The hidden risk of ionizing radiation in the operating room: a survey among 258 orthopaedic surgeons in Brazil

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Regarding Radiation and its Hazards Among Orthopaedic Surgeons in India: A Questionnaire-Based Study

Introduction

Orthopaedic surgeons are among the most frequent users of radiation and are often exposed to X-Ray radiation regularly. There is an overall unsatisfactory level of knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding the same among surgeons. This study aimed to assess the practices among orthopaedic surgeons regarding radiation and its hazards in India.

Methodology

This questionnaire-based survey was conducted between March and September 2022. The questionnaire broadly assessed the knowledge, awareness, and practices among orthopaedic surgeons regularly exposed to X-ray radiation. The questionnaire consisted of objective and Likert scale questions which were distributed to the respondents electronically using publicly available contact information. A qualitative review of interpretations obtained from the responses and available evidence in the literature was then performed.

Results

The response rate for the survey was 36.4%. 65.9% reported using trunk protection all the time during procedures. 57.1% of respondents reported not using thyroid protection during procedures. 92.3% reported not using protective goggles and 100% did not use appropriate gloves. 76.9% were not issued dosimeters, and only 5.5% of those who had been issued one wore it during radiation procedures. 58.2% reported having a dedicated employee to operate the machine. 86.8% of respondents did not have formal training and 81.3% were not aware of institutes offering formal training.

Conclusion

There is very high compliance with the use of protection aprons among the respondents however, the use of other apparel like thyroid shields, protection goggles and gloves was poor. The awareness regarding radiation exposure was also poor as most respondents were not issued dosimeters, however, those issued with one were well aware of their exposure. It is imperative to prioritize both surgeons' and patients' safety where radiation exposure is concerned.

Orthopaedic surgeons' knowledge and practice of radiation safety when using fluoroscopy during procedures: A narrative review

OBJECTIVES

The fluoroscopy environment poses a potential occupational radiation exposure risk to theatre personnel. Risks can be mitigated with effective application of radiation protection knowledge and methods. This review aimed to determine the link between orthopaedic surgeon's knowledge and the use of appropriate safety methods when using fluoroscopy.

KEY FINDINGS

A keyword search of three databases discovered six articles, totalling 2209 orthopaedic surgeons, who completed surveys to assess knowledge on various aspects of radiation safety and training. Participants had varying levels of experience. Moreover 1981 participants always wore a lead gown (89 %), while only 1052 participants wore thyroid protection (47 %). 449 participants (20 %) received some form of training.

CONCLUSION

Although surveys asked a range of questions it appeared that there was low knowledge of the ALARP principles. Usage of protective equipment is a legal requirement and thus was observed throughout, however, there were a number of incidences of disregarding some protective measures. Although there appeared to be limited knowledge surrounding radiation protection measures and lack of training provided, no clear link was demonstrated between compliance with protective methods and knowledge of the risks.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Formal and continuous training should be provided for the enhancement of knowledge to ensure the safety of all staff and help prevent the long-term effects of ionising radiation when using fluoroscopy.

Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Radiation Using OEC 9900 Elite C-arm: Risk and Method for Decreasing Exposure

ABSTRACT

The use of intraoperative fluoroscopy in surgery produces scattered radiation that can expose all operating room personnel to measurable and, in some cases, substantial radiation doses. The goal of this work is to assess and document potential radiation doses to various staff positions in a simulated standard operating room environment. Adult-sized mannequins wearing standard lead protective aprons were placed at seven positions around large and small BMI cadavers. Doses were recorded in real time at thyroid level with Bluetooth-enabled dosimeters for a variety of fluoroscope settings and imaging views. A total of 320 images were acquired, resulting in 2,240 dosimeter readings from the seven mannequins. Doses were compared to cumulative air kerma (CAK) calculations provided by the fluoroscope. There was a strong correlation between the CAK and the recorded scattered radiation doses ( P < 0.001). Radiation doses could be reduced by manipulating C-arm manual technique settings [e.g., turning off the automatic exposure control (AEC) and using pulse (PULSE) or low dose (LD) settings]. Staff position and patient size also affected the recorded doses. The highest radiation doses were recorded across all settings for the mannequin positioned immediately adjacent to the C-arm x-ray tube. The larger BMI cadaver generated greater scattered radiation than the smaller BMI cadaver for all views and settings. This work provides suggestions for reducing exposure to operating room personnel beyond standard techniques of reducing beam-on time, increasing the distance from the radiation source, and use of shielding. Simple changes in C-arm settings (turning AEC off, avoiding DS setting, use of PULSE or LD settings) can markedly reduce dose to staff.

[Imaging after trauma in clinics and practice for children and adolescents : Part 1 of the results of a nationwide online survey of the Pediatric Traumatology Section of the German Trauma Society]

BACKGROUND

The indication for radiography should strictly follow the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle in pediatric and adolescent trauma patients. The effect of radiation on the growing sensitive tissue of these patients should not be disregarded.

QUESTION

The Pediatric Traumatology Section (SKT) of the German Trauma Society (DGU) wanted to clarify how the principle is followed in trauma care.

METHODS

An online survey was open for 10 weeks. Target groups were trauma surgeons, pediatric surgeons, general surgeons, and orthopedic surgeons.

RESULTS

From Nov. 15, 2019, to Feb. 29, 2020, 788 physicians participated: branch office 20.56%, MVZ 4.31%, hospital 75.13%; resident 16.62%, senior 38.07%, chief 22.59%. By specialist qualification, the distribution was: 38.34% surgery, 33.16% trauma surgery, 36.66% special trauma surgery, 70.34% orthopedics and trauma surgery, 18.78% pediatric surgery. Frequency of contact with fractures in the above age group was reported as 37% < 10/month, 27% < 20/M, 36% > 20/M. About 52% always request radiographs in 2 planes after acute trauma. X-ray of the opposite side for unclear findings was rejected by 70%. 23% use sonography regularly in fracture diagnosis. In polytrauma children and adolescents, whole-body CT is never used in 18%, rarely in 50%, and standard in 14%.

DISCUSSION

The analysis shows that there is no uniform radiological management of children and adolescents with fractures among the respondents.

CONCLUSION

Comparing the results of the survey with the consensus findings of the SKT recently published in this journal, persuasion is still needed to change the use of radiography in primary diagnosis.

Knowledge and practice of radiation protection in the operating theater among orthopedic surgeons

Purpose

Many orthopedic procedures, particularly minimally invasive surgeries that require fluoroscopic imaging, present a radiation exposure risk to the orthopedic surgeon. Surgeons may have a higher risk of developing cancer if they receive significant amounts of radiation. Using personal protective equipment (PPE) and appropriate imaging device positioning, plays an important role in reducing the surgeon's radiation exposure. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the surgeon's radiation safety awareness and practices. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the practices and radiation protection knowledge of orthopedic surgeons in the operating theater.

Approach

A nationwide survey was conducted from October 2021 to January 2022 to evaluate the radiation protection practices and awareness of orthopedic surgeons in Jordan. Normalized practice and knowledge scores were evaluated through the survey and compared between different groups. Descriptive statistics were used to present the surgeon's practices and radiation protection knowledge. Student's t -test was used to compare the outcomes between surgeons that received radiation protection training and surgeons who did not. Using ANOVA analysis, we compared the score outcomes for all the other variables.

Results

The surgeons that received radiation protection training had significantly higher practice score 39.6% compared with 31% for the group that did not have training ( p = 0.01 ). No statistically significant difference in the knowledge scores was found between the two groups. Although 91% of the surgeons reported using some kind of PPE, only 5.5% used a dosimeter badge during surgeries.

Conclusion

There is an obvious deficit in radiation safety training of orthopedic surgeons.

Occupational Hazards to the Joint Replacement Surgeon: Radiation Exposure

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative fluoroscopy is an essential tool to assist orthopedic surgeons in accurately and safely implanting hardware. In arthroplasty cases, its use is on the rise with the increasing popularity of the direct anterior (DA) approach for THA. However, exposure of ionizing radiation poses a potential health risk to surgeons. While the benefits of intraoperative fluoroscopy in DA THA is becoming clearer, and are well-described in the literature, the potential health dangers associated with career-long cumulative radiation exposure are rarely discussed.

METHODS

In this article, we review the available literature to discuss radiation safety in orthopedics with a focus on total joint arthroplasty. We present the basic science of radiation, discuss the amount of radiation exposure in orthopedic surgery, and review the potential health risks associated with long-term exposure.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the radiation dose exposure to arthroplasty surgeons is low and within recommendations for occupation exposure limits. However, due to the stochastic health impacts of ionizing radiation, there is no threshold dose below which radiation exposure is truly safe. Therefore, it is imperative that surgeons practice proper fluoroscopy safety habits, such as wearing proper protective equipment, minimizing fluoroscopy time and magnification, and maximizing distance from the radiation source to minimize the life-long cumulative radiation exposure and associated health risks.

Percepção de cirurgiões ortopédicos sobre os riscos da exposição à radiação na fluoroscopia

Objective  The present study aims to understand the perceptions of orthopedists and traumatologists regarding the risk of exposure to ionizing radiation in fluoroscopy procedures.

Methods  An objective, structured, self-administered questionnaire with sociodemographic, professional, and occupational variables was developed, available through an invitation sent to orthopedist physicians whose contacts were made publicly available.

Results  A total of 141 questionnaires were answered and analyzed. Most respondents (99%) use fluoroscopy in their surgeries, and only 34.8% of the participants feel safe with the use of the equipment. It was observed that the knowledge about ionizing radiation is inadequate, because 22.6% of the participants are unaware of the type of radiation emitted in fluoroscopy and its biological effects. In addition, 52% of the participants did not know or do not understand the principles of radiological protection and their relationship with surgical practices.

Conclusion We concluded that the radiological protection of most orthopedists in surgical procedures is inadequate, and initial and continued training programs of professionals are necessary, bringing health benefits to orthopedists and their patients.

Radiation safety awareness and practices amongst orthopaedic surgeons in Scotland

As orthopaedic surgeons we use x-rays every day; not only when diagnosing pathology but often to assist in operative management of said pathology or ensure satisfactory outcomes for our patients in clinic. An awareness of the correct use of ionising radiation in the form of fluoroscopic imaging is therefore of great importance to reduce intraoperative exposure and has led to the development of the As Little As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle. The primary aim of this study is to determine the knowledge and practises of radiation safety amongst orthopaedic surgeons in Scotland. Secondary aim is to assess the prevalence of back pain and relation to lead gowns. A google forms survey containing 20 questions about both an individual's radiation practises, and knowledge and departmental practises were distributed to all 4 deaneries in Scotland. In total 72 responses were received from 20 hospitals across all 4 Scottish deaneries. This included 28 Consultants, 23 Senior trainees and 21 Junior trainees. We found that the level of radiation training and knowledge varied considerably across seniority and the nation. Of those surveyed 100% reported always wear lead aprons/gowns however only 46.2% (n = 34) frequently or always wear thyroid protection when using X-rays. Only 55% (n = 40) of those surveyed had completed a radiation safety course with this being far less likely amongst junior trainees (29%, n = 6) than amongst Consultants (82%, n = 23) and senior trainees (48%, n = 11) (p < 0.0001). To our knowledge this is the most extensive survey into the radiation practises of Orthopaedic Surgeons in the literature and shows the need for increased education and awareness of radiation safety practises, particularly amongst junior trainees.

Occupational ionizing radiation-induced skin injury among orthopedic surgeons: A clinical survey

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess orthopedic surgeons' attitudes and behaviors toward occupational radiation exposure and investigate the prevalence of occupational radiation-induced skin injury among orthopedic surgeons. Similarly, risk factors for the presence of radiation-induced skin injury were investigated.

METHODS

Overall, 108 orthopedic surgeons were administered self-reported questionnaires about occupational radiation exposure, and their hands were then photographed. Their fields of expertise were classified into spine, arthroplasty, sports medicine, hand, oncology, rheumatoid arthritis, pediatric orthopedic, and resident. Dermatologists evaluated the surgeons' skin conditions and classified into 3 grades of injury: grade 0, no clinical symptoms; grade 1, careful observation required; and grade 2, detailed examination required. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the factors related to the presence of radiation-induced skin injury. Crude and adjusted logistic regression analysis using the backward stepwise selection method was similarly conducted. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to estimate the predictive power of exposure time, occupational period, and accumulated annual exposure time for radiation-induced skin injury.

RESULTS

In total, 93.5% of the surgeons were careful about occupational radiation exposure, of which 76.8% used a dosimeter. Skin changes in the hands were self-reported by 42.5% of the surgeons, and radiation-induced skin injury was diagnosed in 31.4%. The accuracy of the self-reported skin changes was 100% for grade 2 and 61.5% for grade 1. Adjusted regression analysis showed that dermatologists' diagnosis-related factors were self-reported skin changes (odds ratio [OR] 3.1) and spine surgeons (OR 3.2). ROC analysis demonstrated that an occupational period >21 years and an accumulated exposure time >6696 min were considered risk factors, with ORs of 4.07 and 5.99, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthopedic surgeons, particularly spine surgeons, should be regularly examined by dermatologists early in their careers for early detection of radiation-induced skin injury on the hands.

Radiation in orthopaedics (RIO) study: a national survey of UK orthopaedic surgeons

OBJECTIVES

Orthopaedic surgeons have a responsibility to minimise risks of ionising radiation to patients, themselves and staff. This study aims to establish the understanding of radiation practice, legislation and risk by orthopaedic surgeons.

METHODS

A nationwide online survey of UK-based orthopaedic surgeons was conducted. Participants answered 18 multiple-choice questions assessing level of radiation safety training, basic principles/knowledge of ionising radiation, relevant legislation and operating practice.

RESULTS

A total of 406 surgeons completed the survey. 92% reported using intraoperative ionising radiation at least once per week. 38% received no formal training on radiation safety. Knowledge of basic principles of radiation and legislation was limited. There was variable knowledge when labelling an image intensifier machine and choosing its safest orientation. Poor uptake of radiation protection equipment was noted. Only 19% agreed they had adequate training in ionising radiation safety and 27% reported receiving adequate training in equipment emitting ionising radiation in the operating theatre.

CONCLUSION

Many orthopaedic surgeons in the UK do not believe they are adequately trained in radiation safety. There is a deficiency amongst practicing surgeons in basic knowledge, relevant legislation and practicalities of the use of ionising radiation in the operating room. This could potentially put patients and health-care professionals at additional risk. We recommend that a standardised national training programme on the basic principles and safety of ionising radiation is implemented for all practicing orthopaedic surgeons.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This paper is the first UK national survey amongst orthopaedic surgeons and is one of the largest reported internationally.