Differences between primary peritoneal serous carcinoma and advanced serous ovarian carcinoma: a study based on the SEER database

Case report: Germline BRCA 2 mutation in primary peritoneal carcinoma: a rare malignancy

Background

Primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) is a rare malignancy. Clinically, its histological morphology resembles that of epithelial ovarian tumors (EOC), often leading to misdiagnosis. Diagnosis and treatment of PPC are time-sensitive because of the rapidly progressive nature of the disease.

Case report

Herein, we report the case of a 54-year-old woman who was initially diagnosed with ovarian cancer; however, extensive workup showed evidence of Müllerian PPC origin. Furthermore, the patient harbored a targetable BRCA mutation.

Conclusion

The patient was treated with the BRCA-targeting agents and had a good prognosis after surgery.

Nomogram incorporating log odds of positive lymph nodes improves prognostic prediction for ovarian serous carcinoma: a real-world retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Ovarian serous carcinoma (OSC) is a major cause of gynaecological cancer death, yet there is a lack of reliable prognostic models. To address this, we developed and validated a nomogram based on conventional clinical characteristics and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) to predict the prognosis of OSC patients.

SETTING

A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results programme.

PARTICIPANTS

We obtained data on 4192 patients diagnosed with OSC between 2010 and 2015. Eligibility criteria included specific diagnostic codes, OSC being the primary malignant tumour and age at diagnosis over 18 years. Exclusion criteria were missing information on various factors and unknown cause of death or survival time.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome were overall survival (OS) and ovarian cancer-specific survival (OCSS).

RESULTS

For OS and OCSS outcomes, we selected 7 and 5 variables, respectively, to establish the nomogram. In the training and validation cohorts, the C index for OS or OCSS was 0.716 or 0.718 and 0.731 or 0.733, respectively, with a 3-year time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) of 0.745 or 0.751 and a 5-year time-dependent AUC of 0.742 or 0.751. Calibration curves demonstrated excellent consistency between predicted and observed outcomes. The Net Reclassification Index, integrated discrimination improvement and decision curve analysis curves indicated that our nomogram performed better than the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system in predicting OS and OCSS for OSC patients in both the training and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Our nomogram, which includes LODDS, offers higher accuracy and reliability than the FIGO staging system and can predict overall and OCSS in OSC patients.

Unravelling Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Using Cross-Sectional Imaging Modalities

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) refers to malignant epithelial cells that spread to the peritoneum, principally from abdominal malignancies. Until recently, PC prognosis has been considered ill-fated, with palliative therapies serving as the only treatment option. New locoregional treatments are changing the outcome of PC, and imaging modalities have a critical role in early diagnosis and disease staging, determining treatment decision making strategies. The aim of this review is to provide a practical approach for detecting and characterizing peritoneal deposits in cross-sectional imaging modalities, taking into account their appearances, including the secondary complications, the anatomical characteristics of the peritoneal cavity, together with the differential diagnosis with other benign and malignant peritoneal conditions. Among the cross-sectional imaging modalities, computed tomography (CT) is widely available and fast; however, magnetic resonance (MR) performs better in terms of sensitivity (92% vs. 68%), due to its higher contrast resolution. The appearance of peritoneal deposits on CT and MR mainly depends on the primary tumour histology; in case of unknown primary tumour (3-5% of cases), their behaviour at imaging may provide insights into the tumour origin. The timepoint of tumour evolution, previous or ongoing treatments, and the peritoneal spaces in which they occur also play an important role in determining the appearance of peritoneal deposits. Thus, knowledge of peritoneal anatomy and fluid circulation is essential in the detection and characterisation of peritoneal deposits. Several benign and malignant conditions show similar imaging features that overlap those of PC, making differential diagnosis challenging. Knowledge of peritoneal anatomy and primary tumour histology is crucial, but one must also consider clinical history, laboratory findings, and previous imaging examinations to achieve a correct diagnosis. In conclusion, to correctly diagnose PC in cross-sectional imaging modalities, knowledge of peritoneal anatomy and peritoneal fluid flow characteristics are mandatory. Peritoneal deposit features reflect the primary tumour characteristics, and this specificity may be helpful in its identification when it is unknown. Moreover, several benign and malignant peritoneal conditions may mimic PC, which need to be considered even in oncologic patients.

Brain metastases in patients with ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis (BM) are uncommon among women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The frequency, risk factors and clinical repercussions of BM in these patients are not well described.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated EOC patients treated at our center from 2002 to 2020 and assessed their clinical parameters, risk for BM development and association with overall survival (OS). This cohort has a known high frequency of BRCA mutation carriers (BRCAm) due to women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent.

RESULTS

Among 1035 EOC patients, 29 (2.8%) were diagnosed with BM. The prevalence of BRCA mutations was more common among women with BM (56.5% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.033). The BM rate in patients with BRCAm was higher than the BM rate in those with wildtype BRCA (BRCAw; 5.1% vs. 2.1%, OR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.2-5.4, p = 0.013). Median time from diagnosis to BM and from disease recurrence to BM was longer among patients with BRCAm. Median OS was not significantly different among patients with BM versus those without BM (59.4 vs. 73.4 months, p = 0.243). After BM diagnosis, median OS was not statistically significantly different between patients with BRCAm and those with BRCAw (20.6 vs. 12.3 months, p = 0.441). Treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and bevacizumab had no impact on subsequent development of BM.

CONCLUSIONS

BM are rare among EOC patients. However, the risk is three-fold higher among patients with BRCAm. BM do not significantly alter OS among EOC patients. The higher rate of BM in patients with BRCAm may be related to longer OS in this subpopulation.