Comprehensive analysis of three female patients with different types of X/Y translocations and literature review

Recurrent Xp22.31-Yq11 Unbalanced Translocations: Molecular Diagnosis and Clinical Implications in Three Families

Unbalanced translocation between chromosomes X and Y is a recurring chromosomal rearrangement. The presence of a derivative chromosome X (derX), where a Yq11-qter segment is attached to the short arm of chromosome X, replacing a terminal Xpter-p22.31, poses challenges for interpretation of findings by prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening, establishing genotype-phenotype correlation in male and female individuals, and for genetic counseling. In this report, we provide clinical outcomes, inheritance, and clinical implications of derX in three families referred to diagnostic testing due to discrepant results for sex chromosomes reported by cfDNA, abnormal prenatal ultrasound findings, recurrent pregnancy losses, or affected family members with derX transmitted through multiple generations. Reports of discrepant sex and risk for sex chromosome aneuploidy such as 45,X, 47,XXY and 47,XYY are common false positive outcomes of a prenatal cfDNA screening if either a mother or a fetus has unbalanced Xp-Yq translocation. In addition, mothers who carry der(X) facing a recurrent risk of ambiguity in prenatal testing. Pregnancy loss and neonatal death/stillbirth of male offspring are common in affected families, but this risk does not directly correlate with the size of deleted Xp region. This study emphasizes the importance of CMA and familial testing for accurate diagnosis and genetic counseling.

Non-Invasive Prenatal Test Analysis Opens a Pandora's Box: Identification of Very Rare Cases of SRY-Positive Healthy Females, Segregating for Three Generations Thanks to Preferential Inactivation of the XqYp Translocated Chromosome

The translocation of the testis-determining factor, the SRY gene, from the Y to the X chromosome is a rare event that causes abnormalities in gonadal development. In all cases of males and females carrying this translocation, disorder of sex development is reported. In our study, we described a peculiar pedigree with the first evidence of four healthy females from three generations who are carriers of the newly identified t(X;Y)(q28;p11.2)(SRY+) translocation with no evidence of ambiguous genitalia or other SRY-dependent alterations. Our study was a consequence of a Non-Invasive Prenatal Test (NIPT) showing a sexual chromosomal abnormality (XXY) followed by a chorionic villus analysis suggesting a normal karyotype 46,XX and t(X;Y) translocation detected by FISH. Here, we (i) demonstrated the inheritance of the translocation in the maternal lineage via karyotyping and FISH analysis; (ii) characterised the structural rearrangement via chromosomal microarray; and (iii) demonstrated, via Click-iT® EdU Imaging assay, that there was an absolute preferential inactivation of the der(X) chromosome responsible for the lack of SRY expression. Overall, our study provides valuable genetic and molecular information that may lead personal and medical decisions.

Characteristics and clinical evaluation of X chromosome translocations

BACKGROUND

Individuals with X chromosomal translocations, variable phenotypes, and a high risk of live birth defects are of interest for scientific study. These characteristics are related to differential breakpoints and various types of chromosomal abnormalities. To investigate the effects of X chromosome translocation on clinical phenotype, a retrospective analysis of clinical data for patients with X chromosome translocation was conducted. Karyotype analysis plus endocrine evaluation was utilized for all the patients. Additional semen analysis and Y chromosome microdeletions were assessed in male patients.

RESULTS

X chromosome translocations were detected in ten cases, including seven females and three males. Infantile uterus and no ovaries were detected in case 1 (FSH: 114 IU/L, LH: 30.90 mIU/mL, E2: < 5.00 pg/ml), and the karyotype was confirmed as 46,X,t(X;22)(q25;q11.2) in case 1. Infantile uterus and small ovaries were both visible in two cases (FSH: 34.80 IU/L, LH: 17.06 mIU/mL, E2: 15.37 pg/ml in case 2; FISH: 6.60 IU/L, LH: 1.69 mIU/mL, E2: 23.70 pg/ml in case 3). The karyotype was detected as 46,X,t(X;8)(q13;q11.2) in case 2 and 46,X,der(X)t(X;5)(q21;q31) in case 3. Normal reproductive hormone levels and fertility abilities were found for cases 4, 6 and 7. The karyotype were detected as 46,X,t(X;5)(p22.3;q22) in case 4 and 46,X,der(X)t(X;Y)(p22.3;q11.2) in cases 6 and 7. These patients exhibited unremarkable clinical manifestations but experienced a history of abnormal chromosomal pregnancy. Normal phenotype and a complex reciprocal translocation as 46,X,t(X;14;4)(q24;q22;q33) were observed in case 5 with a history of spontaneous abortions. In the three male patients, multiple semen analyses confirmed the absence of sperm. Y chromosome microdeletion and hormonal analyses were normal. The karyotypes were detected as 46,Y,t(X;8)(q26;q22), 46,Y,t(X;1)(q26;q23), 46,Y,t(X;3)(q26;p24), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides insights into individuals with X chromosome translocations. The clinical phenotypes are variable and unpredictable due to differences in breakpoints and X chromosome inactivation (XCI) patterns. Our results suggest that physicians should focus on the characteristics of the X chromosome translocations and provide personalized clinical evaluations in genetic counselling.