1
|
Ivanova M, Porta FM, D'Ercole M, Pescia C, Sajjadi E, Cursano G, De Camilli E, Pala O, Mazzarol G, Venetis K, Guerini-Rocco E, Curigliano G, Viale G, Fusco N. Standardized pathology report for HER2 testing in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer. Virchows Arch 2024; 484:3-14. [PMID: 37770765 PMCID: PMC10791807 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03656-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
Since the release of the DESTINY-Breast04 (DB-04) trial findings in June 2022, the field of pathology has seen a renaissance of HER2 as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer. The trial focused on patients with metastatic breast cancer who were classified as "HER2-low," i.e., those with immunohistochemistry (IHC) HER2 1 + or 2 + and negative in situ hybridization (ISH) results. The study revealed that treating these patients with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) instead of the oncologist's chosen chemotherapy led to outstanding improvements in survival. This has challenged the existing binary HER2 pathological classification system, which categorized tumors as either positive (overexpression/amplification) or negative, as per the ASCO/CAP 2018 guideline reaffirmed by ASCO/CAP 2023 guideline update. Given that DB-04 excluded patients with HER2 IHC score 0 status, the results of the ongoing DB-06 trial may shed further light on the potential benefits of T-DXd therapy for these patients. Roughly half of all breast cancers are estimated to belong to the HER2-low category, which does not represent a distinct or specific subtype of cancer. Instead, it encompasses a diverse group of tumors that exhibit clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular variations. However, HER2-low offers a distinctive biomarker status that identifies a specific therapeutic regimen (i.e., T-DXd) linked to a favorable prognosis in breast cancer. This unique association emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying these tumors. Differentiating between a HER2 IHC score 0 and score 1 + has not been clinically significant until now. To ensure accurate classification and avoid misdiagnosis, it is necessary to adopt standardized procedures, guidelines, and specialized training for pathologists in interpreting HER2 expression in the lower spectrum. Additionally, the utilization of artificial intelligence holds promise in supporting this endeavor. Here, we address the current state of the art and unresolved issues in assessing HER2-low status, with a particular emphasis on the score 0. We explore the dilemma surrounding the exclusion of HER2-zero patients from potentially beneficial therapy based on traditional HER2 testing. Additionally, we examine the clinical context, considering that DB-04 primarily involved heavily pretreated late-stage metastatic breast cancers. We also delve into emerging evidence suggesting that extrapolating HER2-low status from the original diagnosis may lead to misleading results. Finally, we provide recommendations for conducting high-quality testing and propose a standardized pathology report in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariia Ivanova
- Division of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Maria Porta
- Division of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Marianna D'Ercole
- Division of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Pescia
- Division of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Elham Sajjadi
- Division of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Cursano
- Division of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa De Camilli
- Division of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Oriana Pala
- Division of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzarol
- Division of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Venetis
- Division of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Guerini-Rocco
- Division of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Division of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Division of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sajjadi E, Venetis K, Ivanova M, Fusco N. Improving HER2 testing reproducibility in HER2-low breast cancer. CANCER DRUG RESISTANCE (ALHAMBRA, CALIF.) 2022; 5:882-888. [PMID: 36627898 PMCID: PMC9771736 DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2022.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
HER2 is a pillar biomarker in breast cancer, and it is assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a three-tier scoring system and reflex in situ hybridization (ISH) for IHC score 2+. Novel HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugates have demonstrated significant antitumor activity in breast cancers with low levels of HER2 expression, i.e. IHC score 1+ or ISH-negative IHC score 2+. Both primary and acquired resistance to anti-HER2 therapies remains a challenge in the treatment of breast cancers according to the HER2 positivity continuum. Thus, the ability to precisely discriminate among HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2-positive breast cancers is no longer a mere academic exercise. HER2 testing criteria, guidelines, and quality controls are re-gaining momentum for this new clinical need. Therefore, all preanalytical and analytical variables that might trouble the sensitivity and reproducibility of this test should be carefully considered to address all possible issues and open all possible therapeutic opportunities for breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elham Sajjadi
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Venetis
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Mariia Ivanova
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy.,Correspondence to: Prof. Nicola Fusco, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|