The influence of the windlass mechanism on kinematic and kinetic foot joint coupling

New Perspectives on Foot Segment Forces and Joint Kinetics-Integrating Plantar Shear Stresses and Pressures with Multi-segment Foot Modeling

The role of the many small foot articulations and plantar tissues in gait is not well understood. While kinematic multi-segment foot models have increased our knowledge of foot segmental motions, the integration of kinetics with these models could further advance our understanding of foot mechanics and energetics. However, capturing and effectively utilizing segmental ground reaction forces remains challenging. The purposes of this study were to (1) develop methodology to integrate plantar pressures and shear stresses with a multi-segment foot model, and (2) generate and concisely display key normative data from this combined system. Twenty-six young healthy adults walked barefoot (1.3 m/s) across a pressure/shear sensor with markers matching a published 4-segment foot model. A novel anatomical/geometric template-based masking method was developed that successfully separated regions aligned with model segmentation. Directional shear force plots were created to summarize complex plantar shear distributions, showing opposing shear forces both between and within segments. Segment centers of pressure (CoPs) were shown to be primarily stationary within each segment, suggesting that forward progression in healthy gait arises primarily from redistributing weight across relatively fixed contact points as opposed to CoP movement within a segment. Inverse dynamics-based normative foot joint moments and power were presented in the context of these CoPs to aid in interpretation of tissue stresses. Overall, this work represents a successful integration of motion capture with direct plantar pressure and shear measurements for multi-segment foot kinetics. The presented tools are versatile enough to be used with other models and contexts, while the presented normative database may be useful as a baseline comparison for clinical work in gait energetics and efficiency, balance, and motor control. We hope that this work will aid in the advancement and availability of kinetic MSF modeling, increase our knowledge of foot mechanics, and eventually lead to improved clinical diagnosis, rehabilitation, and treatment.

Impact of pronated foot on energetic behavior and efficiency during walking

BACKGROUND

The longitudinal arch of the foot acts like a spring during stance and contributes to walking efficiency. Pronated foot characterized by a collapsed medial longitudinal arch may have the impaired spring-like function and poor walking efficiency. However, the differences in the energetic behavior during walking between individuals with pronated foot and neutral foot have not been considered.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How does the energetic behavior within the foot and proximal lower limb joints in pronated foot affect walking efficiency?

METHODS

Twenty-one healthy young adults were classified into neutral foot and pronated foot based on the Foot Posture Index score. All subjects walked across the floor and attempted to have the rearfoot and forefoot segments contact separate force plates to analyze the forces acting on isolated regions within the foot. Kinematic and kinetic data were recorded by a three-dimensional motion capture system. The hip, knee, ankle, and mid-tarsal joint power was quantified using a 6-degree-of-freedom joint power method. To qualify total power within all structures of the foot and forefoot, we used a unified deformable segment analysis. Additionally, we calculated the center of mass power to quantify the total power of the whole body RESULTS: There is no difference in the mid-tarsal joint work between the pronated foot and neutral foot. On the other hand, pronated foot exhibited greater net negative work at structures distal to the forefoot during walking. Additionally, pronated foot exhibited less net positive work at the ankle and center of mass during walking compared to neutral foot.

SIGNIFICANCE

Individuals with pronated foot generate the mid-tarsal joint work by increasing the work absorbed at structures distal to the forefoot, which results in reduced energy efficiency during walking. That energy inefficiency may reduce positive work at the ankle and affect the walking efficiency in individuals with pronated foot.

For plantar taping, direction of elasticity matters

Plantar taping has been used in clinical settings as a short-term conservative treatment for plantar heel pain and related pathologies. The rise of at-home taping methods may offer patients more independence, but effectiveness has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of plantar taping on foot mechanics during gait. We hypothesized that material compliance would drive mechanical effectiveness, with longitudinally inelastic tape reducing medial longitudinal arch (MLA) motion and anterior/posterior (A/P) plantar tissue spreading forces, and laterally inelastic tape reducing medial/lateral (M/L) tissue spreading. We also hypothesized that these effects would be influenced by foot structure. Fifteen healthy participants were tested in a randomized cross-over study design. Barefoot (BF) plus four taping methods were evaluated, including two inelastic tapes (Low-Dye, LD, and FasciaDerm, FD) along with longitudinally elastic kinesiology tape (KT) and a novel laterally elastic kinesiology tape (FAST, FS). Participants' arch height and flexibility were measured followed by instrumented gait analysis with a multi-segment foot model. Ankle eversion and MLA drop/rise were calculated from rearfoot and forefoot reference frames, while plantar tissue spreading was calculated from shear stresses. ANOVAs with Holm pairwise tests evaluated tape effects while correlations connected arch structure and taping effectiveness (α = 0.05). The three longitudinally inelastic tapes (LD, FD, FS) reduced MLA drop by 11-15% compared with KT and BF. In late stance, these tapes also inhibited MLA rise (LD by 29%, FD and FS by 10-15%). FS and FD reduced A/P spreading forces, while FD reduced M/L spreading forces compared with all other conditions. Arch height had a moderately strong correlation (r = -0.67) with the difference in MLA drop between BF and FS. At-home plantar taping can affect the mechanical function of the foot, but tape elasticity direction matters. Longitudinally elastic kinesiology tape has little effect on mechanics, while inelastic tapes control MLA drop but also restrict MLA rise in late stance. Lateral elasticity does not limit tissue spreading and may increase comfort without sacrificing MLA control. At-home taping has the potential to broaden conservative treatment of plantar heel pain, flat foot deformity, and related pathologies, but additional studies are needed to connect mechanics with symptom relief.

The signed helical angle: A technique for characterizing midfoot motion during gait

Quantifying motion in the midfoot during gait and other movements is important for a variety of applications, but challenging due to the complexity of the multiple small articulations involved. The most common motion capture based techniques are limited in their ability to characterize the non-planar nature of the midfoot joint axes. In this study we developed a novel Signed Helical Angle (SHA) to quantify midfoot angular displacement. Motion capture data from 40 healthy subjects walking at a controlled speed were used to calculate finite helical axes and angles from a two-segment foot model. Axes were classified as either pronation or supination based on their orientation, and given a sign, thus either adding to or subtracting from the angular displacement. Analysis focused on insights from axis orientation and comparisons to other techniques. Results showed that when transitions were excluded, pronation and supination axes were fairly well clustered in the transverse plane. The resulting SHA midfoot angle waveform was comparable to sagittal plane Euler and helical component waveforms, but with 39% (approximately 3°) greater range of motion in pronation and 25% (approximately 4°) greater in supination, due to the direct measurement of the motion path and the influence of the other planes. The proposed SHA method may provide an intuitive and useful method to analyze midfoot motion for a variety of applications, particularly when interventions cause subtle changes that may be diluted in planar analyses.

Kinetic coupling in distal foot joints during walking

BACKGROUND

Kinematic coupling between the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) and midtarsal joints is evident during gait and other movement tasks, however kinetic foot coupling during walking has not been examined. Furthermore, contributing factors to foot coupling are still unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate kinematic and kinetic coupling within the foot by restricting MTP motion during overground walking. We hypothesized that when the MTP joint was prevented from fully extending, the midtarsal joint would achieve less peak motion and generate less positive work compared to walking with normal MTP motion.

METHODS

Twenty-six individuals participated in this randomized cross-over study. Using motion capture to track motion, participants walked at 1.3 m/s while wearing a brace that restricted MTP motion in a neutral (BR_NT) or extended (BR_EX) position. Additionally, participants walked while wearing the brace in a freely moveable setting (BR_UN) and with no brace (CON). A pressure/shear sensing device was used to capture forces under each foot segment. During stance, peak joint motion and work were calculated for the MTP and midtarsal joints using inverse dynamics. A series of ANOVAs and Holm post hoc tests were performed for all metrics (alpha = 0.05).

RESULTS

The brace successfully decreased peak MTP motion by 19% compared to BR_UN and CON. This was coupled with 9.8% less midtarsal motion. Kinetically, the work absorbed by the MTP joint (26-51%) and generated by the midtarsal joint (30-38%) were both less in BR_EX and BR_NT compared to BR_UN.

CONCLUSION

Implications and sources of coupling between the MTP and midtarsal joints are discussed within the context of center of pressure shifts and changes to segmental foot forces. Our results suggest that interventions aimed at modulating MTP negative work (such as footwear or assistive device design) should not ignore the midtarsal joint.