Goal-directed therapy and acute kidney injury: as good as it gets?

Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol versus standard of care on postoperative Acute Kidney Injury (AKI): A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common postoperative complication with an incidence of nearly 15%. Relatively balanced fluid management, flexible use of vasoactive drugs, multimodal analgesia containing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are fundamental to ERAS protocols. However, these basic tenants may lead to an increased incidence of postoperative AKI.

METHODS

A search was done in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and reference lists to identify relevant studies from inception until May 2020 to be included in this study. Effects were summarized using pooled risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (Cls) with random effect model. Heterogeneity assessment, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were performed.

RESULTS

A systematic review of nineteen cohort studies covering 17,205 patients, comparing impact of ERAS with conventional care on postoperative AKI was performed. Notably, the ERAS regimen did not increase the incidence of postoperative AKI compared with standard care (RR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.52; I2 = 53%). Both goal-directed fluid therapy (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.99-1.61; I2 = 55%) and restrictive fluid management (RR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.57-1.98; I2 = 60%) had no significant effect on the incidence of postoperative AKI. There was no significant statistical difference between different AKI diagnostic criteria (P = 0.43; I2 = 0%). ERAS group had significantly shorter hospital stay (MD: -1.54; 95% CI: -1.91 to -1.17; I2 = 66%). There was no statistical difference in 30-day readmission rate (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.20; I2 = 42%), 30-day reoperation rate (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.34; I2 = 42%) and mortality (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.11; I2 = 0%) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that ERAS protocols do not increase readmission or reoperation rates and mortality while significantly reducing LOS. Most importantly, the ERAS protocol was shown to have no promoting effect on the incidence of postoperative AKI. Even GDFT and restrictive fluid management cannot avoid the occurrence of postoperative AKI, and the ERAS protocol is still worth recommending and its safety is further confirmed.

Goal-directed fluid therapy on laparoscopic colorectal surgery within enhanced recovery after surgery program

INTRODUCTION

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols (ERAS) are used in peri-operative care to reduce the stress response to surgical aggression. As fluid overload has been associated with increased morbidity and delayed hospital discharge, a major aspect of this is fluid management. Intra-operative goal-directed fluid protocols have been shown to reduce post-operative complications, particularly in high risk patients.?.

OBJECTIVE

To compare 2fluid therapy models (zero-balance versus goal-directed fluid therapy) in patients who were scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an ERAS program, recording the rate of complications such as surgical site infection, ileus, post-operative náusea and vomiting, and variability of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational, retrospective study was conducted including adults who were scheduled for elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an ERAS program, and to investigate the postoperative complication rate.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients were included in this study; 43 (33.6%) in the zero-balance group and 85 (66.4%) in the goal-directed fluid therapy group. The total fluids administered was lower in the goal-directed fluid therapy group, as well as the incidence of post-operative complications (surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, ileus, and postoperative náusea and vomiting). No significant differences were found for length of stay, intra-operative urine output, and variability of the eGFR.?.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that by using a goal-directed fluid therapy algorithm, the total amount of fluids administered can be reduced, as well as obtaining a lower incidence of post-operative complications.