Concordance and limits between transcutaneous and arterial carbon dioxide pressure in emergency department patients with acute respiratory failure: a single-center prospective observational study

Prospective, observational study investigating the level of agreement between transcutaneous and invasive carbon dioxide measurements in critically ill emergency department patients

BACKGROUND

Transcutaneous carbon dioxide (Ptcco2) measurement is a non-invasive surrogate marker for arterial carbon dioxide (Paco2), which requires invasive arterial blood sampling. Use of Ptcco2 has been examined in different clinical settings, however, most existing evidence in the adult emergency department (ED) setting shows insufficient agreement between the measurements. This study assessed the level of agreement between Ptcco2 and Paco2 in undifferentiated adult ED patients across multiple timepoints.

METHODS

This prospective observational study (study period 2020-2021) assessed paired Ptcco2 and Paco2 measurements at four consecutive timepoints (0, 30, 60 and 90 min) in adult (aged 18 years or over) Australian ED patients requiring hospital admission and arterial catheter insertion. Agreement between the pairs was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. It was prospectively determined by expert consensus that limits of ±4 mm Hg would be a clinically acceptable level of agreement between Ptcco2 and Paco2.

RESULTS

During the study period 168 paired Ptcco2 and Paco2 readings were taken from 42 adult ED patients. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean Ptcco2 reading 3.85 mm Hg higher than Paco2, although at each timepoint the 95% CIs breached the limit of 4 mm Hg difference. In addition, only 66% (111/168) of results fell within the clinically acceptable range.

CONCLUSION

The level of agreement between Ptcco2 and Paco2 measurements may not be sufficiently precise for the adoption of Ptcco2 monitoring in patients presenting to the ED.

Comparison of arterial CO2 estimation by end-tidal and transcutaneous CO2 measurements in intubated children and variability with subject related factors

Transcutaneous PCO₂ (P_TCCO₂) and end-tidal PCO₂ (P_ETCO₂) measurement methods serve as alternatives to arterial PCO₂ (PaCO₂), providing continuous non-invasive monitoring. The objective of this study was to evaluate the P_TCCO₂ and P_ETCO₂ methods with actual PaCO₂ levels, and to assess the variability of measurements in relation to subject-related factors, such as skin and subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness and presence of pulmonary diseases. P_TCCO₂, P_ETCO₂ and PaCO₂ were measured at the same time in intubated pediatric subjects. Subjects' demographic characteristics, clinical features, laboratory parameters, skin and subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness were identified. The study was carried out on 102 subjects with a total of 1118 values for each method. In patients with non-pulmonary disease, the mean difference between P_TCCO₂ and PaCO₂ was - 0.29 mmHg (± 6.05), while it was 0.44 mmHg (± 6.83) bias between P_ETCO₂ and PaCO₂. In those with pulmonary diseases, the mean difference between P_TCCO₂ and PaCO₂ was - 1.27 mmHg (± 8.32), while it was - 4.65 mmHg (± 9.01) between P_ETCO₂ and PaCO₂. Multiple linear regression demonstrated that increased subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness, core body temperature and inotropic index were related with higher P_TCCO₂ values relative to the actual PCO₂ values. Other factors, such as skin tissue thickness, presence of pulmonary disease, measurement location and measurement times were non-significant. The P_TCCO₂ method has higher reliability than the P_ETCO₂ method, and P_TCCO₂ measurements are not influenced by most subject-related factors; however, core body temperature, inotropic index and subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness can lead to significant differences in PCO₂ measurement.

Can transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure be a surrogate of blood gas samples for spontaneously breathing emergency patients? The ERNESTO experience

BACKGROUND

It is known that the arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2) is useful for emergency physicians to assess the severity of dyspnoeic spontaneously breathing patients. Transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure (PtcCO2) measurements could be a non-invasive alternative to PaCO2 measurements obtained by blood gas samples, as suggested in previous studies. This study evaluates the reliability of a new device in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We prospectively included patients presenting to the ED with respiratory distress who were breathing spontaneously or under non-invasive ventilation. We simultaneously performed arterial blood gas measurements and measurement of PtcCO2 using a sensor placed either on the forearm or the side of the chest and connected to the TCM4 CombiM device. The agreement between PaCO2 and PtcCO2 was assessed using the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven spontaneously breathing patients were prospectively included (mean age 70 years, 52% men) and 64 first measurements of PtcCO2 (out of 67) were analysed out of the 97 performed. Nineteen patients (28%) had pneumonia, 19 (28%) had acute heart failure and 19 (28%) had an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Mean PaCO2 was 49 mm Hg (range 22-103). The mean difference between PaCO2 and PtcCO2 was 9 mm Hg (range -47 to +54) with 95% limits of agreement of -21.8 mm Hg and 39.7 mm Hg. Only 36.3% of the measurement differences were within 5 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that PtcCO2 measured by the TCM4 device could not replace PaCO2 obtained by arterial blood gas analysis.

Erratum: Concordance and limits between transcutaneous and arterial carbon dioxide pressure in emergency department patients with acute respiratory failure: a single-center, prospective, and observational study

Abstract

After publication of this article (Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 23:40, 2015), it came to light that an earlier version had been published in error. This erratum contains the correct version of the article, which incorporates revisions made in response to reviewer comments. Additionally, one of the authors was inadvertently omitted from the author list. This author, Justin Yan, has been included in the corrected author list above.

Background

Transcutaneous CO₂ (PtCO₂) is a continuous and non-invasive measure recommended by scientific societies in the management of respiratory distress. The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between PtCO₂ and arterial partial pressure of CO₂ (PaCO₂) by arterial blood gas analysis in emergency patients with dyspnoea, and to determine the factors that interfere with this correlation.

Methods

From January to June 2014, all adult patients admitted to the RR with dyspnoea during business hours were included in the study if arterial blood gas measurements were indicated. A sensor measuring the PtCO₂ was attached to the ear lobe of the patient before the gas analysis. Anamnesis, clinical and laboratory parameters were identified.

Results

Ninety patients with dyspnoea were included (104 pairs of measurements). The median (IQR) age was 79 years (69 – 85). The correlation between PtCO₂ and PaCO₂ was R² =.83 (p<.001) but became lower for values of PaCO₂ above 60 mm Hg. The mean bias (± SD) between the two methods of measurement (Bland-Altman analysis) was −1.4 mm Hg (± 7.7) with limits of agreement from −16.4 to 13.7 mm Hg. In univariate analysis, PaO₂ interfered with this correlation. After multivariate analysis, temperature (OR = 3.01; 95 % CIs [1.16, 7.80]) and PaO₂ (OR = 1.22; 95 % CIs [1.02, 1.47]) significantly interfered with this correlation.

Conclusions

There is a significant correlation between PaCO₂ and PtCO₂ values for patients admitted to the emergency department for acute respiratory failure. One limiting factor to routine use of PtCO₂ measurements in the emergency department is the presence of hyperthermia.