Combined use of bacterial artificial chromosomes-on-beads with karyotype detection improves prenatal diagnosis

Clinical Utility of the Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ Assay in Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis

Background: The prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ (PNBoBs™) assay has been applied worldwide for prenatal diagnosis. However, there are neither guidelines nor consensus on choosing patients, sample types, or clinical pathways for using this technique. Moreover, different perspectives have emerged regarding its clinical value. This study aimed to evaluate its clinical utility in the context of clinical practice located in a prenatal diagnostic center in Xiamen, a city in southeast China. Methods: We tested 2,368 prenatal samples with multiple referral indications using both conventional karyotyping and PNBoBs™. Positive results from PNBoBs™ were verified using current gold-standard approaches. Results: The overall rates for the detection of pathogenic copy number variation (pCNV) by karyotyping and PNBoBs™ were 1.9% (46/2,368) and 2.0% (48/2,368), respectively. The overall detection rate of karyotyping combined with PNBoBs™ for pCNV was 2.3% (54/2,368). A total of 13 cases of copy number variation (CNV)with a normal karyotype were detected by PNBoBs™. Another case with a normal karyotype that was detected as a CNV of sex chromosomes by PNBoBs™ was validated to be maternal cell contamination by short tandem repeat analysis. Conclusion: Karyotyping combined with PNBoBs™ can improve both the yield and efficiency of prenatal diagnosis and is appropriate in the second trimester in all patients without fetal ultrasound anomalies who undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis.

Evaluation of interpretation methods to improve accuracy of the prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ assay in prenatal diagnosis

Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ (PNBoBs™) technology has been approved for use in routine clinical prenatal diagnosis in numerous countries. However, the influence of data interpretation on the accuracy of the results remains to be evaluated. The present study aimed to determine the accuracy of existing data interpretation approaches and develop an optimization method to improve the performance of the PNBoBs™ assay in prenatal diagnosis. A total of 2,289 prenatal cases with known karyotypes and raw ratio data from PNBoBs™ assays were recruited for the present study. Positive results, according to the data interpretation methods used for the PNBoBs™ test, were validated against current gold-standard approaches. Statistical analyses were then performed to evaluate the accuracy of existing methods in data interpretation to provide a basis for the optimization of a follow-up approach. Among the existing methods, the ‘trimmed standard deviation threshold’ approach had the highest sensitivity and false-positive rates, with 98.1 and 4.2%, respectively. The ‘n-1 or greater probes’ rule had the highest specificity (99.7%) and the second-highest false-negative rate (11.5%). The method optimized in the present study provided a reasonable balance between sensitivity (98.1%) and specificity (99.6%) with regards to the interpretation of the data obtained from the PNBoBs™ assay. The results indicated that the present optimization method outperforms existing approaches in data interpretation for the PNBoBs™ assay, and as a result, may reduce unnecessary verification turnaround time and cost in prenatal diagnosis.