Implementing clinical guidelines to promote integration of mental health services in primary health care: a qualitative study of a systems policy intervention in Uganda

Barriers to and enablers of quality improvement in primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

The quality of health care remains generally poor across primary health care settings, especially in low- and middle-income countries where tertiary care tends to take up much of the limited resources despite primary health care being the first (and often the only) point of contact with the health system for nearly 80 per cent of people in these countries. Evidence is needed on barriers and enablers of quality improvement initiatives. This systematic review sought to answer the question: What are the enablers of and barriers to quality improvement in primary health care in low- and middle-income countries? It adopted an integrative review approach with narrative evidence synthesis, which combined qualitative and mixed methods research studies systematically. Using a customized geographic search filter for LMICs developed by the Cochrane Collaboration, Scopus, Academic Search Ultimate, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PSYCHINFO, EMBASE, ProQuest Dissertations and Overton.io (a new database for LMIC literature) were searched in January and February 2023, as were selected websites and journals. 7,077 reports were retrieved. After removing duplicates, reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts, performed quality appraisal and data extraction, followed by analysis and synthesis. 50 reports from 47 studies were included, covering 52 LMIC settings. Six themes related to barriers and enablers of quality improvement were identified and organized using the model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ) and the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). These were: microsystem of quality improvement, intervention attributes, implementing organization and team, health systems support and capacity, external environment and structural factors, and execution. Decision makers, practitioners, funders, implementers, and other stakeholders can use the evidence from this systematic review to minimize barriers and amplify enablers to better the chances that quality improvement initiatives will be successful in resource-limited settings. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023395166.

Enhancing the Capacity of Providers in Mental Health Integration (ECaP-MHI) in Rural Uganda: The Adaptation Process

Purpose

Uganda adopted the World Health Organization (WHO) model of creating district health management teams (DHMT) comprised of public health officials and administrators to supervise health service delivery at the community level. The purpose of this study was to characterize the perspectives of the DMHT in providing support supervision to primary health-care providers implementing mental health integration using the pre-recorded material. Our aim was to identify barriers to individual uptake and contextual fit, and to solicit solutions for co-designed improvements.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative exploratory study using one-on-one interviews informed by the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model.

Results

Members of the DHMT identified a systemic gap in supporting mental health integration into primary care, and reported limited knowledge in how to supervise mental health integration and lacked data on mental health delivery and outcomes. They recommended training of the DHMT in supervising mental health integration supported by standard outcome reports, pre-recorded instructional material by psychiatrists, checklists to help guide and standardize the process, and use of visual aids illustrating mental disorders and treatments for low-health literacy populations.

Conclusion

Implementing integrated mental health care using the WHO model of DHMTs as external facilitators and supervisors of primary health-care providers is potentially feasible and scalable, provided that substantial reforms occur such as training in how to provide supervision, standard collection of outcome reports, and practical tools to help guide and facilitate the process.

Lay Health Workers in Community-Based Care and Management of Dementia: A Qualitative ‘Pre’ and ‘Post’ Intervention Study in Southwestern Uganda

Background

The global need for efficient and cost-effective use of healthcare resources in low-income countries has led to the introduction of lay health workers (LHWs) as a link of the community to healthcare services. As such, the LHWs perform a variety of tasks such as education, support for care delivery, and social support across all disease types. However, little is known about their ability to support dementia care and management in the community.

Purpose

The goal of the pilot intervention was to evaluate the 5-day training intervention for LHWs in rural southwestern Uganda in community-based care and management of people with dementia, and implementation of the knowledge and skills gained.

Methods

This was a “pre” and “post” pilot intervention study which involved a qualitative assessment of LHWs' knowledge on community-based management and care for people with dementia. We focused on four core competency domains in the WHO dementia toolkit. The intervention included a five-day training of the LHWs on dementia care, eight weeks of implementation, and an evaluation of the experiences. Analysis focused on the needs assessment, early detection and management, community engagement, support for people with dementia; and evaluation of the eight weeks implementation.

Results

Before the training, the LHWs did not know much about what dementia-related support to provide in the community. Activities were limited to general support, including nutrition, and health education. After the training, LHWs had a basic understanding of dementia and began sensitizing the communities. They felt more comfortable working with people with dementia and reported a notable change in the attitude of family members. However, they reported challenges in differentiating the signs of early dementia from superstitious beliefs.

Conclusion

With enhanced capacity, LHWs may be able to support community-based management for people with dementia. A larger study is needed to explore potential roles for LHWs and further assess effectiveness of the LHWs' skills.

Adherence to clinical guidelines in integration of mental health services into primary health care in Mbarara, southwestern Uganda: a medical records review

Background

The Ugandan Ministry of Health decentralized mental healthcare to the district level; developed the Uganda Clinical Guidelines (UCG); and trained primary health care (PHC) providers in identification, management, and referral of individuals with common mental disorders. This was intended to promote integration of mental health services into PHC in the country. ‘Common mental disorders’ here refers to mental, neurological and substance use conditions as indicated in the UCG. However, the extent of integration of mental health into general healthcare remains unknown. This study aimed to establish the level of adherence of PHC providers to the UCG in the identification and management of mental disorders.

Methods

This was a prospective medical record review of patient information collected in November and December 2018, and March and April 2019 at two health centers (III and IV) in southwestern Uganda. Data (health facility level; sex and age of the patient; and mental disorder diagnosis, management) was collected using a checklist. Continuous data was analyzed using means and standard deviation while categorical data was analyzed using Chi-square. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to establish predictors of PHC provider adherence to the clinical guidelines on integration of mental health services into PHC. The analysis was conducted at a 95% level of significance.

Results

Of the 6093 records of patients at the study health facilities during the study period, 146 (2.4%) had a mental or neurological disorder diagnosis. The commonly diagnosed disorders were epilepsy 91 (1.5%) and bipolar 25 (0.4%). The most prescribed medications were carbamazepine 65 (44.5%), and phenobarbital 26 (17.8%). The medicines inappropriately prescribed at health center III for a mental diagnosis included chlorpromazine for epilepsy 3 (2.1%) and haloperidol for epilepsy 1 (0.7%). Female gender (aOR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.39–0.69) and age 61+ years (aOR: 3.02, 95% CI 1.40–6.49) were predictors of a mental disorder entry into the HMIS register.

Conclusion

There was a noticeable change of practice by PHC providers in integrating mental health services in routine care as reflected by the rise in the number of mental disorders diagnosed and treated and entered into the modified paper based HMIS registers.