Prognosis of psychomotor and mental development in premature infants by early cranial ultrasound

Neurodevelopmental Outcome at Two Years for Preterm Infants With Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

High-grade intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), including grade III and grade IV IVH, is known to impact neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm infants, but prognosis remains difficult to establish due to confounding factors and significant variations in the reported outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm infants with or without severe IVH.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted including preterm infants with gestational age <32 weeks hospitalized between 2009 and 2017 in a level III neonatal intensive care unit. This study included 73 cases with high-grade IVH and 73 controls who were matched to cases, based on the same gestational age, birth weight, sex, and year of birth. The neurodevelopmental outcome was compared at two years of age corrected for prematurity between cases and controls. Neurodevelopmental impairment was defined as cerebral palsy, hearing deficiency, visual impairment, or developmental delay. Multivariate analysis was used to identify whether high-grade IVH was an independent risk factor for neurodevelopmental impairment.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, high-grade IVH was associated with death or poor neurodevelopmental outcome at two years of age corrected for prematurity (odds ratio [OR], 16.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.93 to 57.8; P < 0.001), and this association remained significant after adjusting for confounding factors including neonatal infection and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in multivariate analysis (OR, 8.71; 95% CI, 2.48 to 38.09; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the impact of high-grade IVH as an independent risk factor of poor neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm infants and suggests that early interventions could improve the prognosis of these infants.

Predicting the developmental outcomes of very premature infants via ultrasound classification: A CONSORT - clinical study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the accuracy of ultrasonic grading in determining brain injury in very premature infants and analyze the affecting factors of these neonatal morbidity and mortality, and to investigate the relationship between serial cranial ultrasound (cUS) classification and Mental Developmental Index (MDI)/Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) in premature infants.

METHODS

A total of 129 very preterm infants (Gestational Age ≤ 28 weeks) were subjected to serial cUS until 6 months or older and classified into 3 degrees in accordance with classification standards. The MDI and PDI (Bayley test) of the infants were measured until the infants reached the age of 24 months or older. The consistency between Term Equivalent Age (TEA)-cUS and TEA- magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was calculated. Ordinal regression was performed to analyze the relationship among severe disease, early cUS classifications, psychomotor and mental development, and death. Operating characteristic curve were used to analyze the relationship between serial cUS grades and MDI/PDI scores.

RESULTS

The mortality and survival rates of 129 very preterm infants were 32.8% and 67.3%, respectively. Among the 86 surviving infants, 20.9% developed mild cerebral palsy (CP) and 5.8% to 6.9% developed severe CP. The consistency between TEA-cUS and TEA-MRI was 88%. Grades 2 and 3 at first ultrasound were associated with adverse mental (OR = 3.2, OR = 3.78) and motor (OR = 2.25, OR = 2.59) development. cUS classification demonstrated high sensitivity (79%-96%). Among all cUS classifications, the specificity of the first cUS was the lowest and that of TEA-cUS was the highest (57% for PDI and 48% for MDI).

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate and severe brain injury at first ultrasound is the most important factor affecting the survival rate and brain development of very premature infants. The cUS classification had high sensitivity and high specificity for the prediction of CP, especially in TEA-cUS.

Development skills of children born premature with low and very low birth weight

Purpose

To compare the performance of children born premature with low birth weight (LBW) and very low birth-weight (VLBW) with that of children born at term, within the age range of one to three years, regarding child development in the gross motor, fine motor-adaptive, personal-social and language domains.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study in a cohort of 150 infants born premature (experimental group) and at term (control group) divided into eight groups with respect to weight (low birth weight: <2500 grams and very low birth weight: <1500 grams) and age range (aged 12 to 24 and 25 to 36 months). The control groups were paired with the experimental groups as for gender, chronological age, and socioeconomic level. Assessment comprised the application of anamnesis protocol, socioeconomic classification, and Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST-II). Corrected age was calculated for premature children up to 24 months of age. Descriptive statistical analysis and the Student's t-test were used.

Results

No statistically significant difference was found in the comparison between the groups of infants born premature and at term for all domains evaluated.

Conclusion

The performance of infants born premature was lower than that of infants born at term regarding the gross motor, fine motor-adaptive, personal-social and language domains. In this study, the preterm groups presented different performances, i.e., normative, average, and below average performances were observed within the same group.