1
|
Khraisha Q, Abujaber N, Carpenter S, Crossen RJ, Kappenberg J, Kelly R, Murphy C, Norton O, Put SM, Schnoebelen K, Warraitch A, Roney S, Hadfield K. Parenting and mental health in protracted refugee situations: a systematic review. Compr Psychiatry 2024; 135:152536. [PMID: 39413568 DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refugees' parenting behaviour is profoundly influenced by their mental health, which is, in turn, influenced by their situation of displacement. Our research presents the first systematic review on parenting and mental health in protracted refugee situations, where 78% of all refugees reside. METHODS We pre-registered our protocol and screened documents in 22 languages from 10 electronic databases, reports by 16 international humanitarian organisations and region-specific content from the top 100 websites for each of the 72 countries that 'host' protracted refugees. Our criteria were empirical papers reporting parenting and parental mental health data on refugees who are in a protracted refugee situation. Studies including only internally displaced or stateless persons were excluded. RESULTS A total of 18,125 documents were screened and 30 studies were included. We identified a universal pathway linking macro-level stressors in protracted refugee situations, such as movement restrictions and documentation issues, to symptoms of depression and anxiety, which, in turn, led to negative parenting practices. Addtionally, culture-specific pathways were observed in the way parental mental health and parenting were expressed. Situational (e.g., overcrowding) and relational factors (e.g., spousal dynamics) modulated both of these pathways. Biases in the research included the over-representation of specific protracted refugee situations, overreliance on self-reported data, and a heavy focus on mothers while neglecting fathers and other caregivers. Longitudinal research is needed to clarify the directionality and causality between specific macro-level stressors in a given protracted refugee situation and parental mental health and practices. Refugees were rarely consulted or involved in the design of research about their parenting and parental mental health. CONCLUSION In recognising the existing links between protracted refugee situations, parental mental health, and parenting, our systematic review calls for a shift in thinking: from focusing solely on the micro aspects that affect 'refugee parenting' to understanding and tackling the broader macro-level stressors that drive them. We urge for larger and long-term research efforts that consider diverse protracted refugee situations, greater investment in science communication and diplomacy with governments, and stronger implementation of durable solutions by states to alleviate the roots of refugee parents' distress and negative parenting practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qusai Khraisha
- Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland; School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Nadeen Abujaber
- Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland; Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard University, United States
| | | | - Robert J Crossen
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ronan Kelly
- School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cameron Murphy
- Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Netherlands
| | - Orla Norton
- School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Azza Warraitch
- Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland; School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Stella Roney
- School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kristin Hadfield
- Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland; School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hamdani SU, Huma ZE, Malik A, Tamizuddin-Nizami A, Javed H, Minhas FA, Jordans MJD, Sijbrandij M, Suleman N, Baneen UU, Bryant RA, van Ommeren M, Rahman A, Wang D. Effectiveness of a group psychological intervention to reduce psychosocial distress in adolescents in Pakistan: a single-blind, cluster randomised controlled trial. THE LANCET. CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH 2024; 8:559-570. [PMID: 39025557 PMCID: PMC11254783 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(24)00101-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emotional problems in adolescents living in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain largely unaddressed; key reasons include a scarcity of trained mental health professionals and unavailability of evidence-based, scalable psychological interventions. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a non-specialist-delivered, group psychological intervention to reduce psychosocial distress in school-going adolescents in Pakistan. METHODS In a two-arm, single-blind, cluster randomised controlled trial, eligible public school clusters from a rural subdistrict of Gujar Khan, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, were randomised (1:1, stratified by sex) using permuted block randomisation into intervention (n=20) and wait-list control (n=20) groups. Adolescents aged 13-15 years who provided informed assent and caregivers' consent were screened for psychosocial distress using the youth-reported Pediatric Symptoms Checklist (PSC; total psychosocial distress scores from 0 to 70), and those scoring 28 or more and their caregivers were enrolled into the trial. Adolescents in the intervention group received seven weekly group sessions and their caregivers received three biweekly group sessions in school settings from trained non-specialists. The primary outcome was change from baseline in the total PSC scores at 3 months post-intervention. The trial was registered prospectively with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, ISRCTN17755448. FINDINGS From the 40 school clusters that were included, 282 adolescents in the intervention group and 284 adolescents in the wait-list control group were enrolled between Nov 2 and Nov 30, 2021. At 3 months, adolescents in the intervention group had significantly lower mean total score on the PSC compared with adolescents in the control group (mean difference in change from baseline 3·48 [95% CI 1·66-5·29], p=0·0002, effect size 0·38 [95% CI 0·18-0·57]; adjusted mean difference 3·26 (95% CI 1·46-5·06], p=0·0004, effect size 0·35 (0·16-0·55). No adverse events were reported in either group. INTERPRETATION The group psychological intervention most likely represents a feasible and effective option for adolescents with psychosocial distress in school settings. FUNDING UK Medical Research Council, Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office, Department of Health and Social Care. TRANSLATION For the Urdu translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Usman Hamdani
- Global Institute of Human Development, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
| | - Zill-E Huma
- Global Institute of Human Development, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Aiysha Malik
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Asad Tamizuddin-Nizami
- Institute of Psychiatry, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Hashim Javed
- Global Institute of Human Development, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Fareed Aslam Minhas
- Global Institute of Human Development, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Mark J D Jordans
- Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nadia Suleman
- Global Institute of Human Development, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Um-Ul Baneen
- Global Institute of Human Development, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | | | - Mark van Ommeren
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Atif Rahman
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Duolao Wang
- Global Health Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McEwen FS, El Khatib H, Hadfield K, Pluess K, Chehade N, Bosqui T, Skavenski S, Murray L, Weierstall-Pust R, Karam E, Pluess M. Feasibility and acceptability of phone-delivered psychological therapy for refugee children and adolescents in a humanitarian setting. Confl Health 2024; 18:7. [PMID: 38218936 PMCID: PMC10787498 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-023-00565-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refugee children are at high risk of mental health problems but face barriers to accessing mental health services, a problem exacerbated by a shortage of mental health professionals. Having trained lay counsellors deliver therapy via telephone could overcome these barriers. This is the first study to explore feasibility and acceptability of telephone-delivered therapy with refugee children in a humanitarian setting. METHODS An evidence-based intervention, Common Elements Treatment Approach, was adapted for telephone-delivery (t-CETA) and delivered by lay counsellors to Syrian refugee children in informal tented settlements in the Beqaa region of Lebanon. Following delivery of t-CETA, semi-structured interviews were conducted with counsellors (N = 3) and with children who received t-CETA (N = 11, 45% female, age 8-17 years) and their caregivers (N = 11, 100% female, age 29-56 years) (N = 25 interviews). Thematic content analysis was conducted separately for interviews with counsellors and interviews with families and results were synthesized. RESULTS Three themes emerged from interviews with counsellors and four themes from interviews with families, with substantial overlap between them. Synthesized themes were: counselling over the phone both solves and creates practical and logistical challenges; t-CETA is adapted to potential cultural blocks; the relationship between the counsellor and the child and caregiver is extremely important; the family's attitude to mental health influences their understanding of and engagement with counselling; and t-CETA works and is needed. Counselling over the phone overcame logistical barriers, such as poor transportation, and cultural barriers, such as stigma associated with attending mental health services. It provided a more flexible and accessible service and resulted in reductions in symptoms for many children. Challenges included access to phones and poor network coverage, finding an appropriate space, and communication challenges over the phone. CONCLUSIONS Despite some challenges, telephone-delivered therapy for children shows promising evidence of feasibility and acceptability in a humanitarian context and has the potential to increase access to mental health services by hard-to-reach populations. Approaches to addressing challenges of telephone-delivered therapy are discussed. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03887312; registered 22nd March 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona S McEwen
- Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Science, G.E. Fogg Building, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK
- Department of War Studies, King's College London, Strand, London, UK
| | - Hania El Khatib
- Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Science, G.E. Fogg Building, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK
| | - Kristin Hadfield
- Trinity Centre for Global Health, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Karen Pluess
- Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Science, G.E. Fogg Building, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK
| | | | - Tania Bosqui
- Trinity Centre for Global Health, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Psychology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Laura Murray
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Elie Karam
- Institute for Development, Research, Advocacy and Applied Care, Achrafieh, St. George Hospital Street, Beirut, Lebanon
- Saint Georges Hospital University Medical Center, Achrafieh, Beirut, Lebanon
- Saint Georges University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Michael Pluess
- Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Science, G.E. Fogg Building, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK.
- School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|