Daily laxative therapy reduces organ dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients: a phase II randomized controlled trial

Effects of Abdominal Massage for Preventing Acute Postoperative Constipation in Hip Fractures: A Prospective Interventional Study

Background

This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to determine the effects of abdominal massage on constipation management in elderly patients with hip fractures.

Methods

From August 2017 to December 2018, patients aged above 65 years with hip fractures (n = 88) were randomly assigned to a massage group that received a bowel massage (n = 48) or a control group that did not receive a bowel massage (n = 40). Patients in the bowel massage group received a bowel massage from a trained caregiver after breakfast at approximately 9:00 AM for an hour. On admission, 5 days after surgery, and on the day of discharge, the patient's normal and actual defecation pattern, stool consistency, and any problems with defecation were assessed through a structured interview. The questionnaire comprising the Bristol Stool Scale, patient assessment of constipation, time to defecation, medication for defecations, failure to defecate, cause of admission, admission period, and date of surgery were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed 5 days after surgery and on the day of discharge.

Results

The mean age of the study cohort was 81.4 years (range, 65-99 years). The number of constipation remedies was significantly lower in the massage group than in the control group on postoperative day (POD) 5 and at discharge (9 vs. 15, p = 0.049 and 6 vs. 11, p = 0.039, respectively). The number of defecation failures was significantly lower in the massage group than in the control group (10 vs. 17, p = 0.028) on POD 5. However, the number of defecation failures at discharge was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.131). The development of postoperative ileus (p = 0.271) and length of hospital stay (p = 0.576) were not different between the groups.

Conclusions

The number of constipation remedies was significantly lower in the massage group than in the control group on POD 5 and discharge, and the number of defecation failures was significantly lower in the massage group than in the control group on POD 5. Therefore, abdominal massage may be considered as an independent nursing initiative for constipation management.

Analysis of the economic burden of docusate sodium at a United States tertiary care center

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to determine the financial resources allocated to docusate at a representative U.S. tertiary care center. Secondary objectives included comparing docusate utilization between two tertiary care centers, and exploring alternative uses for the funds spent on docusate.

METHODS

The study population included all patients 18 years and older admitted to University Hospital in Newark, New Jersey. Every scheduled docusate prescription for the study population between January 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2019 was collected. The annual total cost associated with docusate use per year was calculated. The 2015 data from this study and a 2015 McGill University Health Centre study were compared. Also, alternative uses for the money utilized on docusate were assessed.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 37,034 docusate prescriptions and 265,123 docusate doses were recorded. The average cost of prescribing docusate was $25,624.14 per year and $49.37 per hospital bed per year. A comparison between the 2015 data of University Hospital and McGill showed that McGill prescribed 107 doses and spent $10.09 more per hospital bed than University Hospital. Finally, alternative uses for the average yearly spending on docusate equated to 0.35 the salary of a nurse, 0.51 the salary of a secretary, 20.66 colonoscopies, 27.00 upper endoscopies, 186.71 mammograms, 1,399.37 doses of polyethylene glycol 3350, 3,826.57 doses of lactulose, or 4,583.80 doses of psyllium.

CONCLUSION

A single average size tertiary care hospital spent about $25,000 yearly on docusate despite its lack of clinical effectiveness. While this amount is small compared to an overall hospital budget, when considering likely comparable docusate use at the U.S's 6,090 hospitals, the economic burden of docusate becomes significant. The funds currently being used on docusate could be redirected to alternative, more cost-effective purposes.

Gastrointestinal Dysmotility in Critically Ill Patients: Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Common Misconceptions

Disruption of normal gastrointestinal (GI) function in critical illness is linked to increased morbidity and mortality, and GI dysmotility is frequently observed in patients who are critically ill. Despite its high prevalence, the diagnosis and management of GI motility problems in the intensive care unit remain very challenging, given that critically ill patients often cannot verbalize symptoms and the general lack of understanding of underlying pathophysiology. Common clinical presentations of GI dysmotility issues among critically ill patients include: (1) high gastric residual volumes, acid reflux, and vomiting, (2) abdominal distention, and (3) diarrhea. In this review, we discuss the differential diagnosis for intensive care unit patients with symptoms and signs concerning GI motility issues. There are many myths and longstanding misconceptions about the diagnosis and management of GI dysmotility in critical illness. Here, we uncover these myths and discuss relevant evidence in each subject area, with the goal of re-conceptualizing GI motility disorders in critical care and providing evidence-based recommendations for clinical care.

Management of gastrointestinal failure in the adult critical care setting

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastrointestinal failure is a polymorphic syndrome with multiple causes. Managing the different situations from a practical, metabolic, and nutritional point of view is challenging, which the present review will try to address.

RECENT FINDINGS

Acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) has been defined and has evolved into a concept of gastrointestinal dysfunction score (GIDS) built on the model of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and ranging from 0 (no risk) to 4 (life threatening). But there is yet no specific, reliable and reproducible, biomarker linked to it. Evaluating the risk with the Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS) score is the first step whenever addressing nutrition therapy. Depending on the severity of the gastrointestinal failure and its clinical manifestations, nutritional management needs to be individualized but always including prevention of undernutrition and dehydration, and administration of target essential micronutrients. The use of fibers in enteral feeding solutions has gained acceptance and is even recommended based on microbiome findings. Parenteral nutrition whether alone or combined to enteral feeding is indicated whenever the intestine is unable to process the needs.

SUMMARY

The heterogeneity of gastrointestinal insufficiency precludes a uniform nutritional management of all critically ill patients but justifies its early detection and the implementation of individualized care.

Naloxegol to Prevent Constipation in ICU Adults Receiving Opioids: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial

Background

Constipation is frequent in critically ill adults receiving opioids. Naloxegol (N), a peripherally acting mu-receptor antagonist (PAMORA), may reduce constipation. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of N to prevent constipation in ICU adults receiving opioids. Methods and Patients. In this single-center, double-blind, randomized trial, adults admitted to a medical ICU receiving IV opioids (≥100 mcg fentanyl/day), and not having any of 17 exclusion criteria, were randomized to N (25 mg) or placebo (P) daily randomized to receive N (25mg) or placebo (P) and docusate 100 mg twice daily until ICU discharge, 10 days, or diarrhea (≥3 spontaneous bowel movement (SBM)/24 hours) or a serious adverse event related to study medication. A 4-step laxative protocol was initiated when there was no SBM ≥3 days.

Results

Only 318 (20.6%) of the 1542 screened adults during the 1/17–10/19 enrolment period met all inclusion criteria. Of these, only 19/381 (4.9%) met all eligibility criteria. After 7 consent refusals, 12 patients were randomized. The study was stopped early due to enrolment futility. The N (n = 6) and P (n = 6) groups were similar. The time to first SBM (N 41.4 ± 31.7 vs. P 32.5 ± 25.4 hours, P = 0.56) was similar. The maximal daily abdominal pressure was significantly lower in the N group (N 10 ± 4 vs. P 13 ± 5, P = 0.002). The median (IQR) daily SOFA scores were higher in N (N 7 (4, 8) vs. P 4 (3, 5), P < 0.001). Laxative protocol use was similar (N 83.3% vs. P 66.6%; P = 0.51). Diarrhea prevalence was high but similar (N 66.6% vs. P 66.6%; P = 1.0). No patient experienced opioid withdrawal.

Conclusions

Important recruitment challenges exist for ICU trials evaluating the use of PAMORAs for constipation prevention. Despite being underpowered, our results suggest time to first SBM with naloxegol, if different than P, may be small. The effect of naloxegol on abdominal pressure, SOFA, and the interaction between the two requires further research.

Nutrition, defecation, and the lower gastrointestinal tract during critical illness

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this report is to delineate the correlation between constipation as a manifestation of impaired gastrointestinal transit with adverse clinical outcomes, to identify risk factors, which predispose to this condition, and outline a management scheme for prophylactic treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Constipation is common in the ICU, affecting upwards of 60-85% of critically ill patients. As suggested by case series and observational studies, constipation may be an independent prognostic factor identifying patients with greater disease severity, higher likelihood of organ dysfunction, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, prolonged hospital length of stay, and possibly reduced survival. Treating constipation is a low priority for intensivists often relegated to the nursing service, and few ICUs have well designed protocols in place for a bowel regimen. Small randomized controlled trials show improvement in certain outcome parameters in response to a daily lactulose therapy; hospital length of stay, sequential organ failure assessment scores, and duration of mechanical ventilation. However, aggregating the data from these studies in two separate meta-analyses showed that the effect of a bowel regimen on these three endpoints were not statistically different.

SUMMARY

No causal relationship can be determined between constipation and adverse outcomes. Nonetheless, a clinical correlation seems to exist. Whether constipation is an epiphenomenon or simply a reflection of greater severity of critical illness, at some point it may contribute to worsening morbidity in the ICU. A graded prophylactic bowel regimen should help reverse impairment of the gastrointestinal transit and aid in reducing its deleterious impact on the hospital course of the critically ill patient.

Epidemiology of constipation in critically ill patients and its impact on in-hospital mortality: a retrospective observational study

PURPOSE

There are several causes for delayed constipation in critically ill patients. Constipation in critically ill patients is reportedly associated with poor outcomes. However, a consistent definition for constipation and reports on the prognosis of critically ill patients with constipation are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to determine the epidemiology of constipation during critical illness, and assess the association between constipation and in-hospital mortality based on the two definitions of constipation used in previous studies.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study comprised adult patients in a general intensive care unit (ICU) during 2011-2018. We retrieved the information regarding their bowel movements and assessed the impact of constipation on the in-hospital mortality based on the previous definitions (absence of defecation for 72 and 144 h).

RESULTS

Among the 1933 adult ICU patients included, the proportion of patients with constipation decreased with a longer duration of constipation (72 h: 67%, 144 h: 36%). In-hospital mortality in the constipation group was much lower than that in the non-constipation group in the univariable analysis (72 h, 27% vs. 13%; 144 h, 31% vs. 21%). However, constipation was not associated with in-hospital mortality in the multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.30 and adjusted odds ratio: 1.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-1.85 at 72 and 144 h, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Constipation in critically ill patients was not associated with in-hospital mortality based on any definition of constipation used in previous studies. Further prospective studies are necessary to validate our findings.

Factors associated with enteral nutrition and the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders in a cohort of critically ill adults

Introduction

Introduction: adults in intensive care commonly receive enteral nutrition (EN). Data describing the conditions associated with EN in critically ill patients are limited. Objective: to describe the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders and to identify conditions associated with the use of EN. Methods: a prospective cohort, single-center study of critically ill adults. The patients were followed daily for the first 10 days of hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU) or until ICU discharge or death. Clinical, nutritional variables and gastrointestinal disorders were compared between patients who did and did not receive EN. Univariate and multivariate regression identified the conditions associated with EN with the proposed variables. Results: of the 157 included adults, 62 % received EN. The EN group had higher APACHE II (23.6 ± 7.6 vs. 15 ± 7.2, p < 0.001) and SOFA scores on the day of ICU admission [7 (5-10.5) vs. 4 (2-6); p < 0.001], and higher ICU mortality (32 % vs. 10 %, p = 0.002). Diarrhea and need for gastric decompression were more frequent in the EN group (39.7 % vs. 11.7 %, p < 0.001 and 34 % vs. 13.3 %, p = 0.004, respectively). The multivariate analysis showed that neurological deficit (OR: 16.7 [95 % CI: 5.9-46.9]; p < 0.001), previous enteral tube feeding (OR: 45.1 [95 % CI: 5.3-380]; p < 0.001), and SOFA score on the day of ICU admission (OR: 1.2 [95 % CI: 1.01-1.3]; p = 0.03) were associated with EN. Conclusions: conditions related to the severity of critically ill patients, such as higher SOFA scores, greater neurological deficit, and prior enteral tube feeding, were more commonly associated with EN. Diarrhea and need for gastric decompression were more frequent in patients who received EN.

Factors associated with time to defecate and outcomes in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicentre, observational study

Delayed defecation is common in patients on intensive care. We aimed to determine factors associated with time to defecation after admission to intensive care and in turn its association with length of stay and mortality. We studied 396 adults admitted to one of five intensive care units in whom at least 2 days' invasive ventilation was anticipated during an expected stay of at least 3 days. The median (IQR [range]) time to defecate by the 336 out of 396 (84%) patients who did so before intensive care discharge was 6 (4-8 [1-18]) days. Defecation was independently associated with five factors, hazard ratio (95%CI), higher values indicating more rapid defecation: alcoholism, 1.32 (1.05-1.66), p = 0.02; laxatives before admission, 2.35 (1.79-3.07), p < 0.001; non-invasive ventilation, 0.54 (0.36-0.82), p = 0.004; duration of ventilation, 0.78 (0.74-0.82), p < 0.001; laxatives after admission, 1.67 (1.23-2.26), p < 0.001; and enteral nutrition within 48 h of admission, 1.43 (1.07-1.90), p = 0.01. Delayed defecation was associated with prolonged intensive care stay but not mortality.

Ileus in the critically ill: causes, treatment and prevention

Bowel dysfunction, especially ileus, has been increasingly recognized in critically ill patients. Ileus is commonly associated to constipation, however abnormal motility can also concern the upper digestive tract, therefore impaired gastrointestinal transit (IGT) seems to be a more appropriate term. IGT, especially constipation, is common among patients under mechanical ventilation, occurring in up to 80% of the patients during the first week, and has been associated with worse outcome in intensive care unit (ICU). It is acknowledged that the most relevant definition for constipation in ICU is the absence of stool for the first six days after admission. Concerning the upper digestive intolerance (UDI), the diagnosis should rely only on vomiting and the systematic gastric residual volume (GRV) monitoring should be avoided. IGT results from a complex pathophysiology in which both the critical illness and its specific treatments may have a deleterious role. Both observational and experimental studies have shown the deleterious effect of sepsis, multiorgan failure, sedation (especially opioids) and mechanical ventilation on gut function. To date few studies have reported effect of treatment on IGT and the level of evidence is low. However, cholinesterase inhibitors seem safe and could probably be used in case of constipation but remains poorly prescribed. Prevention with bowel management protocol using osmotic laxatives appears to be safe but did not demonstrate its effectiveness. For patients treated with high posology of opioids during sedation, enteral opioid antagonists may be a promising strategy.

Gut dysmotility in the ICU: diagnosis and therapeutic options

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a comprehensive update of diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal dysmotility in the critically ill, with a focus on work published in the last 5 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Symptoms and clinical features consistent with upper and/or lower gastrointestinal dysmotility occur frequently. Although features of gastrointestinal dysmotility are strongly associated with adverse outcomes, these associations may be because of unmeasured confounders. The use of ultrasonography to identify upper gastrointestinal dysmotility appears promising. Both nonpharmacological and pharmacological approaches to treat gastrointestinal dysmotility have recently been evaluated. These approaches include modification of macronutrient content and administration of promotility drugs, stool softeners or laxatives. Although these approaches may reduce features of gastrointestinal dysmotility, none have translated to patient-centred benefit.

SUMMARY

'Off-label' metoclopramide and/or erythromycin administration are effective for upper gastrointestinal dysmotility but have adverse effects. Trials of alternative or novel promotility drugs have not demonstrated superiority over current pharmacotherapies. Prophylactic laxative regimens to prevent non-defecation have been infrequently studied and there is no recent evidence to further inform treatment of established pseudo-obstruction. Further trials of nonpharmacological and pharmacological therapies to treat upper and lower gastrointestinal dysmotility are required and challenges in designing such trials are explored.

Constipation, diarrhea, and prophylactic laxative bowel regimens in the critically ill: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Prophylactic laxative bowel regimens may prevent constipation in enterally-fed critically ill patients. However, their use may also increase diarrhea. We performed a systematic review to: 1. Explore the epidemiology of constipation and/or diarrhea in critically ill patients; and 2. Appraise trials evaluating prophylactic laxative bowel regimens.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL for publications that reported constipation or diarrhea in critically ill adult patients and/or prophylactic laxative bowel regimens.

RESULTS

The proportion of critically ill patients experiencing constipation was reported between 20% and 83% and the proportion experiencing diarrhea was reported between 3.3% and 78%. Six studies of prophylactic laxative bowel regimens were identified but only 3 randomised controlled trials were identified, and these were subjected to meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, a prophylactic laxative bowel regimen increased the risk of diarrhea (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.04) but did not reduce the risk of constipation (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.05), and did not affect the duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of ICU admission, or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Constipation and diarrhea occur frequently in the critically ill but data evaluating prophylactic laxative bowel regimens in such patients are sparse and do not support their use.

Constipation in a cohort prospective in adult critically ill patients: How much occurs and why?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the incidence and factors associated with constipation in adult critical care patients.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Intensive care unit (ICU) of a high-complexity hospital from November 2015 to October 2016.

PATIENTS

Adults who were hospitalized for at least 72h in the ICU were followed from their admission to the ICU until their departure.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In the 157 patients followed up, the incidence of constipation was 75.8%. The univariate analysis showed that constipated patients were younger, used more sedation and showed more respiratory and postoperative causes for hospitalization, while non-constipated patients were hospitalized more for gastrointestinal reasons. The use of vasoactive substances, mechanical ventilation and haemodialysis was similar between the constipated and non-constipated patients. Multivariate analysis, days of use of docusate+bisacodyl (HR: .79; 95% CI: .65-.96) of omeprazole or ranitidine (HR: .80; 95%CI: .73-.88) and lactulose (HR: .87; 95%CI: .76-.99) were independent protection factors for constipation.

CONCLUSION

Constipation has a high incidence among adult critical care patients. Days of drug use acting on the digestive tract (lactulose, docusate+bisacodyl and omeprazole and/or ranitidine) are able to prevent this outcome.

Determining the impact of a bowel management protocol on patients and clinicians' compliance in cardiac intensive care: A mixed-methods approach

BACKGROUND

Bowel management protocols standardise care and, potentially, improve the incidence of diarrhoea and constipation in intensive care. However, little research exists reporting compliance with such protocols in intensive care throughout patients' stay. Furthermore, there is a limited exploration of the barriers and enablers to bowel management protocols following their implementation, an important aspect of improving compliance.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of a bowel management protocol on the incidence of constipation and diarrhoea, levels of compliance, and to explore the enablers and barriers associated with its use in intensive care.

METHODS

A mixed-methods study was conducted in cardiac intensive care using two phases: (a) a retrospective case review of patients' hospital notes, before and after the protocol implementation, establishing the levels of diarrhoea and constipation and levels of compliance; (b) focus groups involving users of the protocol, 6 months following its implementation, exploring the barriers and enablers in practice.

RESULTS AND FINDINGS

Fifty-one patients' notes were reviewed during phase one: 30 pre-implementation and 21 post-implementation. Following the protocol implementation, there was a tendency for a higher incidence of constipation and less severe cases of diarrhoea. Overall compliance with the protocol was low (2.3%). However, there was evidence of behavioural change following protocol implementation, including less variation in aperients given and a shorter, less varied time period between starting enteral feed and administering aperients. Several themes emerged from the focus groups: barriers and enablers to the protocol characteristics and dissemination; barriers to bowel assessment; nurse as a barrier; medical involvement and protocol outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The bowel management protocol implementation generated some positive outcomes to bowel care practices. However, compliance was low and until there is improvement, through overcoming the barriers identified, the impact of such protocols in practice will remain largely unknown.

Constipation in critical care patients: both timing and duration matter

OBJECTIVE

Most of the studies have defined constipation as a period without stool after ICU admission. We aimed to test the impact of both duration and timing of infrequent defecation in critical care patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective, bi-center, observational study. Patients were divided into three subgroups: 'not constipated', '3-5 days', and 'at least 6 days' (longest period without stool passage, respectively, shorter than 3 days, 3-5 days, and ≥6 days). Furthermore, 'early' constipated patients were defined as those for whom the longest time to stool passage occurred just after ICU admission, whereas for 'late' constipated patients the longest period without stool occurred later during ICU stay.

RESULTS

A total of 182 patients were included: the mean age was 67.2 years (54.4-78.9 years), 80 were women, and simplified acute physiology score II was 42 (34-52). In all, 42 (23.1%), 82 (45.1%), and 58 (31.8%) belonged to the nonconstipated, 3-5 days, or greater than or equal to 6 days subgroup of patients, respectively. Time spent under mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay was longer in the greater than or equal to 6 days subgroups as compared with both other subgroups. ICU stay was longer in the 3-5 days subgroup as compared with the not constipated patients. Furthermore, the late patients of the greater than or equal to 6 days subgroups exhibited worse survival as compared with all other patients.

CONCLUSION

Both timing and duration of infrequent defecation seem to have an impact on critical care patient's outcome, and should therefore be included in the diagnostic criteria.

The Use of Bowel Protocols in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Constipation is common among critically ill patients and has been associated with adverse patient outcomes. Many ICUs have developed bowel protocols to treat constipation; however, their effect on clinical outcomes remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review to determine the impact of bowel protocols in critically ill adults.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, ISRCTN, ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference abstracts until January 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts for randomized controlled trials comparing bowel protocols to control (placebo, no protocol, or usual care) in critically ill adults.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently, and in duplicate, extracted study characteristics, outcomes, assessed risk of bias, and appraised the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We retrieved 4,520 individual articles, and excluded 4,332 articles during title and abstract screening and 181 articles during full-text screening. Four trials, including 534 patients, were eligible for analysis. The use of a bowel protocol was associated with a trend toward a reduction in constipation (risk ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.25-1.01]; p = 0.05; low-quality evidence); no reduction in tolerance of enteral feeds (risk ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.62-1.42]; p = 0.77; low-quality evidence), and no change in the duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference, 0.01 d [95% CI, -2.67 to 2.69 d]; low-quality evidence).

CONCLUSIONS

Large, rigorous, randomized control trials are needed to determine whether bowel protocols impact patient-important outcomes in critically ill adults.

Efficacy of daiokanzoto in chronic constipation refractory to first-line laxatives

There are only a few treatment options for constipation and limited evidence of suitable treatments. Daiokanzoto (DKT) is a Kampo medicine often used clincally to treat constipation. DKT is a laxative used predominantly in Japan; however, clinical data on its efficacy and safety is lacking. Patients who used DKT, but were intolerant to either magnesium oxide (MgO; MgO group; n=16) or senna extract (Senna group; n=26) were included in the present study. The frequencies of their bowel movements were compared during the 1 week prior to and following DKT administration. Within 24 hours after DKT administration, 93.8% of the patients in the MgO group evacuated their bowels. The median bowel movement frequency 1 week prior to DKT administration was 2.5 and 1 week after DKT administration was significantly increased to 7.5. In the Senna group, within 24 h of DKT administration, 80.8% of the patients evacuated their bowels. The median bowel movement frequency 1 week prior to the DKT treatment was 2.0, which significantly increased to 8.5 1 week after the administration of DKT. The adverse events from DKT treatment were mild and controllable.