1
|
Dudoignon E, Quennesson T, De Tymowski C, Moreno N, Coutrot M, Chaussard M, Guillemet L, Abid S, Fratani A, Ressaire Q, Cupaciu A, Weinmann V, Pharaboz A, Benyamina M, Mebazaa A, Legrand M, Depret F, Deniau B. Usefulness of lactate albumin ratio at admission to predict 28-day mortality in critically ill severely burned patients: A retrospective cohort study. Burns 2022; 48:1836-1844. [PMID: 35012801 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lactate albumin ratio (LAR) has been used as a prognostic marker associated with organ failure in critically ill septic patients. LAR and its association with outcomes has never been studied in burned patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of LAR to predict 28-day mortality. METHODS A retrospective cohort study including all burn patients hospitalized in intensive care unit. The primary endpoint was the 28-day mortality. RESULTS One thousand three hundred thirty four patients were screened, and 471 were included between June 2012 and December 2018. Briefly, the population study was mainly composed by men (249, 59.1%), the median age, TBSA burned, full thickness, ABSI and IGS2 were 52 [34-68], 20 [10-40], 8 [1-23], 7 [5-9] and 25 [15-40] respectively. Fifty-two patients (12.4%) died at day 28 after admission. At admission, the LAR level was lower in 28-day survivors compared non-survivors (0.05 [0.04, 0.08] vs 0.12 [0.07, 0.26], p < 0.001 respectively). In multivariate analysis accounting for ABSI, LAR levels at admission> 0.13 was independently associated with 28-day mortality (adjusted OR = 3.98 (IC95 1.88-8.35)). The ability of LAR at admission to discriminate 28-day mortality showed an AUC identical when compared to SOFA and ABSI scores (0.81 (IC95 0.74-0.88), 0.80 (IC95 0.72-0.85) and (0.85 (IC95 0.80-0.90), p < 0.05, respectively). Patients with LAR levels ≥ 0.13 at admission had higher 28-day mortality (40.6% vs 6.8%, p < 0.001, HR 7.39 (IC95 4.28-12.76)). CONCLUSION At admission, LAR is an easy and reliable marker independently associated to 28-day mortality in patients with severe burn injury, but prediction by LAR does not perform better than lactate level alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Dudoignon
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France; University Paris Diderot, Paris, France; FHU PROMICE, Paris, France.
| | - Thomas Quennesson
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France
| | - Christian De Tymowski
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France; University Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Nabila Moreno
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Biochemistry Laboratory, Paris, France
| | - Maxime Coutrot
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France
| | - Maïté Chaussard
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France
| | - Lucie Guillemet
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France
| | - Sonia Abid
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Fratani
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France
| | - Quentin Ressaire
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France; University Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Alexandru Cupaciu
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France
| | - Vagh Weinmann
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Pharaboz
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France
| | - Mourad Benyamina
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Mebazaa
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France; University Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), INSERM UMR-S 942 Mascot, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France; INI-CRCT Network, Nancy, France; FHU PROMICE, Paris, France
| | - Matthieu Legrand
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France; University Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), INSERM UMR-S 942 Mascot, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France; INI-CRCT Network, Nancy, France; Department of Anaesthesiology and Peri-operative Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - François Depret
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France; University Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), INSERM UMR-S 942 Mascot, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France; INI-CRCT Network, Nancy, France; FHU PROMICE, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Deniau
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier St Louis-Lariboisière, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Paris, France; University Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), INSERM UMR-S 942 Mascot, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France; FHU PROMICE, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lydon EC, Ko ER, Tsalik EL. The host response as a tool for infectious disease diagnosis and management. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2018; 18:723-738. [PMID: 29939801 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1493378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A century of advances in infectious disease diagnosis and treatment changed the face of medicine. However, challenges continue to develop including multi-drug resistance, globalization that increases pandemic risks, and high mortality from severe infections. These challenges can be mitigated through improved diagnostics, and over the past decade, there has been a particular focus on the host response. Since this article was originally published in 2015, there have been significant developments in the field of host response diagnostics, warranting this updated review. Areas Covered: This review begins by discussing developments in single biomarkers and pauci-analyte biomarker panels. It then delves into 'omics, an area where there has been truly exciting progress. Specifically, progress has been made in sepsis diagnosis and prognosis; differentiating viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogen classes; pre-symptomatic diagnosis; and understanding disease-specific diagnostic challenges in tuberculosis, Lyme disease, and Ebola. Expert Commentary: As 'omics have become faster, more precise, and less expensive, the door has been opened for academic, industry, and government efforts to develop host-based infectious disease classifiers. While there are still obstacles to overcome, the chasm separating these scientific advances from the patient's bedside is shrinking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Lydon
- a Duke University School of Medicine , Duke University , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Emily R Ko
- b Duke Center for Applied Genomics & Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine , Duke University , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Regional Hospital, Department of Medicine , Duke University , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Ephraim L Tsalik
- b Duke Center for Applied Genomics & Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine , Duke University , Durham , NC , USA.,d Division of Infectious Diseases & International Health, Department of Medicine , Duke University , Durham , NC , USA.,e Emergency Medicine Service , Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System , Durham , NC , USA
| |
Collapse
|