Jaffe-Campanacci syndrome or neurofibromatosis type 1: a case report of phenotypic overlap with detection of NF1 gene mutation in non-ossifying fibroma

Jaffe-Campanacci syndrome; a case series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Jaffe-Campanacci syndrome is a rare syndrome, characterized by multiple non-ossifying fibromas (NOF) and cafe-au-lait patches. The name was coined in 1982 by Mirra after Jaffe who first described the case in 1958. Although it's suggested there is a relation with Neurofibromatosis type 1, there is still no consensus on whether Jaffe-Campanacci syndrome is a subtype or variant of neurofibromatosis-1(NF-1).

CASE PRESENTATION

In this article, we present a case series of 2 patients. The first case is a 13-year-old male with Jaffe-Campanacci syndrome who presented with a distal femur fracture. His father had positive features of both Jaffe-Campanacci syndrome and NF-1, while his sister only had features of NF-1, so we presented both.

CONCLUSION

Jaffe-Campanacci has a clear relationship with type 1 neurofibromatosis, which still has to be genetically established. Due to the presence of several large non-ossifying fibromas of the long bones, it is linked to a significant risk of pathological fractures. We concur with previous authors, that an osseous screening program should be performed for all patients with newly diagnosed type 1 neurofibromatosis, to identify non-ossifying fibromas and assess the potential for pathological fracture. Moreover, siblings of patients with NF-1 should be screened for multiple NOFs that may carry a high risk of pathological fractures.

Literature Review, Case Presentation and Management of Non-ossifying Fibroma of Right Angle of Mandible: More Than just a Cortical Defect!

Non-ossifying fibroma (NOF) of jaw bones are rare. While NOF is the most common benign bone tumor of long bones with pathognomonic radiological features and bear a tendency for self-regression, gnathic NOF appears to be comparatively larger in size and behave more aggressively. A 16 years old female patient reported with painless swelling of the right side of the face of 4 months duration. Radiographic analysis showed a unilocular radiolucent lesion of right angle of the mandible with ill-defined margins, cortical perforation and thinning of inferior border. The lesion was provisionally diagnosed as odontogenic keratocyst/unicystic ameloblastoma and incisional biopsy was performed. The histopathological features and immunohistochemical characteristics favored a diagnosis of NOF. The lesion was excised and reconstructed. The excised specimen confirmed the diagnosis. There are no signs of recurrence at 18 months follow-up. NOF should be considered in the differential diagnosis of uni-/multilocular radiolucencies of jaws particularly the posterior mandible.

Case Report: Non-ossifying fibromas with pathologic fractures in a patient with NONO-associated X-linked syndromic intellectual developmental disorder

The NONO gene encodes a nuclear protein involved in transcriptional regulation, RNA synthesis and DNA repair. Hemizygous loss-of function, de novo or maternally inherited variants in NONO have been associated with an X-linked syndromic intellectual developmental disorder-34 (OMIM # 300967), characterized by developmental delay, intellectual disability, hypotonia, macrocephaly, elongated face, structural abnormalities of corpus callosum and/or cerebellum, congenital heart defect and left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy. Few patients have been described in the literature and the phenotype data are limited. We report a 17-year-old boy with dolihocephaly, elongated face, strabismus, speech and motor delay, intellectual disability, congenital heart defect (ASD, VSD and Ebstein's anomaly), left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy, bilateral inguinal hernia and cryptorchidism. Additional features included recurrent fractures due to multiple non-ossifying fibromas, thrombocytopenia, and renal anomalies. Exome sequencing revealed a de novo pathogenic variant (NM_001145408.2: c.348+2_ 348+15del) in intron 5 of the NONO gene. Renal anomalies and thrombocytopenia have been rarely reported in patients with NONO-X-linked intellectual disability syndrome, while recurrent fractures due to multiple non-ossifying fibromas have not previously been associated with this syndrome. The phenotypic spectrum of NONO-X-linked intellectual disability syndrome may be broader than currently known.

A novel mutation of the NF1 gene in a Chinese family with neurofibromatosis type 1

BACKGROUND

Mutations in the neurofibromin 1 (NF1) gene are associated with clinical manifestations of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the relationship between NF1 variants and disease phenotype.

METHODS

Peripheral blood samples were collected from a patient and her relatives and genomic DNA was extracted for next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect potential variants; the results were validated by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

A novel frameshift variant c.4508_c.4509delAT (p.Asn1503fsTer26) was detected in exon 34 of the NF1 gene in the patient and her daughter, but not in any other (healthy) family member. This c.4508_c.4509delAT (p.Asn1503fsTer26) frameshift variant of NF1 may underlie NF1 in this family.

CONCLUSIONS

This finding expands the spectrum of pathogenic mutations of the NF1 gene, which could aid genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis.

Comparison of characteristic features and local recurrence in syndromic versus non-syndromic multifocal non-ossifying fibroma

BACKGROUND

Multiple non-ossifying fibromas (MNOF) could be presented with other extraskeletal anomalies (syndromic) or not (non-syndromic). In this study, we aimed to compare characteristic features and local recurrence between symptomatic syndromic and non-syndromic MNOFs.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with symptomatic MNOF were included in this study, comprised of 30 patients without the café-au-lait spot (non-syndromic) and five with café-au-lait spots plus other signs of neurofibromatosis type 1 (syndromic). Characteristic features of the patients and lesions were compared between syndromic and non-syndromic MNOFs. The lesions were treated with curettage and bone graft. The rate of local recurrences was also compared between the two groups of syndromic and non-syndromic MNOF.

RESULTS

Study population included 19 (54.3%) males and 16 (45.7%) females with the mean age of 7.63 ± 3.1 years (range 4-11). The mean follow-up of the patients was 65.6 ± 38.2 months (range 24-96). The lesion was bilateral in 13.3% of non-syndromic MNOFs and 80% of syndromic MNOFs. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.01). After curettage and bone grafting, the lesion recurred in 6.7%of non-syndromic MNOFs and 60% of the syndromic MNOF. This difference was statistically significant, as well (p = 0.01). No other significant difference was found between syndromic and non-syndromic MNOFs.

CONCLUSIONS

The syndromic form of MNOF is much less prevalent and is associated with a higher rate of recurrence after surgical removal. Therefore, a more rigorous removal of the MNOF lesions might be necessary when presented in a syndromic context.

Neurofibromatosis Type 1 With Cherubism-like Phenotype, Multiple Osteolytic Bone Lesions of Lower Extremities, and Alagille-syndrome: Case Report With Literature Survey

BACKGROUND/AIM

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF) is an autosomal dominant hereditary disease. The cardinal clinical findings include characteristic skeletal alterations. Difficulties in diagnosis and therapy can arise if an individual has further illnesses.

CASE REPORT

This is a case report of a 16-year-old patient affected by NF1. She also suffered from Alagille syndrome and the consequences of fetal alcohol exposure. The patient's facial phenotype showed findings that could be assigned to one or more of the known diseases. The patient was referred for treating a cherubism-like recurrent central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaw. The patient developed bilateral, multilocular non-ossifying fibromas (NOF) of the long bones of the lower extremity. Treatment of the skeletal lesions consisted of local curettage. While NOF regressed after surgery, the CGCG of the jaw remained largely unchanged. Extensive genetic tests confirmed a previously unknown germline mutation in the JAG1 gene, the germline mutation of the NF1 gene, and the somatic mutation in the NF1 gene in the diffuse plexiform neurofibroma, but not in the CGCG.

CONCLUSION

Assigning facial findings to a defined syndrome is ambiguous in many cases and especially difficult in patients who have multiple diseases that can affect the facial phenotype. Surgical therapy should be adapted to the individual findings.