1
|
Linderborg C, Grant A, Weimand BM, Falkov AF, Östman M. Experiences of clinicians and managers in the implementation of a family focused model in child and adult psychiatry. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1360375. [PMID: 38563021 PMCID: PMC10982353 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1360375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction This paper describes the process of implementing a family focused model, The Family Model, in child and adolescent and adult mental health services in Sweden. Additionally, it describes a service development project carried out in both services within a defined geographical area of Region Stockholm. The Family Model is a communication tool designed to assist clinicians in both services to have family focused conversations with their patients and relatives. Internationally, the needs of individuals experiencing mental health challenges (parents, children and young people) and their close relatives are now well recognized, but barriers to family focused practice nevertheless persist. The aim of this study was to better understand clinicians` experiences in implementing The Family Model in both services. Methods Three preplanned focus group interviews were carried out with 14 clinicians and managers across both services and the data were analyzed in accordance with methods of Naturalistic inquiry. Result Findings suggest that The Family Model has utility in both services. The Naturalistic inquiry analyses revealed three main themes: individual, relational and organizational aspects with a total of 10 sub-themes of how the models influence the participants. Furthermore, analyses on a meta understanding level explored that participants underwent a developmental journey in learning about and using The Family Model in practice which was expressed through three themes: "Useful for burdened families", "Influencing prevention", and "To integrate this would be fantastic". Conclusions The Family Model, when adapted for the Swedish context, is a useful tool for assisting experienced clinicians to engage in family focused practice in both child and adolescent and adult mental health services. The Family Model highlights different aspects in everyday clinical services that were of special interest for clinicians, families, and the system. Future research could explore families' perspectives of the utility of the model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Linderborg
- Faculty of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, USN- University of South Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Stockholm Regional Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anne Grant
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Bente Margrethe Weimand
- Faculty of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, USN- University of South Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences Mental Health and Addiction Services, Department for Research and Development, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Adrian Farrel Falkov
- Department of Child and Youth Mental Health, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goodyear MJ, Allchin B, Burn M, von Doussa H, Reupert A, Tchernegovski P, Sheen J, Cuff R, Obradovic A, Solantaus T, Maybery D. Promoting Self-Determination in Parents With Mental Illness in Adult Mental Health Settings. JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING 2022; 28:129-141. [PMID: 35094587 DOI: 10.1177/10748407211067308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
This article reports a strengths-based intervention to support parents with mental illness and their children in adult mental health settings: "Let's Talk About Children" (LTC) intervention. A qualitative methodology was adopted with parent participants receiving LTC in adult mental health and family services. The benefits for parents receiving LTC were described through in-depth interviews with 25 parents following the delivery of the program. Interview data identified an impact on parental self-regulation-mainly through a change in a sense of agency as a parent-and skill building, once a clearer picture of their child's everyday life was understood. This study outlines the benefits of talking with parents about the strengths and vulnerabilities of their children during routine mental health treatment. The role for self-determination of parents in preventive interventions for children is an important consideration for mental health recovery, and it also helps to break the cycle of transgenerational mental illness within families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda J Goodyear
- Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Emerging Minds, Hilton, South Australia, Australia
| | - Becca Allchin
- Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Henry von Doussa
- Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Jade Sheen
- Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rose Cuff
- Satellite Foundation, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Angela Obradovic
- Northern Area Mental Health Service, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tytti Solantaus
- Finnish National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nicholson J, English K, Heyman M. The ParentingWell Learning Collaborative Feasibility Study: Training Adult Mental Health Service Practitioners in a Family-Focused Practice Approach. Community Ment Health J 2022; 58:261-276. [PMID: 33813723 PMCID: PMC8019525 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-021-00818-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
This study investigates the feasibility and impact of the ParentingWell Learning Collaborative (PWLC) model in supporting mental health practitioners in implementing the family-focused ParentingWell practice approach with adults with mental illness. An exploratory design and qualitative methods were employed. Practitioners (n = 29) participated in in-person orientation, training and debriefing sessions; virtual coaching sessions; and via an interactive online hub. Researchers obtained data on participant engagement and satisfaction, and participants' reports of use, helpfulness, intention to use and impact. Participants were engaged in and highly satisfied with the PWLC. They deployed PWLC skills, tools and resources with parents. Evidence of impact was provided at the personal, practice and organizational levels. This study provides preliminary support for the feasibility and impact of the PWLC. Clear specification of a theoretically-based training model for practitioners is an essential step in adapting, implementing and testing interventions in new contexts .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Nicholson
- Institute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
| | - Kelly English
- Children’s Behavioral Health Knowledge Center, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, 25 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Miriam Heyman
- The Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goodyear M, Zechmeister-Koss I, Bauer A, Christiansen H, Glatz-Grugger M, Paul JL. Development of an Evidence-Informed and Codesigned Model of Support for Children of Parents With a Mental Illness- "It Takes a Village" Approach. Front Psychiatry 2022; 12:806884. [PMID: 35173638 PMCID: PMC8841827 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.806884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Providing support to parents and their children to help address the cycle of intergenerational impacts of mental illness and reduce the negative consequences for children is a key focus of selective prevention approaches in public mental health. However, a key issue for children of parents with a mental illness is the lack of access to early intervention and prevention support when needed. They are not easily identifiable (until presenting with significant mental health issues of their own) and not easily accessing the necessary support that address the complex interplay of parental mental illness within families. There are significant barriers to the early identification of these children, particularly for mental health care. Furthermore, there is a lack of collaborative care that might enhance identification as well as offer services and support for these families. The "It takes a Village" project seeks to improve mental health outcomes for children through the co-development, implementation and evaluation of an approach to collaborative practice concerned with the identification of families where a parent has a mental illness, and establishing a service model to promote child-focused support networks in Austria. Here we describe the development of service delivery approach for the "It takes a Village" project that aims to improve identification and support of these children within enhancements of the existing service systems and informal supports. The paper describes the use of codesign and other implementation strategies, applied to a research setting, with the aim of impacting the sustainability of workforce reform to achieve lasting social impact. Results highlight the steps involved in translating evidence-based components, local practice wisdom and lived experience into the "It takes a Village" practice model for Tyrol, Austria. We highlight through this paper how regional context-specific solutions are essential in the redesign of care models that meet the complex needs of children of parents with a mental illness. Service system and policy formation with local and experienced stakeholders are also vital to ensure the solutions are implementation-ready, particularly when introducing new practice models that rely on organizational change and new ways of practice with vulnerable families. This also creates a solid foundation for the evaluation of the "It take a Village" approach for children of parents with a mental illness in Austria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda Goodyear
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Emerging Minds, National Workforce Centre for Child Mental Health, Hilton, SA, Australia
| | | | - Annette Bauer
- Department of Health Policy, Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hanna Christiansen
- Department of Psychology, Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Martina Glatz-Grugger
- Mental Health Research Program, The Village, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jean Lillian Paul
- Mental Health Research Program, The Village, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Innsbruck, Austria
- Division of Psychiatry I, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Allchin B, Solantaus T. An Evidence-Based Practice Developed in-situ: Let's Talk About Children and a Consolidation of Its Evidence Base. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:824241. [PMID: 35237194 PMCID: PMC8882815 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.824241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional models of evidence-based practice assume knowledge is developed in research settings before being installed in practice settings. The role practice settings can play in enhancing effectiveness and enabling sustainability is not therefore acknowledged. Developing interventions in-situ alongside developing their evidence base, provides another pathway to evidence-based practice. One example is Let's Talk about Children (LTC), a brief family-focused intervention that promotes parent, family and child wellbeing. Let's Talk about Children has been developed and adapted to respond to the context into which it has been established, leading to different descriptions reported in its 20 year collection of evidence. Collating the diverse literature on LTC, this paper showcases an evidence-based practice developed in-situ in order to guide future innovation. METHOD Using an integrative review, key literature using LTC were identified through electronic databases and snowballing techniques. Constant comparison analysis synthesized the data to develop patterns and themes. FINDINGS From the 26 records, three forms of LTC were identified and outcomes related to parents, family and child wellbeing, implementation and sustainability were collated. Consolidated outcomes show overall agreement in effectiveness and acceptability outcomes across different settings and populations. Implementation and sustainability impacts are entwined with the context, and influenced by its development in-situ. CONCLUSIONS The study documents that the in-situ model is effective at developing sustainable evidence-based practice. In consolidating the evidence, the review clarified LTC's forms and outcomes, and draws attention to the importance of research on mechanisms of change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Becca Allchin
- Eastern Health, Mental Health Program, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,School of Rural Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tytti Solantaus
- Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mulligan C, Furlong M, McGarr S, O'Connor S, McGilloway S. The Family Talk Programme in Ireland: A Qualitative Analysis of the Experiences of Families With Parental Mental Illness. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:783189. [PMID: 34867563 PMCID: PMC8634387 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.783189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Parental mental illness is common, costly, can lead to children developing mental disorders and impaired lifetime outcomes, and places a substantial burden on caregiving partners. Family Talk (FT) is a widely implemented, 7-session, whole-family programme, with promising evidence of effectiveness in targeting the intergenerational transmission of mental illness. However, to date, very little qualitative research of family experiences of FT has been undertaken. The objectives of this study were to: (1) investigate the experiences of families attending FT; and (2) explore the key facilitators and barriers to engagement in mainstream mental health settings. Methods: This study was nested within a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of Family Talk [N = 86 families (139 parents, 221 children)] implemented in 15 adult, child and primary care mental health sites in Ireland. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 45 participants, including 23 parents with mental illness (PMI), 7 partners and 15 children/young people aged 9 to 18 years. Interview data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using constructivist grounded theory. Results: Over two thirds of families across sites reported substantial benefits from participation in FT, including reduced stigma, giving children and partners a voice, increased service-user confidence, and improved family communication/relationships. Key facilitators identified by families included: programme delivery by a competent, non-judgmental clinician; the whole-family approach; and family readiness to engage. Barriers to engagement included stigma, family crises/relapse, service constraints, impact of COVID-19, and a need for further child, family and follow-up sessions/supports. Conclusion: This study is the first qualitative analysis of family experiences of FT to be conducted within the context of an RCT and national programme to introduce family-focused practise for families with PMI. The findings illustrate that FT is beneficial across cultural/policy contexts, different mental disorders and can be implemented across adult and child mental health settings, including children with existing mental health challenges. Key barriers and facilitators to implementation were identified by families, all of which should help to inform the future implementation of FT, and other similar interventions, both in Ireland and elsewhere.
Collapse
|
7
|
Allchin B, Weimand BM, O'Hanlon B, Goodyear M. A Sustainability Model for Family-Focused Practice in Adult Mental Health Services. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:761889. [PMID: 35115958 PMCID: PMC8804966 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.761889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Translating evidence-based practice to routine care is known to take significant time and effort. While many evidenced-based family-focused practices have been developed and piloted in the last 30 years, there is little evidence of sustained practice in Adult Mental Health Services. Moreover, many barriers have been identified at both the practitioner and organizational level, however sustainability of practice change is little understood. What is clear, is that sustained use of a new practice is dependent on more than individual practitioners' practice. DESIGN AND METHOD Drawing on research on sustaining Let's Talk about Children in adult mental health services and in the field of implementation science, this article proposes a model for sustaining family focused practice in adult mental health services. SUSTAINABILITY MODEL FOR FAMILY-FOCUSED PRACTICE An operational model developed from key elements for sustaining Let's Talk about Children identifies six action points for Adult Mental Health Services and their contexts to support the sustainability of family-focused practices. The model aims to support Services to take action in the complexity of real-world sustainability, providing action points for engaging with service users and practitioners, aligning intra-organizational activities, and the wider context. CONCLUSION The model for sustaining family-focused practice draws attention to the importance of sustainability in this field. It provides a practical framework for program developers, implementers, adult mental health services and policy-makers to consider both the components that support the sustainability and their interconnection. The model could be built on to develop implementation guides and measures to support its application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Becca Allchin
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Eastern Health, Mental Health Program, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Bente M Weimand
- Division Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Brendan O'Hanlon
- The Bouverie Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Melinda Goodyear
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Emerging Minds, Hilton, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|