Middle-term bowel function and quality of life in low-type anorectal malformation

Assessment of long-term quality of life, bowel and voiding function outcomes in patients with anorectal malformation at a single UK centre

AIMS

Assess long-term quality of life (QoL), bowel and voiding function in anorectal malformation (ARM) paediatric patients.

METHOD

Retrospective review of ARM patients between 2007 and 2020 was performed. QoL (all patients), bowel and voiding function (> 5 yo) were assessed using the paediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL), paediatric incontinence and constipation score (PICS) and dysfunctional voiding scoring system (DVSS), respectively.

RESULTS

There were 122 patients (49% female, 85 > 5 yo) with ARM. Two had died, four refused, twenty-two were non-contactable, leaving ninety-four patients (65 > 5 yo) included. Mean age was 89 months (19-183), and follow-up was 86 months (13-183). Patients had significantly poorer scores for QoL, bowel and voiding function compared to published healthy controls. 57% had poor bowel function, 32% had poor voiding function and 38% required 'ancillary aids' to facilitate function. Patients using 'ancillary aids' for voiding function had a significantly lower QoL (parent: 62 vs 77; p = 0.01, patient: 66 vs 79; p = 0.05). Bowel continence was worse in those with high vs low ARM (13 vs 20, p = 0.004) and timely vs delayed diagnosis (17 vs 24, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ARM have significantly worse QoL, bowel and voiding function than normal healthy controls. There is a need for long-term monitoring of function and further support for these children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Bowel function and features of bowel dysfunction in preschool children with anorectal malformation type rectoperineal and rectovestibular fistula

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) of the rectoperineal and rectovestibular fistula type (RPF/RVF) generally have a good prognosis but may be accompanied by bowel dysfunction, especially constipation. Bowel dysfunction in preschoolers may persist into adolescence and adulthood, exerting a negative effect on their quality of life. This study was designed to evaluate bowel function and identify the features of bowel dysfunction in preschoolers with RPF/RVF across type and sex differences. A total of 159 preschoolers with RPF/RVF (male RPF group, n = 95; female RPF group, n = 26; RVF, n = 38) and 128 normal control preschoolers (control group, n = 128; female control group, n = 35), according to the bowel function score (BFS) obtained through a questionnaire survey, the BFS items in the questionnaire, and the clinical characteristics of patients were compared among groups. The rates of bowel dysfunction (BFS < 17) were 27.2% and 50.0% in the RPF and RVF groups, respectively. Normal rates of BFS items, namely, ability to hold back defecation, feels/reports of the urge to defecate, frequency of defecation, and constipation, in the RPF and RVF groups were significantly lower than those in the control and female control groups (all p < 0.05). After subgroup analysis among the male RPF, female RPF, and RVF groups, higher rates of normal bowel function and ability to hold back defecation were found in the male RPF group than in the female RPF and RVF groups (p < 0.05). Normal rates of feels/reports of the urge to defecate were higher in the male and female RPF groups than in the RVF group (all p < 0.05). The rate of never soiling in the male RPF group was significantly higher than that in the RVF group (p < 0.05).  Conclusions: In patients with RPF/RVF, bowel dysfunction is still prevalent, characterized by inadequate ability to hold back defecation, inability to feel/report the urge to defecate, soil, less frequent defecation, and constipation. However, male RPF patients had better overall bowel function than female RPF or RVF patients, including more adequate ability to hold back defecation and feels/reports of the urge to defecate and slighter soiling, which may be linked to early age at surgery, low occurrences of low sacral ratio, and tethered cord in male RPF.  Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on 09/01/2023 (NCT05716230). What is Known: • Rectoperineal and rectovestibular fistula (RPF/RVF) of the anorectal malformation (ARM) type has a good prognosis but may cause bowel dysfunction, especially constipation. • Bowel dysfunction at preschool age may lead to social and psychological disorders that undermine the quality of life in adolescence and adulthood. What is New: • Bowel function in preschoolers with RPF/RVF was deeply evaluated in a relatively large number of patients and normal control children. • Features of bowel dysfunction in RPF/RVF preschoolers across type and gender differences were identified in this study.

Change over time in the postoperative defecation function in female patients with anovestibular fistula at a single institution: focus on the comparison of anal transposition with anterior sagittal anorectoplasty

PURPOSE

Anovestibular fistula (AVF) is the most common type of ARM in female patients. The present study investigated changes over time in the postoperative defecation function of female patients with AVF.

METHODS

Patient data were collected from 1984 to 2021. Eighty-eight female patients with AVF were enrolled. Patients' characteristics and the long-term outcome of defecation function were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively. The bowel function was evaluated according to the Japan Society of ARM Study Group evacuation score (ES).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients underwent anal transposition (AT), and 8 underwent anterior sagittal anorectoplasty (ASARP). The total evacuation score (ES) in AVF patients reached "excellent" at nine years old, regardless of the operative procedure. The constipation scores with AT showed better improvement than those with ASARP, but soiling scores in the ASARP group showed better improvement than those in the AT group. The postoperative complications did not affect the postoperative bowel function in AVF patients.

CONCLUSION

Most patients with AVF eventually achieved a satisfactory total ES. Given the difference in defecation score transition depending on the operative procedure or postoperative complications, it may be important to perform long-term defecation management via surgical procedures.

Anorectal Malformations: Ideal Surgery Timing to Reduce Incontinence and Optimize QoL

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are rare and involve a wide spectrum of malformations. Prenatal diagnosis is often incomplete, and the diagnostic pathway is started during the newborn period to identify the type of malformation and the correct treatment. This retrospective study included patients between 8 and 18 y.o. diagnosed with ARM, referring to Our Clinic. We proposed two questionnaires, Rintala Bowel Function Score and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, and we defined four groups referring to surgical timing (age in months < 3, 3-6, 6-9, >9). In total, 74 patients were recruited (mean age 13.05 ± 2.80 y.o.), and data analysis showed a significant relationship between comorbidity and surgical timing. Moreover, timing was related to outcome in terms of fecal continence (better if surgery performed before 3 months) and Quality of Life (QoL). QoL, however, is influenced by other factors (emotional and social life, psychological sphere and take of care of chronic disease). We considered rehabilitation programs, more often practiced by children who underwent surgery after 9 months, to maintain an appropriate relational life. This study highlights the importance of surgical timing as the first step of a multidisciplinary follow-up, taking care of the child in every phase of his growth, tailored to the single patient.

Bowel function and associated risk factors at preschool and early childhood age in children with anorectal malformation type rectovestibular fistula: An ARM-Net consortium study

BACKGROUND

Outcome of patients operated for anorectal malformation (ARM) type rectovestibular fistula (RVF) is generally considered to be good. However, large multi-center studies are scarce, mostly describing pooled outcome of different ARM-types, in adult patients. Therefore, counseling parents concerning the bowel function at early age is challenging. Aim of this study was to evaluate bowel function of RVF-patients at preschool/early childhood age and determine risk factors for poor functional outcome.

METHODS

A multi-center cohort study was performed. Patient characteristics, associated anomalies, sacral ratio, surgical procedures, post-reconstructive complications, one-year constipation, and Bowel Function Score (BFS) at 4-7 years of follow-up were registered. Groups with below normal (BFS < 17; subgroups 'poor' ≤ 11, and 'fair' 11 < BFS < 17) and good outcome (BFS ≥ 17) were formed. Univariable analyses were performed to detect risk factors for outcome.

RESULTS

The study included 111 RVF-patients. Median BFS was 16 (range 6-20). The 'below normal' group consisted of 61 patients (55.0%). Overall, we reported soiling, fecal accidents, and constipation in 64.9%, 35.1% and 70.3%, respectively. Bowel management was performed in 23.4% of patients. Risk factors for poor outcome were tethered cord and low sacral ratio, while sacral anomalies, low sacral ratio, prior enterostomy, post-reconstructive complications, and one-year constipation were for being on bowel management.

CONCLUSIONS

Although median BFS at 4-7 year follow-up is nearly normal, the majority of patients suffers from some degree of soiling and constipation, and almost 25% needs bowel management. Several factors were associated with poor bowel function outcome and bowel management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric surgery - A systematic review

PURPOSE

With improved long-term survival rates, measuring the quality of surgical care has gradually shifted from clinical morbidity and mortality to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Since the use of PROMs in pediatric surgery is still limited, we undertook a study to identify current PROMs, assess their characteristics, and identify gaps and areas for improvement.

METHODS

A search was conducted in eight databases from their inception until May 2021 to identify PROMs that have been used in pediatric surgical patients. PRISMA standards were followed, and screening was completed by two independent reviewers. The quality of the included studies was appraised using the AXIS and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

Of 8282 studies screened, 101 articles met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies (99%) were cross-sectional. We identified 85 different PROMs among the studies, 53 being disease-specific and the rest generic. The PedsQL™ was the most frequently used tool (42 studies). Almost half of the instruments (41 studies) were not validated, and 28% were developed ad hoc for each specific study. Significantly, all PROMs encountered were standardized (consisting of pre-determined domains), with no individualized tools currently in use. The overall quality of the included studies was good.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMs are increasingly used in pediatric surgery. Disease-specific PROMs predominate the field, yet validated and especially individualized PROMs are notably absent. Future efforts are needed to develop robust tools that reflect individual patient and family needs, preferences, and values, with the aim of furthering family-centered pediatric surgical care.

Reoperative surgery in anorectal malformation patients

Currently accepted primary repair of congenital anorectal malformations (ARMs) includes a posterior sagittal incision, which allows for optimal visualization and identification of important pelvic structures and anatomical features. Reconstructive surgery involves meticulous dissection and separation of pelvic structures, and careful reconstruction can result in good functional outcomes for many patients, who live without ongoing sequelae from their malformation. However, some patients may require reoperative procedures for anatomic or functional reasons. Males and females present with slightly different symptoms and should be approached differently. Males are most likely to require reoperations for anorectal or urethral pathologies, but the urinary system is often spared in females-they instead must contend with Mullerian duct anomalies, of which there are many varieties. Depending on the original malformation and severity of symptoms, redo surgery may be needed to optimize function and quality of life. Surgical management with reoperative surgery in ARMs ranges from straightforward to complex, depending on the issue. One must weigh the risks of reoperative surgery and potentially creating more scarring against the need for a better anatomical and functional outcome. Current management trends and practice patterns with regards to reoperative surgery in ARM patients are not widely studied or standardized but we provide an overview of the more common pathologies, preoperative evaluation and workup required to identify the issues, and options for reoperative repair in these patients.

Laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty for intermediate type rectovestibular fistula: a preliminary report

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) is considered to benefit the male patients with anorectal malformation (ARM). This study evaluates LAARP management for intermediate type rectovestibular fistula (IRVF) in the female patient with ARM.

METHODS

Twelve patients with IRVF (aged 3-5 months) underwent LAARP from 2017 to 2019 in our institute. LAARP was performed for mobilization of the rectum, visualization and enlargement of the center of the sphincter muscle complex (SMC) from pelvic and perineal aspects, intra-fistula mucosectomy and rectal pull-through in the SMC with the fourchette and the perineal body unattached.

RESULTS

LARRP was performed in all patients without conversion to open procedure. No patient suffered from wound infection, vaginal injury, recurrent fistula and anal stenosis. The parents were satisfied with the appearance of the wound. Rectal prolapse developed in one patient and needed surgical correction. The patients were followed up for a mean of 19.7 months (ranged from 12 to 35 months).

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary experience shows that LAARP offers an alternative method of correction for the IRVF with good visualization of the SMC and may diminish the risks of wound dehiscence and vaginal injury.

Spatiotemporal expression of neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 1 in developing caudal spinal cord of fetuses with anorectal malformations from ETU-fed rats

Complications, such as fecal soiling, incontinence, and constipation, are major health issues for patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs) after surgery. Dysplasia of the caudal spinal cord is an increasingly pivotal area in the field of postoperative complications for patients with ARMs. However, the existing research has not fully defined the mechanism underlying ARMs development. The neurogenic locus notch homolog (Notch) signaling pathway comprises several highly conserved proteins that are involved in spinal cord developmental processes. In the present study, the emerging role of Notch1 in fetal lumbosacral spinal cords was investigated in a rat model of ARMs using ethylene thiourea. Immunohistochemical staining, western blot and quantitative reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction were utilized to analyze spatiotemporal expression of Notch1 on embryonic days (E) 16, E17, E19, and E21. The expression levels of the neuronal marker neurofilament and recombination signal-binding protein-J protein were evaluated for temporal correlations to Notch1 expression. The results implied that Notch1 expression was reduced in lumbosacral spinal cord neurons of ARMs embryos compared to control embryos. These results showed that, in ARMs embryos decreased Notch1 expression is related to the dysplasia of the caudal spinal cord during embryogenesis, indicating that Notch signaling may participate pathogenic embryonic lumbosacral spinal development and may be associated with postoperative complications of ARMs.