgent aims.

Efficacy of ravulizumab in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis by time from diagnosis: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the CHAMPION MG study

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

The CHAMPION MG study demonstrated that ravulizumab significantly improved Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total scores versus placebo in adults with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ gMG). This post hoc analysis aimed to assess these outcomes by time from MG diagnosis.

METHODS

Changes from baseline to week 26 in MG-ADL and QMG total scores were analyzed by time from MG diagnosis to study entry (≤2 vs. >2 years). Within each subgroup, least-squares (LS) mean changes for ravulizumab and placebo were compared using mixed models for repeated measures.

RESULTS

In ravulizumab-treated patients, differences in LS mean (standard error of the mean) changes from baseline to week 26 were not statistically significant in the ≤2-years subgroup versus the >2-years subgroup for MG-ADL (-4.3 [0.70] vs. -2.9 [0.37]; p = .0511) or QMG (-4.3 [0.94] vs. -2.5 [0.50]; p = .0822) scores. No clear trends were observed in the placebo group. LS mean changes from baseline were significantly greater for ravulizumab versus placebo in both the ≤2 and >2 years from diagnosis subgroups for MG-ADL and QMG scores (all p < .05). The difference in treatment effect between the ≤2-years and >2-years subgroups was not statistically significant. No clinically meaningful between-subgroup differences in treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in ravulizumab-treated patients.

DISCUSSION

Ravulizumab treatment improved clinical outcomes for patients with AChR+ gMG regardless of time from diagnosis. A numerical trend was observed favoring greater treatment effect with earlier versus later treatment after diagnosis. Further studies are required for confirmation.