1
|
Luckett ES, Zielonka M, Kordjani A, Schaeverbeke J, Adamczuk K, De Meyer S, Van Laere K, Dupont P, Cleynen I, Vandenberghe R. Longitudinal APOE4- and amyloid-dependent changes in the blood transcriptome in cognitively intact older adults. Alzheimers Res Ther 2023; 15:121. [PMID: 37438770 PMCID: PMC10337180 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-023-01242-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gene expression is dysregulated in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, both in peripheral blood and post mortem brain. We investigated peripheral whole-blood gene (co)expression to determine molecular changes prior to symptom onset. METHODS RNA was extracted and sequenced for 65 cognitively healthy F-PACK participants (65 (56-80) years, 34 APOE4 non-carriers, 31 APOE4 carriers), at baseline and follow-up (interval: 5.0 (3.4-8.6) years). Participants received amyloid PET at both time points and amyloid rate of change derived. Accumulators were defined with rate of change ≥ 2.19 Centiloids. We performed differential gene expression and weighted gene co-expression network analysis to identify differentially expressed genes and networks of co-expressed genes, respectively, with respect to traits of interest (APOE4 status, amyloid accumulation (binary/continuous)), and amyloid positivity status, followed by Gene Ontology annotation. RESULTS There were 166 significant differentially expressed genes at follow-up compared to baseline in APOE4 carriers only, whereas 12 significant differentially expressed genes were found only in APOE4 non-carriers, over time. Among the significant genes in APOE4 carriers, several had strong evidence for a pathogenic role in AD based on direct association scores generated from the DISQOVER platform: NGRN, IGF2, GMPR, CLDN5, SMIM24. Top enrichment terms showed upregulated mitochondrial and metabolic pathways, and an exacerbated upregulation of ribosomal pathways in APOE4 carriers compared to non-carriers. Similarly, there were 33 unique significant differentially expressed genes at follow-up compared to baseline in individuals classified as amyloid negative at baseline and positive at follow-up or amyloid positive at both time points and 32 unique significant differentially expressed genes over time in individuals amyloid negative at both time points. Among the significant genes in the first group, the top five with the highest direct association scores were as follows: RPL17-C18orf32, HSP90AA1, MBP, SIRPB1, and GRINA. Top enrichment terms included upregulated metabolism and focal adhesion pathways. Baseline and follow-up gene co-expression networks were separately built. Seventeen baseline co-expression modules were derived, with one significantly negatively associated with amyloid accumulator status (r2 = - 0.25, p = 0.046). This was enriched for proteasomal protein catabolic process and myeloid cell development. Thirty-two follow-up modules were derived, with two significantly associated with APOE4 status: one downregulated (r2 = - 0.27, p = 0.035) and one upregulated (r2 = 0.26, p = 0.039) module. Top enrichment processes for the downregulated module included proteasomal protein catabolic process and myeloid cell homeostasis. Top enrichment processes for the upregulated module included cytoplasmic translation and rRNA processing. CONCLUSIONS We show that there are longitudinal gene expression changes that implicate a disrupted immune system, protein removal, and metabolism in cognitively intact individuals who carry APOE4 or who accumulate in cortical amyloid. This provides insight into the pathophysiology of AD, whilst providing novel targets for drug and therapeutic development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma S Luckett
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
- Laboratory for Complex Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Magdalena Zielonka
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
- Laboratory for the Research of Neurodegenerative Diseases, VIB-KU Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Amine Kordjani
- Laboratory for Complex Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Jolien Schaeverbeke
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
- Laboratory of Neuropathology, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | | | - Steffi De Meyer
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
- Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiomarker Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Patrick Dupont
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Cleynen
- Laboratory for Complex Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
- Neurology Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee AJ, Ma Y, Yu L, Dawe RJ, McCabe C, Arfanakis K, Mayeux R, Bennett DA, Klein HU, De Jager PL. Multi-region brain transcriptomes uncover two subtypes of aging individuals with differences in Alzheimer risk and the impact of APOEε4. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.01.25.524961. [PMID: 36747803 PMCID: PMC9900823 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.25.524961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
The heterogeneity of the older population suggests the existence of subsets of individuals which share certain brain molecular features and respond differently to risk factors for Alzheimer's disease, but this population structure remains poorly defined. Here, we performed an unsupervised clustering of individuals with multi-region brain transcriptomes to assess whether a broader approach, simultaneously considering data from multiple regions involved in cognition would uncover such subsets. We implemented a canonical correlation-based analysis in a Discovery cohort of 459 participants from two longitudinal studies of cognitive aging that have RNA sequence profiles in three brain regions. 690 additional participants that have data in only one or two of these regions were used in the Replication effort. These clustering analyses identified two meta-clusters, MC-1 and MC-2. The two sets of participants differ primarily in their trajectories of cognitive decline, with MC-2 having a delay of 3 years to the median age of incident dementia. This is due, in part, to a greater impact of tau pathology on neuronal chromatin architecture and to broader brain changes including greater loss of white matter integrity in MC-1. Further evidence of biological differences includes a significantly larger impact of APOEε4 risk on cognitive decline in MC-1. These findings suggest that our proposed population structure captures an aspect of the more distributed molecular state of the aging brain that either enhances the effect of risk factors in MC-1 or of protective effects in MC-2. These observations may inform the design of therapeutic development efforts and of trials as both become increasingly more targeted molecularly. One Sentence Summary: There are two types of aging brains, with one being more vulnerable to APOEε4 and subsequent neuronal dysfunction and cognitive loss.
Collapse
|
3
|
Moruno-Manchon J, Noh B, McCullough L. Sex-biased autophagy as a potential mechanism mediating sex differences in ischemic stroke outcome. Neural Regen Res 2023; 18:31-37. [PMID: 35799505 PMCID: PMC9241419 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.340406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Stroke is the second leading cause of death and a major cause of disability worldwide, and biological sex is an important determining factor in stroke incidence and pathology. From childhood through adulthood, men have a higher incidence of stroke compared with women. Abundant research has confirmed the beneficial effects of estrogen in experimental ischemic stroke but genetic factors such as the X-chromosome complement can also play an important role in determining sex differences in stroke. Autophagy is a self-degrading cellular process orchestrated by multiple core proteins, which leads to the engulfment of cytoplasmic material and degradation of cargo after autophagy vesicles fuse with lysosomes or endosomes. The levels and the activity of components of these signaling pathways and of autophagy-related proteins can be altered during ischemic insults. Ischemic stroke activates autophagy, however, whether inhibiting autophagy after stroke is beneficial in the brain is still under a debate. Autophagy is a potential mechanism that may contribute to differences in stroke progression between the sexes. Furthermore, the effects of manipulating autophagy may also differ between the sexes. Mechanisms that regulate autophagy in a sex-dependent manner in ischemic stroke remain unexplored. In this review, we summarize clinical and pre-clinical evidence for sex differences in stroke. We briefly introduce the autophagy process and summarize the effects of gonadal hormones in autophagy in the brain and discuss X-linked genes that could potentially regulate brain autophagy. Finally, we review pre-clinical studies that address the mechanisms that could mediate sex differences in brain autophagy after stroke.
Collapse
|