Uniparental disomy is a chromosomic disorder in the first place

Diagnostic Use of Genome Sequencing in Patients With 11p15.5 Imprinting Disorder Features: A Pilot Study

To assess the suitability of genome sequencing (GS) as the second step in the diagnostics of patients with the features of 11p15.5-associated imprinting disorders (ImpDis: Silver-Russell syndrome [SRS], Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome [BWS]), we performed short-read GS in patients negatively tested for imprinting disturbances. Obtaining a genetic diagnosis for patients with the features of these syndromes is challenging due to the clinical and molecular heterogeneity and overlap, and many patients remain undiagnosed after the currently suggested stepwise diagnostic workup. GS was conducted in 48 patients (SRS features: n = 37 and BWS features: n = 11). The detection rate differed markedly between the ImpDis: although a genetic cause could be identified in 51% of patients referred with SRS features, no pathogenic variants were detected in patients with BWS features. Thus, GS substantially improves the diagnostic yield and broadens the spectrum of overlapping disorders with SRS features. Obtaining a precise molecular diagnosis provides the basis for a personalized clinical management. Our findings support the use of GS as a second-tier diagnostic tool for patients with growth disturbances, as it addresses all currently known variant types and shortens the diagnostic odyssey.

Heterodisomy in the GNAS locus is also a cause of pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1B (iPPSD3)

Objective

To identify the genetic cause underlying the methylation defect in a patient with clinical suspicion of PHP1B/iPPSD3.

Design

Imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism that allows the regulation of gene expression. The GNAS locus is one of the loci within the genome that is imprinted. When the methylation pattern is affected, it causes pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1B (PHP1B) or inactivating PTH/PTHrP signaling disorder 3 (iPPSD3). Paternal uniparental isodisomy (iUPDpat) of the chromosomal region comprising the GNAS locus has been described as one of the possible underlying genetic causes of the methylation alteration.

Methods

We present the case of a patient clinically diagnosed with iPPSD3. We performed a commercial methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA), single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, and microsatellite study. In addition, we designed a custom MS-MLPA to analyze GNAS and nearby differentially methylated regions (DMRs).

Results

A methylation defect at the four GNAS-DMRs was detected, confirming the clinical diagnosis. Complementary techniques revealed the presence of a mixed isodisomy and heterodisomy of chromosome 20. Surprisingly, the GNAS locus was located on the heterodisomic zone.

Conclusions

Paternal uniparental heterodisomy (hUPD) at the GNAS locus is also a genetic defect associated with iPPSD3. In the absence of parental samples, our custom MS-MLPA allows for the detection of a methylation defect at the GNAS locus and flanking DMRs, suggestive of uniparental disomy (UPD). We also suggest updating the actual guidelines to include hUPD at the GNAS locus as a cause of iPPSD3.

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic analyses of a homozygous Robertsonian translocation family with novel mosaic Robertsonian fission karyotype

BACKGROUND

Approximately one person in 1000 is a Robertsonian translocation carrier. Errors in the formation of eggs (or more rarely of sperms) may be the cause of Robertsonian translocation. Most Robertsonian translocation carriers are healthy and have a normal lifespan, but do have an increased risk of offsprings with trisomies and pregnancy loss. The fitness of Robertsonian translocation carriers is reduced, but can provide material for evolution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have done prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic analyses on this homozygous Robertson translocation family. We report a homozygous Robertson translocation family with previously undescribed mosaic Robertsonian fission karyotype.

RESULTS

We identified six Robertsonian translocation carriers in this family. Four were heterozygous translocation carriers of 45,XX or XY,der(14;15)(q10;q10), one was a homozygous translocation carrier of a 44,XY,der(14;15)(q10;q10),der(14;15)(q10;q10), and one was a previously undescribed Robertsonian fission carrier of 45,XN,der(14;15)(q10;q10)[42]/46,XN[58] with normal phenotype.

CONCLUSION

We reported a previously undescribed mosaic Robertsonian fission karyotype. The homozygosity of Robertsonian translocation for speciation may be a potential mechanism of speciation in humans. In theory, the carriers of homologous Robertsonian translocation cannot produce normal gametes, but Robertson fission made it possible for them to produce normal gametes.

Automatized detection of uniparental disomies in a large cohort

Uniparental disomy (UPD) is the inheritance of both homologues of a chromosome from only one parent. The detection of UPDs in sequencing data is not well established and a common gap in genetic diagnostics. We applied our in-house UPD detection pipeline to evaluate a cohort of 9212 samples, including multigene panels as well as exome sequencing data in a single, duo or trio constellation. We used the results to inform the design of our publicly available web app altAFplotter. UPDs categorized as heterodisomy, whole chromosome or segmental isodisomy were identified and validated with microsatellites, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification as well as Sanger sequencing. We detected 14 previously undiagnosed UPDs including nine isodisomies, four segmental isodisomies as well as one heterodisomy on chromosome 22. We characterized eight findings as potentially causative through homozygous pathogenic variants or imprinting disorders. Overall, our study demonstrates the utility of our UPD detection pipeline with our web app, altAFplotter, to reliably identify UPDs. This not only increases the diagnostic yield of cases with growth and metabolic disturbances, as well as developmental delay, but also enhances the understanding of UPDs that may be relevant for recurrence risks and genetic counseling.

Mechanism of chromosomal mosaicism in preimplantation embryos and its effect on embryo development

Aneuploidy is one of the main causes of miscarriage and in vitro fertilization failure. Mitotic abnormalities in preimplantation embryos are the main cause of mosaicism, which may be influenced by several endogenous factors such as relaxation of cell cycle control mechanisms, defects in chromosome cohesion, centrosome aberrations and abnormal spindle assembly, and DNA replication stress. In addition, incomplete trisomy rescue is a rare cause of mosaicism. However, there may be a self-correcting mechanism in mosaic embryos, which allows some mosaicisms to potentially develop into normal embryos. At present, it is difficult to accurately diagnose mosaicism using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Therefore, in clinical practice, embryos diagnosed as mosaic should be considered comprehensively based on the specific situation of the patient.

Human Reproduction and Disturbed Genomic Imprinting

Genomic imprinting is a specific mode of gene regulation which particularly accounts for the factors involved in development. Its disturbance affects the fetus, the course of pregnancy and even the health of the mother. In children, aberrant imprinting signatures are associated with imprinting disorders (ImpDis). These alterations also affect the function of the placenta, which has consequences for the course of the pregnancy. The molecular causes of ImpDis comprise changes at the DNA level and methylation disturbances (imprinting defects/ImpDefs), and there is an increasing number of reports of both pathogenic fetal and maternal DNA variants causing ImpDefs. These ImpDefs can be inherited, but prediction of the pregnancy complications caused is difficult, as they can cause miscarriages, aneuploidies, health issues for the mother and ImpDis in the child. Due to the complexity of imprinting regulation, each pregnancy or patient with suspected altered genomic imprinting requires a specific workup to identify the precise molecular cause and also careful clinical documentation. This review will cover the current knowledge on the molecular causes of aberrant imprinting signatures and illustrate the need to identify this basis as the prerequisite for personalized genetic and reproductive counselling of families.

Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic chromosomal aneuploidy and uniparental disomy and clinical outcomes evaluation of four fetuses

BACKGROUND

Few co-occurrence cases of mosaic aneuploidy and uniparental disomy (UPD) chromosomes have been reported in prenatal periods. It is a big challenge for us to predict fetal clinical outcomes with these chromosome abnormalities because of their highly heterogeneous clinical manifestations and limited phenotype attainable by ultrasound.

METHODS

Amniotic fluid samples were collected from four cases. Karyotype, chromosome microarray analysis, short tandem repeats, and whole exome sequencing were adopted to analyze fetal chromosomal aneuploidy, UPD, and gene variation. Meanwhile, CNVseq analysis proceeded for cultured and uncultured amniocytes in case 2 and case 4 and MS-MLPA for chr11 and chr15 in case 3.

RESULTS

All four fetuses showed mosaic chromosomal aneuploidy and UPD simultaneously. The results were: Case 1: T2(7%) and UPD(2)mat(12%). Case 2: T15(60%) and UPD(15)mat(40%). Case 3: 45,X(13%) and genome-wide paternal UPD(20%). Case 4: <10% of T20 and > 90% UPD(20)mat in uncultured amniocyte. By analyzing their formation mechanism of mosaic chromosomal aneuploidy and UPD, at least two adverse genetic events happened during their meiosis and mitosis. The fetus of case 1 presented a benign with a normal intrauterine phenotype, consistent with a low proportion of trisomy cells. However, the other three fetuses had adverse pregnancy outcomes, resulting from the UPD chromosomes with imprinted regions involved or a higher level of mosaic aneuploidy.

CONCLUSION

UPD is often present with mosaic aneuploidy. It is necessary to analyze them simultaneously using a whole battery of analyses for these cases when their chromosomes with imprinted regions are involved or known carriers of a recessive allele. Fetal clinical outcomes were related to the affected chromosomes aneuploidy and UPD, mosaic levels and tissues, methylation status, and homozygous variation of recessive genes on the UPD chromosome. Genetic counseling for pregnant women with such fetuses is crucial to make informed choices.

SNP chromosome microarray genotyping for detection of uniparental disomy in the clinical diagnostic laboratory

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chromosome microarray is well established for investigation of children with intellectual deficit/development delay and prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformation but has also emerged for uniparental disomy (UPD) genotyping. Despite published guidelines on clinical indications for testing there are no laboratory guidelines published for performing SNP microarray UPD genotyping. We evaluated SNP microarray UPD genotyping using Illumina beadchips on family trios/duos within a clinical cohort (n=98) and then explored our findings in a post-study audit (n=123). UPD occurred in 18.6% and 19.5% cases, respectively, with chromosome 15 most frequent (62.5% and 25.0%). UPD was predominantly maternal in origin (87.5% and 79.2%), highest in suspected genomic imprinting disorder cases (56.3% and 41.7%) but absent amongst children of translocation carriers. We assessed regions of homozygosity among UPD cases. The smallest interstitial and terminal regions were 2.5 Mb and 9.3 Mb, respectively. We found regions of homozygosity confounded genotyping in a consanguineous case with UPD15 and another with segmental UPD due to non-informative probes. In a unique case with chromosome 15q UPD mosaicism, we established the detection limit of mosaicism as ∼5%. From the benefits and pitfalls identified in this study, we propose a testing model and recommendations for UPD genotyping by SNP microarray.

Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 18 and maternal uniparental disomy 18 by amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues and a favorable fetal outcome

OBJECTIVE

We present prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 18 and maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) 18 in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome.

CASE REPORT

A 34-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age, and the result was 47,XY,+18 [4]/46,XY [25] in cultured amniocytes. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on uncultured amniocytes revealed 65% mosaicism for trisomy 18. Prenatal ultrasound was normal. She consulted our hospital and underwent repeat amniocentesis at 22 weeks of gestation, and the result revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+18 [9]/46,XY [12] in cultured amniocytes. Simultaneous aCGH on uncultured amniocytes revealed arr 18p11.32q23 × 2.4 (log₂ ratio = 0.3) consistent with 40% mosaicism for trisomy 18. Parental karyotypes were normal. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on the DNA extracted from parental bloods and uncultured amniocytes confirmed maternal uniparental heterodisomy of chromosome 18. At 26 weeks of gestation, she underwent the third amniocentesis which revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+18 [7]/46,XY [19] in cultured amniocytes. Simultaneous aCGH on uncultured amniocytes revealed arr 18p11.32q23 × 2.4 (log₂ ratio = 0.27) consistent with 40% mosaicism for trisomy 18. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on uncultured amniocytes revealed 38% (38/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 18. The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a 2620-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered at 40 weeks of gestation. At birth, the karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 47,XY,+18 [14]/46,XY [26], 47,XY,+18 [9]/46,XY [31] and 47,XY,+18 (40/40 cells), respectively. When follow-up at age 2½ months, the neonate was phenotypically normal. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 47,XY,+18 [28]/46,XY [12], and interphase FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells detected 6.4% (7/93 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 18, compared with 0% (0/100 cells) in the normal control. When follow-up at age seven months, the neonate was normal in development, and the peripheral blood had a karyotype of 47,XY,+18 [18]/46,XY [22].

CONCLUSIONS

Mosaic trisomy 18 at amniocentesis can be associated with cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues, UPD 18 and a favorable fetal outcome. Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 18 should alert the possibility of UPD 18 and include UPD testing.

Uniparental disomy of multiple chromosomes in two cases with a complex phenotype

Uniparental disomy (UPD) is the inheritance of both chromosomal homologs from one parent. Depending on the chromosome involved and the parental origin, UPD may result in phenotypic abnormalities due to aberrant methylation patterns or unmasking recessive conditions in isodisomic regions. UPD primarily originates from somatic rescue of a single meiotically-derived aneuploidy, most commonly a trisomy. Double UPD is exceedingly rare and triple UPD has not been previously described. Here, we report two unrelated clinical cases with UPD of multiple chromosomes; an 8-month-old male with maternal isodisomy of chromosome 7 and paternal isodisomy of chromosome 9, and a 4-week-old female with mixed paternal UPD for chromosomes 4, 10, and 14. These cases also demonstrate that although extremely rare, the detection of AOH on two or more chromosomes may warrant additional clinical and laboratory investigation such as methylation and STR marker analysis, especially when involving chromosomes known to be associated with imprinting disorders.

The past, present, and future for constitutional ring chromosomes: A report of the international consortium for human ring chromosomes

Human ring chromosomes (RCs) are rare diseases with an estimated newborn incidence of 1/50,000 and an annual occurrence of 2,800 patients globally. Over the past 60 years, banding cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has been used to detect an RC and further characterize its genomic alterations. Ring syndrome featuring sever growth retardation and variable intellectual disability has been considered as general clinical presentations for all RCs due to the cellular losses from the dynamic mosaicism of RC instability through mitosis. Cytogenomic heterogeneity ranging from simple complete RCs to complex rearranged RCs and variable RC intolerance with different relative frequencies have been observed. Clinical heterogeneity, including chromosome-specific deletion and duplication syndromes, gene-related organ and tissue defects, cancer predisposition to different types of tumors, and reproductive failure, has been reported in the literature. However, the patients with RCs reported in the literature accounted for less than 1% of its occurrence. Current diagnostic practice lacks laboratory standards for analyzing cellular behavior and genomic imbalances of RCs to evaluate the compound effects on patients. Under-representation of clinical cases and lack of comprehensive diagnostic analysis make it a challenge for evidence-based interpretation of clinico-cytogenomic correlations and recommendation of follow-up clinical management. Given recent advancements in genomic technologies and organized efforts by international collaborations and patient advocacy organizations, the prospective of standardized cytogenomic diagnosis and evidence-based clinical management for all patients with RCs could be achieved at an unprecedented global scale.

The First Neocentric, Discontinuous, and Complex Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosome Composed of 7 Euchromatic Blocks Derived from 5 Different Chromosomes

Background: The majority of small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) are derived from one single chromosome. Complex sSMCs instead consist of two to three genomic segments, originating from different chromosomes. Additionally, discontinuous sSMCs have been seen; however, all of them are derived from one single chromosome. Here, we reported a 41 year-old patient with infertility, hypothyroidism, rheumatism, and degenerative spine and schizoaffective disorder, being a carrier of a unique, complex, and discontinuous sSMC. Methods: The sSMC was characterized in detail by banding and molecular cytogenetics including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), as well as by optical genome mapping (OGM). Results: The neocentric sSMC characterized here contained seven portions of five different chromosomes and was present in ~50% of both peripheral blood cells and buccal mucosa cells. aCGH and OGM revealed gains of 8q12.3q12.3, 8q22.3−8q23.1, 9q33.3−9q34.11, 14q21.1−14q21.1, 14q21.1−14q21.2, 15q21.2−15q21.2, and 21q21.1−21q21.1. Furthermore, glass-needle based microdissection and reverse FISH, as well as FISH with locus-specific probes confirmed these results. The exact order of the involved euchromatic blocks could be decoded by OGM. Conclusions: Among the >7000 reported sSMCs in the literature, this is the only such complex, discontinuous, and neocentric marker with a centric minute shape.

Prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of a uniparental isodisomy of chromosome 8 with no phenotypic abnormalities

Background

Uniparental disomy (UPD) refers to an epigenomic abnormality in which both copies of, or a part of, a homologous pair of chromosomes are inherited from one parent. UPD arises via a number of mechanisms, including monosomic and trisomic rescue (in embryonic development), incomplete segregation of chromosomes, and mitotic recombination.

Case presentation

A 34-year-old, gravida 2, para 0 woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because the noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) showed the highly possibility of trisomy chromosome 8. GTG-banding karyotype analysis was performed on cultured amniocytes. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH), whole-exome sequencing(WES) on uncultured amniocytes were performed.

Results

CMA detected a 29.4 Mb uniparental isodisomy of chromosome 8, arr 8p23.3p12(168484_29427840) × 2 hmz [GRCh37(hg19)]. FISH, WES and ultrasound examination showed no abnormal. At the 36-month checkup, the baby was developing normally.

Conclusion

Combination of NIPT,prenatal ultrasound, karyotype analysis, CMA, FISH, WES and genetic counseling will prove a more accurate risk assessment for the prenatal diagnosis of UPD.