CPR with restricted patient access using alternative rescuer positions: a randomised cross-over manikin study simulating the CPR scenario after avalanche burial

Alternative techniques for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in extreme environments - A scoping review

Background

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential for saving lives during cardiac arrest, but performing CPR in extreme environments poses unique challenges. In scenarios ranging from hypogravity or microgravity to confined spaces like aeroplanes and underwater scenarios, traditional CPR techniques may be inadequate. This scoping review aims to identify alternative chest compression techniques, synthesise current knowledge, and pinpoint research gaps in resuscitation for cardiac arrest in extreme conditions.

Methods

PubMed and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials as well as the website of ResearchGate was searched to identify relevant literature. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated alternative chest compression techniques, including manual or mixed CPR approaches, whilst assessing feasibility and effectiveness based on compression depth, rate, and/or impact on rescuer effort.

Results

The database search yielded 9499 references. After screening 26 studies covering 6 different extreme environments were included (hypogravity: 2; microgravity: 9, helicopter: 1, aeroplane: 1, confined space: 11; avalanche: 2). 13 alternative chest compression techniques were identified, all of which tested using manikins to simulate cardiac arrest scenarios.

Conclusion

To address the unique challenges in extreme environments, novel CPR techniques are emerging. However, evidence supporting their effectiveness remains limited.

Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Avalanche Victims with a Single Rescuer: A Prospective, Crossover, Manikin Pilot Study

Tanaka, Shota, Koshi Nakagawa, Yosuke Kanagawa, Takashi Katsurahara, Kazuki Kozakai, Ken Tsuhako, Fumitaka Yoshikawa, Soh Gotoh, Kensuke Osanai, Madoka Sono, Hironori Inoue, Shuji Sakanashi, Hiroyuki Takahashi, and Hideharu Tanaka. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in avalanche victims with a single rescuer: a prospective, crossover, manikin pilot study. High Alt Med Biol. 25:60-67, 2024. Background: Winter outdoor recreational activities such as off-piste skiing have gained popularity and, as a result, the number of avalanche-related deaths has increased. However, the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at avalanche sites remains unclear. Our study compared the quality of CPR performed in a simulated avalanche burial on a snowy mountain with that performed indoors. Methods: Ten prehospital health care providers participated in the crossover pilot study. Various methods, including over-the-head CPR (OTH-CPR) and standard CPR, were used to perform avalanche resuscitation, with five rescue breaths, followed by 30 chest compressions and two breaths. The quality CPR was judged by four variables of chest compression and ventilation. Results: The OTH-CPR performed indoors was better in quality: 5.33% [95% confidence interval (CI) -14.2 to 3.5] higher in adequate compression depth (94.3 ± 10.6% on the snow vs. 99.3 ± 1.1% indoors), 3.4% [95% CI -16.1 to 22.9] higher in adequate compression rate (70.4 ± 38.0% vs. 76.1 ± 35.7%), and 2.3% [95% CI -6.4 to 1.72] higher in adequate recoil (96.9 ± 4.8% vs. 99.2 ± 1.6%) than OTH-CPR on the snow. In terms of ventilation quality, OTH-CPR performed indoors had a 50% higher ventilation score [95% CI -73.0 to -27.0] than OTH-CPR on the snow (1.4 ± 4.3% vs. 45.9 ± 32.6%, Cohen's d = -1.81). Conclusions: Chest compression quality was slightly impaired in the avalanche scenarios on the snow than in indoor settings. Asphyxiation is the main cause of avalanche-related deaths; however, low ventilation quality was observed on snow compared with the indoor setting.

Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prevention and Management of Avalanche and Nonavalanche Snow Burial Accidents: 2024 Update

To provide guidance to the general public, clinicians, and avalanche professionals about best practices, the Wilderness Medical Society convened an expert panel to revise the evidence-based guidelines for the prevention, rescue, and resuscitation of avalanche and nonavalanche snow burial victims. The original panel authored the Wilderness Medical Society Practice Guidelines for Prevention and Management of Avalanche and Nonavalanche Snow Burial Accidents in 2017. A second panel was convened to update these guidelines and make recommendations based on quality of supporting evidence.

On-site treatment of avalanche victims: Scoping review and 2023 recommendations of the international commission for mountain emergency medicine (ICAR MedCom)

INTRODUCTION

The International Commission for Mountain Emergency Medicine (ICAR MedCom) developed updated recommendations for the management of avalanche victims.

METHODS

ICAR MedCom created Population Intervention Comparator Outcome (PICO) questions and conducted a scoping review of the literature. We evaluated and graded the evidence using the American College of Chest Physicians system.

RESULTS

We included 120 studies including original data in the qualitative synthesis. There were 45 retrospective studies (38%), 44 case reports or case series (37%), and 18 prospective studies on volunteers (15%). The main cause of death from avalanche burial was asphyxia (range of all studies 65-100%). Trauma was the second most common cause of death (5-29%). Hypothermia accounted for few deaths (0-4%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

For a victim with a burial time ≤ 60 minutes without signs of life, presume asphyxia and provide rescue breaths as soon as possible, regardless of airway patency. For a victim with a burial time > 60 minutes, no signs of life but a patent airway or airway with unknown patency, presume that a primary hypothermic CA has occurred and initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) unless temperature can be measured to rule out hypothermic cardiac arrest. For a victim buried > 60 minutes without signs of life and with an obstructed airway, if core temperature cannot be measured, rescuers can presume asphyxia-induced CA, and should not initiate CPR. If core temperature can be measured, for a victim without signs of life, with a patent airway, and with a core temperature < 30 °C attempt resuscitation, regardless of burial duration.

Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand im alpinen Gelände

Die Anzahl von Touristen und Freizeitsportlern in Bergregionen nimmt zu. Im Verhältnis dazu steigt auch die Zahl an Notfallsituationen wie Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand. Wiederbelebungsmaßnahmen in diesen Umgebungsbedingungen sind anspruchsvoll. Eine besondere Bedeutung in diesem Rahmen hat die prolongierte kardiopulmonale Reanimation.

Serum SCUBE-1 Levels and Return of Spontaneous Circulation Following Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Adult Patients

Background  SCUBE 1-has been used as a biomarker for the diagnoses of myocardial infarction, stroke, mesenteric ischemia, and gastric cancer in some recent studies. In this study, we investigated the relationship between serum SCUBE−1 levels and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

Methods  Patients over 18 years of age who were not pregnant and received CPR were divided into two groups: those who achieved ROSC and those who died. There were 25 patients in each group. SCUBE−1 and other routine biochemical parameters were studied in blood samples taken at the time of admission.

Results  There was no significant difference between the age and gender distribution of the patients between the two groups. The SCUBE−1 value of the ROSC group was significantly higher than that of the non-survivor group ( p ˂ 0.05). At a cut-off value of 9 ng/mL, SCUBE−1 had a sensitivity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 65.8%, specificity of 48%, and a negative predictive value of 100% in predicting ROSC.

Conclusions  The SCUBE−1 values were found to be significantly higher in the ROSC group compared with the non-survivor group.